- Joined
- Mar 14, 2023
- Messages
- 111,355
WSJ: Cohen paid thousands to rig polls in Trump's favor
In a striking revelation from the Wall Street Journal, it has been reported that Michael Cohen, President Donald Trump’s former personal attorney, paid a substantial sum to manipulate online polls in favor of Trump back in 2015. This act of poll rigging raises ethical questions about the integrity of public opinion metrics and the lengths to which political figures may go to shape favorable narratives.
The video dives into the details illustrating how Cohen allegedly coordinated with a small technology company to implement these polling strategies. Although specifics about the nature of the polls were not exhaustively covered in the summary, the implications of such actions are vast, potentially influencing voter perception and engagement during the critical phases leading up to the election.
Without a transcript available, those interested might find it beneficial to watch the video directly for more nuanced discussions regarding Cohen’s actions and the broader implications for campaign transparency and ethics in political warfare. This incident not only sheds light on past electoral tactics but also serves as a cautionary tale for future elections in the digital age, where information—and misinformation—can spread rapidly.
As we dwell into 2024, it's crucial to reflect on how past behaviors might influence future political landscapes. How do you think incidents like these affect public trust in electoral processes? Are we seeing similar tactics in the current political climate? Feel free to share your thoughts and any similar experiences you've encountered in the political forum discussions here!
In a striking revelation from the Wall Street Journal, it has been reported that Michael Cohen, President Donald Trump’s former personal attorney, paid a substantial sum to manipulate online polls in favor of Trump back in 2015. This act of poll rigging raises ethical questions about the integrity of public opinion metrics and the lengths to which political figures may go to shape favorable narratives.
The video dives into the details illustrating how Cohen allegedly coordinated with a small technology company to implement these polling strategies. Although specifics about the nature of the polls were not exhaustively covered in the summary, the implications of such actions are vast, potentially influencing voter perception and engagement during the critical phases leading up to the election.
Without a transcript available, those interested might find it beneficial to watch the video directly for more nuanced discussions regarding Cohen’s actions and the broader implications for campaign transparency and ethics in political warfare. This incident not only sheds light on past electoral tactics but also serves as a cautionary tale for future elections in the digital age, where information—and misinformation—can spread rapidly.
As we dwell into 2024, it's crucial to reflect on how past behaviors might influence future political landscapes. How do you think incidents like these affect public trust in electoral processes? Are we seeing similar tactics in the current political climate? Feel free to share your thoughts and any similar experiences you've encountered in the political forum discussions here!
- Joined
- Mar 14, 2023
- Messages
- 111,355
This CNN Newsroom clip covers breaking coverage of a Wall Street Journal report revealing that Donald Trump's former personal lawyer, Michael Cohen, paid a tech firm owner to manipulate online polls in Trump's favor ahead of the 2016 campaign. Co-anchors Jim Sciutto and Poppy Harlow open with an exclusive statement from Cohen, where he asserts that "what I did was at the direction of and for the sole benefit of Donald J. Trump." Correspondent MJ Lee breaks down the bizarre details around 01:06, explaining how Cohen allegedly handed over a Walmart bag containing around $12,000 to $13,000 in cash to tech company owner John Gauger for running scripts to boost Trump's online polling figures, despite later billing the Trump Organization for $50,000.
Later in the segment around 04:27, legal analyst Paul Callan weighs in on whether rigging online polls could be prosecuted under federal mail or wire fraud statutes. He notes the legal hurdles prosecutors would face, given how widespread exaggerated polling claims are in political campaigns, while pointing out the twist that Trump could ironically frame himself as a victim of Cohen's overbilling scheme. It is a solid example of cable news breaking news coverage, capturing a wild chapter of political news complete with instant legal commentary.
Later in the segment around 04:27, legal analyst Paul Callan weighs in on whether rigging online polls could be prosecuted under federal mail or wire fraud statutes. He notes the legal hurdles prosecutors would face, given how widespread exaggerated polling claims are in political campaigns, while pointing out the twist that Trump could ironically frame himself as a victim of Cohen's overbilling scheme. It is a solid example of cable news breaking news coverage, capturing a wild chapter of political news complete with instant legal commentary.