Windows 10 End of Support: Migration Paths and MSP Guidance for SMBs

Microsoft and Z‑Jak Technologies converged this week around a blunt, unavoidable reality: Windows 10 is officially out of support, and the choices organizations and consumers make next will determine whether their PCs remain secure — or become low-hanging fruit for cybercriminals. Dawne Gee welcomed representatives from Z‑Jak Technologies to WAVE Country on October 20, 2025 to discuss the implications of Windows 10’s end of support and to share practical cyber‑safety tips for viewers navigating the transition.

Background​

Windows 10 reached its official end of support on October 14, 2025. After that date Microsoft stopped delivering feature updates, regular quality updates, and most importantly, security fixes for mainstream Windows 10 editions — including Home, Pro, Enterprise, and Education. Microsoft’s lifecycle pages and support documentation spell out the consequences plainly: devices will continue to operate but will no longer receive the security updates that protect against new vulnerabilities.
At the same time, Microsoft has offered transitional options: migration to Windows 11, enrollment in a limited Extended Security Updates (ESU) program for eligible devices, or replacement of aging hardware. Vendors and local managed service providers — like Louisville’s Z‑Jak Technologies — are stepping into the conversation to help customers evaluate risk, cost, and practical migration plans.

---

What “End of Support” Actually Means​

The practical consequence for everyday users​

When a product hits end of support it isn’t erased from machines overnight. Instead:

• Security updates stop — new exploits discovered after the cutoff will not be patched by Microsoft for standard Windows 10 releases. This creates a widening window of exposure that attackers can exploit.
• Technical support is withdrawn — phone and online assistance for troubleshooting Windows 10 issues is no longer a Microsoft service option.
• Compatibility risks grow over time — third‑party applications and drivers will eventually be updated for newer platforms, making them less reliable on an unsupported OS.

These points are not theoretical: Microsoft’s lifecycle documentation and product end‑of‑support notices make the same warnings. For organizations bound by regulation (HIPAA, PCI, FINRA, etc.), continuing to run unsupported software can also trigger compliance and insurance problems.

Extended Security Updates (ESU) — a short bridge, not a long road​

Microsoft’s ESU program provides an extra year of critical security updates for Windows 10 consumers and organizations that need more time to migrate, but it is explicitly temporary. ESU enrollments close at a fixed deadline, and the program is designed as a pragmatic stopgap rather than a replacement for migration planning. Businesses that delay beyond ESU risk being left without vendor patches at all.

---

Where the Windows 10 User Base Stands Today​

Market analysts and telemetry providers reported that Windows 11 adoption accelerated in 2024–2025 while Windows 10 adoption steadily declined — but a very large installed base remains. Different measurement firms show varied percentages depending on methodology (device telemetry vs. web reach), yet the common conclusion is consistent: hundreds of millions of devices still run Windows 10 and many corporate fleets cannot upgrade immediately due to hardware or application compatibility constraints.
This adoption picture matters because the larger the remaining Windows 10 population, the more attractive it becomes for attackers who will assay unsupported systems for unpatched vulnerabilities. Security vendors and industry press have underscored this concentration of risk in recent reporting.

---

Z‑Jak Technologies on the WAVE Country Segment — Local Context, Practical Focus​

Z‑Jak Technologies, an Louisville‑area managed IT and cybersecurity firm, used the WAVE Country platform to translate enterprise guidance into concrete actions for local viewers. The company positions itself as a full‑service MSP offering 24/7 support, compliance consulting, backups, and incident response — services many small and medium businesses (SMBs) need now that vendor patching windows are shrinking. Z‑Jak’s public materials emphasize proactive assessments, multi‑layered defenses, and a roadmap approach to migration and compliance.
It’s worth noting a few facts and caveats from Z‑Jak’s public profile: the company markets decades of experience and a suite of managed services tailored to regional businesses. Those offerings — especially backup/recovery, patch management, and co‑managed IT — align with the most effective defensive measures for a post‑Windows‑10 world. Readers should confirm any quoted claims about awards or timescales directly with the vendor for contractual or procurement decisions.

---

Why This Transition Is Risky — Threat Model and Real‑World Impacts​

Security exposure increases sharply​

Without routine security updates, even a low‑complexity exploit can become catastrophic at scale. Attack techniques that once required skill and time are now commoditized through ransomware kits, botnets, and phishing-as-a-service. Unsupported systems are a prime target because attackers know vulnerabilities will not be patched. Recent tech press coverage forecasts an elevated attack surface after major OS support sunsets.

Compliance and legal risk for businesses​

Organizations that handle regulated data are expected to maintain supported software baselines. Running Windows 10 beyond support deadlines can undermine compliance audits and may affect cyber insurance claims. This is not speculative: regulators and auditors use vendor lifecycle statements as part of their assessments.

Operational and productivity risks​

Older systems often lack driver and firmware updates that newer peripherals, applications, and cloud services assume. Over time, incompatible drivers, new app versions, and missing platform features degrade employee productivity and increase IT support costs. MSPs report that delayed upgrades frequently multiply help‑desk tickets and unplanned downtime.

---

Migration Options and Trade‑offs​

1. Upgrade eligible PCs to Windows 11​

The simplest path where feasible is to upgrade devices that meet Windows 11’s hardware requirements. Benefits include continued security updates, modern security defaults (TPM, Secure Boot, hardware‑backed isolation), and access to newer features. The downside: many older devices fail minimum requirements, and large fleet upgrades require testing and app compatibility validation. Microsoft’s upgrade tools and PC Health Check app help identify eligible machines.

2. Enroll in Extended Security Updates (ESU)​

ESU provides a limited, paid safety net for those who must delay migration. It buys time but not indefinitely — organizations should treat ESU as a one‑year extension rather than a permanent solution. Pricing, enrollment conditions, and availability differ by region and customer type.

3. Replace hardware​

For older devices that can’t or shouldn’t be upgraded, replacing hardware with Windows 11–capable machines can be the most secure long‑term strategy. Total cost of ownership should factor in increased hardware reliability, reduced help‑desk burden, and better security posture. Many OEMs and retail partners offer trade‑in and recycling programs.

4. Alternate operating systems​

Power users and some businesses may consider switching to Linux distributions or ChromeOS/ChromeOS Flex for selected workloads or legacy hardware. That path requires validation of critical application compatibility and staff training. For web‑centric or lightweight computing needs, ChromeOS Flex or Linux can extend device life while reducing exposure.

---

Practical Cyber‑Safety Tips — What Z‑Jak and Security Experts Recommend​

Below are the actionable, priority steps Z‑Jak and other security practitioners advocated during the WAVE Country discussion and in their guidance materials. These tips are designed for both home users and SMBs facing the Windows 10 sunset.

• Inventory first — Know the exact count and model of devices, their OS build, and which are upgrade‑eligible. Accurate asset data drives every subsequent decision.
• Prioritize by risk — Classify devices by role and exposure (e.g., servers, point‑of‑sale systems, executive laptops, remote worker devices). Patch or replace the highest‑risk assets first.
• Apply multilayered defenses — Use endpoint detection and response (EDR), modern anti‑malware with behavioral detection, robust email filtering, and network segmentation to reduce lateral movement. Relying on a single antivirus product is insufficient in a post‑EOL environment.
• Backup and test restores — Maintain immutable, offsite backups with tested recovery plans. Ransomware often succeeds against organizations that have inadequate backup testing.
• Use strong identity controls — Implement multi‑factor authentication (MFA), conditional access, and least‑privilege accounts to reduce credential theft impact.
• Harden remote access — For remote workers, use VPNs or zero‑trust network access (ZTNA) solutions and enforce device posture checks before granting access.
• Patch critical third‑party software — Even if the OS is unsupported, many high‑risk issues stem from unpatched drivers, browsers, Java runtimes, and document readers. Keep these updated.
• Plan and communicate — Inform stakeholders about timelines, costs, and expected disruptions. A transparent migration plan reduces surprise outages and helps secure budget approval.

---

A Step‑by‑Step Migration Checklist (Recommended Sequence)​

• Inventory devices and group by upgradeability and business criticality.
• Identify applications that require compatibility testing; create a test lab for validation.
• Estimate costs for hardware refresh vs. ESU vs. migration effort.
• Prioritize upgrades for high‑risk, public‑facing, and compliance‑sensitive machines.
• Implement emergency controls for systems that will remain on Windows 10 during migration: strict segmentation, application whitelisting, EDR, and hardened credentials.
• Schedule staged upgrades with rollback plans and user training sessions.
• Verify backups and perform simulated restores pre‑ and post‑migration.
• Retire and securely wipe replaced hardware; complete documentation for audits.

---

Financial and Operational Considerations​

Upfront costs — whether for new hardware or ESU purchases and migration labor — are real. But running unsupported systems carries hidden costs: higher help‑desk volume, increased incident response expenditures, potential regulatory fines, and possible cyber insurance complications. For many SMBs, partnering with an MSP like Z‑Jak can turn unpredictable capital projects into managed services with predictable monthly costs and built‑in security expertise. That trade‑off is often favorable for organizations without an in‑house IT team.
Some vendors and Microsoft partners offer financing, trade‑in credit, or phased refresh programs that reduce the immediate capital burden. These programs should be evaluated along with total life‑cycle costs and security controls delivered.

---

What to Expect from Attackers After End‑of‑Support​

Historically, product end‑of‑life events attract attacker attention. The more widespread an OS is, the greater the payback for authors of exploit kits and ransomware. Expect:

• Increased volume of automated scanning and exploitation attempts targeted at known but unpatched vulnerabilities.
• Social engineering campaigns timed to the transition, including fake "upgrade now" prompts and malicious installers.
• Targeting of legacy protocols and services frequently used on older machines (SMBv1, outdated RDP configurations, unsecured admin shares).

Organizations that do not harden exposure points or that continue to run unsupported endpoints without compensating controls will face a material uptick in breach attempts.

---

Small Business Playbook — Minimal Viable Security Actions​

For constrained budgets, Z‑Jak and other MSPs recommend a focused set of defenses that buys the most risk reduction per dollar:

• Enforce MFA on all administrative and remote access accounts.
• Implement strong, tested backups with offsite/immutable snapshots.
• Put EDR on devices that cannot be immediately upgraded.
• Restrict administrative privileges and remove local admin rights from daily users.
• Patch and monitor internet‑facing servers and VPN appliances immediately.

These measures are practical, cost‑effective, and can be rolled out quickly to reduce exposure while a phased migration proceeds.

---

Where to Seek Help — What to Ask an MSP or Consultant​

When engaging a managed service provider or local vendor, ask direct questions:

• Do you perform a full asset inventory and compatibility assessment?
• Can you provide a clear migration timeline with milestones and rollback steps?
• What is your incident response plan for a ransomware or data‑breach scenario?
• How do you handle backups and disaster recovery testing?
• What compliance documentation and reporting can you provide after migration?

Good providers will offer transparent pricing, proof of past engagements, and clear SLAs. Beware vendors who promise unsupported “workarounds” that sacrifice security or breach licensing terms.

---

Notable Strengths and Potential Risks of the Current Transition Period​

Strengths​

• Opportunity for modernization — Moving to Windows 11 brings hardware‑backed security and platform features that can materially improve posture.
• Vendor focus — Microsoft and many OEMs are actively supporting migration with tools, trade‑in programs, and documentation.
• Service market growth — The MSP ecosystem has matured; smaller organizations can access enterprise‑grade security through partners.

Risks​

• Large residual installed base — The sheer number of remaining Windows 10 devices creates a concentrated attack surface.
• Budget and skill constraints — SMBs often lack in‑house staff or capital to execute rapid migrations without external help.
• Complacency around backups and segmentation — Some organizations overestimate their protections and underestimate how quickly a breach can cascade.

Where claims about specific market share numbers or counts of devices vary by source, those differences reflect different measurement methodologies; readers should treat exact market‑share percentages as approximations and focus on the broader trend instead.

---

Final Assessment and Takeaways​

The Windows 10 end of support is a watershed moment that combines technical, security, and business risk. For end users, the immediate danger is loss of security updates — a vulnerability that magnifies over months. For businesses, the calculus must factor in compliance, potential fines, insurance implications, productivity impacts, and the prospect of a security incident.
The prudent approach is straightforward: inventory assets, apply compensating controls on systems that must remain on Windows 10 for a short period, and pursue a migration or refresh plan with clearly defined milestones. For many organizations, using an experienced MSP to manage the transition — including backups, patching, EDR, and user training — converts a risky one‑off into a predictable program of work. Local providers such as Z‑Jak Technologies are positioning themselves precisely to help small and midsize organizations through this lifecycle event.
In an era where a single unpatched vulnerability can lead to an expensive breach, the choice is less about if to act and more about how fast and how well. The next 12 months will separate organizations that treated the Windows 10 sunset as a tactical detail from those that treated it as the strategic, security‑critical migration it truly is.

---

Source: WAVE News WAVE Country Z-Jak Technologies - Windows 10 & Cyber Safety