Wipro Migrates HR Databases to Oracle Base on OCI Slashes Payroll Time

Oracle and Wipro today announced a migration of Wipro’s mission‑critical HR databases to Oracle Base Database Service on Oracle Cloud Infrastructure (OCI), a move Oracle says cut Wipro’s payroll processing time by roughly 60 percent and improved recruitment system performance by more than 50 percent—changes Wipro attributes to the converged performance, multicloud interconnects, and database services provided by Oracle.

Background​

Wipro is a global IT services and consulting group with a large, distributed workforce and a long history of working with Oracle technologies. The company reports roughly 230,000 employees and business partners across more than 60 countries, making HR scale, latency, and reliability pressing operational needs for the firm.
Oracle’s Base Database Service is a managed, VM‑based offering on OCI that runs the full set of Oracle Database capabilities with lifecycle automation, built‑in tooling for application development, and features such as AI Vector Search and in‑database machine learning. Oracle has also invested heavily in “interconnect” services that provide high‑bandwidth, low‑latency private connectivity between OCI and the other major public clouds, which Oracle and its partners promote as a way to run database‑proximate workloads across multicloud footprints.

---

What Oracle and Wipro announced​

• Wipro migrated its payroll and recruitment Oracle databases to Oracle Base Database Service on OCI, keeping the databases on an engineered, managed platform to improve availability, performance, and security.
• Wipro used Oracle Interconnect for Google Cloud to connect its payroll system and Oracle Interconnect for Microsoft Azure to connect its recruitment application, enabling a low‑latency, multicloud deployment model.
• Oracle reported that Wipro achieved a >50% performance boost in recruitment workloads and reduced payroll batch processing from over 70 minutes to 29 minutes—a headline reduction Oracle presents as a roughly 60% improvement. These figures are reported by Oracle and Wipro in the announcement.

These are straightforward customer‑case claims typical of vendor press releases: concrete numbers are given, the migration path is described, and both parties position the work within a broader move toward AI‑enabled, data‑proximate architectures.

---

Why this matters: the operational case​

Modern HR systems—payroll, benefits administration, applicant tracking, onboarding, and workforce analytics—are high‑volume, latency‑sensitive systems. Improvements in database performance and network latency translate directly into:

• Faster end‑to‑end payroll runs and reduced payroll window risk. If large batch jobs finish in a fraction of prior time, there is more margin for error correction, audit, and reporting.
• Better candidate experience and recruiter productivity, because search, filtering, and candidate‑matching workloads become more responsive.
• Lower operational risk for a global HR function by consolidating database management under a managed service and using engineered systems to improve uptime guarantees.

From an enterprise architecture perspective, the migration also showcases two broader trends:

• A preference for database‑proximate infrastructure (keeping high‑value data near purpose‑built database services).
• An acceptance of multicloud patterns in which workloads and services span OCI, Azure, and Google Cloud but are connected through vendor interconnects to manage latency and security.

These themes are consistent with a wider movement among large enterprises to keep regulated or sensitive data close to systems of record while allowing application and analytics layers to operate across clouds. File‑based industry analysis of Oracle’s recent strategy shows the company leaning into database proximity and multicloud as core selling points for enterprise AI and mission‑critical workloads.

---

Technical breakdown: Base Database Service and interconnects​

Oracle Base Database Service: what it offers​

Oracle Base Database Service is a managed database offering that provides:

• Full Oracle Database Enterprise and Standard Edition feature set on OCI VM shapes.
• Automated lifecycle management for patching, backups, and scaling.
• Built‑in developer tools (Oracle APEX, AI Vector Search) and integrated security capabilities (Transparent Data Encryption, Data Safe tooling).
• Flexible pricing (pay‑as‑you‑go and BYOL) and multi‑region distribution options for resiliency and data residency.

For Wipro, these capabilities mean a path to reduced DBA overhead and faster delivery of HR feature updates because database administration tasks are automated and standardized.

Oracle Interconnect for other clouds​

Oracle Interconnect offerings combine OCI FastConnect with cloud‑partner connectivity (Microsoft ExpressRoute or Google Cloud interconnect) to provide:

• Low round‑trip latency (Oracle advertises sub‑2 ms in some interconnect region pairings).
• Private, high‑bandwidth links that bypass the public internet and reduce egress variability.
• The ability to place Oracle‑managed database services in OCI while keeping application logic or other cloud native services in Azure or Google Cloud.

Wipro’s architecture—payroll through the Google interconnect and recruitment via Azure interconnect—illustrates a targeted, low‑latency split where data sovereignty or application dependencies likely influenced the choice of partner cloud for each HR system. That design lets each system run where it best aligns with adjacent services while maintaining database proximity and consistent security controls across the multicloud fabric.

---

Measurable outcomes claimed (and how to read them)​

Oracle’s announcement lists clear, measurable outcomes:

• Recruitment system performance: >50% improvement.
• Payroll processing time: from over 70 minutes to 29 minutes (presented as a ~60% reduction).

These are meaningful if accurate. However, vendor press release metrics require context:

• What workload and dataset were used for the benchmark? Public announcements rarely reveal workload mix, concurrency, or batch size details that explain whether the improvement stems from pure compute throughput, I/O density, query optimization, or application‑level refactoring. The observed gains could be a combination of better I/O, database tuning, upgraded CPU/memory, and re‑architected job scheduling.
• Were the numbers observed in production under live load, or from a targeted migration pilot or benchmark? The press release states the results as outcomes of the migration but does not publish workload profiles or third‑party audit. Treat the numbers as vendor‑reported operational improvements unless independently verified.

Bottom line: the gains are credible given Oracle’s engineered stacks and the known impact of moving from older on‑prem hardware to modern cloud VM shapes and tuned database services—but independent validation is advisable for mission‑critical planning or procurement decisions.

---

Strategic rationale: why Wipro made this move​

Wipro’s rationale follows common enterprise drivers:

• Operational efficiency: Reducing payroll window times and speeding recruitment workflows frees operations staff from long batch windows and improves HR responsiveness.
• Security and compliance: Moving to a managed database service with built‑in encryption and lifecycle controls reduces the operational security burden for an enterprise with highly distributed operations.
• AI‑first posture: Wipro frames the move within a broader "AI‑first" strategy; consolidating data on an Oracle database platform that includes AI features (like Vector Search) can simplify the route to enterprise‑grade generative AI or people analytics projects.
• Multicloud flexibility: The use of Oracle Interconnects lets Wipro keep certain application components in Azure or Google Cloud while centralizing database functions in OCI—preserving existing investments and team skill sets where useful.

These are sensible enterprise choices: minimize change where it’s costly, centralize where scale and control matter, and use private interconnects to manage latency and security across providers.

---

Benefits for HR, IT, and business stakeholders​

• HR: Faster payroll cycles reduce close‑window risk and enable faster reconciliation and reporting. Recruitment performance gains translate to better candidate throughput and more usable recruiter tools.
• IT operations: Managed database services reduce routine DBA toil—patching, backups, and capacity planning are automated—freeing staff to focus on higher‑value initiatives.
• Finance and procurement: Predictable cloud pricing (pay‑as‑you‑go or BYOL) and a managed service model can shift costs from CAPEX to OPEX with clearer operational SLAs.
• Security & compliance: Centralized database management with encryption, auditing, and region‑aware replication supports governance needs in regulated markets.

---

Risks and caveats — what to watch for​

• Vendor and platform lock‑in: Consolidating core databases on an Oracle managed service increases dependence on Oracle’s licensing, tooling, and operational model. Enterprises must weigh the tradeoffs between performance and future negotiation leverage. The business case should include migration and exit economics.
• Cost predictability and egress: Although Oracle promotes free or optimized interconnects in certain pairings, multicloud cross‑region data flows can generate complex egress and networking cost profiles. Proper architectural cost modeling is essential.
• Claims vs. independent verification: Performance and efficiency gains are reported by the vendor and customer. Independent benchmarking or published operational baselines are rarely available in press announcements; procurement teams should insist on reproducible benchmarks or performance SLAs if those metrics materially affect the deal.
• Operational concentration risk: Moving mission‑critical systems to a single cloud provider—even one that offers multicloud interconnects—creates concentration that must be mitigated with DR plans, contractual SLAs, and multi‑region replication strategies.
• Data governance and residency: For global employers, payroll and personnel data are subject to a patchwork of national privacy laws. Ensure that replication and residency choices comply with local regulations and that interconnects do not inadvertently place data in jurisdictions that create compliance risk.

---

Procurement and architecture checklist for enterprises considering a similar move​

• Define measurable success criteria up front (e.g., payroll batch time, average candidate search latency, MTTR).
• Require reproducible benchmarks against your actual workloads, not just vendor benchmarks.
• Model total cost of ownership, including egress, licensing, and managed service fees over 3–5 years.
• Negotiate SLAs tied to the key metrics and include remedies for missed performance targets.
• Design DR and cross‑region replication strategies that meet regulatory needs and business continuity objectives.
• Validate data residency and cross‑border transfer compliance with legal and privacy teams.
• Plan a phased migration with rollback options and a runbook for both planned and unplanned events.

This list is practical and sequential: start with concrete metrics, then validate technical claims before signing long‑term contracts.

---

How this fits into broader cloud and AI trends​

Oracle has been promoting a strategy that emphasizes database proximity, engineered systems, and multicloud interconnects as competitive differentiators for mission‑critical and AI workloads. Industry analysis and internal briefs show Oracle leaning heavily into purpose‑built infrastructure for database‑centric AI, and partnering with other clouds to reduce migration friction and increase adoption options. These strategic themes are visible in multiple Oracle announcements over the past year and reflected in vendor and analyst commentary.
For service providers such as Wipro, the choice to modernize HR systems on a single vendor’s managed database while using interconnects to preserve multicloud flexibility is pragmatic: it balances operational simplicity (managed DB) with existing cloud investments (Azure, Google Cloud) and a path to embed AI capabilities adjacent to core employee data stores.

---

Independent validation and verification notes​

• The central performance and time‑to‑process claims appear in Oracle’s official press release and are attributed to Wipro. These are vendor‑reported operational metrics and should be treated as such until audited benchmarks are published or third‑party validations are available.
• Oracle Base Database Service capabilities and security features are documented in Oracle’s product pages and technical documentation. These pages describe the service model and features relevant to Wipro’s migration.
• Oracle Interconnect offerings and the claim of low‑latency private links are documented in Oracle’s public materials; they are also described in joint announcements that explain how FastConnect plus ExpressRoute/Google interconnect are combined to create private paths. Enterprises should verify actual latency and throughput in the specific regional pairings relevant to their workloads.

Where public detail is missing—especially about the precise workload profiles used to produce the performance claims—procurement teams should request reproducible tests and contractual performance commitments.

---

Readiness advice for HR and IT leaders​

• Treat vendor press release numbers as plausible but conditional. Insist on a measurable pilot run using your data and peak workload windows, with a rollback contingency and documented test methodology.
• Model the complete cost structure, including cloud egress, interconnect fees (if any), licensing, and managed service premiums. Include sensitivity scenarios for increased usage driven by future AI or analytics workloads.
• Design a governance framework for AI and people analytics that includes fairness testing, privacy safeguards, audit trails, and human oversight—especially when HR systems feed into hiring or pay decisions. Independent assessments and periodic audits mitigate legal and reputational risk.

---

Final analysis — strengths, tradeoffs, and strategic verdict​

Strengths

• The migration leverages a managed, engineered database service that can materially reduce operational overhead and improve throughput for batch and interactive HR workloads.
• Oracle’s multicloud interconnects give a practical route for organizations to maintain a heterogeneous cloud footprint while centralizing database services, which can be attractive where workloads must be split by vendor.
• For Wipro—an organization with scale and global HR complexity—the approach reduces payroll window risk and improves recruiter productivity in ways that map directly to business outcomes.

Tradeoffs and risks

• The largest tradeoff is increased dependency on Oracle’s managed database and licensing model. The more mission‑critical workloads consolidated on OCI, the higher the migration and exit costs become.
• Vendor‑reported performance claims need independent benchmarking or contractual SLAs to be relied upon in procurement decisions.
• Multicloud architectures using interconnects solve latency and security problems but add complexity in cost management and governance across clouds.

Strategic verdict

• For enterprises whose most valuable, sensitive data already lives in Oracle databases and where HR operations are high‑scale and regulated, the Wipro approach is a rational modernization pattern: move the database to a managed, optimized platform; keep application or analytics workloads where they are most effective; and use private interconnects to tie the pieces together. The result can be significant operational improvement—if the migration is executed with disciplined benchmarking, cost modeling, and governance.

---

Conclusion​

Wipro’s migration of payroll and recruitment databases to Oracle Base Database Service on OCI is a contemporary example of how enterprises are balancing performance, governance, and multicloud flexibility. The vendor‑reported improvements—faster recruitment systems and a dramatic reduction in payroll batch time—are plausible and align with the benefits of modern managed database services combined with private interconnects. Yet these gains rest on implementation specifics that the press release does not disclose; procurement teams should insist on reproducible benchmarks, SLA commitments, and thorough cost modeling before assuming identical outcomes.
For organizations wrestling with similar HR modernization needs, the Wipro case offers a template: centralize data where it must be tightly governed and performant, use multicloud interconnects to preserve application flexibility, and require measurable, auditable performance and governance outcomes as part of any migration contract. The architecture is powerful, but the business value depends on the details—measurement, verification, and contractual guardrails are what convert a vendor press release into reliable, repeatable results.

---

Source: Oracle https://www.oracle.com/in/news/anno...re-to-accelerate-hr-modernization-2025-10-07/

 

[ChatGPT]

Oracle and Wipro announced a targeted migration of Wipro’s mission‑critical HR databases to Oracle Base Database Service on Oracle Cloud Infrastructure (OCI) — a move Oracle says accelerated Wipro’s recruitment workflows by more than 50 percent and slashed payroll batch processing from “over 70 minutes” to just 29 minutes, a roughly 60 percent reduction.

Background​

Wipro is a global IT services and consulting giant with a complex, high‑scale HR footprint that supports hiring, payroll, benefits, and people analytics for more than 230,000 employees and business partners across dozens of countries. For organizations of that size, HR systems are not just administrative back‑ends — they are core operational systems whose throughput, latency, and reliability directly affect payroll windows, hiring velocity, and compliance.
Over the past several years Oracle has pushed a database‑centric modernization play for enterprises: purpose‑built database services on OCI, integrated AI features (vector search, in‑database ML), and Oracle Interconnect constructs that provide private, low‑latency links between OCI and other hyperscalers (Microsoft Azure, Google Cloud). That strategy is explicitly intended to give customers the performance of Oracle’s engineered stacks while enabling a multicloud application footprint.

What Wipro announced — the essentials​

• Wipro migrated its payroll and recruitment Oracle databases to Oracle Base Database Service on OCI to modernize database management, improve availability, and tighten security.
• Wipro used Oracle Interconnect for Google Cloud to attach its payroll system and Oracle Interconnect for Microsoft Azure for its recruitment application, creating private, low‑latency links between OCI and those clouds.
• The reported outcomes are a >50% improvement in recruitment system performance and payroll processing time reduced from over 70 minutes to 29 minutes. These figures come from the Oracle/Wipro announcement; independent benchmarking was not published with the release.

Technical overview: Oracle Base Database Service and Interconnects​

Oracle Base Database Service on OCI — what it provides​

Oracle’s Base Database Service is a managed offering that runs full Oracle Database features on OCI VM shapes, with lifecycle automation for patching, backups, scaling, and integrated security controls (Transparent Data Encryption, Data Safe tooling). For many enterprises this shifts routine DBA tasks to the cloud provider and provides engineered performance characteristics that are difficult to reproduce on legacy on‑premises kits.
Key technical characteristics often cited for Base Database Service:

• Managed lifecycle: automated patching and backups.
• Engineered I/O: optimized VM shapes, high bandwidth NVMe/flash tiers.
• Built‑in security controls and audit tooling.
• AI‑adjacent features (vector search, in‑database analytics) that can be leveraged for people analytics or talent‑matching workloads.

Oracle Interconnect for Azure and Google Cloud — how it works​

Oracle Interconnect combines OCI FastConnect with partner cloud private‑peering (Microsoft ExpressRoute, Google Cloud Interconnect) to create private, high‑bandwidth, low‑latency connections between OCI and partner clouds. Oracle claims sub‑2ms round‑trip latency for some interconnect pairings and emphasizes predictable network performance and lower egress variability versus public internet paths. These interconnects let organizations place Oracle‑managed databases in OCI while running application or analytics components in Azure or Google Cloud.
For Wipro’s use case, that meant:

• Payroll remained attached to OCI via the Google Cloud interconnect.
• Recruitment workflows ran through Azure while using OCI as the database layer via the Azure interconnect.
  This split keeps the database close to the data while preserving application flexibility in partner clouds.

---

Reading the performance claims: what’s credible, what needs verification​

Vendor press releases frequently include concrete numeric improvements; they are useful but require context. The headline Wipro numbers are plausible — moving heavy batch jobs off older on‑prem hardware or poorly tuned VM shapes to a modern managed database on tuned OCI infrastructure often yields large improvements — but the release leaves several important diagnostic questions unanswered.
What’s missing (and why it matters):

• Workload profile: Were the payroll numbers measured on a production payroll run under full concurrent load, or on a controlled pilot with reduced contention?
• Baseline hardware and configuration: What was the prior on‑prem or cloud configuration (CPU, memory, storage tier, network) that produced the “over 70 minutes” baseline?
• Optimization factors: Did the migration include application refactoring, database tuning, updated batch scheduling, or schema/index changes that materially contributed to the improvements?
• Repeatability: Are these gains reproducible on different payroll cycles, regions, or under increased concurrency?
  Without these specifics, the percentage improvements should be treated as observed outcomes for Wipro’s environment, not universal guarantees for other organizations.

Practical interpretation:

• If Wipro moved from older on‑prem disks and single‑threaded batch windows to a cloud database with NVMe, parallelized I/O, and larger CPU/memory envelopes, a 60% payroll time reduction is credible.
• The >50% recruitment performance gain could derive from faster index scans, lower network latency via interconnects, or moving heavyweight analytic queries closer to the database engine (vector search, in‑DB ML). But the precise mix of factors is not described in the release.

Business and strategic implications​

For HR operations​

• Faster payroll cycles reduce the operational risk of missing payroll windows and provide more time for reconciliation, exception handling, and audits. Shorter payroll windows can also reduce business disruption during close periods.
• Improved recruiter tooling and candidate experience: Faster search, filtering, and candidate‑matching reduces recruiter wait time, increases candidate throughput, and can improve offer responsiveness — a direct business lever in tight labor markets.
• Data proximity for AI: Consolidating HR data in an environment that supports vector search and in‑database analytics makes it easier to experiment with people analytics, attrition models, and AI‑assisted recruitment workflows without moving large volumes of sensitive data around.

For IT and cloud strategy​

• Managed database reduces DBA toil: Automated patching, backups, and lifecycle controls free DBAs to focus on data modeling, performance tuning, and business features.
• Multicloud flexibility with centralized data: Using interconnects lets teams keep application or analytics layers where skill sets or vendor relationships exist (Azure, Google Cloud) while centralizing the database on OCI.
• Vendor negotiation and procurement leverage: Consolidating core databases with Oracle strengthens operational efficiency but reduces vendor diversity, which affects exit economics and negotiating power.

---

Risks, tradeoffs, and governance considerations​

No migration is risk‑free. The Wipro case highlights practical tradeoffs enterprises must evaluate before committing mission‑critical HR systems to a managed database on OCI.

• Vendor lock‑in: Placing core records on an Oracle managed service increases dependency on Oracle’s licensing and service model. Exit costs for large, normalized HR databases can be substantial.
• Cost unpredictability across multicloud flows: Interconnects may reduce public internet variability, but egress, networking, and cross‑cloud data transfer costs can still create complex TCO profiles if not modeled accurately.
• Data residency and compliance: Payroll and personnel data are subject to strict regional laws. Architectures that replicate or transit data across jurisdictions using interconnects must be validated against country‑specific privacy regulations.
• Operational concentration risk: Moving many mission‑critical workloads to one provider increases exposure to that provider’s outages or policy changes. Contracts and DR plans must compensate for concentration.
• Unvalidated performance claims: Vendor‑reported outcomes are a useful starting point but not a substitute for workload‑specific benchmarks or contractual SLAs.

How enterprises should evaluate a similar move — a practical checklist​

• Define measurable success criteria before any migration:
• Payroll batch wall clock time (e.g., from start to completion).
• Candidate search / average query latency.
• Mean time to recover (MTTR) for HR system outages.
• Require reproducible benchmarks:
• Run identical payroll and recruitment workloads in a pilot and collect metrics under typical peak concurrency scenarios.
• Validate results on production‑sized datasets.
• Model total cost of ownership (3–5 years):
• Include licensing (BYOL vs. pay‑as‑you‑go), interconnect setup fees, data egress, and managed service premiums.
• Negotiate SLAs tied to the key metrics:
• Seek performance remedies or credits if payroll windows or availability SLAs are missed.
• Design DR and cross‑region replication:
• Ensure backup locations meet regional privacy and regulatory needs.
• Validate data residency and legal compliance:
• Confirm interconnect paths, replication targets, and physical region pairings align with local laws.
• Plan a phased migration with rollback options:
• Keep a tested rollback runbook for critical payroll cycles and dry runs for failover.

---

Cost vs. benefit: practical modeling notes​

• Migrating a payroll system typically converts CAPEX (on‑prem hardware refresh) into OPEX (managed cloud service). While this can smooth capital expenditure, cloud OPEX over multiple years may exceed the refreshed on‑prem TCO unless optimized.
• Interconnects may reduce public internet egress unpredictable costs, but internal egress, replication, and multi‑region reads still add to monthly bills. Model both normal and peak scenarios, especially when enabling AI/analytics that dramatically increase read volumes.
• For organizations running a large estate of Oracle databases, bundling more workloads into OCI can yield licensing and operational economies of scale — but it reduces diversification.

---

Independent verification: what we checked​

• Oracle’s official announcement of the Wipro migration and the performance figures appears in Oracle’s press release dated October 7, 2025. That announcement includes the >50% recruitment performance figure and the payroll reduction from “over 70 minutes” to 29 minutes.
• Industry coverage and secondary reporting—CRN India and other outlets—reprinted Oracle’s figures and added context about the interconnect usage, confirming that the claims originated in a joint Oracle/Wipro announcement rather than independent third‑party benchmarks.
• Internal analysis and forum discussion (company‑internal briefings and community threads) emphasize that these results are vendor‑reported and that procurement teams should require reproducible benchmarks and contractual SLAs before treating the numbers as guarantees for other customers.

Where claims are unverifiable

• The release does not publish workload profiles, concurrency levels, or the exact prior configuration used to generate the baseline. Those elements are crucial to replicability, so the precise magnitude of benefit for another enterprise is not independently verifiable from the materials published so far. This uncertainty should be factored into procurement and benchmarking dialogues.

---

Strategic verdict — when this pattern makes sense​

The Wipro pattern — centralize Oracle databases on a managed OCI service while keeping application or analytics layers on partner clouds connected via private interconnects — maps cleanly to a pragmatic set of enterprise needs:

• Organizations that already have large Oracle footprints and need tight operational control over data and compliance benefit from OCI’s engineered database services.
• Service providers and consultancies that must maintain pre‑existing investments in Azure or Google Cloud can use interconnects to preserve those investments while consolidating database operations on OCI.
• The architecture is especially attractive where HR or other systems feed AI/analytics workloads and where data proximity reduces movement of sensitive information.

However, it is less compelling for organizations that favor open‑source databases, multi‑cloud vendor diversity as a primary negotiating lever, or those unwilling to model licensing exit costs.

---

Recommendations for HR, IT, and procurement leaders​

• Treat vendor case studies as the beginning of due diligence, not the endpoint.
• Insist on pilot runs using your actual data and payroll cycles, authored measurement plans, and third‑party validation where performance claims materially affect the contract.
• Build contractual SLAs around measurable HR outcomes (e.g., payroll completion time, recruitment search latency percentiles) and include remedies for non‑performance.
• Model multiple cost scenarios, including accelerated AI adoption that may increase read or inference volumes against your database.
• Ensure legal and privacy teams sign off on interconnect topologies and cross‑border replication paths.

---

Conclusion​

Wipro’s migration of payroll and recruitment databases to Oracle Base Database Service on OCI — connected by Oracle Interconnect links to Google Cloud and Microsoft Azure — is a clear example of a modern enterprise choosing database proximity and managed services to accelerate HR modernization. The reported gains (over 50% in recruitment performance; payroll time cut to 29 minutes) are credible in principle and align with what enterprises often achieve when moving legacy workloads to tuned managed infrastructure.
At the same time, the announcement is a vendor‑reported case study that omits workload and baseline details necessary for independent replication. Organizations contemplating the same path should combine disciplined benchmarking, rigorous cost modeling, and contractual SLAs with governance controls for data residency and vendor concentration. When executed with those safeguards, the approach can deliver measurable HR operational improvements and position HR data for future AI initiatives — but it requires honest tradeoff analysis and carefully negotiated protections to manage long‑term risks.

---

Source: SMEStreet Wipro Selects Oracle Cloud Infrastructure to Accelerate HR Modernization