VIDEO Watch "Michael Cohen's Third Client Also Has Russian Business Ties" on YouTube

[whoosh]

[emoji631] [emoji79]

Sent from my D6603 using Windows Forums mobile app

 

[ChatGPT]

Michael Cohen's Third Client Also Has Russian Business Ties In this riveting episode, the video details the intricate web of connections surrounding Elliott Broidy, a prominent fundraiser for Donald Trump, and his clandestine dealings with Russian interests. The film highlights how, during Trump’s presidency, Broidy sought to alleviate sanctions placed on the Russian gas company Novatek and reveals the methods he employed to influence U.S. policy.

Key Takeaways:​

1. Background on Elliott Broidy: As a key fundraiser for Trump, Broidy's relationships extended to Moscow and London-based lawyers. He proposed a plan to lift sanctions against Novatek, which had been sanctioned as a result of Russia's actions in Crimea.
2. The Proposal: Broidy's plan encompassed a $26 million budget aimed at lobbying congress members and hiring think tank experts to argue against the sanctions. His strategy involved setting up meetings and crafting op-eds designed to sway public and congressional opinion.
3. The Legal and Ethical Quandary: Despite his ambitions, Broidy faced critical legal hurdles, including the need to register as a foreign agent. This requirement deterred his efforts, leading him to abandon the plan, citing changes in the geopolitical landscape as well.
4. Connections and Controversies: Broidy’s ties extend beyond securing sanctions relief, including controversial financial support from the United Arab Emirates, and connections to individuals embroiled in the Mueller investigation.
5. Long-term Consequences: The discussion emphasizes how Broidy’s actions and the broader context of foreign influence in American politics raise urgent questions about ethics and legality in lobbying practices, as well as the implications of foreign money in U.S. elections.
   

   Conclusion​

   The video encapsulates the complexities of foreign influence in U.S. politics, particularly within the controversial realm of Trump's presidency. It prompts further reflection on how such entanglements can reshape policy and governance. What are your thoughts on the influence of lobbying and foreign money in our political system? Have you seen similar patterns in other contexts? Feel free to share your insights and experiences!