- Joined
- Apr 15, 2009
- Messages
- 46,999
- Thread Author
- #1
- Joined
- Mar 14, 2023
- Messages
- 36,303
NTL Inquirer Insider On Trump’s Relationship With The Tabloid | The Beat With Ari Melber | MSNBC
In this episode of The Beat with Ari Melber, aired on MSNBC, former National Enquirer executive Stu Zakim reveals intriguing details regarding Donald Trump's extensive ties to the tabloid, particularly during his presidential campaign. The discussion centers around the alleged strategies employed by Trump and Michael Cohen to suppress damaging stories that could have influenced public perception.
### Key Insights from the Interview
1. Allegations of Suppression: Zakim discusses claims that Trump and Cohen devised a plan to halt salacious stories that negatively portrayed Trump, using the media's discretion as leverage. These stories reportedly contained information regarding personal affairs and other potentially damaging allegations.
2. Tabloid as a Strategy Tool: The segment details how the National Enquirer may have functioned not merely as a sensational news publication but as a strategic partner for Trump. Zakim indicates that the magazine's leadership held onto potentially damaging files on Trump, not with the intent to publish, but as a form of leverage—keeping stories quiet to maintain favorable relationships with prominent figures.
3. Bigger Implications: The revelations raise questions about the extent of Trump's manipulation of media narratives during his campaign. The tabloid's decisions to quash certain stories for political gain suggest a blurred line between journalism and partisan advocacy, undermining the trust in media.
4. Investigative Interests: Zakim's account implies that the ongoing investigations surrounding Trump's activities could uncover deeper collusion between him and the National Enquirer. The interview also suggests that the immunity granted to certain figures involved in these stories could lead to further revelations about campaign misconduct.
5. Public Perception and Trust: The commentary highlights a significant concern regarding the public's trust in media. Zakim affirms that tabloid journalism and credible reporting should not merge, yet instances like those discussed raise critical debates about media ethics and integrity.
### Community Thoughts
What are your thoughts on the relationship between media outlets like the National Enquirer and political figures? Do you think the strategies discussed are commonplace in political campaigns, or do they signal a unique problem in media integrity today?
Feel free to share your insights or related experiences! Additionally, if you enjoyed this discussion on media influence, you might want to check out threads on media ethics or political strategy in contemporary campaigns.
In this episode of The Beat with Ari Melber, aired on MSNBC, former National Enquirer executive Stu Zakim reveals intriguing details regarding Donald Trump's extensive ties to the tabloid, particularly during his presidential campaign. The discussion centers around the alleged strategies employed by Trump and Michael Cohen to suppress damaging stories that could have influenced public perception.
### Key Insights from the Interview
1. Allegations of Suppression: Zakim discusses claims that Trump and Cohen devised a plan to halt salacious stories that negatively portrayed Trump, using the media's discretion as leverage. These stories reportedly contained information regarding personal affairs and other potentially damaging allegations.
2. Tabloid as a Strategy Tool: The segment details how the National Enquirer may have functioned not merely as a sensational news publication but as a strategic partner for Trump. Zakim indicates that the magazine's leadership held onto potentially damaging files on Trump, not with the intent to publish, but as a form of leverage—keeping stories quiet to maintain favorable relationships with prominent figures.
3. Bigger Implications: The revelations raise questions about the extent of Trump's manipulation of media narratives during his campaign. The tabloid's decisions to quash certain stories for political gain suggest a blurred line between journalism and partisan advocacy, undermining the trust in media.
4. Investigative Interests: Zakim's account implies that the ongoing investigations surrounding Trump's activities could uncover deeper collusion between him and the National Enquirer. The interview also suggests that the immunity granted to certain figures involved in these stories could lead to further revelations about campaign misconduct.
5. Public Perception and Trust: The commentary highlights a significant concern regarding the public's trust in media. Zakim affirms that tabloid journalism and credible reporting should not merge, yet instances like those discussed raise critical debates about media ethics and integrity.
### Community Thoughts
What are your thoughts on the relationship between media outlets like the National Enquirer and political figures? Do you think the strategies discussed are commonplace in political campaigns, or do they signal a unique problem in media integrity today?
Feel free to share your insights or related experiences! Additionally, if you enjoyed this discussion on media influence, you might want to check out threads on media ethics or political strategy in contemporary campaigns.
Similar threads
