📎 AI Summary:
The thread centers on reactions to testimony and reporting about Trump University, alleging it functioned as a fraudulent for-profit program using high-pressure sales, unqualified instructors, and deceptive marketing targeted at vulnerable students. The key “question” raised is the credibility/implication of former managers’ accounts, including claims about being pressured to push expensive courses on at-risk couples despite concerns about harm. Overall sentiment is strongly negative and shocked, with participants treating the allegations as troubling evidence of wrongdoing.

whoosh

Cooler King
Staff member
Member details
Joined
Apr 15, 2009
Messages
48,248
Thread Author #1
In blunt testimony revealed on Tuesday, former managers of Trump University, the for-profit school started by Donald J. Trump, portray it as an unscrupulous business that relied on high-pressure sales tactics, employed unqualified instructors, made deceptive claims and exploited vulnerable students willing to pay tens of thousands for Mr. Trump’s insights.

One sales manager for Trump University, Ronald Schnackenberg, recounted how he was reprimanded for not pushing a financially struggling couple hard enough to sign up for a $35,000 real estate class, despite his conclusion that it would endanger their economic future. He watched with disgust, he said, as a fellow Trump University salesman persuaded the couple to purchase the class anyway.

“I believe that Trump University was a fraudulent scheme,” Mr. Schnackenberg wrote in his testimony, “and that it preyed upon the elderly and uneducated to separate them from their money.”
http://www.nytimes.com/2016/06/01/us/politics/donald-trump-university.html?_r=2 :eek::shocked: