Critical CVE-2025-40746 in Siemens RTLS Locating Manager: Patch and Harden Now

Siemens’ SIMATIC RTLS Locating Manager was republished in a consolidated advisory this August after vendor and national vulnerability databases identified a high‑severity improper input‑validation flaw that can give an authenticated attacker with elevated application privileges the potential to execute code as NT AUTHORITY\SYSTEM, and operators should treat this as a priority patch-and-hardening task. (nvd.nist.gov)

Background​

SIMATIC RTLS Locating Manager is the Windows‑based server component in Siemens’ real‑time location system (RTLS) portfolio; it collects measurements from gateways, computes tag positions, and exposes location feeds and APIs for integration with warehouse management, MES, and analytics stacks. The product is widely deployed in critical manufacturing, logistics, and transportation environments worldwide, making vulnerabilities in the product operationally sensitive.
On 12 August 2025 Siemens disclosed one of the more serious issues in this family as CVE‑2025‑40746: an improper input validation weakness in a backup script used by Locating Manager versions prior to V3.2. Vendor scoring and follow‑on trackers reported a CVSS v3.1 base of 9.1 and a CVSS v4 base of 9.4 for that CVE — ratings that classify the issue as critical due to network accessibility and high impact to confidentiality, integrity, and availability. These vendor CVE entries are reflected in public databases and vendor advisories. (cvedetails.com, tenable.com)
Siemens subsequently republished related ProductCERT advisories covering additional RTLS fixes, including a later V3.3 update that consolidated further issues across the product family (including separate CVEs for local loopback and credential storage weaknesses). Operators should track both the original SSA‑493787 advisory for CVE‑2025‑40746 and the vendor’s later consolidation notices for the most current remediation guidance. (cert-portal.siemens.com, tenable.com)

---

Executive summary — what every administrator needs to know​

• A critical improper input validation vulnerability (CWE‑20) in a Locating Manager backup script is tracked as CVE‑2025‑40746 and affects SIMATIC RTLS Locating Manager versions prior to V3.2. (nvd.nist.gov)
• Vendor scoring places CVE‑2025‑40746 at CVSS v3.1 = 9.1 and CVSS v4 = 9.4, indicating remote exploitable attack vector with high privileges required in‑app but with severe system impact (possible SYSTEM code execution). (tenable.com, cvedetails.com)
• Siemens recommends updating to V3.2 or later for CVE‑2025‑40746; a later ProductCERT consolidation points to V3.3 to address other RTLS issues — patch to the latest available release after testing.
• CISA reiterated the vendor guidance in its advisory archive and emphasizes network isolation and defense‑in‑depth for OT/RTLS infrastructure; CISA no longer provides continuous Siemens updates beyond initial advisories, so ProductCERT is the canonical source.

---

Technical overview​

The vulnerability in plain language​

The root cause for CVE‑2025‑40746 is inadequate validation of input to an automated backup script used by the Locating Manager. Specifically, the product accepts input to the backup process that an authenticated user with elevated Manager privileges can control; this insufficient sanitization allows crafted input to be processed in a way that leads to arbitrary code execution in the context of the Windows service, elevating attacker control to SYSTEM. (nvd.nist.gov, cvedetails.com)
This is not a classic unauthenticated remote‑code‑execution hole — it requires a user authenticated to the application with high application privileges — but because the exploitable code path runs under the Locating Manager service context, the consequences of a successful exploit are equivalent to full host compromise. The vendor‑provided CVSS vectors explicitly reflect a requirement for high privileges in the application (PR:H) while still assigning Network attack vector and low attack complexity. (tenable.com)

Related weaknesses in the product family​

August 2025 vendor republishing highlighted additional CVEs in the same component family: a reachable assertion on a loopback listening port (CVE‑2025‑30034) that can be triggered by a local process to cause a denial‑of‑service, and a credential storage weakness in Report Clients (CVE‑2025‑40751) that can allow local credential extraction and privilege escalation to Systemadministrator. Those issues were addressed in later updates and are a reminder that the Locating Manager historically contained both remote and local trust‑assumption flaws. (nvd.nist.gov, tenable.com)

Why this is operationally important​

RTLS components are not isolated curiosities; they integrate with automation, AGVs, WMS, and analytics. If a Locating Manager host becomes compromised, attackers can:

• Disrupt location feeds and availability for dependent systems (availability impact).
• Modify or falsify positional data (integrity impact) to misdirect processes, logistics, or safety controls.
• Harvest credentials and pivot into adjacent services — such as integration middleware or MES — because RTLS admin accounts often have elevated integration roles.

In short, a vulnerable Locating Manager is a high‑value target in any OT/IT‑converged environment.

---

Verification and cross‑checks​

Key technical claims in this analysis were verified against multiple independent repositories and the vendor advisory:

• Vendor CNA and published advisory entries for CVE‑2025‑40746 and related RTLS CVEs. (nvd.nist.gov, cert-portal.siemens.com)
• Public vulnerability trackers (Tenable, CVE Details, NVD) that reproduced vendor scoring and the CWE mapping to CWE‑20 (Improper Input Validation). (tenable.com, cvedetails.com)

Where vendor and public trackers disagree on procedural details (for example, exact remediation version numbers in early and later advisories), operators must treat Siemens ProductCERT as authoritative and confirm the specific ProductCERT advisory ID and release notes before applying patches. If any claim could not be directly corroborated in two independent, reputable sources, it is called out explicitly in this article as time‑sensitive and requiring a fresh check against ProductCERT.

---

Practical mitigation playbook — immediate actions​

1. Inventory and prioritize
   • Identify every host running SIMATIC RTLS Locating Manager, all Report/Track Viewer Clients, and operator consoles. Record version strings and SKUs. Prioritize hosts that interface directly with production automation, AGV fleets, or enterprise systems.
2. Patch quickly, but safely
   • Test the vendor update in a staging environment first. Apply Siemens’ ProductCERT updates (V3.2 to remediate CVE‑2025‑40746; V3.3 may be required for subsequent CVEs) following your change‑control window. If your environment uses vendor or integrator‑provided images, coordinate a validated upgrade path. (nvd.nist.gov, tenable.com)
3. Compensating controls if patching will be delayed
   • Remove any internet exposure: ensure Locating Manager and clients are not accessible from the public internet. Put RTLS hosts behind an OT/DMZ firewall and restrict in‑scope IPs/ports to only what is necessary.
   • Harden the Windows host: enforce least privilege for services, remove unnecessary local accounts, lock down interactive logons, and apply OS security patches.
4. Credential hygiene
   • Rotate and re‑protect any credentials stored by Report Clients or operator consoles after patching. Migrate from local file stores to an enterprise secrets vault or OS‑backed secure store where possible. Limit the number of accounts with Systemadministrator rights.
5. Monitoring and detection
   • Enable and centralize Windows event logging, process monitoring, and file integrity checks on RTLS hosts. Create alerts for unexpected service restarts, failed privilege operations, and unusual API calls to Locating Manager endpoints. Maintain baselines for normal traffic and API patterns.
6. Incident readiness
   • Backups and rollback plans: verify backups are isolated and restorable before applying patches. If credential exposure is suspected, assume compromise, rotate secrets, and conduct a forensic review of host artifacts and logs.

---

Detection guidance — indicators to watch for​

• Unexpected spawn of child processes from the backup script binary or the Locating Manager service process.
• New or modified scheduled tasks that run backup or maintenance scripts.
• Sudden restarts or crashes of the Locating Manager service (could signal exploitation or the trigger of reachable assertion bugs).
• Unusual outbound network connections from the Locating Manager host, especially to unknown destinations or cloud storage endpoints.
• Access attempts to privileged RTLS APIs from non‑whitelisted operator workstations.

Log collection should include Windows Security, Application, and System logs; process command‑line arguments; and file hash inventories for any binary modified since the last patch cycle.

---

Risk analysis and threat modeling​

Strengths in Siemens’ response​

Siemens assigned this issue a high severity, released a ProductCERT advisory, and provided version guidance for remediation. Public CVE records were created quickly and populated by multiple CVE aggregators and vulnerability trackers, enabling customers to hunt for affected assets via common scanners. The vendor’s step to republish consolidated advisories (V3.3 coverage) demonstrates attention to lifecycle maintenance and a willingness to consolidate fixes across multiple CVEs. (tenable.com, cert-portal.siemens.com)

Where organizations remain exposed​

• Local‑trust assumptions: Several CVEs in the product family target local interfaces (loopback, client‑side credential stores). If an attacker can breach an operator workstation or a less‑hardened test host, the pathway to privilege escalation is real. Local access vectors are often overlooked when organizations focus solely on internet exposure.
• Patch lag and operational constraints: RTLS systems are often tightly coupled to production schedules; operators sometimes defer patching. This creates windows of exposure where adversaries can weaponize disclosed flaws or chain them with other weaknesses.
• Secrets management gaps: The Report Client credential storage weakness demonstrates that product ecosystems still ship with insecure defaults for secret handling. Until secrets are consolidated into hardened vaults, the risk of credential harvesting and lateral pivoting remains high. (tenable.com)

Attack scenarios to prioritize in tabletop exercises​

• An operator workstation is phished and a low‑privilege tool executes a binary that leverages the credential storage weakness to steal Manager credentials, then runs the backup script abuse path to gain SYSTEM code execution on the Locating Manager host.
• A compromised test box on the OT VLAN triggers the loopback assertion CVE, causing a service crash during peak shift transitions and disrupting AGV operations.
• A sophisticated adversary targeting supply‑chain artifacts seeds a malicious DLL into an installer path and uses previously published web installer DLL‑hijacking issues to move from installer context to service compromise on the Locating Manager host. (Note: Siemens has had separate installer integrity advisories; verify for your environment.)

---

Long‑term recommendations for RTLS owners​

• Adopt secrets vaulting and ephemeral credentials for all RTLS clients and integration points. Reduce or eliminate persistent plaintext credential stores.
• Enforce strict network segmentation: place RTLS servers in a hardened OT/DMZ with allow‑lists and micro‑segmentation between operator consoles, test labs, and core servers.
• Maintain a software bill of materials for RTLS components and integrate ProductCERT advisories into patch management and change‑control processes. Operators should subscribe to Siemens ProductCERT notification channels; CISA will not continue iterative advisories beyond the initial CISA posts for Siemens products.
• Insist on secure default configurations from vendors: encryption of in‑transit client resources, signed and integrity‑checked update packages, and hardened installers. If a vendor repeatedly ships components with local trust assumptions or weak credential handling, require contractual remediation SLAs.

---

Limitations, caveats, and unverifiable assertions​

• Public trackers reflect the vendor’s CNA submissions for CVE vectors and scores; occasionally NVD enrichment can alter presentation or add analysis. This article relied on Siemens’ CNA‑provided vectors and public trackers (NVD, Tenable, CVE Details) for score verification at the time of writing. Operators should re‑check the current NVD and Siemens ProductCERT entries immediately prior to triage, as scores or vector nuances may be updated. (nvd.nist.gov, tenable.com)
• The vendor‑provided advisory identifies the attacker requirement as “authenticated with high privileges in the application.” Exact exploit complexity and any constraints in real‑world exploitability (such as specific configuration prerequisites) are determined by implementation details Siemens documents in its remediation notes; if those are needed for proof‑of‑concept or scanner tuning, pull the ProductCERT advisory files for the patched build and release notes. If any claim here cannot be validated against at least two independent technical sources, it is called out and should be double‑checked in live triage.

---

Recommended checklist for operators (actionable)​

• Inventory: list all RTLS hosts, report clients, and operator consoles; capture versions and SKUs.
• Patch: test and deploy Siemens’ ProductCERT updates (V3.2 or later for CVE‑2025‑40746; ensure any follow‑on advisories are applied). (nvd.nist.gov, tenable.com)
• Isolate: confirm no Locating Manager endpoints are reachable from the internet and restrict lateral movement with allow‑lists.
• Rotate secrets: change and re‑protect any credentials stored or used by Report Clients, operator consoles, and integration accounts.
• Monitor: enable Windows process, event, and file integrity logging and centralize logs for detection.
• Test: perform offline exploit simulation in an isolated lab to validate remediation and detections; ensure rollback plans are in place.

---

Conclusion​

CVE‑2025‑40746 in the SIMATIC RTLS Locating Manager is a critical vulnerability that turns an application‑level privileged account into a potential route for full host compromise via an improperly validated backup script. The practical consequence for industrial and logistics operations is severe: SYSTEM‑level compromise of the Locating Manager can disrupt availability, falsify location integrity, and act as a pivot for broader OT/IT intrusion. Public repositories and Siemens’ ProductCERT have issued guidance and patches; the immediate priority for operators is controlled patching to the latest vendor release, combined with host hardening, credential rotation, and network segmentation. (tenable.com, nvd.nist.gov)
Treat RTLS infrastructure as a first‑order security concern. Patch fast, isolate aggressively, and assume that local trust boundaries are fragile — because they are.

---

Source: CISA Siemens SIMATIC RTLS Locating Manager | CISA