Critical Vulnerabilities in FESTO CODESYS Gateway V2 Threaten Industrial Security

In the rapidly evolving world of industrial control systems (ICS), vulnerabilities within automation infrastructure can reverberate far beyond the factory floor, exposing critical manufacturing environments to increasingly sophisticated cyber threats. Recent advisories concerning the FESTO CODESYS Gateway Server V2 have brought such issues to the forefront, detailing a constellation of severe vulnerabilities with the potential to disrupt or compromise essential operational processes worldwide. This feature offers an in-depth analysis of these security flaws, their potential impact on critical infrastructure, the technical realities underlying these threats, and a critical outlook on both the strengths and gaps in the proposed mitigations.

The Heart of Automation: FESTO and CODESYS​

FESTO, headquartered in Germany, is a global leader in industrial automation and control solutions, supplying both hardware and software to enhance efficiency in manufacturing environments. Central to many FESTO systems is CODESYS—an industrial automation platform supporting programmable logic controllers (PLCs), gateways, and supervisory control mechanisms. Within this architecture, the CODESYS Gateway Server enables seamless communication between user workstations and PLCs, orchestrating crucial data transfers in real-time.
As digital transformation drives factories toward interconnected ICS networks, the role of robust, secure gateways becomes paramount. The recent vulnerabilities identified within the FESTO CODESYS Gateway Server V2 underscore the high stakes involved in securing these vital links.

Executive Summary: High-Severity Vulnerabilities​

A security disclosure coordinated by CERT@VDE and published by CISA outlines three core vulnerabilities present in all versions of the FESTO CODESYS Gateway Server V2 prior to version 2.3.9.38. The risks can be succinctly summarized as follows:

• Partial String Comparison (CWE-187): Enables authentication bypass by matching only a portion of the password (CVE-2022-31802, CVSS v3.1: 9.8)
• Uncontrolled Resource Consumption (CWE-400): Allows service denial by exhausting available TCP connections (CVE-2022-31803, CVSS v3.1: 5.3)
• Memory Allocation with Excessive Size Value (CWE-789): Permits attackers to crash the gateway by allocating excessive memory (CVE-2022-31804, CVSS v3.1: 7.5)

These flaws can be exploited remotely and require minimal technical skill to abuse, thus presenting a low barrier for potential attackers. Successful exploitation could lead to unauthorized access, service unavailability, or complete system crashes within critical manufacturing networks.

Technical Deep Dive: Understanding the Vulnerabilities​

1. Partial String Comparison (CWE-187)​

Perhaps the most severe of the issues, this vulnerability arises from improper password verification logic in CODESYS Gateway Server V2 versions prior to 2.3.9.38. Instead of comparing the full input string to the stored password, the software only checks whether a fragment of the provided password matches the corresponding prefix of the real password. An attacker who submits a truncated password—matching just the start of the actual password—can gain unauthorized access, completely undermining gateway authentication controls.
This flaw (CVE-2022-31802, scored 9.8/10) enables straightforward exploitation, particularly if attackers can guess or infer even part of the actual password. In ICS environments, where strong password policies and complexity are not always enforced due to operational constraints, the real-world risk is significant.

2. Uncontrolled Resource Consumption (CWE-400)​

A classic denial-of-service (DoS) pathway, this vulnerability stems from poor management of TCP client sessions. The gateway fails to adequately vet client connection activity, allowing an unauthenticated party to initiate—and leave open—numerous TCP connections. Over time, this can saturate the server’s connection pool, preventing new legitimate users or automation clients from connecting. While existing sessions remain unaffected, loss of remote access at the wrong moment could have cascading operational consequences.
This issue (CVE-2022-31803, scored 5.3/10) highlights a frequently overlooked facet of ICS security: resource management under adversarial conditions.

3. Memory Allocation with Excessive Size Value (CWE-789)​

The gateway server's insufficient validation of request sizes introduces the risk of memory exhaustion. An unauthenticated attacker can submit requests that direct the server to allocate vast amounts of memory, ultimately leading to a system crash as available resources are depleted. Given that many ICS gateways run on fixed-resource industrial PCs or embedded hardware, the threshold for catastrophic failure may be dangerously low.
CVE-2022-31804 (scored 7.5/10) is especially dangerous in unattended or remotely managed environments where a crash could mean hours or even days of downtime and physical intervention for recovery.

Risks to Critical Infrastructure: A Global Concern​

CODESYS is widely embedded in critical manufacturing, with FESTO’s solutions deployed across production lines, process automation, and advanced robotics in diverse industrial sectors. The potential fallout from exploits targeting these vulnerabilities is magnified by three key trends:

• Universal Exposure: Industrial environments are increasingly interconnected, often with legacy network architectures not designed for the realities of persistent cyber threats.
• Automation Dependency: Automation systems are central to uptime, safety, and productivity—any disruption can influence supply chains and, in worst cases, public safety.
• Global Deployment: As depicted in the advisories, FESTO solutions are operational worldwide, making these vulnerabilities not just a local but an international risk.

While there is no evidence of public exploitation as of this writing, the simplicity and severity of the attacks outlined render FESTO CODESYS Gateway environments attractive targets for cybercriminals and advanced persistent threats (APTs) alike.

Mitigation Strategies: Strengths and Limitations​

FESTO and leading cybersecurity bodies, including CISA and CERT@VDE, have published a comprehensive set of recommendations for affected organizations:

• Immediate Remediation: Upgrade CODESYS Gateway Server V2 to version 2.3.9.38 or later, where these vulnerabilities have been addressed.
• Password Protection: Ensure all gateways require strong authentication, explicitly enabling password protection if not already configured. However, users should note that password configuration files are not covered by FESTO’s default backup/restore routines, requiring manual intervention to secure credentials post-upgrade—a crucial operational detail that, if missed, could undermine restoration efforts after incidents.
• Network Isolation: Limit network exposure of ICS devices, positioning them behind secure firewalls and physically or logically segregating control networks from general business systems.
• Remote Access Hardening: Rely on secured VPNs for remote management. While VPNs are not immune to attack, they meaningfully reduce the attack surface when kept current and robustly configured.
• Proactive Monitoring: Adopt comprehensive logging and anomaly detection across ICS assets to spot malicious activity quickly.

Supplementing these manufacturer-specific steps, CISA’s guidance is clear: protect against both technical and social engineering threats by following industry best practices, such as:

• Minimizing exposure of devices to the public internet.
• Applying defense-in-depth strategies, combining technical, human, and procedural safeguards.
• Training users to recognize phishing and email-based threats.

Strengths of the Response​

These advisories represent a clear, actionable framework for ICS operators to follow. The emphasis on prompt patching and layered network defenses reflect lessons learned from previous high-profile ICS compromises.
Explicit detail regarding the password configuration file's backup exclusion is a noteworthy positive, as it preempts post-upgrade mishaps and aligns with responsible disclosure best practices.

Potential Limitations​

Despite robust recommendations, several challenges may impede universal risk mitigation:

• Patch and Upgrade Cycles: ICS environments notoriously lag behind IT in applying patches, due to the need to maintain process stability, the fear of disrupting production, and the prevalence of legacy systems incompatible with newer software. Even with new versions available, global fleets of vulnerable devices may remain unaddressed for months or years.
• Resource Constraints: Many industrial organizations lack sufficient cybersecurity expertise or resources, hindering thorough risk assessments and timely remediation.
• Backup Nuances: The need to manually secure password configuration files may easily be overlooked, especially in environments that automate system backups. If a restoration from backup omits these files, security assumptions could fail during a critical event.
• Limited Detection: Without widespread adoption of advanced monitoring and logging, exploit attempts—successful or otherwise—may fly under the radar. This is especially concerning in sectors where system uptime trumps visibility or incident response readiness.

The Bigger Picture: CODESYS, ICS, and Cybersecurity Trends​

CODESYS underpins countless industrial products, from PLCs to safety controllers, and is licensed by hundreds of vendors across the globe. Its ubiquity both raises awareness of common vulnerabilities and provides attackers with a large, relatively homogenous target. The flaws identified in the FESTO Gateway are not unique, but rather symptomatic of a broader challenge: balancing openness, interoperability, and legacy support against escalating cyber risk.
The industrial cyber threat landscape is evolving rapidly. Attackers—ranging from financially motivated criminals to state-sponsored actors—are increasingly targeting ICS environments for extortion, espionage, or sabotage. Credential-based attacks, denial of service, and resource exhaustion are all growing concerns in environments formerly considered insulated from the internet or too niche to attract unwanted attention.
This changing reality is visible not just in advisories such as these, but in the strategic priorities of organizations like CISA, which increasingly emphasize proactive, rather than reactive, security postures for ICS users. Best practices documents, such as "Improving Industrial Control Systems Cybersecurity with Defense-in-Depth Strategies," are now recommended reading for all organizations operating critical processes.

Recommendations for ICS Leaders and Stakeholders​

Drawing from both the specifics of the FESTO CODESYS vulnerabilities and broader industry trends, the following best practices emerge for leaders, managers, and hands-on engineers:

1. Implement Rapid Patch Management​

• Maintain a real-time inventory of all deployed controllers, gateways, and associated software.
• Prioritize patching of critical vulnerabilities, especially those rated CVSS 7.0 or above.
• Whenever possible, establish redundancy and testing environments to validate updates prior to deploying into production.

2. Harden Authentication and Access Controls​

• Require strong, unique passwords for all ICS interfaces. Where possible, implement multi-factor authentication.
• Regularly audit and update credential storage and backup procedures to ensure all critical files, not just standard system images, are protected and encrypted during transfers.

3. Segregate and Shield Control Networks​

• Employ physical and logical separation of production networks, limiting interactions with business IT or external systems.
• Use advanced firewalls with strict allow/block rulesets, and segment networks to reduce the blast radius of any compromise.

4. Monitor for Anomalies and Incidents​

• Deploy real-time intrusion detection systems (IDS) and maintain comprehensive, centralized logs.
• Train personnel to recognize both system-level anomalies (unusual connections, failed logins, resource exhaustion) and social engineering tactics.

5. Foster a Culture of Continuous Security Improvement​

• Conduct regular cyber risk assessment exercises and tabletop incident response drills.
• Engage with industry groups and vendors for up-to-date threat intelligence and best practices.

Looking Forward: Balancing Innovation and Security​

As cyber threats continue to evolve in both volume and sophistication, the risks associated with vulnerable ICS platforms can no longer be an afterthought. The FESTO CODESYS Gateway vulnerabilities exemplify the kinds of weaknesses that—if left unaddressed—could facilitate high-impact attacks, even across well-defended perimeters.
Yet these challenges also provide an opportunity for positive change. Organizations that respond proactively—by patching, hardening, and monitoring—will not only minimize immediate risk but also elevate their resilience against the next wave of industrial cyber threats.
The imperative is clear: maintain a vigilant focus on patching and secure configuration, continuously evaluate attack surfaces, and invest in both technical and human capabilities for threat detection and response. With operational continuity, safety, and fiscal performance on the line, the cost of complacency has never been higher.
For the ICS community and its supply chain, these latest advisories on FESTO and CODESYS serve as both a warning and a roadmap, highlighting that the dual priorities of automation and security are not mutually exclusive—but rather, fundamentally intertwined.

---

Source: CISA FESTO CODESYS | CISA