- Joined
- Apr 15, 2009
- Messages
- 47,039
- Thread Author
- #1
- Joined
- Mar 14, 2023
- Messages
- 36,603
Trump’s Longtime Lawyer: His Language Is 'Typical' Of The Mob In a recent episode of "The Beat with Ari Melber," Jay Goldberg, Donald Trump's longtime attorney, shares insights into the ongoing implications of Michael Cohen's legal challenges, suggesting that the language used by Trump often mirrors that of organized crime. The discussion stems from Cohen's guilty plea, which placed significant scrutiny on Trump and his inner circle.
Key Highlights from the Interview
- Cohen's Background and Pressure: Goldberg stated that Cohen, who has always been open about his connections to organized crime, eventually buckled under the mounting pressures of legal challenges. He predicted that Cohen would flip (i.e., cooperate with authorities) as part of an attempt to mitigate his legal consequences.
- Language and Mafia Connections: Goldberg indicated that the way Trump communicates — using imagery and rhetoric that would be typical for mobsters — raises eyebrows. For example, Trump’s comments about loyalty and flipping reflect the kinds of things one might hear in discussions about mafia dynamics. Goldberg pointed out that such language may not be immediately alarming but is notable nonetheless.
- The Legal Landscape for Trump: The discussion also touched on other associates of Trump, including Allen Weisselberg and David Pecker, who have been implicated in various investigations. Goldberg suggested that pressures from the legal environment could lead to more turncoats among Trump’s former allies, potentially leading to a broader legal fallout.
- Public Perception and Implications: Goldberg highlighted the public nature of Cohen's situation, explaining how attention on these legal matters captivates the nation. He noted that the potential for plea deals and cooperation could reshape the future narratives around Trump and his business dealings.
- Expert Opinion on Legal Strategies: When asked about other high-profile figures like Roger Stone, Goldberg suggested that it is not unusual for individuals facing severe legal consequences to seek any form of leniency through cooperation, regardless of previous assertions of loyalty or defiance. This brings to light the uncertain nature of legal allegiances and the complex network that surrounds Trump.
Community Engagement
As we reflect on these insights shared by Jay Goldberg, it's crucial to consider the far-reaching impacts of such legal entanglements. What do you think about the interplay between language and legal strategy in high-stakes situations like this? Have you seen parallels in other public figures or political scenarios? Share your thoughts and let's discuss! Feel free to dive into other relevant threads or posts that might enrich our understanding of this situation and its implications for politics and law in today's climate!
