azure linux

The short, practical answer is: Microsoft has publicly attested that Azure Linux includes the upstream NTFS3 code referenced by CVE‑2025‑38167 and is therefore potentially affected, but that attestation is product‑scoped — it is not a technical proof that Azure Linux is the only Microsoft...

The Linux kernel fix labeled CVE-2025-38160 patches a simple but meaningful null-pointer check omission in the Raspberry Pi clock driver: a call to devm_kasprintf() in raspberrypi_clk_register() could return NULL on allocation failure and the caller did not guard against that, allowing a kernel...

Microsoft’s short answer — that “Azure Linux includes this open‑source library and is therefore potentially affected” — is correct as a product‑level attestation, but it is not a technical guarantee that Azure Linux is the only Microsoft product that could contain the vulnerable mt76/mt7915...

A bug in the Linux kernel’s hardware-monitoring driver for ASUS embedded‑controller sensors — tracked as CVE‑2025‑38142 — was fixed upstream this summer, and Microsoft’s advisory for the issue explicitly attests that Azure Linux is a product that includes the affected open‑source component...

The short answer is: No — Azure Linux is not necessarily the only Microsoft product that could include the vulnerable ath9k_htc code, but it is the only Microsoft product Microsoft has publicly attested so far as “including this open‑source library and therefore potentially affected.” That...

The Linux kernel fix tracked as CVE-2025-38127 — described upstream as “ice: fix Tx scheduler error handling in XDP callback” — landed in July 2025 to close a correctness and stability hole in Intel’s ICE Ethernet driver. Microsoft’s Security Response Center (MSRC) entry for the issue contains...

The Microsoft Security Response Center’s short FAQ line — “Azure Linux includes this open‑source library and is therefore potentially affected” — is accurate for the Azure Linux family, but it is not a categorical guarantee that no other Microsoft product can contain the same vulnerable Linux...

Microsoft’s short MSRC line — that “Azure Linux includes this open‑source library and is therefore potentially affected by this vulnerability” — is accurate as an inventory attestation, but it is not a technical guarantee that no other Microsoft product could contain the same vulnerable code...

The Linux kernel patch that closed a net/mdiobus flaw assigned CVE-2025-38110 has drawn renewed attention to how large vendors — Microsoft included — publish product-level attestations for open-source components and what those attestations actually mean for operators running other...

The Linux kernel patch that closed CVE-2025-38108 — a race in net_sched’s RED implementation (__red_change) — is a reminder that a named distributor’s attestation about a component is a valuable, product-scoped signal, not a universal proof that the component cannot appear elsewhere inside the...

The short, operational answer is: No — Azure Linux is not the only Microsoft product that could include the vulnerable Linux kernel code behind CVE-2025-38100, but it is the only Microsoft product Microsoft has publicly attested so far to include the upstream component and therefore to be...

The short answer is: No — Azure Linux is the only Microsoft product Microsoft has publicly attested, so far, to include the upstream VMCI code linked to CVE‑2025‑38102, but that attestation is product‑scoped and not an exclusivity guarantee. Microsoft’s MSRC inventory statement is authoritative...

The short answer is: Microsoft has publicly attested that the Azure Linux distribution includes the vulnerable GnuTLS component for CVE‑2025‑32989, but that attestation is product‑scoped — it is not proof that no other Microsoft product or image can include the same upstream library. In...

Microsoft’s short public line — that “Azure Linux includes this open‑source library and is therefore potentially affected” — is accurate as a product-level attestation, but it is not an exclusivity guarantee that no other Microsoft product or image could contain the same vulnerable component...

Microsoft’s terse MSRC note — “Azure Linux includes this open‑source library and is therefore potentially affected” — is accurate as far as it goes, but it should not be read as a categorical statement that only Azure Linux can possibly carry the vulnerable MySQL component tracked as...

CVE-2024-25178 is a real-world reminder that even tiny pieces of high‑performance open‑source software can become a critical link in the supply‑chain security story — Microsoft has publicly attested that Azure Linux includes the vulnerable LuaJIT component, but that attestation is a...

A heap-buffer-overflow in giflib’s gif2rgb utility (DumpScreen2RGB in gif2rgb.c) was assigned CVE‑2022‑28506: the bug was reported in giflib 5.2.1 and fixed upstream in later maintenance releases, and Microsoft’s MSRC advisory has mapped the issue to Azure Linux — but that mapping is a...

Microsoft’s short answer on its CVE page — that “Azure Linux includes this open‑source library and is therefore potentially affected” — is technically correct for the product Microsoft has inspected, but it is not an exclusivity guarantee and should not be read as proof that other...

Microsoft’s short MSRC phrasing that “Azure Linux includes this open‑source library and is therefore potentially affected” is an authoritative, product‑scoped inventory statement — but it is not a certificate of exclusivity: Azure Linux is the only Microsoft product Microsoft has publicly...

Microsoft’s concise MSRC line — “Azure Linux includes this open‑source library and is therefore potentially affected” — is accurate for Azure Linux, but it is a product‑scoped attestation, not proof that no other Microsoft product can contain the same vulnerable code. Background / Overview...