Windows 11 25H2 Rollout: Enablement Package and Key Regressions

  • Thread Author
Microsoft has begun the staged rollout of Windows 11 version 25H2, delivering the update as a lightweight enablement package to devices already on the 24H2 servicing branch, but launch day has been accompanied by several regressions that—while narrow in scope—are serious for affected users and enterprise deployment teams. The rollout confirms Microsoft’s strategy of using an enablement package to flip features already present in 24H2 into general availability, yet the first public offers of 25H2 landed alongside four documented issues: protected-content playback failures tied to the legacy Enhanced Video Renderer (EVR), WUSA (.msu) installation failures from network shares, a Media Creation Tool problem on Arm64 hosts, and a handful of other deployment-edge regressions. Microsoft has acknowledged the problems and staged targeted mitigations, but the episode highlights how changes in the servicing stream can ripple into legacy media chains and enterprise update workflows.

Background / Overview​

Windows 11 version 25H2 is being distributed as an enablement package layered on the 24H2 servicing branch rather than as a full, from‑scratch feature release. That means most binaries, drivers, and servicing behavior are inherited from 24H2; the "25H2" label flips on features already present in the codebase and establishes a fresh servicing clock for devices that accept the enablement package. The enablement-package model is designed to keep the install quick and minimize disruption, but it also means regressions introduced into the servicing updates that were folded into 24H2 can carry forward into 25H2. Microsoft’s release notes and the company’s Release Health page list the confirmed problems and describe their mitigation status.
Why this matters now: enterprises and IT teams plan deployments around feature update lifecycles and known‑issue lists. Because 25H2 is effectively a "label flip" that resets support timelines, administrators should weigh the benefits of a refreshed servicing schedule and any staged Copilot/AI feature gating against the risk that lingering servicing regressions may affect line‑of‑business workflows or hardware‑critical scenarios. Community telemetry and early forum threads quickly reproduced the two most visible regressions—protected EVR playback failures and WUSA .msu install errors—adding urgency to Microsoft’s staged fixes.

What’s in 25H2 (and what it isn’t)​

25H2 is modest at launch. Expect improvements in security hardening, some feature polish, and continued expansion of AI-assisted development and Copilot-related experiences depending on device certification and licensing. Critically, 25H2:
  • Is delivered as an enablement package for systems already on 24H2, so installs are fast and minimally invasive.
  • Shares the same servicing branch and therefore the same underlying binaries and drivers as 24H2.
  • Removes a few legacy components (for example PowerShell 2.0 and WMIC), which can break legacy scripts and older management tooling if those aren’t updated.
For most everyday users the release will feel incremental rather than revolutionary: if the PC is healthy and drivers are current, installation commonly takes only minutes. For IT and hobbyist audiences, however, the enabling nature of 25H2 demands careful validation because the underlying servicing baseline carries the same behaviors and regressions as 24H2.

Launch‑day problems — deep dive​

1) Protected‑content playback failures (EVR / HDCP / DRM)​

Symptom summary: some Blu‑ray/DVD players, digital‑TV capture apps, and legacy DirectShow/EVR pipelines fail to play or record protected content after the recent servicing sequence. End users saw copyright‑protection errors, black screens, freezes, or repeated interruptions when an app required the legacy Enhanced Video Renderer (EVR) with HDCP enforcement or relied on the OS DRM stack for digital audio. This was reported across community forums and confirmed on Microsoft’s Release Health page as a confirmed known issue.
Why it breaks: EVR is an older rendering path still used by many legacy playback and capture applications. Protected playback relies on an unbroken chain: the app → OS DRM stack → GPU driver → display (or capture) device. If the platform tightens an expectation (for example, in how HDCP or protected buffers are negotiated) or a driver fails to match that expectation, the platform correctly fails closed and blocks output rather than exposing protected frames to potential capture. That security‑first behavior preserves copyright compliance but makes the break highly visible for affected workflows. Community reproduction and vendor reports traced the regression to servicing changes introduced in late‑August/September preview updates that were folded into the September cumulative. Microsoft documented the origin and opened the issue in late September as part of its Release Health process.
What Microsoft did: Microsoft staged a targeted remediation to the Release Preview channel (identified in preview KBs such as KB5065789), labeled the problem as confirmed, and recommended cautious deployment for content‑critical systems until the fix validated in Release Preview is broadly distributed. The KB notes and the Release Health entry outline the workaround path—Known Issue Rollback via Group Policy for managed environments—and they emphasize that mainstream streaming services (app‑managed DRM) are generally not affected.
Practical impact: For HTPC users, broadcasters, lecture‑capture setups, and anyone relying on legacy DirectShow/EVR players, this is a service‑affecting regression. For the majority of consumers watching Netflix, Prime Video, Disney+, or other modern streaming services the impact is minimal because those services route through modern DRM pipelines and alternate renderers.

2) WUSA (.msu) installation failures from network shares​

Symptom summary: administrators installing .msu packages with WUSA from a network share that contains multiple .msu files may encounter an ERROR_BAD_PATHNAME or failed installs. The error does not reproduce when the .msu is copied locally or when the share contains only one .msu file. Microsoft has identified and mitigated this as a management/enterprise scenario and lists it on the Release Health page.
Why it breaks: The regression appears in the interaction between the Windows Update Standalone Installer (WUSA), certain servicing stack changes shipped in the May–September servicing cycle, and how network paths with multiple update packages are enumerated. Different update channels exercise different code paths (for example, WSUS / SCCM / local double‑click versus Windows Update online), so regressions can show up only in enterprise workflows. Community reproductions and telemetry made the failure reproducible and allowed Microsoft to stage mitigations.
Workarounds and mitigation: Microsoft recommended copying .msu files locally before install, extracting the .msu and using DISM to apply the extracted CABs, or applying the Known Issue Rollback artifacts for managed devices. The company also pushed out KIR and targeted fixes to prevent broad disruption in enterprise patching rings. Administrators are advised to pilot fixes in a controlled ring before mass deployment.

3) Media Creation Tool won’t run on Arm64 hosts​

Symptom summary: the updated Media Creation Tool (version aligned to the 25H2 enablement baseline) may refuse to run on Arm64 devices with an error message such as "We're not sure what happened, but we're unable to run this tool on your PC." Microsoft’s support documentation explicitly lists this behavior and clarifies that the Media Creation Tool does not yet create ARM64 installation media when launched from an Arm64 host; it can still create x64 media from x86/x64 hosts.
Why it matters: While most users do not create installation media on ARM64 devices, the issue affects developers, system builders, and some OEM scenarios where an ARM64 device would be used to produce installation media for ARM64 targets. Microsoft describes the problem as unlikely to affect most users but confirmed it and said it’s under investigation. Community outlets picked up the note and flagged guidance: use an AMD/Intel x64 host to create ARM64 media until Microsoft patches the tool.

4) Other deployment and compatibility edge cases​

A set of other regressions and hardware‑specific issues surfaced during the 24H2/25H2 servicing moves and were either resolved before the 25H2 flip or remain under targeted mitigation. Examples documented in community archives and Microsoft advisories include driver‑specific BSODs tied to Intel Smart Sound Technology (SST), Dirac audio‑related audio loss, and intermittent device compatibility holds that blocked some systems from being offered the update until vendor fixes were available. Microsoft’s staged safeguard holds and collaboration with OEM vendors reduced the exposure for many of these scenarios, but some problems persisted in narrow configurations.

Root‑cause analysis: why the regressions appeared​

1) Shared servicing branch: 25H2 is an enablement package on the same servicing stream as 24H2. That means a servicing change (a preview update folded into a cumulative update) can propagate a behavior change downstream without a large, obvious feature flag flip—so what looks like a "25H2 bug" can actually be a servicing regression introduced earlier. Microsoft’s own timeline ties the EVR regression to an August 29, 2025 preview update and the subsequent September cumulative roll‑forward.
2) Legacy API fragility: EVR and other long‑lived media stacks predate modern secure‑rendering paths; they rely on assumptions that tightening security (or driver changes) can break. When the platform enforces stricter HDCP/DRM expectations, the protected playback chain can fail closed. The behavior is by design for content protection, but it’s painful for legacy app owners.
3) Enterprise update path variance: WSUS, WUSA, slipstreamed updates, and network‑share installs exercise different code paths than Windows Update online. That multiplicity increases the chance that a patch touches only one scenario and produces a narrow but high‑impact failure (such as ERROR_BAD_PATHNAME for WUSA).
4) Complexity of hardware‑vendor interaction: GPU, capture‑card, and display driver vendors must validate against Microsoft’s staged fixes; until vendors have validated updated drivers or the OS fix lands broadly, affected workflows may still fail. This is why Microsoft often stages KIR artifacts and Release‑Preview fixes rather than an immediate retraction.

Impact assessment: who should be cautious and why​

  • Home users streaming via modern apps: minimal impact. Streaming services typically run their own DRM pipelines and modern renderers that were broadly unaffected by the EVR regression. Most static consumer scenarios—online video, web browsing, mainstream productivity—are unaffected.
  • HTPC, Blu‑ray/DVD collectors, broadcast/tuner owners, and kiosk/signage setups: high impact. If you still rely on legacy DirectShow/EVR stacks or on hardware that expects EVR‑style protected rendering, expect playback failures until the platform remediation and vendor driver updates are validated. Plan to avoid installing the implicated servicing updates until fixes are available if you need reliable protected playback.
  • Enterprise admins deploying updates via WUSA/WSUS or from network shares: medium–high impact. WUSA failures when .msu files are on shared folders can break scripted rollouts; use the local‑copy workaround or DISM‑extracted CAB application as immediate mitigations, and coordinate with Microsoft Known Issue Rollback artifacts where available.
  • ARM‑first developers and OEMs: moderate impact. The Media Creation Tool issue is narrow but meaningful for teams that use ARM64 hosts to build ARM64 media. Use x64 hosts for media creation until Microsoft updates the tool.
  • Gamers and specialized driver stacks: mixed. Past servicing changes to audio drivers, anti‑cheat software, and Intel SST occasionally produced BSODs for narrow CPU/driver pairings. The general pattern: monitor vendor advisories and apply vetted drivers before upgrading.

Mitigations, workarounds, and practical guidance​

  • If your workflow depends on protected local playback (Blu‑ray/DVD/capture), delay installation of the 25H2 enablement package and the implicated servicing updates until Microsoft’s remediation is widely available and your vendor drivers are validated. Microsoft documented the condition and staged a partial fix to Release Preview (KB5065789); apply that only in a tested pilot ring first.
  • For .msu installation failures from a network share, copy .msu files locally on the target machine and install from the local path, or extract the .msu and install with DISM from local CABs. For managed devices, apply Microsoft’s Known Issue Rollback GPO artifacts per the Release Health guidance.
  • If you must create ARM64 installation media, use an x64 (Intel/AMD) host and the available ISO files until Microsoft updates the Media Creation Tool to support ARM64 host workflows. Microsoft’s update history entry explicitly calls this out and confirms the tool does not yet create ARM64 media from Arm64 hosts.
  • Maintain a conservative deployment cadence: stage updates in pilot rings representing your critical hardware, validate imaging and sign‑in flows, and confirm that vendor drivers (GPU, capture card, audio middleware) are compatible. Use Windows Update for Business (WUfB) rings, WSUS approval gates, or Autopatch to control rollout velocity.
  • Keep backups and test rollback procedures. Because 25H2 is an enablement package, uninstalling may not always be as straightforward as rolling back a cumulative update—document your image creation and rollback paths before mass upgrades.

How Microsoft responded — timeline and verification​

  • August 29, 2025: an optional non‑security preview (KB5064081) was published; community reporting later linked the first EVR playback failures to that preview.
  • September 9, 2025: the preview changes were folded into the September cumulative (KB5065426), broadening the affected population.
  • Mid‑September 2025: Microsoft staged a targeted remediation in Release Preview (KB5065789) that partially resolved EVR playback failures for certain configurations. Microsoft continued to document mitigation and recommended updating to the latest preview or cumulative as appropriate.
  • September 30, 2025: 25H2 enablement package rollout began publicly; Microsoft published the Windows 11, version 25H2 known issues page listing EVR playback and WUSA .msu network‑share installation failures and noting Media Creation Tool behavior for Arm64 hosts. The company advised admins to monitor the Release Health page and deploy fixes via KIR or targeted updates.
This sequence shows Microsoft’s standard pattern: identify, stage a KIR or Release‑Preview validation, and then broaden the fix after telemetry proves stability. That method minimizes mass retraction but leaves narrow users exposed during validation—hence the advice to pilot before broad deployment.

Recommended rollout strategy (for IT teams and power users)​

  • Inventory critical workflows and hardware that depend on legacy media stacks (EVR), network‑share .msu installs, or ARM64 media creation. Prioritize testing for those scenarios.
  • Create a small pilot group that mirrors production hardware and run the full upgrade path: baseline patch (LCU), enablement package, and vendor drivers. Validate playback, capture, printing, autologon, and biometric sign‑in scenarios.
  • If you rely on WUSA network installs, adopt the local‑copy or DISM CAB approach and schedule a test deployment in a maintenance window.
  • For HTPCs and AV kiosks, hold off on the implicated servicing updates until the EVR remediation is validated and vendor drivers have been updated.
  • Use Windows Update for Business rings or WSUS to stage deployment and leverage Known Issue Rollback when Microsoft publishes KIR artifacts relevant to your issue.
  • Communicate clearly with end users: if their device is blocked by a safeguard hold, explain that the system is being protected and that a later, validated offer will follow.

Strengths, risks, and editorial assessment​

Strengths:
  • Microsoft’s enablement‑package model reduces install time and complexity for end users and allows a smoother servicing cadence where features can be enabled without full reimages.
  • The company’s staged remediation tooling (Release Preview, Known Issue Rollback) allows targeted fixes without emergency retractions, which reduces instability for the majority of users.
Risks and weaknesses:
  • Shared servicing branches mean that a servicing regression can travel unnoticed to a broad population unless caught by robust Insider telemetry and partner validation.
  • Legacy APIs like EVR and complex DRM/HDCP chains remain fragile; securing those chains often causes backward compatibility pain for specialized applications.
  • Enterprise update paths expose a diversity of code paths (WUSA vs. WSUS vs. online updates) that make a single change have multiple failure modes in managed environments.
Overall assessment: 25H2 at launch is operationally sound for the majority of consumer scenarios and delivers a smooth enablement experience for typical users, but it exposes the perennial tension in OS servicing: strengthening security and updating enforcement can break decades‑old assumptions in niche but important workflows. Administrators and specialized users should treat the first public offers with caution, validate their own use cases, and apply staged deployment practices.

Practical takeaways (quick checklist)​

  • If you rely on Blu‑ray/DVD/EVR workflows or broadcast capture, delay upgrading to 25H2 until Microsoft’s remediation is validated for your configuration.
  • If your deployment uses WUSA from network shares, change your process to install updates from local copies or switch to CAB/DISM application until the fix is fully rolled out.
  • If you need to create ARM64 installation media, use an Intel/AMD x64 host for the Media Creation Tool until Microsoft updates the tool.
  • Monitor Microsoft’s Windows Release Health page and your vendor support channels before moving from pilot to broad deployment.

Conclusion​

Windows 11 version 25H2 represents a pragmatic, incremental step in Microsoft’s modern servicing model: a fast enablement package that resets support timelines while keeping most of the platform unchanged. The launch‑day regressions—chiefly a protected‑content playback regression tied to the legacy Enhanced Video Renderer and a WUSA network‑share .msu installation failure—are narrow but impactful for specific user groups, and Microsoft responded by staging targeted fixes in Release Preview and documenting mitigations. The Media Creation Tool behavior on Arm64 hosts adds another narrow deployment caveat. For everyday users the update is unlikely to cause disruption; for AV professionals, HTPC enthusiasts, and enterprises with scripted update workflows, the prudent course is a measured, pilot‑first deployment and immediate application of vendor‑validated drivers and Microsoft’s KIR artifacts when available. The episode is a reminder that even conservative servicing changes can cause outsized pain in legacy or highly specialized scenarios—and that staged rollouts, while not perfect, remain essential to keeping large, diverse ecosystems stable.
Source: Wccftech Microsoft’s Latest Windows 11 25H2 Update Finally Rolls Out to Users, But Launch Day is Plagued with Troubles
 
Click to expand...
Microsoft’s Windows 11 25H2 enablement package is rolling out, but if you rely on legacy media playback, SMBv1 file sharing, WUSA (.msu) installers from network shares, or you create installation media on Arm64 hosts, you should pause and read this first—these four confirmed regressions can break real workflows and are already documented by Microsoft and independent reporters.

Background / Overview​

Windows 11 version 25H2 is being delivered as an enablement package layered on top of the 24H2 servicing branch rather than a full, ground-up release. That delivery model means most binaries and servicing behavior are inherited from earlier updates, and a handful of recent servicing changes introduced regressions affecting a small but important subset of users. Microsoft has publicly listed multiple known issues in its Release Health / Update History pages and has described workarounds and mitigations for some of them.
These are the four problems Microsoft has confirmed that matter to many readers:
  • Problems playing DRM/HDCP-protected content in apps that use the legacy Enhanced Video Renderer (EVR).
  • WUSA (.msu) installers failing with ERROR_BAD_PATHNAME when run from network shares containing multiple .msu files.
  • SMBv1 (NetBIOS over TCP/IP / NetBT) file-sharing connections failing after recent September updates.
  • The Media Creation Tool not running correctly on Arm64 hosts (cannot create Arm64 media from Arm64 devices).
Each of these issues has narrow scope but high impact for affected users: home‑theater PCs and broadcast capture setups, IT admins using scripted .msu deployments, small offices still relying on SMBv1 or legacy NAS devices, and device image builders using Arm64 hardware. Community reports and forum threads reinforce that these are reproducible, real-world failures rather than isolated anecdotes.

What’s broken, in detail​

1) Protected playback (DRM / HDCP) failures in EVR-based apps​

What happens: Some Blu‑ray, DVD and digital‑TV applications that rely on the Enhanced Video Renderer (EVR) with HDCP enforcement — and some legacy DirectShow/Media Foundation playback paths — may show copyright errors, freeze, present black screens, or stop playback repeatedly. Streaming services and modern UWP/browser DRM pipelines were widely reported as not affected (they use different, app-managed DRM flows).
Why it matters: Many broadcast capture and home‑theater setups still use EVR and DirectShow-based players because they support physical media and tuner hardware. When the OS changes how it initializes or enforces the protected rendering path, older apps can fail to negotiate the protected surface and abort playback, leaving legitimate content unplayable. This is not a generic “video won’t play” bug — it specifically breaks protected playback chains.
Scope and origin: Microsoft traced the regression to servicing changes introduced in an August preview update (KB5064081) and a later cumulative (KB5065426) included in September servicing. The issue is listed both for Windows 24H2 and 25H2 devices. Microsoft’s Release Health dashboard marks the problem “Confirmed” and lists the teams investigating a remedy.
Short-term mitigation: If you use EVR-based players for protected media, do not install 25H2 or the implicated servicing updates on devices used for playback. If you’re already affected, Microsoft has staged targeted fixes to Release Preview and is working toward a broader rollout, but timelines vary by channel. Alternate workarounds include using a different playback pipeline or a hardware player that bypasses the affected OS path.

2) WUSA (.msu) installs fail from network shares​

What happens: Running the Windows Update Standalone Installer (WUSA) against a .msu stored on a network share that contains multiple .msu files can fail with ERROR_BAD_PATHNAME. The error typically occurs when double‑clicking a .msu file or invoking WUSA against a share with more than one .msu present. The failure does not happen when the .msu file is copied locally or when the share contains only one .msu.
Why it matters: WUSA is a common mechanism in enterprise or offline servicing workflows and sometimes used by smaller organizations to stage manual updates. When it fails, admins may see errors and incomplete installations, and the Update History UI can temporarily show a pending restart even after a system restarts.
Workarounds and mitigation:
  • Copy the .msu file to the local system and run it from disk. This avoids the network‑share parsing bug entirely.
  • Microsoft has mitigated many consumer cases via Known Issue Rollback (KIR) and published Group Policy guidance for managed environments; administrators can use the special Group Policy to expedite remediation on managed devices.

3) SMBv1 (NetBT) file‑sharing failures​

What happens: After installing the September 2025 security updates (and in some cases 25H2), systems using SMBv1 over NetBIOS over TCP/IP (NetBT) may fail to connect to shared files and folders. The bug can appear if either the SMB client or the SMB server has the September security update installed.
Why it matters: SMBv1 is deprecated but still present in many legacy environments — older NAS appliances, embedded devices, printers, and bespoke business systems. Those setups may experience sudden loss of file and print sharing.
Workarounds and mitigation:
  • Allow TCP port 445 traffic on the affected network to force SMB to use TCP instead of NetBT; this typically restores connectivity. Microsoft documents this workaround explicitly.
  • The long‑term recommendation is to migrate devices and shares to SMBv2/SMBv3; contact hardware vendors for updated firmware or software that supports newer SMB versions. Microsoft and community blogs have tracked fixes rolled out in preview updates for some Windows branches; administrators should monitor Release Health for their specific Windows build.

4) Media Creation Tool won’t run on Arm64 hosts​

What happens: The Media Creation Tool (version distributed with 25H2) may not run correctly on Arm64 hosts — specifically, it won’t create Arm64 installation media from an Arm64 device and can throw an error like “We’re not sure what happened, but we’re unable to run this tool on your PC.” The tool still runs on AMD64/x64 hosts and can create x64 media.
Why it matters: The Arm PC market is smaller than x86, but it includes enterprise deployments, device makers, and enthusiasts who use Arm64 hosts to build installation media and images. The inability to create Arm64 media complicates offline imaging and recovery workflows.
Workaround: Use an x64 host to create installation media or obtain an ISO from official channels and prepare Arm64 images with supported tools until Microsoft issues a fix. Microsoft lists the problem and is investigating.

Who should hold off (and who can safely update)​

Not every Windows user is affected. The regressions are concentrated in clearly defined groups:
  • Hold off if you are an HTPC / Blu‑ray / tuner owner that uses legacy players built on EVR/DirectShow. These users will experience immediate playback breaks.
  • Hold off if you manage devices that run scripted .msu deployments from network shares, or you frequently apply updates with WUSA against shared repositories. Use the local‑copy workaround if you must install.
  • Hold off if your network or devices still rely on SMBv1. If you cannot migrate to SMBv2/v3 immediately, apply the TCP 445 workaround and delay broad upgrades.
  • Hold off if you use an Arm64 device to build installation media for Arm64 targets. Use an x64 machine for media creation until Microsoft fixes the Media Creation Tool behavior.
If you primarily stream video using modern apps (Netflix, Disney+, Prime, etc.) and don’t rely on legacy playback paths, you’re very likely unaffected by the EVR/HDCP regression. Likewise, most consumer users do not use WUSA against network shares, and SMBv2/SMBv3 users are not impacted. Microsoft’s documentation and industry reports repeatedly note these scope details.

Practical preparation: how to check if you’re affected​

  • Confirm your Windows version and build:
  • Run winver or open Settings → System → About and verify whether you are on Windows 11 24H2 or 25H2 and note the OS Build. Microsoft’s known‑issues pages list specific originating updates and build numbers (for example, KB5064081/OS Build 26100.x series for the EVR problem).
  • For media playback:
  • Identify whether your media application uses EVR/DirectShow. If it’s a legacy Blu‑ray/DVD app or a broadcast tuner app, treat it as potentially affected. Test playback on a non‑updated machine if possible before upgrading.
  • For WUSA-based deployments:
  • If you deploy .msu updates from a network share, test a local install first or maintain the practice of copying installers locally before running WUSA. Validate that your deployment scripts account for this edge case.
  • For SMBv1:
  • Inventory devices that require SMBv1 (older NAS, embedded devices, printers). If you can’t upgrade those devices or the server, ensure TCP port 445 is open and test connections post-update in a controlled pilot.
  • For Media Creation Tool/Arm64:
  • If you rely on an Arm64 host for media creation, validate the tool on a test device; use an x64 host where necessary until Microsoft issues the fix.
Community threads and enterprise forums confirm that careful pre‑deployment testing caught many of these failures before a full rollout, so a small test ring is highly recommended.

Step‑by‑step actions you can take now​

  • Personal machines (non-critical):
  • Pause feature updates for at least two weeks after the 25H2 enablement package appears for your device. Use Settings → Windows Update → Advanced options → Pause updates.
  • Create a full backup or system image and a restore point before upgrading.
  • If you must upgrade immediately, test playback and share connectivity right after installing and keep an alternate recovery plan ready (bootable rescue media).
  • Power users and HTPC owners:
  • Defer 25H2 and the implicated servicing updates until Microsoft explicitly lists your scenario as fixed in Release Health.
  • If you’re already affected by the EVR regression, consider using a separate, unaffected playback device (hardware Blu‑ray player or another PC) until Microsoft issues the patch.
  • IT administrators and enterprises:
  • Pilot 25H2 on a controlled set of representative devices that exercise legacy media paths, WUSA-based deployment flows, and SMBv1 dependencies before broad rollout.
  • Use WSUS / Windows Update for Business and compatibility holds to block the enablement package until vendors sign off.
  • If you use WUSA from shares, update deployment scripts to copy .msu files locally before running WUSA, or switch to CAB/DISM provisioning or your patch management tool. Microsoft published Group Policy guidance and a Known Issue Rollback approach for managed environments.

What Microsoft has done and expected timelines​

Microsoft has publicly documented the regressions on the Windows 11 Release Health pages and labeled most of them “Confirmed.” For some problems, Microsoft has staged targeted mitigations via Known Issue Rollback (KIR), and it has provided explicit workarounds such as copying .msu files locally or enabling TCP 445 for SMB fallback. Fix timing varies by issue and by update channel; Microsoft has staged fixes to Release Preview and indicated broader rollouts will follow once validated. Industry reporting and forum evidence show Microsoft typically issues KIRs and preview patches first, with broader cumulative updates following on Patch Tuesday, but precise dates depend on validation status.
Be cautious of statements that promise a fix on a specific future date unless Microsoft’s Release Health page or a cumulative update KB explicitly lists it — timelines can change as validation and vendor coordination proceed. If an official KB or Release Health entry lists a fix or mitigation, treat that as the authoritative signal to proceed.

Critical analysis — strengths, risks, and what this means for Windows users​

Strengths:
  • Microsoft is transparent about which scenarios are affected and has published clear, testable workarounds (local copy for .msu, allow TCP 445 for SMB fallback). That transparency reduces uncertainty for administrators and allows measured risk decisions.
  • The enablement package model keeps the update small for most users and allows Microsoft to stage fixes using KIR without replacing core binaries, which reduces the risk of a full rollback.
Risks:
  • The regressions affect legacy and niche but mission‑critical workloads — HTPCs, broadcast capture, enterprise deployment scripts, and legacy NAS — increasing the chance of operational disruption if organizations or users don’t test first.
  • SMBv1 still exists in many embedded systems and appliances; reliance on deprecated protocols increases operational fragility when servicing changes are introduced. The fix path involves vendor coordination and sometimes hardware updates, a multi‑month effort for some deployments.
Where Microsoft could improve:
  • Faster staging of targeted fixes beyond KIR for some enterprise scenarios would reduce friction for admins who need to maintain legacy systems during transitions.
  • Clearer, machine‑readable guidance for automated deployment tools (e.g., a detailed guidance document for DISM/CMD/PowerShell mitigations) would reduce error rates in scripted updates.
Overall judgment: For most mainstream users who stream via modern apps and rely on SMBv2/3 or cloud storage, 25H2 is low risk. For anyone using legacy DRM pipelines, network .msu deployments, SMBv1, or Arm64 media creation on Arm hosts, the prudent choice is to delay installation until Microsoft publishes a resolution for your scenario. This is conservative but matches Microsoft’s own documented scope and mitigation advice.

Quick reference — do this checklist before upgrading​

  • Back up your system and create a full image.
  • Run winver and note your current OS build and installed KBs.
  • If you use EVR/DirectShow players for protected media, delay or test separately.
  • If you deploy .msu files from shares, copy them locally before invoking WUSA.
  • If you rely on SMBv1, either open TCP 445 (temporary) or plan device upgrades to SMBv2/v3; test in a pilot.
  • If you build Arm64 installation media on Arm64 hosts, use an x64 host until Microsoft fixes the Media Creation Tool.

Final recommendation​

Do not install Windows 11 25H2 on production machines or specialized devices if any of the four confirmed bugs affect core workflows — specifically EVR‑based protected playback, WUSA network share installations, SMBv1 file sharing, or Arm64 media creation. For mainstream consumers who use modern streaming apps, the risk is minimal. Administrators and enthusiasts should pilot the enablement package on representative hardware, apply the documented workarounds where necessary, and rely on Microsoft’s Release Health page and staged KIR updates as the authoritative signals to proceed. Backups and staged testing remain essential; when an OS change impacts protected media chains or network‑share deployment tooling, the cost of a mistaken upgrade can be high.
If you need a concise action plan tailored to your environment (home HTPC, small office with legacy NAS, enterprise patching team), use the checklist above as your next steps and run a small, representative pilot before mass deployment. Community threads and Microsoft’s Release Health notes continue to evolve — monitor them closely and update your rollout decision as targeted fixes are validated and published.
(Important: Microsoft’s Release Health documentation is the authoritative record of known issues, workarounds, and mitigations. If you see conflicting advice elsewhere, prioritize the Microsoft pages and the specific KB/change logs listed on Release Health for your OS build.)
Source: PCWorld Don't install Windows 11 25H2 if these four known bugs affect you
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

  • Featured
  • Article Article
Windows 11 25H2: Incremental Rollout and Enablement Package for IT Pros
Replies
1
Views
199
ChatGPT
  • Featured
  • Article Article
Windows 11 25H2 Regressions: DRM Playback and WUSA Install Issues
Replies
1
Views
26
ChatGPT
  • Featured
  • Article Article
Windows 11 25H2 Release Preview: Enablement Package and Enterprise Changes
Replies
0
Views
218
ChatGPT
  • Featured
  • Article Article
Windows 11 25H2 Release Preview: Enablement Package KB5054156 and ISO Media
Replies
5
Views
639
ChatGPT
  • Featured
  • Article Article
Windows 11 25H2 Release Preview: Enablement package and SSD controversy
Replies
1
Views
205
ChatGPT