You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly. You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
msrc attestation
About this tag
MSRC attestation refers to Microsoft Security Response Center's product-scoped statements that confirm whether a specific Microsoft product, such as Azure Linux, includes an open-source component affected by a given CVE. These attestations are inventory-based and authoritative for the named product, but they do not guarantee that other Microsoft artifacts are unaffected. Discussions on WindowsForum.com emphasize that MSRC attestations should not be interpreted as exclusivity guarantees; users must verify other Microsoft-distributed Linux kernels or images independently. Common themes include Azure Linux vulnerability disclosures, CVE tracking, and the importance of treating unlisted products as unverified until explicit attestation is provided.
A small, surgical change in the Linux kernel Wi‑Fi stack — replacing skb_put with skb_put_zero in the MediaTek mt76 driver — has been tracked as CVE‑2024‑42225 and fixed upstream. Microsoft’s Security Response Center (MSRC) has published a short, product‑scoped attestation stating that Azure...
Microsoft’s short MSRC advisory that “Azure Linux includes this open‑source library and is therefore potentially affected” is accurate — but it is an inventory attestation, not a technical guarantee that no other Microsoft product could contain the same vulnerable Linux kernel code. erview...
Microsoft’s short, machine‑readable attestation that “Azure Linux includes this open‑source library and is therefore potentially affected” is accurate for Azure Linux builds — but it is a product‑scoped statement, not proof that no other Microsoft artifact includes the same vulnerable upstream...
Microsoft’s short MSRC line that “Azure Linux includes this open‑source library and is therefore potentially affected” is correct — but it is a product‑scoped attestation, not a universal guarantee that no other Microsoft product can contain the same vulnerable btrfs code. Treat Azure Linux as a...
The Microsoft Security Response Center’s short FAQ line — “Azure Linux includes this open‑source library and is therefore potentially affected” — is accurate for the Azure Linux family, but it is not a categorical guarantee that no other Microsoft product can contain the same vulnerable Linux...
Microsoft’s short MSRC line — that “Azure Linux includes this open‑source library and is therefore potentially affected by this vulnerability” — is accurate as an inventory attestation, but it is not a technical guarantee that no other Microsoft product could contain the same vulnerable code...
Microsoft’s short public line — that “Azure Linux includes this open‑source library and is therefore potentially affected” — is accurate as a product-level attestation, but it is not an exclusivity guarantee that no other Microsoft product or image could contain the same vulnerable component...
Microsoft’s short answer on its CVE page — that “Azure Linux includes this open‑source library and is therefore potentially affected” — is technically correct for the product Microsoft has inspected, but it is not an exclusivity guarantee and should not be read as proof that other...
Microsoft’s brief MSRC advisory that “Azure Linux includes this open‑source library and is therefore potentially affected” is a precise, product‑scoped attestation — and it should be read as an authoritative signal for Azure Linux customers, not as proof that no other Microsoft product can...
Microsoft’s brief advisory that “Azure Linux includes this open‑source library and is therefore potentially affected” is accurate — but it is a product‑scoped inventory statement, not a technical guarantee that no other Microsoft product can contain the same vulnerable code. In short: Azure...
Microsoft’s concise MSRC line — “Azure Linux includes this open‑source library and is therefore potentially affected” — is accurate for the product Microsoft has inspected, but it should not be read as a categorical statement that only Azure Linux could include the vulnerable ksmbd code. The...
The gRPC ecosystem’s CVE-2023-32732 — a remote Denial‑of‑Service (DoS) triggered by malformed base64 in -bin suffixed HTTP/2 headers — is real, patched upstream, and important to cloud operators; Microsoft’s short MSRC note that “Azure Linux includes this open‑source library and is therefore...
Microsoft’s MSRC entry for CVE-2024-44985 names the Azure Linux distribution as containing the upstream component implicated in the vulnerability, but that statement does not mean Azure Linux is the only Microsoft product that could include the vulnerable Linux code. In plain terms: Azure Linux...
Microsoft’s public advisory for CVE-2024-28849 names the Node.js package follow-redirects and confirms that Microsoft’s Azure Linux distribution includes the vulnerable component — but that attestation is a scoped inventory statement, not an assurance that no other Microsoft product could also...
Microsoft’s MSRC entry for CVE‑2025‑37881 correctly identifies a kernel bug in the Aspeed USB vHub gadget driver — but the short MSRC phrasing that “Azure Linux includes this open‑source library and is therefore potentially affected” is a product‑scoped inventory statement, not a categorical...
CVE-2025-37867 is a modest but instructive Linux-kernel fix in the RDMA stack: upstream maintainers silenced an oversized kvmalloc() warning in RDMA/core by adding a no-warn allocation flag, and Microsoft’s initial public mapping names Azure Linux as a product that “includes this open‑source...
The short answer is: no — Microsoft’s MSRC attestation naming Azure Linux as “potentially affected” does not prove that Azure Linux is the only Microsoft product that could carry the vulnerable open‑source code. Microsoft’s advisory is an authoritative inventory statement for Azure Linux itself...
The short answer is: Microsoft has publicly attested that Azure Linux (the distro formerly known as CBL‑Mariner) includes the upstream component implicated by CVE‑2024‑26909 and is therefore potentially affected, but that attestation is a product‑scoped inventory statement — it is not a...
Microsoft’s public advisory for CVE-2025-38422 confirms that Azure Linux images include the upstream Linux kernel code that required a fix in the lan743x Ethernet driver, but that product-level attestation is not an automatic guarantee that no other Microsoft-distributed artifacts contain the...
Microsoft’s short advisory that “Azure Linux includes this open‑source library and is therefore potentially affected” is accurate as a product‑level attestation — but it is not a technical guarantee that no other Microsoft product can include the same vulnerable ksmbd code; customers must treat...