Amazon's Growth Engines 2026: AWS, Ads, and AI Fuel a Bull Case

  • Thread Author
A futuristic AWS marketplace city with cloud data lines and subscription visuals.
Amazon’s mix of e-commerce scale, a dominant cloud franchise, fast-growing advertising, and subscription cash flow is the central thesis behind a bullish call that the company “will soar in 2026,” but the argument works only if a few key growth engines continue to outperform and capital intensity for AI doesn’t erode margins.

Background / Overview​

Amazon today is not a single business; it is a portfolio of large, semi-independent franchises that together create strategic optionality few companies enjoy. The takeaway from the recent bullish note is simple: Amazon’s dominant online retail footprint funds investments in higher-margin and faster-growing businesses — most notably Amazon Web Services (AWS), Amazon Ads, and increasingly, AI infrastructure and services — that can materially re-shape the company’s profit mix in coming years.
Those businesses are already substantial:
  • E‑commerce remains massive in volume and scale (third‑party marketplace plus first‑party sales), creating enormous gross merchandise volume (GMV) exposure and a rich dataset for advertising and personalization.
  • AWS is the profitable backbone that generates the majority of Amazon’s operating income, and it continues to lead global cloud infrastructure by share.
  • Advertising and subscriptions provide recurring, higher-margin revenue that reduces reliance on low-margin retail.
This structure — a giant, cash-generating retail engine subsidizing investment into high-margin growth areas — is the single most important reason investors are debating a re‑rating for Amazon into 2026.

The headline numbers and what they mean​

The bullish piece frames the case with a handful of concrete figures: a reported GMV estimate for Amazon’s platform approaching the high hundreds of billions, double‑digit retail revenue growth in recent quarters, AWS expansion and market share leadership, advertising growth in the mid‑20s percent range, and subscription revenue as a smaller but steady recurring stream. Those figures are useful shorthand, but they are a mix of third‑party estimates, company disclosures, and aggregations — each with different reliability.
  • Third‑party estimates put Amazon’s GMV in the vicinity of the high hundreds of billions for calendar 2024 — an estimate, not a GAAP figure. These are useful to show marketplace scale, but they’re not line‑item disclosures in Amazon’s SEC filings.
  • Multiple market trackers show AWS still leading the cloud infrastructure market with roughly a 29% share in Q3 2025, with Microsoft Azure and Google Cloud trailing. That leadership matters because AWS is the highest-margin core of Amazon’s operating income.
  • Advertising and subscriptions are meaningful margin contributors, and the retail media opportunity is where Amazon can expand monetization without incremental shipping cost pressure. Estimates and firm disclosures point to strong mid‑teens or higher growth rates for ads in recent trailing quarters.
Where the headline numbers come from — and how they were derived — matters. GMV is an inferred metric (useful to compare marketplace scale across platforms), AWS share is a survey/market-research figure (Synergy/Statista/industry reports), and ad/subscription rates are usually disclosed by Amazon in aggregate segments but sometimes require parsing in quarterly slide decks and 10‑Q/K commentary.

AWS: the crown jewel that subsidizes everything​

Market position and growth​

AWS remains Amazon’s most strategically valuable asset: it leads global cloud infrastructure and still generates a disproportionate share of Amazon’s operating profits. Independent market trackers reported AWS at roughly 29% of the global infrastructure market in Q3 2025, with Microsoft at ~20% and Google Cloud near 13%. Those share figures are consistent across several industry watchers and underscore AWS’s enduring lead. AWS reported strong sequential growth in recent quarters (high‑teens to low‑20s percent on the comparable revenue lines in industry summaries), driven by continued enterprise migration and an acute surge in AI workloads that demand GPU and specialized AI‑accelerated infrastructure. That step‑change in demand is the reason hyperscalers and “neocloud” GPU providers are expanding capacity aggressively.

Profit dynamics​

Historically, AWS has been the single largest contributor to Amazon’s operating income — a structural advantage that allows Amazon to tolerate low margins in commerce while investing heavily in logistics and customer acquisition. AWS’s margins are materially higher than retail; as that franchise grows faster than retail, the company’s consolidated margin profile improves. That dynamic is a central pillar of the bullish case.
Caveat: precise operating‑income splits change quarter to quarter. Public commentary from Amazon and industry analysts supports the general narrative (AWS = outsized share of operating income), but any specific percentage should be verified against the company’s most recent financial statements.

CapEx and AI infrastructure​

To stay competitive on AI workloads, AWS and peers are committing enormous capital to data centers and GPU capacity. Industry reports cite very large capex figures/run rates in 2025 as hyperscalers race to meet demand for generative AI training and inference. Those investments are the necessary cost of maintaining leadership and scaling AI services; they also compress free cash flow in the near term but could widen margins longer term if utilization and higher‑value services scale.

Advertising: Amazon’s retail media growth story​

Why ads matter​

Amazon’s ad business takes advantage of direct purchase intent, first‑party shopping data, and placements across its vast storefront, video content (including Prime Video), Fire TV, and other properties. Retail media has become a standard way for brands to reach buyers with measurable ROI, and Amazon benefits from being both the transaction platform and the ad platform.
Recent industry summaries and ad‑market trackers show Amazon Ads growing rapidly — in many quarters outpacing companywide growth — and representing an increasing share of Amazon’s revenue mix. A number of independent estimates put Amazon Ads well into the tens of billions annually, with sequential strength driven by Sponsored Products, display, and video formats.

Scale and margin profile​

Ads are materially higher margin than e‑commerce because they have lower fulfillment and inventory cost exposure. As ad revenue grows, it can shift consolidated operating margins higher even if retail continues to scale in GMV. That’s the practical mechanism behind the claim that Amazon’s optionality extends well beyond pure retail.

Risks​

Retail ad growth can be cyclical and tied to overall marketing budgets. A macro slowdown or changes in advertiser behavior (privacy regulation, measurement shifts, or a weaker retail advertising CPM environment) could compress ad growth rates and blunt margin expansion.

Subscriptions, Prime, and the sticky revenue base​

Subscription revenue — Prime membership, digital media subscriptions (Music, Audible, Kindle Unlimited), and Prime Video benefits — drives recurring revenue and improves customer lifetime value.
Subscription streams are modest relative to retail but have strategic value:
  • They support high‑frequency customer behavior, which is the backbone of marketplace monetization and advertising effectiveness.
  • They smooth revenue and increase predictability.
Estimates show subscription revenue growing moderately year over year, and Amazon explicitly calls out its subscription ecosystem as a strategic asset. The exact share of total revenue that subscriptions represent is relatively small (single-digit percentage in many trailing quarters) but important for ecosystem stickiness.

The GMV debate: scale is obvious, exact numbers are estimates​

The bullish narrative cites a very large GMV figure for Amazon’s platform (high‑hundreds of billions in 2024). GMV is a useful lens for marketplace scale, but it’s an inferred metric and not a GAAP accounting line Amazon reports consistently for total platform GMV. Multiple third‑party trackers produce GMV estimates; numbers vary by methodology and scope (global domains vs. marketplace‑only vs. first‑party included). For example, industry estimates and tracker reports show Amazon GMV in the high‑hundreds of billions in recent years, but exact figures differ across data providers. Treat any single GMV point as an estimate rather than a precise company disclosure. Why this matters: GMV captures scale and opportunity for monetization (ads, logistics, seller services), but it does not translate one‑for‑one into revenue or profit. Marketplace economics (fee rates, fulfillment mix, sponsored listings) determine how much of GMV flows to Amazon’s top and bottom lines.

Valuation: “32 times earnings” — watch the clock​

The bullish note highlights a mid‑30s or low‑30s price‑to‑earnings multiple as attractive given Amazon’s optionality. Valuation is inherently time‑sensitive: P/E, enterprise value, and forward multiples fluctuate with market prices, consensus earnings, and one‑time accounting items.
  • If AWS continues to grow faster than the wider company and advertising/subscriptions expand faster than retail, the market could re‑rate Amazon to a higher multiple because growth would look both durable and higher‑quality.
  • But valuations already embed expectations; a 30x+ multiple assumes sustained growth and margin expansion. Any evidence the company is reinvesting heavily with limited near‑term margin pickup (for example, heavy capex for AI) could compress multiples until revenue leverage is evident.
Investors should confirm current market multiples and forward estimates with up‑to‑date market data before drawing conclusions.

Strengths: why the “soar” thesis is credible​

  • Multiple durable revenue streams: Retail (scale), AWS (high margin), Ads (high margin, data moat), Subscriptions (recurring revenue). Together they reduce single‑product risk.
  • Data advantage: Amazon’s combination of shopping data, fulfillment signals, and advertising endpoints is rare and creates a strong retail‑media moat.
  • Leadership in cloud infrastructure: AWS’s market share and comprehensive service set give Amazon a high‑value cash engine to fund investments.
  • AI optionality: With GPU/data‑center investments and product tie‑ins, Amazon can monetize AI both as infrastructure (AWS) and product (shopping assistants, ad targeting, logistics optimization).
  • Scale economics in logistics and marketplace: Scale helps reduce per‑unit cost in warehousing and fulfillment; that advantage is hard for new entrants to replicate quickly.
These strengths form a coherent structural bull case: Amazon can convert retail scale into higher‑margin growth areas while maintaining top‑line expansion.

Risks and potential drain on returns​

  • Capital intensity for AI: Building and provisioning GPU capacity and AI‑specific infrastructure requires huge capex. If utilization or pricing power lags, returns on that capital will disappoint.
  • Cloud competition and share pressure: While AWS leads, Azure and Google Cloud continue to take share in pockets; sustained share erosion would reduce AWS’s absolute scale advantage. Market trackers show AWS share down slightly year‑over‑year in some quarters.
  • Advertising cyclicality: Ads are exposed to marketing budgets; an economic slowdown could disproportionately hit ad revenue growth.
  • Regulatory and antitrust scrutiny: Amazon faces regulatory pressure over marketplace practices, seller fees, and cross‑marketplace behavior (favoritism, buy box rules). New rules could impact marketplace economics.
  • Gross margin compression in retail: Fulfillment and shipping costs, wage pressures, and international expansion can keep retail margins thin for longer.
  • Valuation risk: If growth disappoints while the market assumes continued acceleration, multiples can compress fast.
  • Data‑privacy changes and measurement shifts: Privacy regulation and tracking restrictions can blunt ad targeting efficiency and measurement, reducing ad yield.
These risks are real, measurable, and in many cases correlated. For example, rising capex for AI both enables AWS growth and squeezes near‑term free cash flow.

Scenario analysis: three outcomes for 2026​

  1. Bull case (High probability conditional on AI monetization): AWS continues to grow ~20%+, advertising scales to mid‑20% growth, subscription stickiness improves, AI infrastructure drives new high‑margin services. Result: margin expansion, re‑rating to higher multiple, outsized stock performance.
  2. Base case (Most likely): AWS growth moderates as AI demand normalizes, ads and subscriptions continue steady growth, retail remains stable. Capital investments weigh on near‑term FCF but pay off gradually. Result: modest multiple expansion and steady returns.
  3. Bear case (Catalysts: macro slowdown, regulatory action, AI capex overhang): Ad slump, cloud price competition, increased regulation on marketplace practices, and high capex conspire to slow profit growth. Result: multiple compression, sideways to negative share performance.
Assigning probabilities requires up‑to‑date market inputs; investors should weigh personal risk tolerance and time horizon.

What to watch in 2026 — specific data points and triggers​

  1. AWS revenue growth rate and margins (quarterly): continued 20%+ growth and margin resilience would confirm the cloud thesis.
  2. Advertising revenue growth and ad yield (quarterly): sustained mid‑teens to mid‑20s growth is a strong positive.
  3. Subscription and Prime metrics: membership counts, retention, and per‑member spend.
  4. Capital expenditures and utilization rates for new GPU capacity: rising capex with improving utilization is ideal; rising capex with flat utilization is risky.
  5. Regulatory developments and any executive commentary about marketplace rules or advertising measurement changes.

Practical takeaways for investors and tech observers​

  • Amazon’s optionality is the critical investment narrative: the company is not single‑threaded. That structural flexibility is worth a premium if high‑margin businesses scale materially.
  • Near‑term GAAP and cash flows can be volatile because Amazon chooses to invest heavily in growth (logistics, data centers). Read capex and operating‑income trends quarter by quarter.
  • Validate the bullish thesis against current market multiples — a “32x earnings” claim must be checked against live market data before it drives an investment decision.
  • Treat GMV figures as directional rather than precise; they illustrate scale and monetization potential but are estimates from third parties.
  • Monitor cloud market share trackers (Synergy, Statista, CRN summaries) for shifts in hyperscaler dynamics; small shifts in share can have big profit implications.

Final analysis — strength, but not a slam dunk​

Amazon’s case for a strong 2026 rests on a coherent strategic playbook: use retail scale and rich first‑party data to fund and accelerate higher‑margin businesses (AWS, Ads, subscriptions) while investing in AI infrastructure that can create new product and monetization tiers. The arrangement is powerful because it’s additive — more ad revenue improves retail economics, and more AWS scale funds AI investments that draw new enterprise customers.
That said, the thesis is not without credible countervailing forces. The capital intensity of next‑generation AI infrastructure, the competitive dynamics in cloud, the cyclical nature of advertising, and regulatory scrutiny are real downsides that can limit upside or delay it.
In short: the prediction that “Amazon will soar in 2026” is plausible under a scenario where AWS and retail media continue to grow above expectations and AI investments quickly translate into higher‑margin offerings. It is also possible — and investable risk — that heavy capex, competition, or ad cyclicality keep returns modest until monetization catches up.
Investors should treat the Motley Fool piece as a concise bullish framework and then verify the underlying numbers (market multiples, AWS growth rates, ad and subscription trajectories) against current quarter results and independent market trackers before making allocation decisions.

Conclusion
Amazon’s multi‑pronged model — giant marketplace scale, profitable cloud leadership, fast‑growing advertising, and sticky subscription revenue — gives it one of the clearest optionality profiles in big tech. That optionality is the single best reason to believe in upside into 2026, but it is conditional: the company must translate capex and data advantage into durable, high‑quality revenue growth without letting margin pressure or regulatory friction overwhelm the gains. Investors should monitor AWS market share and revenue, advertising growth and ad yields, subscription metrics, and capital expenditure utilization as the real signals that will determine whether Amazon’s 2026 really will be a soaring year.
Source: The Motley Fool Prediction: Amazon Will Soar in 2026. Here's 1 Reason Why. | The Motley Fool
 

Amazon’s retail scale is no longer the whole story — it’s the funding mechanism that could supercharge higher‑margin businesses into a re‑rating in 2026, and that optionality is the single reason many bullish analysts argue the stock can “soar.”

AWS cloud and Amazon Prime drive ads, subscriptions, AI capex growth by 2026.Background / Overview​

Amazon has evolved from an online retailer into a multi‑franchise technology and services conglomerate. What once was a single top‑line engine — e‑commerce — is now the financing arm for several faster‑growing, higher‑margin businesses: Amazon Web Services (AWS), Amazon Ads (retail media), and subscription services (Prime, music, digital content). The bullish thesis that Amazon could significantly outperform into 2026 rests on a straightforward structural argument: retail produces enormous cash flow; AWS and advertising produce the margins; AI is the new lever that can amplify both. That framework is the core takeaway of the recent bullish note shared by the user.
The numbers used to make this case are largely verifiable — AWS grew strongly in recent quarters, ad revenue is growing at healthy mid‑20% rates, and Amazon’s retail scale (often discussed as GMV) runs in the high hundreds of billions — but a few headline claims (notably the precise GMV figure) are estimates rather than GAAP disclosures and should be treated as directional.

Why investors say 2026 could be a breakout year​

1) AWS: the high‑margin cash engine​

  • What happened recently: AWS returned to stronger acceleration, reporting roughly $33 billion in Q3 revenue — up about 20% year‑over‑year — and a roughly $132 billion annualized run rate. That quarterly acceleration is notable because it was the fastest growth AWS had posted in over a year.
  • Why it matters: AWS still produces a disproportionate share of Amazon’s operating income. As AWS grows faster and occupies a larger share of consolidated revenue, Amazon’s overall margin profile improves even if retail margins stay thin. Independent market trackers put AWS’s global infrastructure market share at around 29% in Q3 2025, leaving room for absolute dollar growth even as percentage share drifts.
  • The AI angle: Demand for GPU/accelerated compute, managed model services, and foundational model hosting has lifted AWS’s revenue mix toward higher‑value, AI‑driven services. Management has also increased capex plans to build AI‑ready capacity (see “capex” section). If AWS monetizes AI at scale — through managed services, inference, and higher utilization of premium instances — AWS will not only grow revenue but likely expand operating margins.

2) Advertising: a fast, high‑margin lever​

  • The trend line: Amazon’s advertising business produced about $17.7B in Q3 and grew roughly 22–24% year‑over‑year in the quarter. Advertising now contributes a meaningful share of revenue and, importantly, a much higher share of operating profit compared with core retail.
  • Why it compounds value: Amazon’s ads business benefits uniquely from first‑party shopping, fulfillment, and streaming endpoints — a data loop that improves ad targeting and measurement. Advertising revenue scales without the same fulfillment cost pressure that compresses retail margins, making it a natural margin amplifier if growth persists.

3) Subscriptions and Prime: sticky revenue and monetization pathways​

  • The baseline: Subscription services (Prime membership, digital media, music, e‑books) are smaller in absolute size than retail or AWS but provide predictable, recurring revenue and raise lifetime customer value.
  • Strategic role: Subscriptions improve ad monetization (Prime users spend more and are more valuable to advertisers) and smooth revenue volatility. Continued mid‑single‑digit to low‑double‑digit growth in this segment strengthens the overall optionality thesis.

4) E‑commerce scale — a dataset and balance‑sheet advantage​

  • Scale matters: Amazon’s marketplace remains massive. Multiple industry trackers estimate Amazon’s total platform transaction volume in the high hundreds of billions for recent calendar years; these GMV figures are third‑party estimates (not GAAP line items) but they illustrate why advertisers and sellers flock to the platform. Treat any single GMV headline as an estimate rather than a precisely audited figure.
  • Data advantage: The combination of shopping behavior, fulfillment signals, and ad endpoints is a rare data moat that makes Amazon Ads a sticky, high‑yield business.

Verifying the key claims (what’s solid and what’s estimated)​

  • AWS revenue and growth: Multiple independent reporting outlets and company transcripts confirm ~$33B in AWS revenue for Q3 2025 and roughly 20% YoY growth. Synergy data and industry reporting likewise put AWS at roughly 29% global infra share in Q3 2025. These are verifiable, high‑confidence claims.
  • Advertising revenue and growth: Quarterly disclosures and independent reporting place ad revenue near $17.7B and growth in the low‑to‑mid‑20s percent range in recent quarters; this is verifiable.
  • Capital expenditures: Amazon’s capex stepped up dramatically in 2025 — management indicated ~$125B of cash capex for 2025 and signaled higher 2026 spending as the company expands AI infrastructure. That scale of investment is confirmed in company statements and financial reporting. This is verifiable and material to the investment thesis.
  • GMV headline (e.g., “$790B” for 2024): GMV is widely used by industry commentators as a measure of marketplace scale, but Amazon does not report GMV as a formal GAAP metric; most GMV figures are third‑party estimates that vary by methodology. Use GMV to understand scale and monetization opportunity — not as a precise accounting number. Flag any single GMV figure as an estimate.
  • Valuation (the “32× earnings” claim): Trailing price‑to‑earnings multiples are time‑sensitive. As of early December 2025, trailing P/E for Amazon sits in the low‑30s — roughly the 32× level cited in bullish commentary — according to major market quote services. That multiple is confirmable at market close snapshots but will change with price and earnings moves. Always verify the live multiple before acting.

Strengths that support a 2026 re‑rating​

  • Diversified, durable revenue streams. Amazon’s three‑pronged structure (retail scale + profitable cloud + high‑margin advertising) reduces single‑product risk and creates cross‑sell opportunities across businesses.
  • Data and fulfillment moat. Amazon’s first‑party shopping data, combined with tight integration of fulfillment, payments, and advertising endpoints, gives it uniquely high ad yields that competitors cannot easily replicate.
  • Scale economics for AI. AWS’s hyperscale footprint, in‑house silicon (Trainium/Inferentia families) and new GPU investments create cost advantages if enterprise customers migrate AI workloads at scale.
  • Capital firepower. Strong free‑cash‑flow generation from a trillion‑plus revenue engine supports multibillion‑dollar capex and M&A optionality without immediate balance‑sheet stress.
  • Proof points in recent results. The Q3 2025 quarter showed the AWS acceleration and advertising strength together — the sort of result that can change investor narrative quickly if the trend continues.

Risks that could derail the “soar” thesis​

Capital intensity and timing risk​

Building and provisioning AI‑grade capacity (GPUs, networking, power) is capital‑heavy. Amazon’s reported capex (~$125B in 2025) is enormous; if utilization and pricing power lag expectations, the near‑term effect will be compressed free cash flow and pressure on multiples. Capital investments need time to convert into higher margins.

Cloud competition and share pressure​

AWS remains the largest provider by absolute dollars, but Microsoft and Google have shown faster percentage growth and aggressive productization of AI. A durable, multi‑quarter trend of share erosion — or better productization of AI features by rivals — would constrain AWS’s ability to surprise to the upside. Synergy data show AWS market share drifting lower over several quarters even as the market grows.

Advertising cyclicality and measurement risk​

Ad revenue is exposed to cyclical marketing budgets. In an economic slowdown, ad spend is often one of the first discretionary items to be cut. Additionally, regulatory or platform measurement changes (privacy laws, attribution rules) could reduce ad effectiveness and yield.

Regulatory and competitive scrutiny on marketplace practices​

Antitrust and marketplace regulation — around seller favoritism, buy‑box mechanics, and fee structure — can change marketplace economics. Regulatory action that limits cross‑selling or forces clearer separation between AWS/retail/ad businesses could reduce optionality.

Execution risk around AI productization​

Building AI infrastructure is one thing; turning it into defensible, sticky, high‑margin enterprise products is another. AWS’s engineering depth is immense, but productization — the process of turning infrastructure into easy, trusted services for enterprises — is time‑consuming and fraught with adoption friction relative to the competitor narratives about packaged AI experiences.

Scenario analysis: how 2026 can play out​

  • Bull case (conditional): AWS sustains 20%+ growth, advertising remains in mid‑20% growth, and AI infrastructure investments begin to show utilization gains and margin expansion. Result: consolidated margins rise, the market re‑rates the stock to a higher multiple, and the share price leaps materially.
  • Base case (most likely): AWS growth moderates as AI demand normalizes to a higher baseline (mid‑teens), advertising and subscriptions grow steadily, but capex keeps free cash flow muted until 2027. Result: modest multiple expansion with steady returns.
  • Bear case: capex overruns, slower-than‑expected AI monetization, ad cyclicality, or regulatory interventions limit margin improvement. Result: multiple compression and sideways-to-negative returns until company proves convertibility of investments into durable profits.
Each scenario is a function of three monitored signals: AWS revenue & margins, ad revenue & ad yield, and capex/utilization for AI infrastructure.

A practical 10‑point watchlist for 2026​

  • AWS quarterly revenue growth rate and operating margin trends.
  • AWS backlog / large contract disclosures and named customer wins.
  • Advertising revenue growth, ad yield (revenue per buyer / ad RPM), and new ad placements outside the retail funnel.
  • Subscription / Prime paid units, retention, and per‑member revenue.
  • Quarterly cash capex cadence and guidance vs. prior guidance; watch for utilization commentary on GPU clusters.
  • Any regulatory developments affecting marketplace structure or advertising measurement.
  • Competitive product announcements from Microsoft, Google, and niche AI cloud vendors that could change relative productization speed.
  • Evidence of margin expansion (operating income ex‑special items) across consolidated results.
  • GMV and marketplace economics only as directional indicators — verify with multiple third‑party trackers when cited.
  • Live valuation multiples (trailing and forward P/E, EV/EBITDA) at the time of any investment decision. The trailing P/E has hovered in the low‑30s in December 2025 — confirm current readings.

Technical and operational caveats (for IT and Windows‑centric readers)​

  • For enterprises building AI‑driven apps that depend on AWS, capacity and latency remain the practical constraints. Amazon’s recent capacity additions and Trainium/In‑house silicon push reduce price‑performance friction — but customers must architect for portability and burstability to avoid vendor lock‑in and to manage price spikes during peak AI demand.
  • Outages and SLAs matter. High‑profile AWS operational incidents in recent periods have shown how dependent enterprise services are on hyperscalers; redundancy planning and multi‑cloud strategies remain best practice for mission‑critical workloads. A spate of outages could temporarily affect customer sentiment and renewals.
  • Power, cooling, and regional permitting shape the real timeline of capacity expansions. Data‑center buildouts are limited by physical infrastructure and long lead times for power agreements; these are non‑trivial gating factors for how quickly newly announced capex actually converts to usable capacity.

Valuation reality check​

A trailing P/E in the low‑30s — roughly 32× earnings as of early December 2025 — is not “cheap” in absolute terms, but it becomes attractive if investors believe the company can materially improve its earnings growth and margins. The important framing is that valuation is time‑sensitive: if AWS and advertising continue to grow and AI investments begin to convert into durable higher‑margin services, the multiple is defensible or even conservative. If those gains are delayed or capex compresses returns, the multiple looks aggressive. Always verify live multiples at the point of decision.

Final analysis: why the prediction is credible — and where it could fail​

Amazon’s optionality is real: a giant retail engine funding a leading cloud franchise and a rapidly growing ad business creates an unusually powerful strategic portfolio. Recent quarters have supplied the first hard evidence that this thesis is working again — AWS acceleration to ~20% growth, advertising in the low‑to‑mid‑20s, sustained retail growth, and explicit, large AI capex commitments. Those facts make the prediction that Amazon “will soar” into 2026 a plausible outcome under the right conversion of capex to utilization and productized AI monetization. But plausibility is not certainty. The thesis depends on execution across multiple dimensions: productization of AI, disciplined capex utilization, continued ad yield growth, and a regulatory landscape that does not structurally reduce marketplace monetization. Each represents a measurable risk; together they form a correlated downside path that can delay or reduce upside.
In short: the bullish prediction is grounded in verifiable operational momentum, but it is conditional. Investors and tech professionals should treat the recent results as renewed evidence of optionality — then watch the concrete signals (AWS growth and margins, ad yield, capex/utilization) quarter by quarter. If those signals consistently point positive, a re‑rating remains fully within reach; if they do not, the market’s 32× expectation can become a restraint rather than a catalyst.

Conclusion
Amazon’s 2026 upside case rests on a simple structural truth: scale in retail funds investment into higher‑margin, higher‑growth businesses. Recent quarters have supplied confirmatory evidence — AWS re‑acceleration, strong ad growth, and explicit AI infrastructure commitments — that make the “soar” thesis credible. However, the path from capital spending to durable margin expansion is long and execution‑sensitive. The sensible approach for investors and technology leaders is to validate each quarter against the watchlist above and to treat GMV estimates as directional context rather than audited facts. If Amazon consistently turns AI capex into productized services and if advertising and AWS continue to outpace retail, a meaningful re‑rating in 2026 is a realistic outcome; if not, the optionality remains valuable — but unrealized.
Source: The Globe and Mail Prediction: Amazon Will Soar in 2026. Here's 1 Reason Why.
 

Amazon cloud ecosystem with AWS, Prime, AI, GPU, and data-center components.
Amazon’s e‑commerce dominance is only the opening act — the real case for a 2026 breakout is the company’s optionality: a cash‑generating retail behemoth funding a market‑leading cloud franchise, a fast‑growing advertising business, and sweeping AI infrastructure investments that together can re‑shape profitability and investor expectations.

Background​

Amazon’s public narrative has shifted from “online retailer” to “portfolio company” built around several semi‑independent, high‑scale franchises. That evolution matters because it changes how revenue growth, margins, and strategic capital are evaluated. Retail still produces enormous gross merchandise volume (GMV) and first‑party data; Amazon Web Services (AWS) produces the lion’s share of operating income; advertising and subscription services offer higher margin optionality; and recent capex directed toward AI‑ready infrastructure could tilt the entire mix toward higher profitability. Those are the structural facts underpinning the claim that Amazon “will soar” in 2026 — but the thesis is conditional and hinges on execution and macro factors.
GMV and headline retail scale are useful directional measures but are not audited revenue lines in Amazon’s financial filings. Multiple third‑party trackers place Amazon’s GMV in the high hundreds of billions for recent calendar years; treat any specific GMV headline as an estimate rather than a GAAP figure.

The Engines of Growth: How optionality becomes real​

Amazon Web Services (AWS): the crown jewel​

AWS remains the single most important engine for margins and optionality. Independent market trackers and industry summaries show AWS leading global cloud infrastructure with roughly a 29% market share in recent quarters, while Microsoft Azure and Google Cloud trail at roughly 20% and 13% respectively. That leadership translates into scale advantages for price/performance, enterprise trust, and an ability to fund long‑term investments.
AWS growth has re‑accelerated into the high‑teens and low‑20s percentages in recent periods, driven in part by a surge in AI and GPU‑demand workloads that command premium pricing. Because AWS contributes a disproportionate share of Amazon’s operating income, sustained AWS outperformance would materially improve consolidated margins even if retail margins remain muted.
Key AWS dynamics to watch:
  • Scale economics for GPU and AI instances — more utilization converts capex into operating leverage.
  • Productization of managed model services — turning raw infrastructure into sticky, high‑margin services.
  • Competitive movement by Microsoft and Google: share shifts matter even if public market share appears static.

Amazon Advertising: the high‑margin lever​

Amazon has built a retail‑media advertising business that benefits from first‑party shopping data and fulfillment signals. Ad revenue has been growing in the mid‑teens to mid‑20s percent range recently, and advertising now represents a meaningful share of consolidated revenue while contributing a disproportionately large share of operating income because it scales without retail fulfillment costs. This makes ad growth a natural margin amplifier for the company.
Advertising’s advantages:
  • Unique ad endpoints (search, product pages, Prime Video, streaming sports) create targeting and measurement that competitors cannot easily match.
  • Ad monetization scales with traffic and purchase conversion rather than physical goods handling.
  • Rising ad yield per buyer (ad RPM) multiplies the effect of user growth.

Subscriptions and Prime: sticky, recurring revenue​

Subscription services — led by Prime membership — are smaller by dollar size than retail or AWS but are strategically valuable. They raise lifetime customer value, increase purchase frequency, and improve advertising monetization for a cohort that spends more on the platform. Subscription revenue growth has been steady and supports predictability in overall revenue. Treat this as the glue that ties retail engagement to ad yield and repeat purchases.

E‑commerce: scale, data, and the marketplace advantage​

E‑commerce still matters because it provides the dataset and customer touchpoints that feed advertising and subscription value. Although retail margins are thin, the sheer volume of transactions (marketplace + first‑party) supplies the raw material for retail media, logistics services, and seller offerings. GMV metrics illustrate scale but should be interpreted as directional indicators rather than precise inputs to revenue modeling.

AI and the capital question: investment today, returns tomorrow​

Amazon’s strategic bet to build AI‑ready data centers, invest in in‑house silicon, and expand GPU capacity is the central wildcard in the 2026 thesis. If those investments convert into durable, productized services (managed models, inference platforms, specialized AI instances), they can materially increase AWS margins and create new pricing layers that support a higher multiple.
But the math is capital‑intensive. Building AI‑grade capacity requires significant power, cooling, and lead time for data‑center buildouts. The capex cadence and utilization rates are the essential signal: rising capital expenditure with improving utilization is healthy; rising capex with flat utilization is a negative. The company’s capex commitments are large and visible; investors must watch for utilization commentary and named large enterprise AI wins that show the investments are converting to revenue.
Important technical considerations for enterprise adopters:
  • Latency and capacity constraints remain practical barriers for some AI workloads; multi‑region and edge strategies will be necessary for low‑latency applications.
  • In‑house silicon like Trainium/Inferentia can reduce price/performance friction but requires ecosystem packaging for developers.
  • Outages and SLAs: hyperscaler incidents expose the need for redundancy and multi‑cloud architectures in mission‑critical applications.

Valuation: the 32× earnings claim and what it means​

A trailing price‑to‑earnings multiple in the low‑30s (roughly 32× earnings as of early December 2025 in the data set under review) is not a statement that the stock is cheap; it is a claim about expected future earnings growth and margin expansion. If AWS sustains 20%+ growth, advertising continues in the mid‑20s, and AI investments begin to generate higher‑margin services, that multiple could be justified or even conservative. Conversely, if capex overwhelms near‑term free cash flow or AI monetization is delayed, the multiple becomes an anchor that can hurt total returns. Live multiples should be verified at the point of any investment decision.
Valuation sensitivities:
  1. AWS revenue and margin trajectory.
  2. Advertising yield and cyclical exposure to marketing budgets.
  3. Capex-to‑utilization conversion for AI infrastructure.
  4. Regulatory outcomes that could affect marketplace monetization.

Scenario analysis: how 2026 could play out​

  1. Bull case (conditional)
    • AWS sustains 20%+ growth.
    • Ad revenues grow in the mid‑20% range with improving yield.
    • AI capex utilization ramps rapidly into productized high‑margin services.
    • Result: consolidated margin expansion and a re‑rating to a higher multiple — the stock “soars.”
  2. Base case (most likely)
    • AWS growth moderates to mid‑teens as AI demand normalizes.
    • Advertising and subscriptions grow steadily.
    • Capex weighs on free cash flow through 2026 but starts to convert in 2027.
    • Result: modest multiple expansion and steady returns.
  3. Bear case
    • Ad cyclicality or macro slowdown reduces ad spend sharply.
    • Cloud competition erodes AWS share in key enterprise segments.
    • AI capex fails to convert quickly, compressing near‑term free cash flow.
    • Regulatory interventions limit marketplace monetization.
    • Result: multiple compression and sideways or negative returns until evidence of convertibility appears.

Risks: explicit and correlated​

Amazon’s upside is real but paired with measurable downside vectors:
  • Capital intensity and timing risk: AI infrastructure is expensive and slow to monetize; poor utilization can compress returns for quarters or years.
  • Cloud competition: Microsoft and Google have both productized AI features aggressively; share losses in strategic enterprise segments can reduce AWS’s absolute scale advantage.
  • Advertising cyclicality and measurement shifts: ad spending is cyclical and vulnerable to privacy regulation or measurement changes that blunt targeting effectiveness.
  • Regulatory and antitrust scrutiny: marketplace rules, seller protections, and potential forced separations or behavioral restrictions could alter monetization levers.
  • Operational constraints: data‑center permitting, power availability, and supply chain limits for silicon are real gating factors for how quickly capacity becomes usable.
These risks are not independent: for example, a downturn that reduces ad budgets while capex remains elevated amplifies the negative impact on margins and multiples.

What enterprise IT and Windows‑centric readers should care about​

Amazon’s strategic moves have direct implications for IT teams and Windows‑focused enterprises:
  • Multi‑cloud strategies remain best practice. Despite AWS’s scale, operational incidents and vendor risk mean mission‑critical services should plan for redundancy and portability.
  • AI workload architecture matters. Expect to design for burstability: baseline workloads on one cloud, burst to GPU‑heavy instances when training or inference spikes. This limits vendor lock‑in while optimizing costs.
  • In‑house silicon and managed AI services will change procurement conversations. If AWS’s Trainium/In‑house silicon materially improves cost/performance, procurement plans for AI projects may shift toward cloud‑native paths that favor integrated stacks. But portability libraries and abstraction layers are essential to avoid lock‑in.
  • Monitor SLAs and outage post‑mortems closely when migrating critical services to hyperscaler AI offerings; outage risk for AI hosting can have outsized business impact.

A practical 10‑point watchlist for 2026​

Investors and IT leaders should track the following quarter‑by‑quarter signals to measure whether the “soar” thesis is unfolding:
  1. AWS quarterly revenue growth rate and operating margin trends.
  2. Advertising revenue growth and ad yield per buyer (ad RPM).
  3. Subscription and Prime paid unit metrics: membership counts, retention, ARPU.
  4. Quarterly capex guidance and commentary on GPU cluster utilization.
  5. Named large AI enterprise wins and managed model service contracts.
  6. Third‑party cloud market‑share trackers (Synergy, industry reports) for AWS/Azure/GCP.
  7. Changes in ad measurement rules or privacy regulations that could affect attribution.
  8. Marketplace economics: seller fee trends, buy‑box rules, and any regulatory interventions.
  9. Free cash flow trajectory after capex and any material changes to buyback or dividend policy.
  10. Evidence of durable margin expansion outside retail — specifically, higher AWS operating margins or ad operating income scaling meaningfully.

Strengths worth highlighting​

  • Diversified revenue streams: Retail scale, AWS, Ads, and subscriptions reduce single‑product risk and create compounding cross‑sell opportunities.
  • Data moat: First‑party shopping, fulfillment signals, and ad endpoints deliver proprietary measurement and targeting advantages.
  • Capital firepower: A very large revenue base enables multibillion‑dollar capex without immediate balance‑sheet stress, creating optionality for long‑horizon investments.
  • AI runway: In‑house silicon and hyperscale infrastructure set the stage for differentiated AI offerings if Amazon can productize those assets into trusted enterprise services.

How to think about investing or architecting around this thesis​

  1. Time horizon matters: Amazon’s upside is optionality realized through multi‑quarter execution. Short‑term volatility from capex cycles is likely.
  2. Validate claims quarter by quarter with the watchlist above; avoid extrapolating a single quarter’s acceleration into permanent re‑rating.
  3. For IT teams: design for portability and burst patterns, and include cost/latency modeling for AI workloads.

Final analysis and conclusion​

Amazon’s compelling structural argument is simple and powerful: a giant retail engine funds several high‑margin, high‑growth possibilities that conventional retailers cannot replicate. The recent evidence — AWS re‑acceleration, robust ad growth, and explicit AI capex commitments — aligns with a thesis that justifies optimism for 2026. But optimism must be calibrated. The path from capex to durable margin expansion is long and execution‑sensitive. The bullish prediction that Amazon “will soar” in 2026 is plausible under a scenario where AWS and retail media continue to out‑perform and AI investments convert quickly into productized, high‑margin offerings. It is equally plausible that heavy capex, competitive pressures in cloud, ad cyclicality, or regulatory actions delay or limit upside.
For investors and technology leaders, the right approach is evidence‑driven: monitor AWS revenue and margins, advertising yield, subscription metrics, capex/utilization, and marketplace regulation. The optionality is real — and that is the single best reason to assign a credible probability to a breakout in 2026 — but it is not a certainty. Treat GMV figures and single‑quarter spikes as directional, verify live valuation multiples before making allocation decisions, and use the practical watchlist above as the quarterly scoreboard for whether Amazon’s investments are converting into the higher‑quality earnings the market expects.

Amazon’s multi‑franchise model makes the 2026 bull case interesting and investable — conditional on disciplined execution, improving utilization of AI capex, and the continued conversion of retail scale into higher‑margin, recurring revenue streams.

Source: The Globe and Mail Prediction: Amazon Will Soar in 2026. Here's 1 Reason Why.
 

Amazon’s e‑commerce dominance is only the opening act — the argument that the stock “will soar in 2026” rests on the company’s optionality: a cash‑generating retail behemoth funding a market‑leading cloud franchise, a rapidly growing advertising engine, and aggressive investments in AI infrastructure that together can re‑shape margins and investor expectations.

AWS cloud links Amazon services like ad and Prime Video with Trainium chips.Background / Overview​

Amazon’s public narrative has shifted from pure retail to a multi‑franchise technology and services conglomerate. Its retail footprint still supplies the raw transactional data and cash flow that feed higher‑margin businesses: Amazon Web Services (AWS), Amazon Ads, and subscription services such as Prime. Recent commentary arguing for a 2026 breakout centers on three measurable pillars:
  • AWS re‑acceleration and its role as the company’s profit engine.
  • Rapid ad revenue growth and higher ad yields from first‑party shopping data.
  • Large capital expenditure for AI‑ready infrastructure and in‑house silicon that could turn scale into new, higher‑margin services.
Those themes are the essence of the bullish thesis reported in the Globe and Mail and summarized in the note under review. The original piece highlights specific figures — a reported 2024 gross merchandise volume (GMV) estimate in the high hundreds of billions, AWS market leadership, and ad and subscription growth — but it treats some of those numbers (notably GMV) as third‑party estimates rather than GAAP disclosures.

What the numbers actually show today​

AWS: the profit engine re‑asserts itself​

Amazon’s own results for the third quarter confirm the narrative’s most important datapoint: AWS is back to accelerating growth. In Q3 Amazon reported AWS segment sales of $33.0 billion, up about 20% year‑over‑year — the fastest pace in several quarters and the highest quarterly dollar amount in the public data set. That re‑acceleration is central because AWS produces a disproportionate share of Amazon’s operating income; higher AWS growth shifts the consolidated margin profile materially. Independent market trackers corroborate AWS’s leadership in cloud infrastructure: multiple industry reports place AWS at roughly 29% of global cloud infrastructure spend in Q3 (with Microsoft Azure around 20% and Google Cloud near 13%). Those market‑share figures are directionally consistent across Synergy Research Group aggregates and industry reporting. AWS’s share has been drifting down slowly over the past few quarters even as the market expands — an important nuance for investors who watch share trends in addition to absolute growth. Why this matters to investors and IT teams alike: AWS is the scalable, high‑margin engine that funds low‑margin retail and enables the company to accept thin commerce returns in exchange for optionality. If Amazon converts more of its AI‑directed capex into productized services (managed models, inference, higher‑value instances), AWS can expand both revenue and margins simultaneously.

Advertising: a high‑margin compounding lever​

Advertising is the clearest example of margin leverage inside Amazon’s portfolio. In Q3 advertising revenue was reported in the high‑teens billions for the quarter — industry reporting cites $17.6–$17.7 billion (roughly a 24% year‑over‑year increase). Advertising scales much faster than physical goods because it doesn’t carry fulfillment costs; it therefore contributes outsized operating income as it grows. The ad business’s access to first‑party shopping signals and emerging streaming endpoints (Prime Video sports, Twitch, Fire TV) makes its data moat difficult for competitors to replicate at the same level of purchase intent.

Subscriptions and recurring revenue​

Subscription revenue (Prime memberships and digital services) grew at a steady clip in recent quarters — ~11% year‑over‑year in the Q3 reporting period, by widely reported numbers — and now accounts for a mid‑single‑digit percentage of total revenue. While smaller in absolute size than retail or AWS, subscriptions increase customer stickiness and boost lifetime value, enhancing both retail spend and ad monetization per user.

Capital intensity and cash‑flow dynamics​

Amazon’s big strategic change is not just product mix but capital allocation. The company disclosed a large increase in purchases of property and equipment as a driver of falling trailing‑12‑month free cash flow; management has been explicit about a large capex program to add AI‑grade capacity, power and cooling, and in‑house silicon. That capex surge is the central macroeconomic risk to the bullish thesis: if the investments are underutilized or slower to monetize, they pressure free cash flow and can compress multiples even as revenue rises. Amazon’s own earnings release explicitly links a meaningful portion of the free‑cash‑flow decline to stepped‑up purchases of property and equipment.

Cross‑checking the core claims: what’s confirmed and what is estimated​

The bullish note we are evaluating uses a mix of company disclosures and third‑party estimates. It’s important to separate what is auditable (company statements and filings) from what’s inferential (GMV and some market share aggregations).
  • AWS revenue and Q3 growth: confirmed by Amazon’s investor relations release.
  • Advertising revenue and the ~24% growth rate for Q3: reported consistently across quarter summaries and media coverage.
  • AWS global cloud market share ~29% in Q3: corroborated by Synergy Research Group reporting and independent industry outlets.
  • Trailing price‑to‑earnings multiple in the low‑30s (roughly 32×): market quote aggregators show Amazon’s TTM P/E around 32 as of early December 2025; this is a live market statistic that must be checked at the time of any trade decision.
  • Gross Merchandise Volume (GMV) $790 billion (2024): this is an estimate rather than an audited line item in Amazon’s SEC filings. Third‑party analysts and marketplace trackers publish GMV estimates, but the precise $790B figure in the bullish write‑up appears to be a directional third‑party estimate rather than a company‑reported GAAP figure; independent GMV trackers place Amazon’s GMV in the high‑hundreds of billions range for 2024, but exact tallies differ by methodology. Treat single‑figure GMV claims as directional context, not an audited revenue line.
When a narrative depends on GMV to argue future ad or marketplace revenue scale, that narrative should make clear the measurement method: are we counting third‑party marketplace gross merchandise sales only, or total platform GMV including first‑party sales and international volumes? Different definitions produce different numbers.

Strengths that make the 2026 "soar" thesis credible​

  • Diversified revenue streams: Amazon is no longer a single‑engine retailer; commerce, AWS, ads, and subscriptions give the company multiple levers to expand revenue and margins simultaneously.
  • AWS scale and product breadth: market leadership in cloud infrastructure gives Amazon both pricing power in certain segments and the technical platform to productize AI offerings at enterprise scale. The Q3 re‑acceleration is a practical example of this advantage.
  • Data moat for advertising: first‑party shopping signals, fulfillment telemetry, and streaming endpoints create a unique advertising value proposition that’s difficult to replicate for rivals whose primary signals are web or social interactions rather than purchase intent.
  • Capital firepower: the retail cash‑engine allows Amazon to commit to multi‑year capex without immediate balance‑sheet stress. When that capex is converted into higher‑margin services, the payoff is asymmetric.
  • In‑house silicon and AI stack: Amazon’s investment in Trainium/Trainium2 and its new instance families are real investments that aim to lower price/performance friction for AI workloads — a structural advantage if adopted broadly by customers.

Risks and failure modes that could derail the upside​

  • Capital‑intensity and timing risk
  • Building AI‑grade infrastructure is expensive; deployment lead times, power permitting, and utilization curves matter. Rising capex without commensurate utilization will depress free cash flow and compress market multiples.
  • Cloud competition and productization by rivals
  • Microsoft and Google are rapidly packaging AI features and managed services; share erosion in strategic enterprise segments could blunt AWS’s ability to surprise to the upside. Recent market trackers show AWS share down a couple of points year‑over‑year even as the market grows.
  • Advertising cyclicality and measurement changes
  • Ad budgets are cyclical and vulnerable to privacy regulation or shifts in measurement that could reduce ad yield. A downturn in ad revenue would disproportionately hit operating income because ad is a large source of high margin.
  • Regulatory and antitrust action
  • Marketplace rules, seller protections, or forced behavioral limits could alter monetization levers and limit cross‑business synergies that currently boost ad yields or seller fees.
  • Execution risk on productization
  • Turning infrastructure into sticky, enterprise‑grade products (managed models, inference platforms, dedicated AI instances) is hard; strong engineering does not automatically translate to high adoption or pricing power.
These risks are correlated: for example, an economic slowdown that reduces ad budgets while capex remains elevated compounds the negative impact on margins and multiples.

A practical watchlist for 2026 — what to monitor quarter by quarter​

Investors and IT leaders should track the following signals as a scoreboard for whether Amazon’s investments are converting into the higher‑quality earnings the market expects:
  • AWS quarterly revenue growth rate and operating margin trends (look for sustained high‑teens to low‑20s growth plus margin resilience).
  • Advertising revenue growth and ad yield per buyer (ad RPM) — ad expansion should continue to outpace retail growth.
  • Subscription / Prime paid unit metrics: membership counts, retention, and average revenue per member.
  • Quarterly capex guidance and management commentary on GPU cluster utilization and Trainium/Trainium2 instance adoption.
  • Named enterprise AI wins or large managed model contracts: public customer announcements reduce uncertainty about utilization.
  • Third‑party cloud market trackers (Synergy/Canalys/CRN) for material share shifts that could affect AWS’s competitive moat.
  • Any regulatory developments affecting marketplace structure or advertising measurement.
  • Free cash flow trajectory after capex and any changes to buyback or capital allocation policies.
  • Live valuation multiples — trailing and forward P/E and EV/EBITDA — at the time of investment decisions. The market was pricing Amazon in the low‑30s P/E range in early December 2025; this is a moving target.

Tactical implications for investors and Windows‑centric enterprise IT teams​

For investors:
  • Treat this as a conditional re‑rating story: upside depends on conversion of capex into higher‑margin monetization. If AWS keeps accelerating and ad yields keep rising, the multiple can expand; if not, heavy capex will act as a drag.
  • Time horizon matters. Short‑term volatility is likely as capex spending and utilization normalize; a multi‑quarter view is essential.
  • Validate assumptions quarter by quarter rather than extrapolating a single quarter’s acceleration into permanent re‑rating.
For IT and Windows‑centric teams:
  • Design for portability and burst patterns. Most enterprise AI workloads will be hybrid: baseline services on a primary cloud, bursts to GPU‑heavy instances when training or inference spikes — this avoids lock‑in while optimizing costs.
  • Include capacity, latency, and SLAs in procurement decisions. Hyperscaler outages or capacity constraints can have outsized impacts on AI pipelines.
  • Monitor AWS commodity vs. differentiated offerings. Trainium/Inferentia cost advantages are real only if ecosystem packaging and developer tooling make them easy to adopt.

Balanced conclusion: plausible, conditional, and measurable​

The bullish thesis that Amazon “will soar in 2026” is plausible and supported by verifiable operational momentum: AWS re‑acceleration, rapid advertising growth, and a retail engine that continues to produce scale and first‑party data. Those facts create credible optionality that can justify higher multiples — if the company executes on productizing AI infrastructure and converts capex into durable, higher‑margin services. That said, plausibility is not certainty. Key risks — capital intensity, cloud competition, ad cyclicality, and regulatory action — are measurable and correlated. The difference between a re‑rating and a prolonged period of capex‑driven cash‑flow pressure will be visible in quarterly signals: AWS margins and revenue, ad RPM, subscription metrics, capex utilization commentary, and third‑party market‑share trackers. Investors should watch those metrics closely and treat GMV estimates as directional context rather than an audited foundation for valuation.

Quick reference: headline datapoints and where they stand today​

  • AWS Q3 revenue: ~$33.0 billion, ~20% year‑over‑year growth (confirmed in company release).
  • AWS market share (Q3 snapshot): ~29% of global cloud infrastructure (industry trackers).
  • Advertising revenue (Q3): ~$17.6–$17.7 billion, ~24% year‑over‑year growth (widely reported).
  • Subscription revenue growth (Q3): ~11% year‑over‑year to roughly $12.6 billion (reported by quarter summaries).
  • Trailing P/E (early Dec 2025): low‑30s (~32×) — a live market multiple that should be checked at trade time.
  • GMV (2024) cited at ~$790 billion in one bullish piece: treat as a third‑party estimate and flag as non‑GAAP; independent trackers place Amazon GMV in the high‑hundreds of billions but vary by methodology.

Amazon’s story in 2026 is a high‑conviction conditional bet: the company has the structural advantages to earn a re‑rating, but the market will require visible evidence that heavy AI investments are converting into durable, high‑margin products and higher utilization. For investors and technologists alike, the right posture is evidence‑driven: monitor the quarter‑by‑quarter scoreboard, separate audited results from third‑party estimates, and treat GMV and single‑quarter spikes as directional signals rather than certainties. The optionality is real — and that is the single best reason to assign a credible probability to a breakout — but it will be won or lost on measurable execution.

Source: The Globe and Mail Prediction: Amazon Will Soar in 2026. Here's 1 Reason Why.
 

Back
Top