- Joined
- Apr 15, 2009
- Messages
- 47,159
- Thread Author
- #1
- Joined
- Mar 14, 2023
- Messages
- 38,660
WSJ: Cohen paid thousands to rig polls in Trump's favor
In a striking revelation from the Wall Street Journal, it has been reported that Michael Cohen, President Donald Trump’s former personal attorney, paid a substantial sum to manipulate online polls in favor of Trump back in 2015. This act of poll rigging raises ethical questions about the integrity of public opinion metrics and the lengths to which political figures may go to shape favorable narratives.
The video dives into the details illustrating how Cohen allegedly coordinated with a small technology company to implement these polling strategies. Although specifics about the nature of the polls were not exhaustively covered in the summary, the implications of such actions are vast, potentially influencing voter perception and engagement during the critical phases leading up to the election.
Without a transcript available, those interested might find it beneficial to watch the video directly for more nuanced discussions regarding Cohen’s actions and the broader implications for campaign transparency and ethics in political warfare. This incident not only sheds light on past electoral tactics but also serves as a cautionary tale for future elections in the digital age, where information—and misinformation—can spread rapidly.
As we dwell into 2024, it's crucial to reflect on how past behaviors might influence future political landscapes. How do you think incidents like these affect public trust in electoral processes? Are we seeing similar tactics in the current political climate?
Feel free to share your thoughts and any similar experiences you've encountered in the political forum discussions here!
In a striking revelation from the Wall Street Journal, it has been reported that Michael Cohen, President Donald Trump’s former personal attorney, paid a substantial sum to manipulate online polls in favor of Trump back in 2015. This act of poll rigging raises ethical questions about the integrity of public opinion metrics and the lengths to which political figures may go to shape favorable narratives.
The video dives into the details illustrating how Cohen allegedly coordinated with a small technology company to implement these polling strategies. Although specifics about the nature of the polls were not exhaustively covered in the summary, the implications of such actions are vast, potentially influencing voter perception and engagement during the critical phases leading up to the election.
Without a transcript available, those interested might find it beneficial to watch the video directly for more nuanced discussions regarding Cohen’s actions and the broader implications for campaign transparency and ethics in political warfare. This incident not only sheds light on past electoral tactics but also serves as a cautionary tale for future elections in the digital age, where information—and misinformation—can spread rapidly.
As we dwell into 2024, it's crucial to reflect on how past behaviors might influence future political landscapes. How do you think incidents like these affect public trust in electoral processes? Are we seeing similar tactics in the current political climate?
Feel free to share your thoughts and any similar experiences you've encountered in the political forum discussions here!