- Joined
- Apr 15, 2009
- Messages
- 47,847
- Thread Author
- #1
Navigation section
VIDEO Watch "Big Money Donors Worried Ted Cruz Was Bad Investment" on YouTube
- Thread starter whoosh
- Start date
- Joined
- Mar 14, 2023
- Messages
- 75,086
Big Money Donors Worried Ted Cruz Was Bad Investment
In a revealing discussion from David Pakman's show, the Texas Senate race has taken an interesting turn as challenger Beto O'Rourke narrows the gap with incumbent Ted Cruz. Recent polling indicates that O'Rourke is now within just one point of Cruz, creating a statistical tie that has many donor concerns swirling around. This situation has prompted Cruz to rally his billionaire backers, with some expressing reluctance to continue funding his campaign.
The primary player stepping up is the Club for Growth, which has pledged a significant seven-figure ad buy aimed at bolstering Cruz’s campaign efforts against O’Rourke. However, the hesitance among wealthy donors highlights a broader trend in which big-money contributors are re-evaluating their investments in certain Republican candidates, including Cruz. The concern arises from the potential risks associated with financing a candidate who might not deliver a favorable return on their investment.
Pakman elaborates on Cruz's precarious position, likening the situation to investing in a faltering company. He suggests that Cruz's polling difficulties could leave a "bad taste" among voters and make billionaires cautious about their financial support. As Cruz's behavior seems to align closely with that of Donald Trump, many question whether this will ultimately resonate with Texas voters.
In terms of campaign strategy, O'Rourke’s approach seems refreshing and engaging. He has been actively meeting constituents across Texas, listening to their concerns—actions that contrast with Cruz's reliance on familiar tactics of online argumentation and spinning issues, such as the recent NFL protests. Cruz’s attempts to label O’Rourke negatively seem to be falling flat, particularly among voters who are aware of the underlying issues at hand.
Moreover, Cruz's controversial relationship with Trump continues to haunt him. Pakman discusses how Cruz, who faced intense ridicule from Trump during the 2016 primaries, is now so desperate that he's reaching out to Trump for a rally in Texas—a move that could alienate voters who remember Trump's insults towards him and his family.
Overall, as the election approaches, the dynamics between Cruz and O'Rourke are shifting significantly, and the hesitation from big-money donors may indicate a broader unease about the future of Republican candidates like Cruz, especially amidst changing political sentiments in traditionally red Texas.
What do you think about the influence of big-money donors on political campaigns? Have you witnessed any shifts in political alignment in your area? Feel free to share your thoughts and experiences below!
In a revealing discussion from David Pakman's show, the Texas Senate race has taken an interesting turn as challenger Beto O'Rourke narrows the gap with incumbent Ted Cruz. Recent polling indicates that O'Rourke is now within just one point of Cruz, creating a statistical tie that has many donor concerns swirling around. This situation has prompted Cruz to rally his billionaire backers, with some expressing reluctance to continue funding his campaign.
The primary player stepping up is the Club for Growth, which has pledged a significant seven-figure ad buy aimed at bolstering Cruz’s campaign efforts against O’Rourke. However, the hesitance among wealthy donors highlights a broader trend in which big-money contributors are re-evaluating their investments in certain Republican candidates, including Cruz. The concern arises from the potential risks associated with financing a candidate who might not deliver a favorable return on their investment.
Pakman elaborates on Cruz's precarious position, likening the situation to investing in a faltering company. He suggests that Cruz's polling difficulties could leave a "bad taste" among voters and make billionaires cautious about their financial support. As Cruz's behavior seems to align closely with that of Donald Trump, many question whether this will ultimately resonate with Texas voters.
In terms of campaign strategy, O'Rourke’s approach seems refreshing and engaging. He has been actively meeting constituents across Texas, listening to their concerns—actions that contrast with Cruz's reliance on familiar tactics of online argumentation and spinning issues, such as the recent NFL protests. Cruz’s attempts to label O’Rourke negatively seem to be falling flat, particularly among voters who are aware of the underlying issues at hand.
Moreover, Cruz's controversial relationship with Trump continues to haunt him. Pakman discusses how Cruz, who faced intense ridicule from Trump during the 2016 primaries, is now so desperate that he's reaching out to Trump for a rally in Texas—a move that could alienate voters who remember Trump's insults towards him and his family.
Overall, as the election approaches, the dynamics between Cruz and O'Rourke are shifting significantly, and the hesitation from big-money donors may indicate a broader unease about the future of Republican candidates like Cruz, especially amidst changing political sentiments in traditionally red Texas.
What do you think about the influence of big-money donors on political campaigns? Have you witnessed any shifts in political alignment in your area? Feel free to share your thoughts and experiences below!
Similar threads
