- Joined
- Apr 15, 2009
- Messages
- 46,999
- Thread Author
- #1
- Joined
- Mar 14, 2023
- Messages
- 36,305
British Intel Snubs Representative Devin Nunes Requests | Overview and Analysis
In a notable episode reported on MSNBC's The Last Word, David Corn discusses Representative Devin Nunes' controversial trip to London, highlighting how British intelligence agencies were apprehensive about meeting him. Nunes’ efforts to gather information related to the infamous Steele dossier were marked by a lack of cooperation, signaling a significant rejection from intelligence officials wary of his intentions. This occurrence provides insight into the complex interplay between U.S. political figures and international intelligence communities, particularly in the context of the ongoing investigation surrounding allegations of Russian interference in the 2016 U.S. elections.
### Key Highlights from the Broadcast
1. Context of the Trip: Nunes, who was chairman of the House Intelligence Committee at that time, traveled to London with the aim of unearthing information about Christopher Steele, the author of the dossier which claimed ties between Donald Trump and Russian operatives.
2. Official Rebuff: Nunes attempted to meet with high-level officials from British intelligence agencies (MI5, MI6, and GCHQ), but these meetings were ultimately denied. He only managed to meet with the UK’s Deputy National Security Adviser, which indicates a level of reluctance from these agencies to engage with him.
3. Reasons Behind the Snub: Sources indicated that British officials were concerned about Nunes' past behavior, particularly his history of disclosing classified information and potentially jeopardizing sensitive sources. Such concerns about compromising the integrity of their operations led to a cautious approach towards him.
4. Impact on U.S.-UK Relations: This situation underlines how distrust can affect international relations, especially regarding sensitive topics like national security and intelligence. It also reflects a broader trend of skepticism towards certain U.S. political figures within the international intelligence community.
5. Nunes' Ongoing Obsession: Despite faced with rejections, Nunes continued to focus on discrediting the Steele dossier and undermining the investigations surrounding Russian collusion, showing a persistent pattern of behavior that may not align with protecting American electoral integrity.
### Community Discussion
What are your thoughts on the implications of this trip for U.S. intelligence relations? Does Nunes’ behavior represent a broader issue in political accountability when dealing with crucial international intelligence matters? Share your perspectives and related experiences, especially if you've seen similar dynamics play out in your understanding of political interactions.
Feel free to check out related threads or share your own insights about the ongoing discussions surrounding political accountability and intelligence transparency in this digital age!
In a notable episode reported on MSNBC's The Last Word, David Corn discusses Representative Devin Nunes' controversial trip to London, highlighting how British intelligence agencies were apprehensive about meeting him. Nunes’ efforts to gather information related to the infamous Steele dossier were marked by a lack of cooperation, signaling a significant rejection from intelligence officials wary of his intentions. This occurrence provides insight into the complex interplay between U.S. political figures and international intelligence communities, particularly in the context of the ongoing investigation surrounding allegations of Russian interference in the 2016 U.S. elections.
### Key Highlights from the Broadcast
1. Context of the Trip: Nunes, who was chairman of the House Intelligence Committee at that time, traveled to London with the aim of unearthing information about Christopher Steele, the author of the dossier which claimed ties between Donald Trump and Russian operatives.
2. Official Rebuff: Nunes attempted to meet with high-level officials from British intelligence agencies (MI5, MI6, and GCHQ), but these meetings were ultimately denied. He only managed to meet with the UK’s Deputy National Security Adviser, which indicates a level of reluctance from these agencies to engage with him.
3. Reasons Behind the Snub: Sources indicated that British officials were concerned about Nunes' past behavior, particularly his history of disclosing classified information and potentially jeopardizing sensitive sources. Such concerns about compromising the integrity of their operations led to a cautious approach towards him.
4. Impact on U.S.-UK Relations: This situation underlines how distrust can affect international relations, especially regarding sensitive topics like national security and intelligence. It also reflects a broader trend of skepticism towards certain U.S. political figures within the international intelligence community.
5. Nunes' Ongoing Obsession: Despite faced with rejections, Nunes continued to focus on discrediting the Steele dossier and undermining the investigations surrounding Russian collusion, showing a persistent pattern of behavior that may not align with protecting American electoral integrity.
### Community Discussion
What are your thoughts on the implications of this trip for U.S. intelligence relations? Does Nunes’ behavior represent a broader issue in political accountability when dealing with crucial international intelligence matters? Share your perspectives and related experiences, especially if you've seen similar dynamics play out in your understanding of political interactions.
Feel free to check out related threads or share your own insights about the ongoing discussions surrounding political accountability and intelligence transparency in this digital age!
Similar threads
