Take a moment to imagine an industrial control room—the hum of hardware, the glow of screens, reams of data painting the story of a power plant, factory, or water treatment facility in real time. Now, imagine the unsung heroes at the center of it all: Yokogawa recorder products. For engineers, operators, and managers in critical infrastructure sectors, these recorders are the silent scribes of modern industry. But recent revelations have thrust these workhorses into the security spotlight, offering a cautionary tale on the evolving world of cyber risk.
There's an old joke in industrial automation: if data’s not recorded, did it even happen? Yokogawa’s recorders—models like the GX10, GX20, GP10, GP20, and more—have become the industry standard for capturing everything from temperature trends to voltage blips, all without a single smudge of paper. Whether you’re overseeing a food processing line, an energy grid, or advanced manufacturing, odds are good that a Yokogawa device is quietly crunching numbers somewhere on your site.
Over the years, the product line has expanded and matured: paperless recorders like the DX1000 and DX2000, rugged data acquisition units such as the MW100, and even venerable chart recorders like the μR10000, with versions deployed on nearly every continent. Their appeal is simple but critical: reliability, precision, and the ability to reconstruct a process down to the millisecond when something goes wrong—or right.
But in 2025, as digital interconnection stretches to its furthest endpoints, even the best-engineered device can become a weak spot—especially when decades-old assumptions about “air-gapped” industrial control systems no longer hold true.
Here's the nutshell: By default, authentication is disabled on a slew of Yokogawa recorder products, including recent versions of the GX Series, GM Data Acquisition System, DX Series, FX1000, μR series, MW100, and others. When these devices are plumbed into a network and given internet access—or even just LAN access—the default settings roll out the digital red carpet, allowing anyone with the right address to start manipulating the device. No passwords, no multi-factor authentication, just unfettered access to settings and operations.
Everything that matters—measured values, device configuration, threshold alarms—can be modified by an unauthenticated attacker. In a process environment, that can mean falsified records, missed alarms, or worse: intentional disruption of a critical process.
For those keeping score: the Common Vulnerability Scoring System (CVSS) rates this at 9.3 on the latest scale, just a whisker from absolute calamity. The attack is remotely executable, doesn’t require advanced skills, and can be performed by anyone with a network connection. In other words, it’s the cybersecurity equivalent of leaving your car running, keys in the ignition, right outside a “Grand Theft Auto” convention.
Software updates, if applied at all, tiptoed through labyrinthine change management processes. Convenience ruled: default settings remained untouched, and enabling security features (if they existed) was often skipped in favor of faster deployment and less operator training. After all, what could possibly go wrong on a cozy, “private” industrial LAN?
Unfortunately, “private” doesn’t mean what it used to. Business priorities changed, remote monitoring became the norm, and vendors—Yokogawa included—added web interfaces and API-based controls. Suddenly, those once-cozy LANs became wide open pastures for would-be attackers. It was only a matter of time before a researcher peered under the hood and found the kind of vulnerability that could make a grown engineer wince.
Yokogawa acted by coordinating with CISA and responding with guidance for their user community—a classic dance of vulnerability disclosure in the age of global supply chains and critical infrastructure dependency.
The attack complexity is low. Anyone who can reach the device over the network can exploit the vulnerability—no secret handshakes, no social engineering, just point, click, and “welcome to the control panel, friend.”
While there’s no evidence (yet) of in-the-wild exploitation, the flaw’s very existence will surely spark interest among more opportunistic threat actors, especially those that target lower-hanging industrial fruit.
But remediation shouldn’t stop with a single checkbox. Yokogawa, echoing best security practices, strongly urges users to build a robust security program, incorporating regular patching, anti-virus updates, backup and recovery planning, network zoning, “hardening” of device settings, and whitelisting to ensure only approved devices and users touch your critical infrastructure. Firewalls and network segmentation (zoning industrial from business networks) are no longer optional—they’re as vital as the devices themselves.
For those in need of a guiding hand, Yokogawa offers risk assessments, setup support, and ongoing guidance to keep security programs on the rails and out of tomorrow’s headlines.
The fact that these recorders are found worldwide, with headquarters operations in Japan and deployments across every continent, means any security lapse has international implications. One vulnerable device in Manitoba could be as problematic as hundreds in Mumbai or Munich.
If the pandemic era taught us anything, it’s that supply chains are interlinked, and local disruptions ripple globally. Industrial cybersecurity is no longer a “nice to have”; it’s a non-negotiable facet of business continuity, public safety, and national security.
This particular vulnerability, humble as it appears, should prompt a wider reckoning. Industrial vendors must ship devices “secure by default.” End users must embrace the (sometimes inconvenient) security settings their devices offer. Regulators and researchers, meanwhile, must keep pulling the thread, keeping the industry honest and alert.
As the lines between cyber and physical systems blur, every engineer, operator, and executive has a role to play in this new culture—a culture where security is not an afterthought but a core operational value.
If the last decade was about “digitizing” industry, the next will be about “securing” it. Let’s make sure, for once, the headlines are about prevented incidents, not preventable disasters. With a little luck (and a lot of vigilance), Yokogawa recorders can return to their preferred role: quietly chronicling the pulse of our industrial age, while keeping their secrets—and yours—safely locked away from prying eyes.
And if you do spot a stray chart recorder on your factory floor, connected to the internet and blithely open to the world? Do your colleagues a favor: dust off that admin login screen, and give your password a long-overdue update. The engineers, and the data, will thank you.
Source: CISA Yokogawa Recorder Products | CISA
Under the Hood: Yokogawa’s Recorders and Their Global Footprint
There's an old joke in industrial automation: if data’s not recorded, did it even happen? Yokogawa’s recorders—models like the GX10, GX20, GP10, GP20, and more—have become the industry standard for capturing everything from temperature trends to voltage blips, all without a single smudge of paper. Whether you’re overseeing a food processing line, an energy grid, or advanced manufacturing, odds are good that a Yokogawa device is quietly crunching numbers somewhere on your site.Over the years, the product line has expanded and matured: paperless recorders like the DX1000 and DX2000, rugged data acquisition units such as the MW100, and even venerable chart recorders like the μR10000, with versions deployed on nearly every continent. Their appeal is simple but critical: reliability, precision, and the ability to reconstruct a process down to the millisecond when something goes wrong—or right.
But in 2025, as digital interconnection stretches to its furthest endpoints, even the best-engineered device can become a weak spot—especially when decades-old assumptions about “air-gapped” industrial control systems no longer hold true.
The Vulnerability that Wasn’t Hiding
Enter CVE-2025-1863, a vulnerability that feels almost quaint in its simplicity yet packs the destructive punch of a blockbuster cyber incident. The issue? Missing authentication for critical functions—a flaw as old as the internet and as devastating as ever.Here's the nutshell: By default, authentication is disabled on a slew of Yokogawa recorder products, including recent versions of the GX Series, GM Data Acquisition System, DX Series, FX1000, μR series, MW100, and others. When these devices are plumbed into a network and given internet access—or even just LAN access—the default settings roll out the digital red carpet, allowing anyone with the right address to start manipulating the device. No passwords, no multi-factor authentication, just unfettered access to settings and operations.
Everything that matters—measured values, device configuration, threshold alarms—can be modified by an unauthenticated attacker. In a process environment, that can mean falsified records, missed alarms, or worse: intentional disruption of a critical process.
For those keeping score: the Common Vulnerability Scoring System (CVSS) rates this at 9.3 on the latest scale, just a whisker from absolute calamity. The attack is remotely executable, doesn’t require advanced skills, and can be performed by anyone with a network connection. In other words, it’s the cybersecurity equivalent of leaving your car running, keys in the ignition, right outside a “Grand Theft Auto” convention.
How Did We Get Here? A Brief Security Autopsy
It's easy to wag fingers in retrospect—shouldn’t someone, somewhere, have noticed that authentication was disabled by default on mission-critical devices? Alas, the industrial sector’s security journey has always lagged behind the IT world’s by a decade, if not two. For years, air gapping—physically isolating industrial controls from the internet—was the de facto security model. Networked recorders were simply seen as local equipment, not endpoints in a sprawling attack surface.Software updates, if applied at all, tiptoed through labyrinthine change management processes. Convenience ruled: default settings remained untouched, and enabling security features (if they existed) was often skipped in favor of faster deployment and less operator training. After all, what could possibly go wrong on a cozy, “private” industrial LAN?
Unfortunately, “private” doesn’t mean what it used to. Business priorities changed, remote monitoring became the norm, and vendors—Yokogawa included—added web interfaces and API-based controls. Suddenly, those once-cozy LANs became wide open pastures for would-be attackers. It was only a matter of time before a researcher peered under the hood and found the kind of vulnerability that could make a grown engineer wince.
A Researcher Rings the Alarm: The Role of Responsible Disclosure
Credit where it’s due: the world was clued in to this ticking clock by Souvik Kandar of MicroSec, who responsibly reported the issue to the U.S. Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA). In a field sometimes bereft of dramatic reveals, Kandar’s finding is refreshingly straightforward—and universally applicable. The lesson is clear: any system, regardless of its physical location, can be vulnerable if networked defaults are set with convenience, not security, in mind.Yokogawa acted by coordinating with CISA and responding with guidance for their user community—a classic dance of vulnerability disclosure in the age of global supply chains and critical infrastructure dependency.
Risk Realities: What Could Go Wrong?
What’s the practical upshot of CVE-2025-1863? The scenarios are nearly endless—and none of them pretty. In an energy facility, an attacker could modify the data used by operators to make critical load decisions, potentially leading to an unscheduled blackout or even equipment damage. In food and beverage processing, falsified records could hide safety violations. And anywhere that data integrity underpins regulatory compliance, manipulated readings could land a plant manager in hot water with authorities, fast.The attack complexity is low. Anyone who can reach the device over the network can exploit the vulnerability—no secret handshakes, no social engineering, just point, click, and “welcome to the control panel, friend.”
While there’s no evidence (yet) of in-the-wild exploitation, the flaw’s very existence will surely spark interest among more opportunistic threat actors, especially those that target lower-hanging industrial fruit.
Affected Products: Name, Version, and Serial Offenders
Let’s bring the technical details into relief. The following Yokogawa recorders are affected:- GX10 / GX20 / GP10 / GP20 Paperless Recorders: Versions R5.04.01 and earlier
- GM Data Acquisition System: Versions R5.05.01 and earlier
- DX1000 / DX2000 / DX1000N Paperless Recorders: Versions R4.21 and earlier
- FX1000 Paperless Recorders: Versions R1.31 and earlier
- μR10000 / μR20000 Chart Recorders: Versions R1.51 and earlier
- MW100 Data Acquisition Units: All versions
- DX1000T / DX2000T Paperless Recorders: All versions
- CX1000 / CX2000 Paperless Recorders: All versions
Charting a Path to Safety: Mitigations and Vendor Response
Let’s not mince words: the fix for this issue is, in essence, flipping a switch that should have been on from the jump. Yokogawa recommends users enable the authentication function (the “login” feature). Once that’s done, change the password to something unique, memorable only to you, and certainly not “admin123” or “password.” While you're at it, take a hard look at who needs network access to the device—and who doesn't.But remediation shouldn’t stop with a single checkbox. Yokogawa, echoing best security practices, strongly urges users to build a robust security program, incorporating regular patching, anti-virus updates, backup and recovery planning, network zoning, “hardening” of device settings, and whitelisting to ensure only approved devices and users touch your critical infrastructure. Firewalls and network segmentation (zoning industrial from business networks) are no longer optional—they’re as vital as the devices themselves.
For those in need of a guiding hand, Yokogawa offers risk assessments, setup support, and ongoing guidance to keep security programs on the rails and out of tomorrow’s headlines.
If You Only Do Three Things…
In the best tradition of IT journalism, here are three things users of Yokogawa recorder products should do, stat:- Enable Authentication And Change Default Passwords: Do not pass “Go,” do not collect your annual bonus until this is done. The majority of industrial attacks succeed because basics go unchecked.
- Isolate The Network: Keep Yokogawa devices—and other control systems—off the public internet. Use firewalls and network segmentation to cordon them off from your main business network. If remote access is a must, employ updated Virtual Private Networks (VPNs), but remember that a VPN is only as strong as its weakest endpoint.
- Establish A Security Program: Now is the time to move past ad hoc fixes and create a repeatable, continuously improving security procedure. From patch management schedules to diversity training (because not all attacks come through software), a mature program is your best insurance policy.
The Wider Context: Critical Infrastructure and the Global Stakes
This is not merely an abstract, “IT-only” issue. Yokogawa’s products are woven into the fabric of global infrastructure—energy, manufacturing, food and agriculture, you name it. And while the issue may seem technical, the consequences play out in the real world: interrupted power supplies, unsafe food production, or regulatory noncompliance on a grand scale.The fact that these recorders are found worldwide, with headquarters operations in Japan and deployments across every continent, means any security lapse has international implications. One vulnerable device in Manitoba could be as problematic as hundreds in Mumbai or Munich.
If the pandemic era taught us anything, it’s that supply chains are interlinked, and local disruptions ripple globally. Industrial cybersecurity is no longer a “nice to have”; it’s a non-negotiable facet of business continuity, public safety, and national security.
Toward a Culture of Security in Industrial Automation
So what’s next? Some would say the gradual eradication of “set it and forget it” attitudes that have lingered since the early 2000s. The growing interconnectedness of operational technology (OT) and information technology (IT) ecosystems means that “security by obscurity” is a dead end. Every device, from the lowliest temperature sensor to the flashiest SCADA workstation, must be scrutinized as a potential risk.This particular vulnerability, humble as it appears, should prompt a wider reckoning. Industrial vendors must ship devices “secure by default.” End users must embrace the (sometimes inconvenient) security settings their devices offer. Regulators and researchers, meanwhile, must keep pulling the thread, keeping the industry honest and alert.
As the lines between cyber and physical systems blur, every engineer, operator, and executive has a role to play in this new culture—a culture where security is not an afterthought but a core operational value.
Reading the Fine Print—and Making It Stick
All of this may sound like a fire drill, but in reality, it’s more like updating the fire code after identifying a previously unknown hazard. The Yokogawa flaw is a wake-up call that prompts questions across industrial facilities:- Are we treating our operational tech like an extension of the IT network?
- Who, if anyone, is regularly reviewing device configurations for security gaps?
- Is security part of onboarding, maintenance, and review cycles—or just an annual compliance headache?
- Do we have a clear path to update, patch, and remediate vulnerabilities, ideally without shutting down critical processes?
No Exploits… Yet
Let’s end with a bit of good news. As of now, there has been no public exploitation of this vulnerability. No shadowy groups have leveraged it to shut down pipelines or spike thermometers. But that is, by every account, just the luck of the draw—security by mercy, not by design. In the connected era, it’s only a matter of time before even obscure vulnerabilities make their way into the dark web’s digital bazaars.Final Thoughts: Upgrade, Update, and Uplift—Or Else
Yokogawa’s vulnerability should be sobering, not paralyzing. The incident offers clarity in a confusing landscape: even the best hardware can become a liability if left on default settings, and even critical infrastructure isn’t immune to the oversight of convenience trumping security. But with clear steps—enable authentication, patch proactively, embrace real network segmentation—operators and engineers can keep their sites safe, their data true, and their productivity on track.If the last decade was about “digitizing” industry, the next will be about “securing” it. Let’s make sure, for once, the headlines are about prevented incidents, not preventable disasters. With a little luck (and a lot of vigilance), Yokogawa recorders can return to their preferred role: quietly chronicling the pulse of our industrial age, while keeping their secrets—and yours—safely locked away from prying eyes.
And if you do spot a stray chart recorder on your factory floor, connected to the internet and blithely open to the world? Do your colleagues a favor: dust off that admin login screen, and give your password a long-overdue update. The engineers, and the data, will thank you.
Source: CISA Yokogawa Recorder Products | CISA
Last edited:
