azure linux

Microsoft’s short public attestation that “Azure Linux includes this open‑source library and is therefore potentially affected” is accurate — but it is an inventory statement for one product, not a blanket claim that no other Microsoft product could contain the same vulnerable Linux kernel code...

The short answer is: No — Azure Linux is the Microsoft product that Microsoft has publicly attested as shipping the JFFS2 component and therefore is a confirmed “potentially affected” product for CVE‑2025‑38194, but that wording is a scoped attestation, not a universal guarantee that no other...

Microsoft’s short advisory line — “Azure Linux includes this open‑source library and is therefore potentially affected by this vulnerability” — is accurate for the product Microsoft has inventory‑checked, but it is a product‑scoped attestation, not proof that no other Microsoft product or...

Microsoft’s short public line — “Azure Linux includes this open‑source library and is therefore potentially affected by this vulnerability” — is accurate as a product‑level inventory attestation, but it is not a technical guarantee that no other Microsoft product could contain the vulnerable ATM...

The short, operational answer is: No — Azure Linux is the only Microsoft product Microsoft has publicly attested so far to include the upstream ATM/atmtcp code tied to CVE‑2025‑38185, but that attestation is product‑scoped and is not a technical guarantee that no other Microsoft artifact could...

Microsoft’s short answer — Azure Linux is the only Microsoft product that Microsoft has publicly attested to include the vulnerable ublk component for CVE‑2025‑38182 so far — is accurate as an attestation, but it is emphatically not a technical guarantee that no other Microsoft artifact could...

CVE-2025-38181 is a kernel-level null-pointer dereference in the CALIPSO option handling that was fixed upstream by defensive checks in calipso_req_setattr() and calipso_req_delattr(); Microsoft’s Security Response Center (MSRC) has publicly attested that Azure Linux includes the implicated...

Microsoft’s short public line — that “Azure Linux includes this open‑source library and is therefore potentially affected” — is correct for the product the company inspected, but it is not a technical guarantee that no other Microsoft product can include the same vulnerable kernel code. Treat...

The Linux kernel fix tracked as CVE-2025-38170 addresses a subtle ARM64 context-switch bug in the FPSIMD/SME handling: under certain preemption and trap conditions the kernel could reuse stale floating-point/vector state, triggering unexpected SME traps and kernel warnings. Microsoft’s Security...

The Linux kernel bug tracked as CVE-2025-38165 — described upstream as “bpf, sockmap: Fix panic when calling skb_linearize” — is a classic example of why vendor attestations matter, and why those attestations are not the same thing as exhaustive, global inventory. Microsoft’s public wording on...

The Linux kernel bug tracked as CVE-2025-38147 — described upstream as “calipso: Don't call calipso functions for AF_INET sk” — is a relatively compact but meaningful vulnerability whose real-world implications hinge less on dramatic remote code execution and more on software supply-chain and...

The Linux kernel fix tracked as CVE‑2025‑38143 — described as a NULL pointer dereference in the backlight driver (pm8941) where wled_configure() failed to check devm_kasprintf() — is real, patched upstream, and has been mapped by multiple vendors; Microsoft’s Security Response Center (MSRC)...

The Linux kernel CVE tracked as CVE‑2025‑38138 is a small but meaningful robustness fix in TI’s UDMA DMA engine driver: the probe routine failed to check the return value of devm_kasprintf(), which can return NULL on allocation failure. Upstream maintainers fixed the bug by inserting a simple...

Microsoft’s short MSRC note that “Azure Linux includes this open‑source library and is therefore potentially affected” is factually correct for the Azure Linux images Microsoft has inspected — but it’s an inventory attestation, not a guarantee that no other Microsoft product or image could...

The short answer: no — Azure Linux is not necessarily the only Microsoft product that could contain the vulnerable Renesas USBHS code, but it is the only Microsoft product Microsoft has publicly attested (so far) to include the specific upstream component that maps to CVE‑2025‑38136. Treat...

No — Azure Linux is the only Microsoft product Microsoft has publicly attested to include the specific open‑source component tied to CVE‑2025‑38122, but that attestation is product‑scoped and does not prove that other Microsoft artifacts cannot also include the same vulnerable upstream Linux...

The short answer is: Microsoft has publicly confirmed Azure Linux as a carrier of the upstream code path implicated by CVE‑2025‑38115, but that attestation is product‑scoped — it is not a technical guarantee that no other Microsoft product could include the same vulnerable kernel code. Treat...

Microsoft’s advisory on CVE-2025-38112 confirms a race condition in the Linux kernel networking code — a time-of-check to time-of-use (TOCTOU) flaw in sk_is_readable() that can result in a null-pointer dereference — and while Microsoft has publicly attested this vulnerability for its Azure Linux...

The Linux kernel patch that fixed CVE-2025-38109 addresses a use‑after‑free during shutdown in the mlx5 driver’s ECVF (embedded chip virtual function) vport teardown — and Microsoft’s public advisory and machine‑readable VEX/CSAF attestation currently name Azure Linux as the Microsoft product...

CVE-2025-38107 fixes a race in the Linux kernel’s ETS qdisc, and Microsoft’s public advisory names Azure Linux as a product that “includes this open‑source library and is therefore potentially affected” — but that wording is an inventory attestation for Azure Linux, not proof that no other...