Windows 11 Adds One-Click Taskbar Network Speed Test (Bing Powered)

Microsoft has quietly added a one‑click network speed test to Windows 11’s taskbar — a small, highly discoverable convenience that launches a browser‑based speed check from the system tray and Wi‑Fi quick settings, putting download, upload and latency measurements one click away for everyday users and technicians alike.

Background​

Windows has historically left ad hoc internet throughput checks to third‑party websites and standalone utilities: Speedtest by Ookla, Fast.com, Cloudflare’s Speedtest, and command‑line tools such as iperf have been the de‑facto ways to validate connectivity. That has meant remembering a URL, installing an app, or running terminal commands — all reasonable, but not exactly convenient for the average user who just wants to know whether their Wi‑Fi is slow or the ISP is throttling them.
Microsoft’s recent preview updates fold a quick launcher for a web‑hosted speed test directly into the places most users already look when connectivity acts up: the network icon in the taskbar and the Wi‑Fi quick settings flyout. The change is being delivered via staged Insider and Release Preview builds (notably the 26100/26200 families and packaged updates such as KB5077241), and Microsoft describes it as a built‑in network speed test accessible from the taskbar that opens in the user’s default browser.
This move continuehan embedding a full native measurement engine into the OS, Microsoft is surfacing lightweight, web‑backed utilities where they are most useful — a pragmatic choice that trades offline capability for ease of update and reduced OS surface area.

---

What Microsoft shipped (exactly)​

Where you’ll see the control​

• Right‑click the network (system tray) icon and look for a new Perform speed test entry in the context menu.
• Left‑click the network icon to open Wi‑Fi quick settings and find a Test internet speed button in the panel.

That single action launches the default browser and lands the user on the Bing‑hosted speed‑test experience. Microsoft’s release notes for the Insider preview explicitly list the taskbar speed test among the new, gradually‑rolled features.

Which builds and update packaging​

• The change began appearing in Insider preview builds tied to the 26100/26200 build families and is part of servicing waves delivered under KB5077241 and related preview updates, where availability is subject to Microsoft’s staged rollout and Controlled Feature Rollout (CFR) gating. If you are in the Release Preview or Beta channels and have the toggle enabled to get the latest updates, you may see the control sooner.

What the control does — and what it does not​

• It is a launcher: the taskbar control opens a web page (Bing’s speed test widget) in your default browser.
• It is not a new kernel‑level or OS‑native measurement engine; Windows itself does not perform the raw throughput measurement in a local subsystem.
• The Bing widget uses an external measurement backend (Speedtest by Ookla is the provider integrated into Bing’s experience), so the traffic and test selection are handled by the web service rather than Windows.

---

How the measurement works (technical overview)​

When you activate the taskbar speed test:

1. Windows launches your default web browser and navigates to Bing’s internet speed test interface.
2. Bing’s in‑page speed test runs standard web‑based measurements (latency/ping, parallel download streams, parallel upload streams, and throughput aggregation) against a selected test server.
3. The test reports basic metrics: download speed, upload speed, and latency (and often an estimated jitter or packet loss metric depending on the provider).

Because the measurement is web‑hosted, several important technical realities follow:

• Server selection and test methodology are controlled by the web provider (Bing/Ookla), not the Windows client. Results reflect the provider’s server choice, stream concurrency, measurement duration, and packet sizing.
• The browser introduces overhead (TCP handshake behavior, HTTP(S) stack, browser network scheduling, and proxy settings) that can slightly affect results compared with a native app or low‑level measurement tool.
• Tests performed via a browser are excellent for sanity checks — is the internet clearly slow? — but less ideal for repeatable, tightly controlled diagnostics where you need to compare precise numbers over time or between specific endpoints.

---

Step‑by‑step: How to try it today​

1. Enroll in the Windows Insider Program (Release Preview or Beta channel) or ensure your device receives Release Preview servicing.
2. Install the relevant preview update (Microsoft’s release notes list builds in the 26100 and 26200 families and packaged updates such as KB5077241). Availability may vary by region and may be gated per account.
3. After the update installs, interact with the network icon on the taskbar:
   1. Right‑click the network icon and select Perform speed test, or
   2. Left‑click to open Wi‑Fi quick settings and press Test internet speed.
4. Your default browser will open and load Bing’s speed test widget; press Start or let it auto‑run to get download/upload/latency numbers.

If you don’t see the control immediately after updating, it may be staged for your device (CFR), or Microsoft could still be rolling it out. Some preview features require toggles under Settings > Windows Update to receive the latest features as they become available.

---

Why Microsoft chose a web‑backed launcher (the rationale)​

• Maintainability: Web‑hosted widgets can be updated independently of the OS. Fixes, methodological tweaks, and UI changes for the speed test do not require a Windows servicing release.
• Leverage existing infrastructure: Bing’s speed test already exists and — since its integration with Ookla — provides a mature backend and global server network. Surface the tool where people expect it rather than re‑implementing measurement infrastructure in Windows.
• User discoverability: Placing the shortcut in the taskbar removes the friction of remembering a URL or searching for a test site during a frustrating connectivity moment.
• Consistency: Using a single web provider gives consistent UX for a large number of users regardless of their installed apps.

---

Benefits — who wins​

• Everyday users gain a fast, low‑friction way to check whether their connection is broadly healthy.
• Helpdesk technicians and home‑office workers get a quick verification tool to use when troubleshooting customer‑facing calls.
• New PCs and unfamiliar Wi‑Fi environments become easier to triage without telling someone to “open a browser, go to Speedtest” or similar.

Key benefits at a glance:

• • One‑click access from where people already check connectivity.
• • No installation required.
• • Cross‑browser behavior: uses your default browser, so it fits user preference.
• • Consistent visual and functional UX courtesy of the Bing widget.

---

Risks, limitations, and legitimate concerns​

While the addition is convenient, there are real trade‑offs and potential issues to consider.

1) It’s not a native diagnostic: reproducibility and precision​

Because the test runs in a browser against servers chosen by a web service, results are not as reproducible as native or CLI tools. For enterprise troubleshooting, controlled tests (same server, same protocol, same concurrency, same timing) are crucial — browser tests are good for a quick sanity check but poor for forensic comparison. Tools like iperf3, Speedtest CLI, or vendor‑specific diagnostics remain the gold standard for reproducible measurement.

2) Privacy and telemetry​

A browser‑hosted test implicates the web provider in logging IP addresses, inferred ISP names, connection locations, and other telemetry. When you run Bing’s speed test, the request and measurement traffic originate from your machine to the test server and will be observable by Microsoft/Ookla and any intermediate networks. For privacy‑sensitive environments — regulated industries, research labs, or enterprises with strict telemetry policies — launching the test by default may be undesirable. Administrators should be aware that the taskbar shortcut funnels users to a web service rather than performing a purely local action.

3) Promotional perception​

Critics will rightly call the control a promotion for Microsoft/Bing rather than a pure platform utility. Because the button opens a Bing experience, some will see this as another attempt to surface Microsoft’s services inside Windows. That perception may stoke pushback among users who prefer neutral, third‑party choices.

4) Enterprise manageability and policy control​

Enterprises typically require deterministic tools and centralized reporting. A one‑click browser test does not integrate with enterprise telemetry, Network Operations dashboards, or SIEM systems. Administrators will prefer managed tools that can be scripted and logged. Microsoft’s staged rollout and Controlled Feature Rollout mean the feature may be invisible or unwanted in managed environments, but there is not, at the time of writing, a published Group Policy specifically to hide the taskbar test. Administrators who need to block or control access can use browser or network policies to limit access to Bing’s speed test endpoint, or rely on MDM configuration to control Windows Update rings and feature visibility.

---

Comparing measurement methods: what to use and when​

• Speedtest by Ookla (web or app)
  • Strengths: large server network, consistent methodology, official apps and CLI for repeatable tests.
  • When to use: cross‑ISP comparisons, logging, and consistent test runs.
• Cloudflare / Fast.com
  • Strengths: simple, reliable, often prioritized by ISP peering; good for quick checks.
  • When to use: quick verification for streaming/latency‑sensitive scenarios.
• iperf3
  • Strengths: customizable, reproducible, runs against a chosen endpoint you control.
  • When to use: lab‑grade testing between two managed endpoints, capacity planning.
• Windows taskbar → Bing speed test
  • Strengths: discoverability and convenience; one click from taskbar.
  • Limits: browser overhead, provider‑controlled server selection, less suited for enterprise diagnostics.

For power users and admins needing precise, repeatable data, client‑side apps or CLI tools (Speedtest CLI, iperf3, MTR, etc.) remain the correct choice. The taskbar shortcut is a situational convenience, not a replacement for rigorous diagnostics.

---

Privacy, telemetry, and what to watch for​

If you care about what data is shared when you run the test, consider these points:

• The test connects to external servers; your public IP and ISP are visible to that server.
• Browsers may send additional identifying headers or be subject to extensions that alter behavior.
• Bing/Ookla may log test metadata (time, location inferred by IP, provider, results).
• Enterprises should treat the test as outbound telemetry and, if necessary, block the test domain at the perimeter or restrict acces

If the organizational policy forbids direct outbound measurements to public endpoints, administrators should disable access to the test page or prevent the preview build from reaching managed devices until a controlled release with appropriate controls is available.

---

Practical recommendations​

• For quick home troubleshooting: use the taskbar control. It’s the fastest way to rule in/out a gross connectivity problem.
• For reproducible diagnostics: use Speedtest CLI, the Ookla desktop app, or iperf3 pointed at a controlled server.
• For privacy‑conscious users: prefer local CLI tools or avoid running the test on networks where you don’t want to publish your external IP to a third party.
• For enterprises: monitor Windows Update channels and MDM configuration; control access to Bing’s test endpoints if needed, and rely on logged, scripted diagnostics for auditing and reporting.
• If you don’t see the option after updating: check that your device is in the Release Preview/Beta Insider rings and that Controlled Feature Rollouts have not gated the functionality on your machine.

---

Larger context: what this says about Windows’ direction​

This small UX addition is telling in three ways:

1. Microsoft prefers surfacing web‑backed flows for lightweight utilities rather than embedding them as native platform features. That reduces maintenance cost and enables faster iteration off the OS release cadence.
2. Microsoft is continuing to make the taskbar and quick settings the place for discoverable troubleshooting tools, aligning with their emphasis on day‑to‑day user experience improvements instead of headline AI features in every release. The same preview wave that added the speed test also included camera PTZ controls and in‑box Sysmon as an optional feature — a mix of consumer convenience and enterprise tooling.
3. There is an ongoing tension between convenience and control. Consumers will likely enjoy the one‑click path. Enterprises, privacy advocates, and power users will scrutinize the telemetry and repeatability trade‑offs — and rightly so.

---

Final analysis — small feature, meaningful trade‑offs​

The Windows 11 taskbar speed test is a pragmatic, low‑risk convenience for the majority of users who want a quick answer: is my connection broken or slow right now? By placing the test where people already look when connectivity is suspect, Microsoft has removed a micro‑friction that used to send frustrated users to a browser search for "speedtest."
However, the implementation is explicitly a launcher to a web service (Bing’s speed test, which itself uses Speedtest by Ookla’s backend in existing Bin raises three core considerations: accuracy and reproducibility for advanced diagnostics, privacy and telemetry for sensitive contexts, and control for organizations that need managed, auditable testing. For most home users this will be a net positive — convenience usually wins — but anyone who relies on consistent measurement practices should continue to use dedicated tools and expect to do so for the foreseeable future.

---

Quick checklist (what to expect and what to do)​

• Expect: a Perform speed test item in the network icon context menu and a Test internet speed button in Wi‑Fi Quick Settings after installing the preview update (KB5077241 / builds 26100.7918 / 26200.7918), subject to staged rollout.
• Use it when: you want a rapid sanity check that your connection is broadly functional.
• Don’t rely on it when: you need reproducible, logged, enterprise‑grade diagnostics or when you must avoid sending telemetry to an external service.
• Alternatives: install Speedtest by Ookla app or use Speedtest CLI for scripting and logging; use iperf3 for controlled endpoint testing.

---

Windows’ new taskbar shortcut won’t replace the toolkits of network engineers any time soon, but it does remove a tiny, persistent annoyance for many users: the need to remember which site or app performs a quick speed check. That micro‑improvement — simple, discoverable, and unobtrusive — is exactly the kind of quality‑of‑life change most people will appreciate. At the same time, the design decisions behind it are a useful reminder that convenience often arrives with trade‑offs, and understanding those trade‑offs will let ordinary users, power users, and enterprise administrators pick the right measurement for the job.

---

Source: Digital Trends Windows 11 is adding a speed test, you can run it from the taskbar

 

[ChatGPT]

If you've ever wondered whether your ISP is actually delivering the speeds you pay for, Windows 11 is now putting a one‑click check directly where most users already look for network status: the taskbar. Microsoft has started rolling a small but widely useful feature that surfaces a "Perform speed test" / "Test internet speed" control in the Taskbar network menu and Wi‑Fi Quick Settings; selecting it launches your default browser and runs a web‑hosted measurement that reports download, upload, and latency (ping) numbers.

---

Background / Overview​

Windows has long left throughput checks to third‑party websites and standalone utilities — think Speedtest by Ookla, Fast.com, Cloudflare Measure, or command‑line tools such as iperf3. The new Taskbar affordance represents a deliberate UX decision: surface a discoverable diagnostic where non‑technical users already expect to check connectivity, without embedding a full measurement engine inside the operating system. The capability is appearing for Windows Insiders in the Release Preview channel as part of update KB5077241 (builds 26100.7918 and 26200.7918) and is tied to Windows 11 versions 24H2 and 25H2.
Microsoft is rolling this change via a controlled feature rollout (CFR), which means visibility is staged and may vary by region, hardware, and account configuration. Insiders in the Release Preview are seeing the UI entries, and broader availability is expected to expand gradually as Microsoft monitors feedback and telemetry.

---

What the feature does — the user flow​

This is intentionally lightweight and focused on convenience.

• Right‑click the network icon in the system tray (or open the Wi‑Fi/Cellular Quick Settings).
• Look for "Perform speed test" (context menu) or "Test internet speed" (Quick Settings).
• Clicking the option opens your default browser and loads the Bing‑hosted speed‑test widget; the measurement runs in the browser and returns download, upload, and latency figures.

Because the measurement runs in the browser rather than inside a Windows binary, the actual backend and methodology are supplied by the web widget Microsoft chooses to use — currently Bing’s embedded speed‑test UI, which in prior Microsoft integrations has relied on established measurement backends. That design choice reduces engineering and maintenance costs for Microsoft but has implications (good and bad) that we'll unpack below.

---

Why this matters: everyday value​

For a large portion of Windows users the value proposition is straightforward: discoverability and speed.

• No more hunting for a URL or remembering which third‑party app you used last time. The taskbar is a natural place to check connectivity, and this puts a diagnostic one click away.
• It helps casual troubleshooting: is a slow call due to Wi‑Fi congestion, a flaky ISP link, or the application itself? A quick test gives a baseline.
• For home setups and helpdesk triage, having a consistent starting point for users reduces support friction and false assumptions about local network configuration.

These are practical wins: the feature lowers the cognitive and procedural barrier to measuring throughput, and for many users that's enough.

---

Technical reality: not a native speed engine​

This is the most important technical caveat to understand: the Taskbar control is a launcher that opens a browser‑based speed test. It does not install a native Windows subsystem that conducts measurements inside the OS itself. That means:

• The test depends on the browser environment and whatever servers and methodology the web widget uses.
• It inherits the same limitations that any single web speed test has — server selection, routing differences, VPN/proxy behavior, and browser‑level restrictions.
• The measurement may not reflect raw link capacity in controlled ways that a dedicated in‑OS tool (or CLI testing to a controlled endpoint) could provide.

Put simply: it's perfect for quick sanity checks and casual troubleshooting, but it isn’t a replacement for repeatable, controlled network benchmarking used in enterprise diagnostics or research.

---

Accuracy, methodology, and the limits of browser tests​

Understanding what a speed test measures — and how it can mislead — is critical.

• Most modern speed tests use parallel TCP streams, ramp‑up behavior, and server selection to saturate the path and estimate available throughput. However, how the test warms up, chooses packet sizes, and picks endpoints materially affects results.
• Browser‑based tests are constrained by the browser's networking stack, any active browser extensions, and the browser's own proxy and caching behaviors.
• VPNs, corporate proxies, captive portals, and multihomed connections (multiple active network interfaces) can all skew results in ways that are not obvious to casual users.
• Latency measurements (ping) depend on the test server selected — a nearby CDN edge will return much smaller latency than a distant measurement server.

For these reasons, if you need reliable, repeatable data — for SLAs, troubleshooting a contested support case, or for comparing ISPs — use CLI tools (Speedtest CLI, iperf3) and point them at controlled endpoints. The Taskbar launcher is a convenience, not a lab.

---

Privacy, telemetry, and policy implications​

The implementation choice opens two policy questions: what data is being collected, and who controls the backend.

• Because the test runs in a browser and hits a web widget, the web service provider sees the client IP, timing, and test metrics — much like any web speed test. Depending on cookie and telemetry settings, the provider may correlate tests across visits or devices.
• Microsoft’s documentation indicates the feature launches a web widget (Bing’s speed test) and that component may delegate to an external backend. Historically, integrations have used well‑known measurement backends. Users should assume standard web telemetry rules apply unless Microsoft documents otherwise.

For enterprise administrators, this raises management questions: can the Taskbar control be disabled or controlled via Group Policy or Intune? At present there’s no broad evidence of an immediately available Group Policy toggle specifically for the Taskbar speed‑test launcher, and the feature is gated via Controlled Feature Rollout, meaning administrative control surfaces may follow later. Enterprises should watch for policy controls in official update notes and management templates.

---

Controlled rollout and what to expect in the wild​

Microsoft packaged the change into KB5077241 — preview builds 26100.7918 and 26200.7918 — and surfaced it to Release Preview Insiders in mid‑February ahead of a wider staged rollout. That means:

• If you’re on the Release Preview channel and have installed the KB5077241 preview, you may already see the new control.
• If you don’t see it immediately, the feature may still be gated server‑side; Microsoft routinely enables features progressively to collect telemetry and monitor for regressions.
• Wider availability to mainstream users will follow the standard pace of Microsoft’s CFR and update schedule; timing can vary by region and hardware.

The staged rollout is deliberate: a small UX change like this can still surface compatibility or accessibility issues at scale, and rolling it out slowly lets Microsoft roll back or adjust rollout criteria without disrupting millions of users.

---

Practical scenarios and examples​

Here are everyday examples of how the Taskbar speed test will be useful — and where it will fall short.

• Home user: running the taskbar test to check whether streaming hiccups are due to slow ISP speeds or a misconfigured home Wi‑Fi mesh. Quick, one‑click check that provides numbers you can quote when calling your ISP. Benefit: immediate evidence; Limit: may be influenced by other devices on the network at the test moment.
• Remote worker: comparing mid‑day speeds versus evening speeds to understand contention and whether a plan upgrade is necessary. Benefit: easy to run repeatedly; Limit: browser tests are noisy and should be averaged for decisions.
• Helpdesk: asking a user to right‑click the network icon and run a test before escalating to network engineering. Benefit: reduces support friction and standardizes the first diagnostic step; Limit: not a substitute for controlled troubleshooting where packet captures or iperf runs are required.

---

Risks, trade‑offs and questions for Microsoft​

The rollout highlights a broader theme in Windows 11 development: surfacing web‑backed, easily updatable utilities while keeping the core OS slim. That approach has advantages but also trade‑offs.

• Strength: fast iteration and lower engineering cost. Pushing the measurement to a web widget avoids needing a Microsoft‑maintained server fleet or native measurement engine.
• Weakness: decreased control and potentially inconsistent results. Enterprises and power users may find the lack of a native measurement engine limiting for forensic work or validated benchmarking.
• Privacy: the web launch model pushes telemetry responsibility to the web provider; Microsoft should clarify which endpoints and backends are used and what telemetry is collected and retained.
• Admin controls: enterprises will want Group Policy/Intune controls to enable, disable, or control the feature and to ensure testing does not conflict with internal monitoring policies.

Finally, there are accessibility and automation questions. For example, should Windows expose the test results to the Settings app as a card or historical trend? Should the system offer scheduled, opt‑in background measurements for proactive diagnostics? Those are sensible next steps but require careful design to balance telemetry and privacy.

---

How this compares to other platforms and past Microsoft behavior​

Microsoft is not the first platform to make speed tests easier. Many routers and consoles (Xbox) have built‑in checks; web browsers and search engines have embedded speed‑test widgets for some time. The novelty here is placing the shortcut in a system UI affordance — the Taskbar — where most users expect connectivity details.
Historically Microsoft has chosen web‑first implementations for small utilities that must remain updatable without heavy OS servicing. The Taskbar speed test follows that pattern: a small OS surface that calls out to a web experience for the heavy lifting. That consistency reduces maintenance but means the OS delegates authority for measurement methodology to the web provider.

---

Recommendations for users and IT pros​

For everyday users:

• Use the Taskbar test as a quick sanity check — confirm whether download/upload numbers look roughly like your plan.
• If you see large, consistent deviations from your paid plan, try multiple tests at different times, and compare results to a CLI test to rule out browser or device issues.
• When calling your ISP, quote several test results and times rather than a single reading.

For power users and IT professionals:

• Don’t rely on a single browser test for forensic work. Use iperf3, Speedtest CLI, or tests against a controlled endpoint to obtain repeatable results.
• If you manage fleets, watch for Microsoft to publish Group Policy/Intune controls for this feature or use endpoint configuration baselines to disable it if required.
• Consider documenting a standard testing protocol for support teams: browser test (taskbar) → Speedtest CLI → iperf3 to isolate the problem progressively.

---

What we’d like to see next​

If Microsoft wants this convenience to be genuinely useful across home and enterprise scenarios, a few sensible enhancements would close the gap between convenience and actionable diagnostics:

• An opt‑in, native measurement mode for enterprise admins that runs scheduled tests to controlled endpoints, logs results locally, and respects privacy controls.
• Official documentation of the web widget's backend providers and telemetry practices so privacy‑sensitive users and organizations can make informed choices.
• Management controls (Group Policy and Intune policy) to enable/disable the Taskbar shortcut and to configure whether tests are permitted on managed devices.
• An optional history card in Settings that tracks recent test results (with user consent) so users can see trends before calling their ISP.
• A built‑in diagnostic option to perform tests that exclude local LAN traffic (i.e., measure WAN path only) to reduce false positives from local congestion.

These changes would preserve the convenience of a one‑click test while making it more actionable and enterprise friendly.

---

Verdict — useful, but modest​

Microsoft's Taskbar speed test is a pragmatic, low‑friction addition to Windows 11: a helpful convenience for most users, but not a technical breakthrough. It improves discoverability and removes the friction of finding a reliable speed test link, and for routine consumer and helpdesk use cases it will be genuinely useful. However, the browser‑launched design limits the feature’s usefulness for repeatable benchmarking and enterprise diagnostics; privacy and admin‑control questions remain unresolved.
In short: this is a sensible UX win with obvious practical benefits, but don’t treat the numbers as authoritative without corroborating them using dedicated tools. If Microsoft follows up with admin controls, clearer telemetry documentation, and an optional native measurement mode, this small feature could evolve into a meaningful diagnostic asset for both consumers and IT professionals.

---

Quick takeaways (TL;DR)​

• Windows 11 now offers a one‑click network speed test in the Taskbar network menu and Wi‑Fi Quick Settings; it launches a browser‑based test and reports download, upload, and ping.
• The change ships in preview under KB5077241 (builds 26100.7918 and 26200.7918) for Windows 11 24H2 and 25H2 and is rolling out via Controlled Feature Rollout.
• It’s convenient for quick checks and helpdesk triage, but it’s not a native measurement tool and will inherit the limitations of browser‑based speed tests (server selection, VPNs, proxies, and browser effects).
• Power users and enterprises should continue to use CLI tools (Speedtest CLI, iperf3) and expect Microsoft to add management controls and clearer telemetry documentation over time.

---

Windows’ decision to put another small diagnostic directly in the taskbar reflects a broader design philosophy: make everyday tools easy to find and rely on web services to deliver the measurement logic. For most users that’s a net win — a tiny UX change that removes friction. For network professionals and privacy‑conscious admins, it’s a reminder that convenience and control frequently tug in opposite directions, and that further platform polish (policy controls, native measurement options, and transparency) will determine whether this ends up as a useful convenience or just a handy bookmark in the UI.

---

Source: PCWorld How fast is your Internet? Windows 11 will (finally) tell you