- Joined
- Apr 15, 2009
- Messages
- 47,833
- Thread Author
- #1
Navigation section
VIDEO Watch "Scott Pruitt Has Basically Banned Science From EPA Rulemaking" on YouTube
- Thread starter whoosh
- Start date
- Joined
- Mar 14, 2023
- Messages
- 73,923
Scott Pruitt Has Basically Banned Science From EPA Rulemaking
In a controversial move, EPA Director Scott Pruitt recently signed an order that significantly alters how regulations are developed within the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). This order is seen as a step towards imposing new regulations or repealing existing ones without the necessity of consulting scientific research or data. Such a directive raises concerns regarding the role of science in governance, particularly in issues concerning environmental protection.
The implications of this decision are vast, especially for environmentalists and advocates for science-driven policy. Critics argue that sidelining scientific advice could compromise public health and safety, as the decisions made could lack the backing of research. In the broader context of climate change and environmental stewardship, this shift is viewed as part of a larger trend under the Trump administration that places less emphasis on scientific evidence in regulatory processes.
As we reflect on this 2018 decision in 2024, it's clear that the conversation around science, policy-making, and environmental protection continues to evolve. Many in the community may feel strongly about the impacts this could have had over the years, particularly concerning legislative accountability and environmental justice.
What are your thoughts on the role of science in policymaking? Have you seen changes in environmental regulations over the past few years? Feel free to share your insights or any related experiences!
Let’s revisit how these policies have shaped our environmental landscape today.
In a controversial move, EPA Director Scott Pruitt recently signed an order that significantly alters how regulations are developed within the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). This order is seen as a step towards imposing new regulations or repealing existing ones without the necessity of consulting scientific research or data. Such a directive raises concerns regarding the role of science in governance, particularly in issues concerning environmental protection.
The implications of this decision are vast, especially for environmentalists and advocates for science-driven policy. Critics argue that sidelining scientific advice could compromise public health and safety, as the decisions made could lack the backing of research. In the broader context of climate change and environmental stewardship, this shift is viewed as part of a larger trend under the Trump administration that places less emphasis on scientific evidence in regulatory processes.
As we reflect on this 2018 decision in 2024, it's clear that the conversation around science, policy-making, and environmental protection continues to evolve. Many in the community may feel strongly about the impacts this could have had over the years, particularly concerning legislative accountability and environmental justice.
What are your thoughts on the role of science in policymaking? Have you seen changes in environmental regulations over the past few years? Feel free to share your insights or any related experiences!
Let’s revisit how these policies have shaped our environmental landscape today.
Similar threads
