Why Virtualizing Your NAS in Proxmox Is a Risky Home Lab Move

Venturing into the world of home labs unveils an alluring promise: total control, relentless experimentation, and the satisfaction of running every pivotal service yourself. As enthusiasts rush to consolidate tasks onto fewer machines—especially with power costs rising and hardware prices fluctuating—virtualization emerges as a tempting strategy. Platforms like Proxmox Virtual Environment (PVE) shine for their flexibility, mature snapshot features, and a thriving support community. Yet, even amid Proxmox’s many strengths, one decisive question lingers: Should you ever virtualize your primary Network-Attached Storage (NAS) server on your Proxmox workstation? After years spent dabbling with hypervisors, container orchestration, and every endearing misstep in between, many seasoned tinkerers are issuing a firm warning: resist the urge.

Reliability at the Core: Why NAS Must Stand Apart​

A robust, always-on NAS functions as the rock of any self-hosted environment. Whereas your Proxmox node is a box of wonders—inviting every test, breakage, and reinstall—a NAS is where family photos, critical backups, password vaults, and digital media libraries quietly reside. To conflate the two roles is to muddy a key distinction: the NAS demands absolute reliability, while the home lab thrives on disruption.
Even the most veteran Proxmox aficionado will admit that “breaking everything” is only ever a click—or a misconfigured kernel module—away. That’s part of the fun. But with storage duties, “one false mistake, and your data goes poof.” The implications stretch beyond minor inconvenience. If your NAS lives only inside a VM or container and the Proxmox node itself is compromised—by a failed update, an abandoned experiment, or a hardware mishap—recovering your stored data or even timely restoring snapshots may be impossible.

The Foundation: Separation Builds Resilience​

Isolating your NAS on separate hardware isn’t just a belt-and-suspenders approach; it acknowledges the fundamentally different roles each system plays within your network. Consider two core principles:

• Reliability: A dedicated physical NAS is less exposed to the experimentation or downtime routine in a home lab.
• Accessibility: If your Proxmox host fails, you can still access critical data hosted on your NAS by other means—ensuring business or personal continuity.

Even a modest budget NAS or a repurposed old desktop loaded with disks far outperforms most virtualized setups in this single aspect: persistence under duress. This is not simply academic. Veteran home labbers often begin with a hand-me-down box running TrueNAS Core or OpenMediaVault—adding drives, tinkering with RAID, but always maintaining clear separation from their hypervisors. Over time, the toolkit matures (perhaps TrueNAS transitions from Core to Scale, RAID goes from single-disk to multi-disk ZFS), but the architectural lesson remains.

The Costs of Virtualized NAS: Balancing Convenience and Catastrophe​

Data Loss: The Unforgiving Price of Experimentation​

It might be trivial to dismiss loss as something that won’t happen to the careful or the prepared. Yet, in practice, virtualization introduces new failure domains:

• Single Point of Failure: Should your PVE node die—via power surge, hardware meltdown, or catastrophic misconfiguration—your NAS is down, along with all its data.
• Snapshot Blindness: Proxmox’s acclaimed backup system is powerless when the node itself is offline. Even the best snapshot or backup arrangement fails if the underlying hypervisor is inaccessible.

For those new to the home lab scene, the temptation to “just run everything in one box” is palpable. It seems clever—cost- and space-efficient. In reality, it’s trading away the most vital property of a NAS for a false sense of streamlined control.

Complexity and Recovery Concerns​

Each new Proxmox feature (clustered nodes, advanced GPU passthrough, or nested virtualization) adds opportunities for things to go wrong. While day-to-day glitches—like a misconfigured network interface or an overzealous kernel upgrade—may only require hours of troubleshooting, deep system failures present a much harsher outcome: total data loss and lengthy restoration hurdles.
Should your Proxmox node require a full wipe and reinstall (not an uncommon event in aggressive home lab settings), virtually hosted NAS services also evaporate. If your backup strategy lives solely inside that node, restoration is not just time-consuming, but potentially impossible.

Use Cases: When (If Ever) Is a Virtualized NAS Sensible?​

The File-Sharing Niche​

For users only interested in simple file sharing—and not actual data archiving or redundancy—the risks diminish. Quick VM or LXC-based setups are serviceable for ephemeral or low-importance files:

• Nextcloud: Great for document syncing and small-group collaboration.
• CasaOS: A user-friendly container platform with basic file browser utility.
• PairDrop: Dead simple cross-device file transfers.

In these scenarios, data isn’t typically irreplaceable. If an LXC container implodes or a VM fails, so be it. But to treat such setups as a viable substitute for a serious NAS is perilous.

The Advantages​

• Ease of Management: Unified interface, quick snapshot/rollback.
• Resource Consolidation: One box, lower idle power usage.

The Risks​

• Performance Penalties: Nested storage (ZFS over ZFS, for instance) can lose significant efficiency.
• No Hardware Redundancy: All eggs in one basket—hardware failure is universally catastrophic.
• Limited Recovery Paths: A dead hypervisor/host equals instant loss of all services—unacceptable for “must have” data.

Technical Realities: Advanced VM Configurations and Why They’re Still a Gamble​

Running a “full” NAS OS like TrueNAS Scale inside Proxmox demands further consideration:

• Disk Passthrough: To maximize NAS performance, you need to pass entire drives or an HBA (Host Bus Adapter) directly to the VM. This involves PCIe passthrough—a technically advanced process.
• S.M.A.R.T. Access: Assigning whole disks to Proxmox means losing direct access to their health statistics within the NAS software; instead, you must monitor drive status from Proxmox itself, complicating operations.
• Nested ZFS Pools: ZFS is not friendly to running inside another filesystem or volume manager; performance and reliability degrade, especially with large pools or under sustained load.

Even with perfect HBA passthrough, you’re bottlenecked by your Proxmox host’s uptime and its physical resilience. Failures become more convoluted, and troubleshooting more opaque as hardware and software layers stack atop one another.

The Business Case: Why Professional Deployments Don’t Virtualize Primary Storage​

Among enterprise environments and even well-managed SMEs, storage is almost never virtualized on the same hardware tasked with general-purpose compute. Key reasons include:

• Change Management: Storage systems must change slowly, with rollback and extensive validation. Experimental or development workloads, by contrast, are fast-moving, often risky, and best isolated.
• Compliance: Many regulations (GDPR, HIPAA, etc.) require certainty about data custody and resilience, incompatible with highly dynamic virtual environments hosting critical NAS functions.
• Supportability: Major NAS vendors and even open-source projects advise against hosting data on anything but purpose-built, stable systems.

It’s true that technologies like VMware vSAN or Microsoft Storage Spaces Direct bring storage virtualization to complex cluster setups—but these operate under strict design and support regimes and never blend with primary day-to-day experimentation.

Home Lab Stories: From Humble Beginnings to Best Practices​

Most home labs echo this journey: the first NAS is a castoff desktop and a single drive running TrueNAS or similar software. Perhaps it becomes the backup location for all your devices, then shares media libraries to Plex or Jellyfin, and soon is running services like Calibre-Web, Immich, or Vaultwarden. Growth accelerates—it might evolve to include RAID, or to offload Proxmox backups from their “riskier” home-lab node.
Such a simple, well-separated setup soon proves itself: hardware upgrades needn’t risk data loss, failed Proxmox experiments no longer threaten years of photos or important documents, and a dead hypervisor can be rebuilt at leisure knowing storage is safe.

Practical Recommendations: Getting the Best of Both Worlds​

1. Run NAS and Hypervisor Separately as a Rule​

• Minimal Hardware: Even a basic old PC with a couple of hard drives suffices for small family setups or solo users. Software like TrueNAS, OpenMediaVault, or UnRAID is mature and well-documented.
• Energy Efficiency: NAS boxes can sleep disks and idle at low power; a multi-purpose Proxmox server draws more current and encourages running more VMs than strictly needed.
• Network Isolation: Segmenting traffic for storage and experimentation enhances security and prevents accidental exposure of critical files.

2. Use Proxmox for What It Excels At​

• Testing: Run wild with LXCs and VMs—break things, learn, repeat.
• Snapshot Joy: Take advantage of Proxmox Backup Server, but point it at your hardware NAS for maximum safety.
• Cluster Novelty: Explore hardware clustering, GPU passthrough, and edge-case orchestrations without jeopardizing core data.

3. If You Must Virtualize NAS—Take Extreme Care​

• Passthrough HBAs, Not Just Individual Disks: To let NAS VMs control drives fully (with SMART monitoring), pass the entire controller, not only disks.
• Dedicated Storage Pools: Avoid nesting ZFS pools or volume managers if possible—performance can drop by 30% or more, and recovery from errors is trickier.
• Backup Religiously—Elsewhere: Use a real, external backup strategy. Rely less on snapshots inside the same box.

Emerging Trends: Could Storage Virtualization Ever Be Safe for Home Labs?​

Innovations in hardware reliability, like ECC memory and redundant power, do improve the viability of “all-in-one” home servers. But these improvements come at cost and complexity levels few hobbyists—or even prosumers—choose for their home setups. Meanwhile, next-generation NAS platforms increasingly weave together virtual machines, containers, and traditional file-serving (see TrueNAS SCALE). Yet the essential advice hasn’t changed: risk segregation beats technological cleverness. Slotting everything into a single box exposes all to a single moment of failure.
Those preaching “one box to rule them all” might not have experienced a calamitous data loss. In the post-mortem, survivors almost always split storage and compute thereafter—even if that means rebooting their “scrap heap” hardware one last time to become the new backup vault.

Conclusion: Proxmox Is Excellent—But Don’t Gamble Your Data​

Proxmox VE makes virtualization and home labbing delightfully accessible. Its ecosystem flourishes because people are encouraged to experiment and push boundaries, reclaiming the full utility of their hardware. But with great power comes greater risk—especially when critical data is on the line.
Tinkerers will always blaze trails and create new synergy between platforms. Even so, the foundational wisdom persists: run your NAS—your lifeboat for irreplaceable files—on separate, dedicated hardware. Use Proxmox to break things—just not your family photos, business files, or digital life collection. In a landscape where one mistaken keystroke or a failed update could spell disaster, that separation is the most enduring home lab upgrade you’ll ever make.

---

Source: xda-developers.com https://www.xda-developers.com/id-never-virtualize-my-primary-nas-server-on-my-pve-workstation/