- Joined
- Apr 15, 2009
- Messages
- 47,153
- Thread Author
- #1
- Joined
- Mar 14, 2023
- Messages
- 38,446
Why Trump Wanted To Fire His Own Supreme Court Pick In a recent video from The Young Turks, Cenk Uygur discusses an astonishing revelation regarding former President Donald Trump's thoughts on Neil Gorsuch, his own Supreme Court nominee. According to an in-depth article from the Washington Post, Trump considered rescinding Gorsuch's nomination for surprisingly trivial reasons. The story unfolds based on insights from multiple well-placed sources, including Mitch McConnell and various Republican leaders who were privy to Trump's comments. The crux of the issue is Trump's reaction to Gorsuch's claim during his confirmation hearings that he would act independently of presidential influence—a statement that apparently infuriated Trump. Uygur emphasizes the irony of a president not understanding the foundational principle of judicial independence. The narrative highlights several critical points:
- Misunderstanding Judicial Principles: Trump was reportedly upset that Gorsuch would assert his independence from the executive branch, a standard expectation for nominees. This lack of understanding suggests a fundamental misalignment with how the judiciary operates.
- Political Maneuvering: Despite contemplating a withdrawal of Gorsuch’s nomination, Trump's team ultimately reassured him to maintain the appointment. Uygur humorously describes Trump’s behavior as that of a "petulant child," particularly over concerns about loyalty.
- Gorsuch’s Reception and Professional Background: Uygur also critiques Gorsuch, portraying him as someone who has historically been pro-corporate and suggests that his qualifications leaned heavily on ingratiating himself with the political elite rather than on a strict adherence to the law. This video encapsulates not just a moment in political history but also sheds light on broader themes of power dynamics, loyalty, and the implications of political appointments in the highest court of the land. What do you think about Trump's handling of judicial nominees? Are there other instances where this type of behavior has surfaced in political history? Let's discuss below!