A Radeon RX 9070 XT and GeForce RTX 5060 Ti are compared in a gaming performance chart beside 4K and 1440p displays.
TechSpot's September 24, 2026 comparison found that the GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 16GB now costs about the same as AMD's Radeon RX 9070 XT at retail. On a Windows 11 25H2 test system, the Radeon card averaged 62% more frames per second at 1440p and 71% more at 4K across 52 games. That makes the RX 9070 XT the clear value choice for gaming at the prices TechSpot recorded. At launch, these two cards were not competitors: AMD positioned the 9070 XT as an enthusiast card, while Nvidia sold the 5060 Ti as a mainstream 1440p card. The memory shortage and the resulting price hikes have pushed them into the same price bracket, so a buyer choosing by brand can now pay the same money for a much slower gaming card.

RX 9070 XT vs RTX 5060 Ti 16GB: How a Tier Mismatch Became a Price Match​

The launch prices show how far apart these cards started. AMD's February 28, 2025 announcement listed the RX 9070 XT with 64 compute units, 16GB of GDDR6 on a 256-bit interface, 304W typical board power and a $599 suggested price, with retail availability from March 6, 2025. Nvidia priced the 16GB RTX 5060 Ti at $429, with cards available from April 16 through most board partners, and aimed the card at 1440p gaming. At launch, the Nvidia card cost $170 less and belonged to a lower tier.

By September 2026 that gap had closed. In Australia, TechSpot found RTX 5060 Ti 16GB cards starting around A$1,050 and mostly out of stock. PC Case Gear had one model available, a PNY card at A$1,049. At Mwave, the A$769 and A$1,000 listings were out of stock, another PNY card was available at A$1,049, and an Asus Dual was listed at A$1,129. RX 9070 XT cards started at A$1,149, and many sat around A$1,249. At Newegg in the US, TechSpot found the 5060 Ti 16GB starting around US$780 and the 9070 XT around US$740, so the Radeon was actually the cheaper card.

Other reporting backs up the US figure. In August, Wccftech reported that the RTX 5060 Ti 16GB had passed $800 on Newegg and was the most affected GPU, with nearly a 39% increase in the median price in just two months. Tech Insider cites ThePCEnthusiast tracking data showing the card more than doubled over the same stretch, from $400 to $805, a 101% increase. The pressure is not limited to Australia. Notebookcheck, citing 3DCenter, reported that the price of the RTX 5060 Ti 16 GB has reportedly exploded over the past months to €573 in Germany.

TechSpot estimates the 9070 XT is now at least 23% above its launch price, while the 5060 Ti 16GB is a little over 80% above. Both cards have gone up, but the Nvidia card has gone up by much more.

Inside TechSpot's 52-Game Benchmark on Windows 11 25H2​

TechSpot's test bench used an AMD Ryzen 7 9800X3D, an MSI MPG X870E Carbon WiFi motherboard on BIOS 7E49v1A4 with Resizable BAR enabled, and G.Skill Trident Z5 RGB DDR5-6000 CL30 memory. The rest of the system was a 4TB TeamGroup T-Force Cardea A440 PCIe 4.0 NVMe SSD and a Kolink Regulator Gold ATX 3.0 1200W power supply, running Windows 11 25H2. The drivers were AMD Radeon Adrenalin 26.8.1 and GeForce Game Ready 610.88. The Radeon card was a Sapphire RX 9070 XT Pure.

There is one error in TechSpot's published specs. The graphics-card line lists an "Asus Prime GeForce RTX 5070 Ti 16GB", but every chart and paragraph in the review reports RTX 5060 Ti results. It is almost certainly a copy-paste error, and the reported frame rates match a 5060 Ti, not a 5070 Ti. TechSpot has not corrected the table, though, so the exact Nvidia board used is not confirmed.

Across the 52-game average at mixed settings, the 9070 XT scored 123 fps against 76 fps at 1440p. Its 1% lows reached 97 fps, higher than the GeForce card's average. (The 1% low is the frame rate of the slowest 1% of frames, a common measure of stutter.) At 4K the averages were 72 fps and 42 fps, and the 5060 Ti's 1% lows fell to 33 fps. In practice, the Radeon handles 4K at native resolution in many games, while the 5060 Ti mostly belongs at 1440p.

The biggest gaps came in demanding modern titles:

Game and settingResolutionRX 9070 XTRTX 5060 Ti 16GBRadeon lead
007 First Light, Medium1440p121 fps67 fps81%
007 First Light, Medium4K70 fps34 fps106%
Cyberpunk 2077: Phantom Liberty, Ultra1440p131 fps69 fps90%
Cyberpunk 2077: Phantom Liberty, Ultra4K63 fps31 fps103%
Forza Horizon 6, Extreme1440p140 fps85 fps65%
Forza Horizon 6, ray tracing1440p75 fps42 fps79%
Spider-Man 2, Very High4K80 fps47 fps70%
Crimson Desert, Cinematic4K53 fps32 fps66%

The 5060 Ti had its worst showing in Ark: Survival Ascended. At the Epic preset in 4K it averaged 12 fps, with 1% lows in single digits, and TechSpot concluded that even DLSS Ultra Performance would not make most of those results playable. Some results were bad on both cards. Cyberpunk 2077 with Ray Tracing Ultra at native 4K ran at 26 fps on the Radeon and 14 fps on the GeForce. An 86% lead means little when neither card is smooth, and games like that need upscaling on either brand.

Ray tracing has long been a reason to pick Nvidia, but it does not rescue the 5060 Ti here. In Spider-Man 2 at Ray Tracing Ultimate, the 9070 XT held a 60% lead at 1440p (67 fps vs 42). In Pragmata with full ray tracing, it scored 135 fps against 83 at 1440p. In Cyberpunk 2077, a game usually associated with Nvidia, the Radeon was 96% faster at 1440p with Ray Tracing Ultra.

Fortnite and Arc Raiders Are Where the RTX 5060 Ti Comes Closest​

The Radeon won every result TechSpot published, but the size of the lead varied, and the closest results matter to competitive players. In Fortnite Performance Mode, the lightweight preset many competitive players use, the 9070 XT led by only 14% at 1440p and 30% at 4K. Once TechSpot switched to Epic Quality with ray tracing, the gap went back to 54% at 1440p (120 fps vs 78) and 50% at 4K.

Arc Raiders was the closest game in the suite. With Epic Quality and RT Static, the Radeon led by 30% at 1440p and 38% at 4K. With RT Epic, the margin shrank to 24% at 1440p, the narrowest in the test, and 30% at 4K, where the cards scored 133 fps and 102 fps. Both cards run this game at high frame rates.

In short, the 52-game average is not what every player will see. If you mostly play one esports title at low settings, the gap will be closer to 14% to 30% than 62%. That is still a real difference at the same price, and the card will have to handle heavier games later.

RX 9070 XT Wins on Cost Per Frame in Australia and the US​

TechSpot's cost-per-frame figures divide each card's price by its average frame rate. At its Australian prices, the 5060 Ti 16GB was A$100 cheaper but cost 48% more per frame at 1440p and 57% more at 4K. At Newegg prices it was worse: 71% more per frame at 1440p and 81% more at 4K.

These figures are tied to one day's listings and TechSpot's choice of games, and they will move as prices change. TechSpot expects Australian prices to rise toward the US level, saying retailers appear reluctant to restock the 5060 Ti at current wholesale costs. That is TechSpot's forecast, not a recorded price change. Still, the performance gap is large enough that the ranking would survive most normal price swings. Last-generation stock prices, where the out-of-stock A$769 Mwave listing sat, would have to come back for the 5060 Ti to compete on gaming value.


GDDR7, Nvidia's Board-Partner Price Increase and CUDA Explain the GeForce Premium​

Three factors explain why the smaller card has risen further. The first is memory. Both cards have 16GB, but the 5060 Ti uses GDDR7 and the 9070 XT uses GDDR6. TechPowerUp reported that the RTX 5060 Ti uses a 128-bit memory interface paired with GDDR7 chips running at an effective 28 Gbps, compared with the 256-bit bus on AMD's card. TechSpot notes the 9070 XT has more raw memory bandwidth despite its older memory type. GDDR7 supply has been under pressure since last winter. In December 2025, OC3D reported rumours that Nvidia might pause 5060 Ti 16GB production because the card uses twice as many memory chips to produce as the 8GB version. In January, Notebookcheck, citing Board Channels, reported that Nvidia had already reduced shipments of the RTX 5060 Ti 16GB and RTX 5070 Ti 16GB models.

The second factor is pricing from the chip suppliers. TechSpot says Nvidia recently told board partners it was raising prices for its GPU-and-memory bundles, and card prices rose soon after. Wccftech reported the same sequence, adding that GIGABYTE, ASUS, and other major vendors quickly raised the prices for the RTX 50 series and RX 9000 series cards. Some even cancelled existing orders to sell the GPUs at newer prices. Nvidia has not published how large its increase was. TechSpot says it has off-the-record information suggesting Nvidia added a margin on top, which would help explain the 80%-plus premium, but that part is unconfirmed. AMD is raising prices too. According to Tech Insider, AMD told partners on July 31, 2026 that Radeon GPU and GDDR6 kit prices would rise by at least 10% starting in August. That may explain why the 9070 XT is also well above its launch price.

The third factor is local AI demand. TechSpot argues that people building PCs to run AI models locally are buying up RTX 5060 Ti 16GB cards because of Nvidia's CUDA software. New models, interfaces, fine-tuning tools and GitHub projects are usually developed and tested on Nvidia hardware first. That lets Nvidia charge gaming buyers a premium the card's gaming performance does not justify. TechSpot says the 9070 XT can work for AI users willing to use AMD's software, particularly on Linux, but describes the 5060 Ti as the safer choice for most local AI work, especially image generation. TechSpot's 52 games do not test any AI workload, so this part is the writer's analysis, not a benchmark result.

What This Means for GPU Buyers This Month​

If you are buying a card mainly for gaming at around US$750–$800 or A$1,100–$1,250, TechSpot's results point to the RX 9070 XT. If you rely on CUDA-based software, whether for local AI, image generation or other Nvidia-first tools, that software compatibility may justify the 5060 Ti's price premium, and gaming benchmarks will not settle the question for you. For everyone else, the choice depends on prices on the day you buy.

Before you buy, check that your PC can handle the Radeon. AMD lists 304W typical board power for the reference 9070 XT, and partner cards differ in power draw, length and power connectors. Check the power supply recommendation for the exact model you are buying.

  • In TechSpot's 52-game test on Windows 11 25H2, the RX 9070 XT averaged 123 fps against 76 fps at 1440p and 72 fps against 42 fps at 4K.
  • At TechSpot's recorded prices, the RTX 5060 Ti 16GB cost 48% to 57% more per frame in Australia and 71% to 81% more at Newegg.
  • The smallest gaps were in Fortnite Performance Mode (14% at 1440p) and Arc Raiders RT Epic (24% at 1440p), so competitive players will see a smaller advantage.
  • The Nvidia card's premium comes from GDDR7 supply problems, Nvidia's higher bundle prices to board partners and demand from AI users, not from its gaming performance.
  • TechSpot's spec table wrongly lists an RTX 5070 Ti, but its results and text consistently describe the RTX 5060 Ti.
  • Compare the per-frame price at your own retailer on the day you buy, because these prices have moved by tens of percent within two months.

A year ago, nobody would have compared an RTX 5060 Ti with an RX 9070 XT, because they sat in different price tiers. Memory costs, Nvidia's partner pricing and AI buyers have pushed the smaller card into the larger card's price range without making it any faster. Until GDDR7 supply improves or Nvidia cuts what it charges board partners, the RX 9070 XT gives gamers much more performance for the same money, and TechSpot expects Australian 5060 Ti prices to rise further in the coming weeks.