• Thread Author
Microsoft’s public preview of a self-service quota management experience for Azure App Service brings a long-requested level of transparency and control to scaling web apps — a dedicated App Service Quota blade in the Azure portal that shows usage per SKU, lets teams request new limits inline, and aims to reduce surprise deployment failures caused by hidden regional or SKU capacity limits. (techcommunity.microsoft.com, windowsreport.com)

Futuristic holographic data dashboard hovering above a laptop in a server room.Background​

Azure customers have for years bumped into quota limits when deploying or scaling App Service plans: a deployment attempt can fail with an opaque “quota of 0 instances for your subscription” message, forcing support tickets, region changes, or trial-and-error provisioning. That friction has driven demand for clearer quota visibility and faster, self-serve increases so engineering teams can scale without business interruption. Microsoft’s new preview targets that exact pain point by surfacing App Service-specific quotas inside the portal. (learn.microsoft.com, reddit.com)
This public preview is available through the Azure portal’s Quotas resource and supplements existing quota flows (the generic “My quotas” experience and vCPU family requests) with App Service–specific data and a dedicated interface. The change matches broader Azure work to make quota increases faster and more automated while preserving support ticketing for complex or capacity-sensitive scenarios. (techcommunity.microsoft.com, learn.microsoft.com)

What Microsoft announced​

The App Service Quota blade — what it shows​

The new App Service Quota blade centralizes several previously scattered datapoints into a single view:
  • Usage and current limits displayed as App Service VMs for each SKU.
  • Filters for region, subscription, and provider so administrators can scope what matters.
  • Grouping options by usage, quota type (SKU), or location to surface hotspots quickly.
  • Inline quota request UI so you can submit a new quota limit without leaving the blade. (techcommunity.microsoft.com)
Microsoft explicitly models each App Service VM size as its own SKU, which means capacity requests must be made per VM size when a plan uses multiple instance sizes (for example, separate requests for P1v3 and P3v3 if your scale strategy includes both). The interface reports usage in units of App Service VMs to make it easier to spot SKUs that are approaching limits. (techcommunity.microsoft.com)

When the self-service flow applies (and when it doesn’t)​

Microsoft’s guidance for the preview is straightforward:
  • For routine App Service quota increases — single subscriptions and non-zone-redundant deployments — use the self-service flow in the portal.
  • If your request involves 10 or more subscriptions or requires zone redundancy, continue to file a support ticket (problem type “Quota”) so regional capacity and redundancy constraints can be validated by the capacity management team. (techcommunity.microsoft.com)
This split reflects the practical reality that quota is typically regional and automated scaling is safe for many standard scenarios, while zone-redundant or very large, multi-subscription requests can require manual capacity coordination.

How the self-service tool works — step by step​

  • Navigate to the portal and search for “Quotas” (the same Quotas resource used for vCPU family requests).
  • Select App Service from the Quotas resource provider.
  • Use the filters to scope by subscription, region, or provider and review the App Service VM usage numbers per SKU.
  • Click the edit (pen) icon on a SKU to open a flyout, enter the new limit (note: you must provide the final limit, not an incremental delta), and submit.
  • The portal attempts automatic fulfillment. If it succeeds, you’ll see confirmation within minutes; if not, the portal gives an option to open a support ticket pre-populated with the request data. (techcommunity.microsoft.com, learn.microsoft.com)
Two operational details to highlight: the portal expects the final desired limit (so requests are absolute), and the processing dialog remains the easiest way to watch automatic fulfillment — closing it early suppresses meaningful request notifications during preview. These are small but important UX points while the experience is still in public preview. (techcommunity.microsoft.com)

Why this matters for engineering and operations teams​

Faster iteration and fewer deployment surprises​

By surfacing SKU-level usage, teams can see when a given instance size is nearing its limit before a scale operation or deployment triggers a failure. The inline request flows reduce context switching and the typical support ticket backlog delays, making it faster to react to load or to scale ahead of traffic spikes. This increases reliability for customer-facing web apps and internal services. (techcommunity.microsoft.com, windowsreport.com)

Better capacity planning across regions and SKUs​

Because the blade lets you filter and group by region and SKU, capacity shortfalls that are regional (for example, high demand in East US) become visible earlier. Teams with multi-region deployments can use this view to compare capacity usage and proactively request increases where they plan to scale. That reduces last-minute migrations or DNS gymnastics when a preferred region hits constraints. (techcommunity.microsoft.com)

Aligning autoscale and quotas​

Autoscale policies are only as useful as the capacity they can consume. Having quota visibility tied to the portal means autoscale playbooks can be reinforced with quota checks: DevOps teams can incorporate capacity thresholds into runbooks and CI/CD gates to prevent autoscale from fighting hard quota limits.

Known limitations and caveats in the preview​

Microsoft lists several known issues in the public preview that admins should weigh before relying on the experience for mission-critical scaling:
  • Closing the quota request flyout can stop meaningful notifications for that specific request; you can still check resulting quota values elsewhere.
  • Some SKUs are not yet represented in the quota dashboard — they will be added during preview.
  • The Azure Activity Log does not yet provide a concise history for quota requests and outcomes in this preview.
  • The preview does not enable zone-redundant deployments — zone redundancy remains a support-ticket-only operation because quota is regional by design.
  • Quota API documentation for bulk non-zone redundant requests is being drafted; bulk automation is not fully available yet. (techcommunity.microsoft.com)
These limitations mean the portal UX is helpful for many day-to-day needs, but large enterprises with complex redundancy or multi-subscription governance will still need to rely on support workflows and capacity planning with Microsoft.

Technical analysis: what’s new versus existing quota models​

App Service SKU granularity​

The decision to represent each App Service VM size as an independent SKU is a meaningful change: quotas are now expressed in terms that match the platform’s scale unit (App Service VMs), so administrators can directly correlate SKU usage with App Service plan behavior. That removes a layer of translation that previously made it hard to know whether a vCPU or family-level quota was the blocker. (techcommunity.microsoft.com)

Relationship to vCPU-family and regional quotas​

Existing quota mechanisms for compute (vCPU family quotas) remain relevant: the Quotas hub in the portal already allows vCPU family increases and follows an automated approval flow for many requests. The App Service Quota blade complements that by focusing on App Service-specific SKUs and their instance counts rather than raw vCPU quotas. For many scenarios, App Service capacity is the gating factor rather than a per-family vCPU limit, so this blade is targeted to that need. (learn.microsoft.com, techcommunity.microsoft.com)

Automation and APIs​

Today’s preview centers on portal flows. Microsoft notes that quota API documentation is being drafted to enable bulk, non-zone-redundant quota requests. That is an important note for automation-driven organizations: until the API is published and stable, large-scale quota changes will require either portal manual requests or support requests routed through Microsoft. Automation via API will be crucial for infra-as-code workflows and CI/CD pipelines that need to ensure capacity before deployment. (techcommunity.microsoft.com)

Risks and operational concerns​

1. Regional capacity constraints and sudden denials​

App Service capacity is regional, and regions can and do hit physical capacity or allocation constraints. Automatic quota approvals are bounded by regional available capacity; if demand outstrips supply, the portal will offer to create a support ticket rather than force allocation. Teams relying exclusively on self-service must still have contingency plans for alternate regions or instance sizes. Community reports show real-world instances where regions returned “quota of 0 instances,” forcing last-minute changes. (reddit.com, learn.microsoft.com)

2. Fragmented SKU requests increase operational overhead​

Because each VM size is its own SKU, scaling strategies that rely on flexible instance size switching will require multiple quota increases (one per size). That can create operational overhead and the potential for missed requests — for example, if you need the ability to scale to both P1v3 and P3v3, you must request capacity for both sizes. This nuance invites careful planning of which sizes your App Service plans will actually use in practice. (techcommunity.microsoft.com)

3. Preview limitations and auditability​

The Activity Log currently lacks a meaningful history of quota requests and outcomes in this preview. For compliance-focused organizations and enterprises that require complete audit trails for provisioning and capacity changes, this is a shortcoming. Until the Activity Log and audit mechanisms are enhanced, teams should capture request confirmations and notifications externally for audit purposes. (techcommunity.microsoft.com)

4. Automation lag​

Automation-first teams expect quota changes to be possible via APIs. While Microsoft is drafting quota API docs, the current preview is portal-centric. Organizations that embed capacity checks in CI/CD or infra-as-code pipelines should treat this preview as a step forward but not a full replacement for programmatic quota management. For large-scale automation, wait for the API and bulk request documentation to reach GA. (techcommunity.microsoft.com)

Practical recommendations and best practices​

Inventory and baseline​

  • Run an inventory of App Service plans and map the instance sizes in use across subscriptions and regions.
  • Use the new blade (or the existing Quotas view) to capture current usage per SKU before scaling events.

Request strategy​

  • For planned increases in a single subscription and region, use the self-service quota flow and request the absolute limit you want to see (not an increment).
  • For multi-subscription rollouts (10+ subscriptions) or zone-redundant needs, open a support ticket so Microsoft’s capacity team can coordinate allocations.
  • When planning to support flexible instance sizing, request quotas for every size you may use to avoid a missing-SKU failure during scale operations. (techcommunity.microsoft.com)

Automation and CI/CD​

  • Until the quota API and bulk request functionality are published and stabilized, implement pipeline checks that verify current quota values before deploying or scaling.
  • Capture portal confirmations and ticket IDs into your deployment logs to provide an audit trail while Activity Log improvements are pending.

Monitoring and alerting​

  • Use Azure Monitor alerts tied to App Service plan metrics (e.g., instance count, CPU, memory) to trigger quota checks and preemptive requests rather than reacting after a failed deployment.
  • Build runbooks that include alternate regions or fallback instance sizes if quota increase requests are delayed or rejected.

What to expect next — roadmap signals​

Microsoft’s public preview notes indicate several imminent directions:
  • More SKU coverage: additional SKUs will be added to the dashboard during the preview.
  • Activity Log integration: a more meaningful quota-request history is planned.
  • Quota APIs and bulk request docs: these are being drafted to enable non-portal automation for bulk (non-zone-redundant) requests.
  • Continued reliance on support tickets for zone-redundant and very large/multi-subscription allocations, where manual capacity coordination remains necessary. (techcommunity.microsoft.com)
When those items reach general availability, the experience will be far more suitable for large enterprises and automation-first organizations.

Real-world context: how customers will experience the change​

Many Azure customers have historically reacted to quota-induced failures by switching regions, changing SKUs, or opening support tickets — sometimes repeatedly. The new App Service Quota blade doesn’t eliminate capacity constraints, but it does reduce the surprise factor and shortens the time from discovery to request. In practice, that will translate to fewer emergency pages and reduced time-to-scale for many teams. Community discussions and Microsoft Q&A entries show that the absence of a clear quota view has been a frequent source of friction until now. (reddit.com, learn.microsoft.com)
Operationally, however, organizations with complex networking, strict residency requirements, or those that require zone redundancy will still need to coordinate with Microsoft directly. The preview is a pragmatic compromise that speeds routine requests but preserves manual intervention where regional capacity and redundancy matter.

Final assessment — strengths and risks​

Strengths​

  • Improved visibility: SKU-level usage in the portal, with filters and grouping, gives teams actionable data.
  • Faster scale requests: inline, automated quota requests reduce time-to-resolution for many routine increases.
  • Practical UX: the workflow integrates with existing Quotas resource in the portal and provides support-ticket escalation when automation cannot fulfill a request. (techcommunity.microsoft.com, learn.microsoft.com)

Risks and limits​

  • Regional capacity is still a hard limit: automatic approval only works when physical capacity exists.
  • Partial SKU coverage and audit limitations in the preview mean enterprises should not yet fully replace their governance processes with the new tool.
  • API and automation gaps: until bulk quota APIs are available and documented, large-scale, programmatic quota management remains incomplete. (techcommunity.microsoft.com)

Short checklist for teams adopting the preview​

  • Audit App Service plan instance sizes across subscriptions.
  • Use the new App Service Quota blade to capture current limits and request needed increases in advance of traffic events.
  • Keep support-ticket procedures handy for zone-redundant and multi-subscription rollout scenarios.
  • Add pre-deployment quota checks to CI/CD pipelines until the API/bulk request capability reaches GA.
  • Archive quota request confirmations externally while Activity Log capabilities are still evolving. (techcommunity.microsoft.com, learn.microsoft.com)

Microsoft’s App Service quota self-service preview is a meaningful step toward reducing the operational friction of scaling web apps in Azure. It does not alter the fundamental reality that capacity is regional and sometimes constrained, but it does give developers and IT admins the visibility and a faster path to request more capacity for most routine scenarios. For organizations that plan carefully around SKU usage, integrate quota checks into automation, and keep the support ticket option for high-scale or zone-redundant needs, this preview will materially improve reliability and deployment velocity. (techcommunity.microsoft.com, windowsreport.com)
Conclusion: treat the preview as a valuable operational tool that shortens the time between capacity need and fulfillment for typical App Service deployments, while maintaining caution and support workflows for large-scale, multi-subscription, or zone-redundant operations. (techcommunity.microsoft.com, learn.microsoft.com)

Source: Windows Report Microsoft previews new self-service quota management for Azure App Service
 

Back
Top