Why people have issues with Vista

Discussion in 'Windows Vista Help and Support' started by Matt, Jan 1, 2008.

  1. Matt

    Matt Senior Member

    Joined:
    May 7, 2007
    Messages:
    861
    Likes Received:
    8
    http://blogs.technet.com/ewan/archive/2007/10/10/dell-s-anti-crapware-initiative-doesn-t-go-far-enough.aspx

    Well, I think this is why many people have issues with Windows, and one reason that Mac's don't have that much problems.
     
  2. ViennaX

    ViennaX New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 31, 2007
    Messages:
    60
    Likes Received:
    0
    No, Everyones wrong. How can you complain about Vista?
    I mean, its just means you have a bad computer, and get a new one!
     
  3. Kyle

    Kyle New Member

    Joined:
    Feb 7, 2008
    Messages:
    1,634
    Likes Received:
    53
    Top 5 Reasons I see that people dislike Vista:

    1. You need a new computer built within the two years to run it properly (within the last year for laptops).
    2. Most PCs come with Home Premium, which, tbh, is like a kick in the face. When you're paying $1000 for a PC (Or more) you want Ultimate.
    3. UAC is f***ing annoying.
    4. Programs may require tweaking to work with Vista, which people believe is too much of a hassle.
    5. XP runs lighter, faster, and as of SP3, almost as secure as Vista, and it's cheap, and familiar.



    Now, I'm not saying people are right but I agree with those reasons, which is why I RARELY use Vista.
     
  4. Matt

    Matt Senior Member

    Joined:
    May 7, 2007
    Messages:
    861
    Likes Received:
    8
    Well, I'm sure Windows 98 is faster than XP, so why not use Window 98 or 2000?

    As for ultimate, I think they need to lower the price of it.

    And, this laptop is 3 years old, came out a year before Vista, and has a Windows Vista Capable logo on it, and runs it better than some new laptops.

    I also never needed to tweak any apps for vista, and I got a Windows 3.11 screensaver, Johnny Castaway.
     
  5. Kyle

    Kyle New Member

    Joined:
    Feb 7, 2008
    Messages:
    1,634
    Likes Received:
    53
    98 would run faster than XP, as would 95, or 3.11.... The issue is; What hardware is supported by those old operating systems? All the Vista supported hardware is still working in XP. Until they have something that I really NEED to have, that XP doesn't support, I, and millions upon millions of others, have no reason to switch.
     
    john3347 and (deleted member) like this.
  6. ViennaX

    ViennaX New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 31, 2007
    Messages:
    60
    Likes Received:
    0
    Well then Kyle, Disable UAC. And Vista Home Premium is actually very good for the money. Where i live it costs the same as XP Pro. And Home Premium has everything what I would need. No *New* (Notice the keyword *new*) Programs I use have trouble with Vista. As because all the old stuff is crap compared to new stuff.
     
  7. Kyle

    Kyle New Member

    Joined:
    Feb 7, 2008
    Messages:
    1,634
    Likes Received:
    53
    I don't buy, so money isn't an issue. I've had Ultimate x86 and x64 running, and I see no reason to run them over XP, even with annoyances disables as much as possible.

    Those reasons I posted are not my personal reasons, but the ones I've heard the most, either directly or indirectly.
     
  8. ArchTech

    ArchTech New Member

    Joined:
    Jun 27, 2008
    Messages:
    94
    Likes Received:
    2
    Most issues in Vista re Hardwares and incompatible drivers, about softwares it runs fine in Vista, my old time fav Earth 2150: Lost Souls still working fine as good as I use in XP...Some softwares might not run in Vista but in my own use, I don't use old softwares much...

    Vista SP1 looks like they fixed some probs in Vista before...about XP SP3 which I haven't tried yet, it's still not much as secure as Vista and it just almost reach the non-SP1 Vista security...
     
  9. john3347

    john3347 Extraordinary Member
    Premium Supporter

    Joined:
    Jan 12, 2009
    Messages:
    1,023
    Likes Received:
    36
    "Well, I'm sure Windows 98 is faster than XP, so why not use Window 98 or 2000?"



    Speed isn't the issue in the least, but I DO run a Windows 98 computer to edit my photographs with. I have a graphics program that works for me that is a hold-over from Windows 3.11 and an old flatbed scanner that XP and later driver is not available for. I foolishly let my copy of Windows 2000 Pro get away, so I use Windows 98 SE for this application. This particular application would not install in Vista, but will install in XP and Windows 7, but does not run well in either. There are stability problems in XP and 7 as well as the 8 character file name limitation.
     
  10. Overlord Laharl

    Overlord Laharl New Member

    Joined:
    Mar 18, 2009
    Messages:
    24
    Likes Received:
    0
    I have installed Vista on home-built PCs without any problems. Zlich, nada, kosong, zero.

    And even on a Celeron D with 512mb of ram, there was no problem at all. Sometimes i wonder if it's more of a classic example of PEBKAC.
     
  11. davehc

    davehc Microsoft MVP
    Premium Supporter Microsoft MVP

    Joined:
    May 1, 2008
    Messages:
    5,116
    Likes Received:
    301
    With respect. This is really old stuff. It has been discussed on almost every computer forum on the web, to the last fullstop.
     
  12. jimbo45

    jimbo45 New Member

    Joined:
    Jan 20, 2009
    Messages:
    1,208
    Likes Received:
    41
    Until SP1 most Vista systems were a real DOG -- Many Many times I saw Hard Disk lights LOCKED ON SOLID for minutes and minutes at a time -- maybe it was building an Index, or maybe it was doing something far more sinister. If it NEEDS to do this sort of stuff it should be done at INSTALL TIME so the user knows. Whilst this was going on the computer was UNUSEABLE. (This problem ocurred particularly on systems with pre-installed OS'ES.

    Once I've installed an OS I want it to work acceptably "OUT OF THE BOX" even if I know I can make it better later.

    Having no install disk also is a real pain as I'm sure anybody who has ever bought a computer knows how much CRAP and ADWARE is pre-installed with the system.

    It's almost impossible to do a CLEAN install without the OS install disk -- the recovery one you get with the computer just re-installs all the original crap again so that doesn't work either.

    Faced with a badly installed OS overloaded with a humungous amount of bloatware which you can't easily get rid of will of course make people think the OS is a load of dogs "little round objects".

    Actually SP1 and SP2 do improve it somewhat --so does the later hardware but even if you buy a computer with a pre-installed OS ALWAYS but ALWAYS make them throw in a proper retail copy (or at least give you the OEM disk --you've paid for it -- there's normally a license / product key written somewhere on the computer --underneath if it is a laptop).

    Cheers
    jimbo
     
    john3347 and (deleted member) like this.
  13. drevilwebmster

    drevilwebmster Honorable Member

    Joined:
    Apr 3, 2009
    Messages:
    27
    Likes Received:
    2
    most people have a hard time finding drivers
    biggest joy in win7 is how well it loads amost everything on the install

    have several crash test systems that have gone thru xp vista and win7 and
    by far the win7 beta install was the best on all of these pentium 4 based machines.
     
  14. rsvr85

    rsvr85 New Member

    Joined:
    Jun 12, 2009
    Messages:
    64
    Likes Received:
    2
    Ridiculous reasons to bash Vista, i've used it for 2 years without any major problems (no more than i had in XP)

    1. It's generally the graphics card and RAM which users need to upgrade/increase, both are cheap.
    2. You can have a gold plated Vista Ultimate disk.....if you pay for it
    3. Turn it off
    4. The compatibility tab in the programs properties will sort that out
    5. XP does run faster true...look at it though, it's ugly as hell, Vista's only heavy because of the GUI, it's noooo where near as fast as Vista. Vista is a LOT more secure than XP, a common misconception! XP is cheaper than Vista and rightly so, MS still need paying for the years of work gone into Vista. Although tbh, Vista Basic probably isn't thtat much more expensive than XP and will also probably have better functionality. And lastly, yes XP is familiar, but that inevitably gets boring and tedious.

    Come back with a good argument as to why Vista sucks, I'm not saying it's perfect (far from it) but it is better than XP. Windows 7, on the other hand blows Vista & XP right out of the water at the same time!!
     
  15. Master Chief

    Master Chief New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 15, 2009
    Messages:
    194
    Likes Received:
    3
    I used Vista and kind of liked it. That is, until I installed Windows 7 beta (7000). Vista seemed like shit compared to that :p
     
  16. marks960

    marks960 New Member

    Joined:
    Jun 20, 2009
    Messages:
    4
    Likes Received:
    0
    Nintendo R4
     
  17. dam89

    dam89 New Member

    Joined:
    May 8, 2009
    Messages:
    372
    Likes Received:
    8
    Using vista on my laptop for the last 2 Years. I went completely over to Windows 7 with the RC. Vista was fast, but 7 is Just amazing. BTW - check my spec :D
     

Share This Page

Loading...