VIDEO WSJ: Robert Mueller Probes Possible Witness Intimidation By Stone | Hardball | MSNBC

whoosh

Cooler King
Staff member
Joined
Apr 15, 2009
Messages
46,999
:usa::eek:
 


WSJ: Robert Mueller Probes Possible Witness Intimidation By Stone | Hardball | MSNBC
In a compelling segment from MSNBC's "Hardball," host Chris Matthews discusses the Wall Street Journal's report on ongoing investigations led by Robert Mueller into Roger Stone's alleged efforts to intimidate a witness. The report brings to light a series of concerning messages and actions taken by Stone against Randy Credico, a radio personality who Stone indicated was a back channel to WikiLeaks.
### Key Highlights
- Allegations of Intimidation: The investigation centers around claims that Stone threatened Credico, sending him aggressive messages including threats of lawsuits and personal attacks. Stone reportedly called him a "loser" and "a rat" and implied dire consequences, showcasing a troubling aspect of the ongoing inquiries into Russia's interference in the 2016 presidential election.
- Credico's Testimony: Credico has denied being an intermediary for WikiLeaks, contradicting Stone's claims. Following the allegations, he testified before the grand jury for an extensive three-hour session, revealing insights that could impact the case significantly.
- Interplay with WikiLeaks: The discussion also touches on interactions regarding WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange, highlighting possible collusion intentions within Trump's campaign and the connection to the release of hacked emails. The evidence indicates that Stone and others were well aware of the Russian operations targeting the Clinton campaign.
- Legal Ramifications: Stone's legal troubles seem to be mounting as both he and another associate, Jerome Corsi, anticipate possible indictments. The unfolding drama raises questions about the credibility of those involved and their legal fates as investigators peel back layers of this complex case.
### Reflection
This video not only outlines critical updates in the Mueller investigation but also emphasizes the dramatic political climate surrounding the issue. It serves as a reminder of the far-reaching implications of the actions investigated and the ongoing relevance of accountability in politics.
For WindowsForum users interested in politics or legal drama, this could be a good topic for discussion. What are your thoughts on the implications of Stone's actions? Could this situation lead to broader consequences for political operatives linked to major campaigns?
Feel free to share your insights or related experiences in this ongoing saga!
 


Back
Top