Copy software

Mathewo

Member
Joined
Nov 7, 2025
Messages
4
What is your preferred copy software that works on windows platforms?
I have a list
- Teracopy
- Fastcopy
-Syncback
-Gs Richcopy 360
-FreeFileSync
-Goodsync
-Total Commander
If you have any other option , please share it with us , I need to know your experience with it
 

Hi Mathewo — good list. I’ll give a short take on each one you listed, add a few other solid options, then a quick recommendation based on typical use-cases.
Quick notes on your list
  • TeraCopy — Excellent for everyday drag‑and‑drop copies. GUI integration, pause/resume, retries and error handling. Good for manual local copies; not ideal for scripted deployments.
  • FastCopy — Very fast and lightweight, especially for lots of small files. Good verify options and a no‑frills UI. Great for power users who want speed.
  • SyncBack (Free/SE/Pro) — Robust backup/sync tool with scheduling, versioning and lots of options. Good for automated backups and scheduled jobs.
  • GS RichCopy 360 — Commercial product designed for enterprise / multi‑threaded copying over networks; good for large migrations and permissions preservation (paid).
  • FreeFileSync — Excellent two‑way and mirror syncs, batch jobs and real‑time sync. User‑friendly for folder synchronization. (Tip: download from the official site and watch installer options.
  • GoodSync — Commercial, polished sync/backup solution with cloud support and versioning. Good for cross‑device/cloud syncing.
  • Total Commander — File manager with powerful copy routines, multi-rename and plugins. Great when you want manual control inside a file manager interface.
Other options worth considering
  • Robocopy (built into Windows) — The go‑to for reliable scripted/mirrored copies and network transfers. Very robust for unattended jobs. Example common command:
    robocopy "C:\Source" "\server\share\Dest" /MIR /Z /R:3 /W:5 /V /LOG:"C:\logs\robocopy.log"
  • Beyond Compare — Excellent for comparing folders/files and synchronizing after review. Not a pure copy tool, but indispensable when you need to verify or resolve differences.
  • Ultracopier / SuperCopier — GUI alternatives to TeraCopy with some extra options; ok for casual use.
  • rsync (via WSL or cwRsync) — If you’re comfortable with Linux tools or need delta transfers, rsync is powerful for network syncs.
When to pick which
  • Quick manual copies (occasional): TeraCopy or Total Commander.
  • Max speed/local bulk copy (lots of small files): FastCopy.
  • Scripted, repeatable, network-safe copies / migrations: Robocopy or GS RichCopy 360 (if you want GUI + multi-threading, paid).
  • Two‑way syncs or real‑time folder mirroring: FreeFileSync or GoodSync.
  • Scheduled, versioned backups: SyncBack (Pro) or GoodSync.
  • Need to compare/verify before syncing: Beyond Compare + Robocopy/FreeFileSync.
Practical tips / cautions
  • Always test with a small dataset first and verify checksums if the data is critical.
  • For network copies, prefer tools that support restartable mode (/Z in robocopy) and limit retries.
  • For backups, use versioning and retention — don’t rely on a single mirror.
  • Download installers from official vendor sites to avoid bundled adware.
My personal short summary
  • For everyday desktop copying: TeraCopy (easy) or FastCopy (fast).
  • For scripted/enterprise/network jobs: Robocopy for free/reliable, GS RichCopy 360 if you want a paid GUI multi‑threaded option.
  • For sync/backups with scheduling and versioning: SyncBack or GoodSync, FreeFileSync for free GUI syncs.
Want a tailored suggestion?
Tell me what you primarily copy (many small files vs large files), whether copies are local or over network/NAS, and whether you need scheduled/automated jobs — I’ll recommend the best tool + example settings.
 

Short answer: FreeCommander is a friendly, feature‑rich free alternative aimed at users who want dual‑pane convenience with a modern UI and a low learning curve. Total Commander is the long‑standing power‑user tool — more configurable, with a bigger plugin/ecosystem and deeper advanced features (multi‑rename, archive/FTP integrations, scripting). Use FreeCommander if you want simplicity on a budget; use Total Commander if you need maximum power and extensibility.
Quick side‑by‑side (practical differences)
  • UI / usability
  • FreeCommander: cleaner, more modern/default Windows‑like appearance; easier for people moving up from Explorer. Good out‑of‑the‑box.
  • Total Commander: dated look by default but extremely keyboard‑driven; steeper learning curve that pays off for heavy users.
  • Power / features
  • FreeCommander: dual‑pane, tab support, basic archive handling, file previews, some built‑in extras; aimed at everyday advanced file tasks.
  • Total Commander: very feature‑rich (powerful copy routines, advanced multi‑rename, numerous plugins for file systems, archivers, cloud/FTP, file ops and automation). Better for complex workflows.
  • Plugins & extensibility
  • FreeCommander: limited plugin ecosystem compared with Total Commander; covers most common tasks but fewer third‑party add‑ons.
  • Total Commander: long history and large plugin ecosystem (WCX/WFX/WLX/etc., so you can extend it for unusual needs (network filesystems, special archive formats, custom tools).
  • Scripting/automation
  • FreeCommander: useful built‑ins and batch ops for normal tasks.
  • Total Commander: more options for automation, custom commands and integrations that power users rely on.
  • Licensing / cost
  • FreeCommander: has a free version and an inexpensive paid edition (small one‑time fee for extra features).
  • Total Commander: shareware (paid license; long history of paid registration for continued use).
  • Stability & updates
  • Both are mature; Total Commander receives steady, conservative updates and has a large user base; FreeCommander is actively used and a good low‑risk choice for most users.
Which should you pick?
  • Pick FreeCommander if: you want a free/easy transition from Explorer, a modern UI, and solid dual‑pane file work without heavy customization.
  • Pick Total Commander if: you’re a power user who needs extensive plugin support, scripting/custom commands, advanced archive/FTP/network features and maximal configurability.
Quick practical test (2 minutes)
  • Download the portable builds of both (so you can try without installing).
  • Try these tasks in each: move a large folder between drives, open/edit an archive, use multi‑rename on 50 files, connect to an FTP server.
  • Pick the one that feels faster and more comfortable — both are small enough to keep installed if you like features from each.
If you tell me which tasks you do most (bulk renames, FTP, syncing, archive management, scripting), I’ll recommend one of them and list the specific plugins/settings to set up.
 

What is your preferred copy software that works on windows platforms?
I have a list
- Teracopy
- Fastcopy
-Syncback
-Gs Richcopy 360
-FreeFileSync
-Goodsync
-Total Commander
If you have any other option , please share it with us , I need to know your experience with it
I mostly use FastCopy on Windows 11. It’s quick, reliable, and great for big file moves. TeraCopy is nice too if you want something easy with a clean look. For backup or syncing, FreeFileSync works really well. I’d say go with FastCopy if you want speed, and FreeFileSync if you need regular backups.
 

What is your preferred copy software that works on windows platforms?
I have a list
- Teracopy
- Fastcopy
-Syncback
-Gs Richcopy 360
-FreeFileSync
-Goodsync
-Total Commander
If you have any other option , please share it with us , I need to know your experience with it
I use fastcopy, it is very good and get the job done, but Gs Richcopy 360 is also a good option, you can try that.
 

I mostly use FastCopy on Windows 11. It’s quick, reliable, and great for big file moves. TeraCopy is nice too if you want something easy with a clean look. For backup or syncing, FreeFileSync works really well. I’d say go with FastCopy if you want speed, and FreeFileSync if you need regular backups.
FreeFileSync also looks good
 

I would to share the final list from the previous list , realy Gs Richcopy 360 and Goodsync are great and full featured
 

Makes sense, Mathewo — GS RichCopy 360 and GoodSync are both “complete” solutions (lots of knobs, good handling of real-world edge cases, and strong automation).
If you want to post a clean “final list” to the thread, here’s a polished version you can copy/paste (with a quick one-liner per tool):

Final list (Windows copy / sync tools)​

Fast copy (manual transfers)​

  • TeraCopy — Easy everyday copy/verify, pause/resume, better UI than Explorer.
  • FastCopy — Very fast for large jobs / many files, great verify options.

Sync / backup (automation & profiles)​

  • SyncBack (Free/SE/Pro) — Strong scheduling and backup features (more “backup” oriented).
  • FreeFileSync — Excellent folder sync/mirror workflows; good for two-way syncs.
  • GoodSync — Full-featured sync/backup with lots of destinations and solid automation (recommended).

Migration / enterprise-grade copy​

  • GS RichCopy 360 — Advanced copy engine (multi-threaded), strong for large migrations and network copies (recommended).

File manager with powerful copy tools​

  • Total Commander — Great file management + dependable copy/move routines.

Built-in (worth a mention)​

  • Robocopy (Windows built-in) — Best for scripted/repeatable copies and migrations; extremely reliable.
If you tell me your “final list” goal (free-only list, best-for-home, best-for-enterprise, or “my top 5”), I can condense this down to a short ranked list for posting.
 

Back
Top