Cursor, the AI coding assistant that has quietly become a developer’s secret weapon, didn’t just pop into existence and disrupt the world of software engineering overnight — although from the way it’s taken over desks and screens in Silicon Valley, you’d be forgiven for thinking it had landed with the force of a meteorite. What began as a canny little project out of a startup called Anysphere has this year thumped its name on the board in the AI tool race, catching the watchful (and admittedly acquisitive) eyes of tech’s biggest players, not least OpenAI, who reportedly courted Anysphere not once, but twice, before instead setting their financial sights on another AI coding darling, Windsurf.
Some stories in Silicon Valley practically write themselves. Picture it: a handful of ambitious founders, a shoestring budget, and a wild hunch that modern programmers want more than what incumbents like Copilot (from Microsoft) offer. Anysphere sets out to change the game with Cursor, an AI coding assistant that promises not only to speed up the slog of software building, but to make the whole process—dare we say it—fun.
And fun, it turns out, is exactly how developers describe this tool. Cursor’s knack for “vibe coding”—a phrase popularized by none other than OpenAI co-founder Andrej Karpathy—has put it on the map as a staple for getting into the zone, for short-circuiting tedium, for making stack traces and spaghetti code seem just a bit more like a collaborative jam session than a bug-hunting marathon.
By March, Cursor boasted over a million daily users. To put that in perspective, that’s more eyeballs than the average hacker conference sees in a decade, and more hands wrangling code than you can shake a dusty Java textbook at.
Fueling this engine: serious revenue. As of January, Anysphere was reportedly pulling in over $100 million in recurring revenue. Investors didn’t need a second invitation. Andreessen Horowitz, Benchmark, Thrive Capital, and even the OpenAI Startup Fund shimmied onboard.
First, last year. At the time, Anysphere was growing but wasn’t yet the primal force it would soon become. Then—again this year—after Cursor’s daily user base swelled and “vibe coding” had become a catchy career enhancer.
But, as it often goes in the Valley, the talks didn’t stick. For reasons yet unpacked—the temptations of independence, a sticker-shocking price tag, or a mutual sense that partnership wasn’t right—no handshake was made. Instead, OpenAI reportedly turned its sizable war chest toward Windsurf, the next AI coding startup in its crosshairs, at a breathtaking rumored buyout price of around $3 billion.
This gives Cursor users a tangible choice. Where Microsoft’s Copilot leans on OpenAI’s GPT-4, Cursor offers a potent rival experience, with many developers reporting preference for Cursor’s output—especially for longer, more complicated programming sessions. That’s the power of model agnosticism: when one LLM can’t autocomplete your obscure regular expression, another just might.
And Cursor hasn’t been resting on model laurels. As Sam Altman, OpenAI CEO, took to announcing a new generation of reasoning models (the cryptically named o3, and the more diminutive but mighty o4-mini), the team at Anysphere rushed to ensure the latest OpenAI models were available within Cursor as well. Frictionless access to the world’s top AIs, in a familiar-yet-supercharged IDE wrapper? Developers didn’t need to be asked twice.
Microsoft’s investment spree, funneled into both OpenAI and the cloud data centers behind its GitHub Copilot, shows just how high the stakes have become. With OpenAI’s new reasoning models touted as “super good at coding,” the chess game has veered into endgame territory. Each product release, each model upgrade, each (sometimes public, sometimes backroom) acquisition attempt is a play for dominance.
Cursor, by maintaining flexibility and refusing to be tied down to a single mega-corporate overlord, has given itself a unique advantage. Developers crave autonomy, empiricism, and a sense that their daily work isn’t being wholly digested into telemetry and sold back to them as a “personalized experience.” Cursor’s vibe, as much philosophical as technical, has made it not just a tool but a statement.
Windsurf’s emergence as a billion-dollar prospect underscores the all-hands-on-deck panic sweeping through tech’s biggest boardrooms: miss the next wave of AI-powered programming, and risk being left in the dust by a new, nimbler generation of tools and teams.
Cursor, in particular, has leaned into this transformation. Where Copilot and its cousins have sometimes been pilloried as distracting or too generic, Cursor delights in being a tool that developers shape to their needs—not the other way around. Its success lies in meeting coders where they live: at the intersection of creativity, frustration, and caffeine.
What’s more, the skyrocketing daily user numbers suggest this isn’t a niche movement. As more code is written with the help of Cursor and friends, the very nature of software development is shifting. No, AI coding tools won’t replace programmers, any more than spreadsheets wiped out accountants. But as they get smarter and more context-aware, the definition of “programmer” is broadening. Sure, you still need to know your classes from your closures. But suddenly, knowing how to wrangle AI suggestions, spot hallucinations, and redirect LLM-powered copilots is just as core a skill.
It’s no surprise, then, that when Cursor’s leadership went shopping for new investment at a valuation approaching $10 billion, they drew an eager crowd. In a market where most startups would kill (metaphorically, we hope) for a tenth of those numbers, Anysphere looks set for a long run at the center of the technology maelstrom.
That agility might prove to be the difference maker. As the LLM field becomes crowded and feature sets begin to converge, the winners won’t just be those who make the best models—they’ll be the companies who deliver those models into developers’ hands, and who shape the workflows in ways that feel intuitive rather than disruptive.
Already, with products like OpenAI’s newly announced Codex CLI aiming to lower the technical barriers for deploying powerful models in real-world pipelines, there’s an uneasy sense that the ground is shifting. The AI wars, once the preserve of brainy researchers and startup cowboys, are now boardroom affairs—to be won not just on technical merit but also through ecosystem lock-in, business partnerships, and sheer, unfiltered user love.
Cursor’s secret sauce isn’t just technical; it’s cultural. The company’s refusal to tie its destiny to any single LLM vendor, its embrace of developer autonomy, its relentless focus on user feedback rather than corporate bean-counting—all combine to make Cursor a darling of the community. The open questions—How will Cursor respond to even fiercer competition? Will it someday succumb to acquisition—but on its own terms?—are the sorts of things to keep AI aficionados glued to their news feeds.
Meanwhile, founders at small and large AI coding tools alike would be wise to study Cursor’s path: model flexibility, deep engagement with developer communities, and a refusal to be boxed in by any single ecosystem. Cursor’s trajectory is a potent reminder that the future of coding—and perhaps the fate of the next digital superpowers—lies as much in attitude as in algorithms.
OpenAI’s gaze, intense but (so far) unrequited, hasn’t slowed Cursor’s pace. If anything, it’s thrown gasoline on the innovation fire. As the world’s largest technology companies fight it out in the cloud, the winners—at least today—are the millions of programmers who now have access to tools that were sci-fi fantasy only a few years ago.
Cursor’s journey is proof that speed, flexibility, and community engagement are the new table stakes in a world remade by AI. Whether Cursor remains an independent powerhouse or succumbs to the gravity of a trillion-dollar titan, one thing is certain: “vibe coding” is here, and software development may never look the same.
So, open your IDE, fire up your favorite LLM, and get coding—the future of programming just got a whole lot more interesting. And Cursor, for now, is setting the pace.
Source: Dataconomy Cursor was on OpenAI’s radar before Windsurf
Cursor’s Meteoric Rise: No Code Left Unoptimized
Some stories in Silicon Valley practically write themselves. Picture it: a handful of ambitious founders, a shoestring budget, and a wild hunch that modern programmers want more than what incumbents like Copilot (from Microsoft) offer. Anysphere sets out to change the game with Cursor, an AI coding assistant that promises not only to speed up the slog of software building, but to make the whole process—dare we say it—fun.And fun, it turns out, is exactly how developers describe this tool. Cursor’s knack for “vibe coding”—a phrase popularized by none other than OpenAI co-founder Andrej Karpathy—has put it on the map as a staple for getting into the zone, for short-circuiting tedium, for making stack traces and spaghetti code seem just a bit more like a collaborative jam session than a bug-hunting marathon.
By March, Cursor boasted over a million daily users. To put that in perspective, that’s more eyeballs than the average hacker conference sees in a decade, and more hands wrangling code than you can shake a dusty Java textbook at.
Anysphere’s Billion-Dollar Streak
Cursor’s traction has done more than win hearts and IDE slots; it’s rocketed Anysphere into rare tech air. In April, sources cited by Bloomberg claimed Anysphere was in fundraising talks at a near-$10 billion valuation. That’s a number that makes unicorn status seem a little passé—one that puts Anysphere in the blindingly bright headlights of the industry’s major powerbrokers.Fueling this engine: serious revenue. As of January, Anysphere was reportedly pulling in over $100 million in recurring revenue. Investors didn’t need a second invitation. Andreessen Horowitz, Benchmark, Thrive Capital, and even the OpenAI Startup Fund shimmied onboard.
OpenAI and the Courtship Dance
The AI arms race is not for the faint of heart. With AI moving fast, little wonder OpenAI, the high priests of generative intelligence, circled in for a closer look at Cursor and Anysphere—twice, according to sources.First, last year. At the time, Anysphere was growing but wasn’t yet the primal force it would soon become. Then—again this year—after Cursor’s daily user base swelled and “vibe coding” had become a catchy career enhancer.
But, as it often goes in the Valley, the talks didn’t stick. For reasons yet unpacked—the temptations of independence, a sticker-shocking price tag, or a mutual sense that partnership wasn’t right—no handshake was made. Instead, OpenAI reportedly turned its sizable war chest toward Windsurf, the next AI coding startup in its crosshairs, at a breathtaking rumored buyout price of around $3 billion.
The Cursor Differentiator: More Than Just Claude
Why has Cursor managed to kernel-panic its way into relevance so quickly? A big part of the answer is right under the hood: Cursor isn’t beholden to one large language model. Its desktop application draws power not just from the usual suspects, but notably from Anthropic’s Claude 3.5 Sonnet—a model lauded for its reasoning and contextual prowess.This gives Cursor users a tangible choice. Where Microsoft’s Copilot leans on OpenAI’s GPT-4, Cursor offers a potent rival experience, with many developers reporting preference for Cursor’s output—especially for longer, more complicated programming sessions. That’s the power of model agnosticism: when one LLM can’t autocomplete your obscure regular expression, another just might.
And Cursor hasn’t been resting on model laurels. As Sam Altman, OpenAI CEO, took to announcing a new generation of reasoning models (the cryptically named o3, and the more diminutive but mighty o4-mini), the team at Anysphere rushed to ensure the latest OpenAI models were available within Cursor as well. Frictionless access to the world’s top AIs, in a familiar-yet-supercharged IDE wrapper? Developers didn’t need to be asked twice.
Microsoft, OpenAI, and the Battle for Programmers’ Attention
It would be a mistake to see Cursor as an isolated phenomenon. The AI coding battleground is tectonic, with major players investing billions—not just in products, but in the very infrastructure that makes modern AI possible.Microsoft’s investment spree, funneled into both OpenAI and the cloud data centers behind its GitHub Copilot, shows just how high the stakes have become. With OpenAI’s new reasoning models touted as “super good at coding,” the chess game has veered into endgame territory. Each product release, each model upgrade, each (sometimes public, sometimes backroom) acquisition attempt is a play for dominance.
Cursor, by maintaining flexibility and refusing to be tied down to a single mega-corporate overlord, has given itself a unique advantage. Developers crave autonomy, empiricism, and a sense that their daily work isn’t being wholly digested into telemetry and sold back to them as a “personalized experience.” Cursor’s vibe, as much philosophical as technical, has made it not just a tool but a statement.
Windsurf: Next on OpenAI’s Dance Card
When talks with Anysphere didn’t pan out, OpenAI didn’t just sit back and let the market have its way. Enter Windsurf, rumored to be snapped up for about $3 billion. While not much is publicly known about Windsurf’s feature set or underlying technology—at least, not enough to cause developer forums to spontaneously combust—the very fact that OpenAI is so publicly linking its direction to the AI coding vertical is telling.Windsurf’s emergence as a billion-dollar prospect underscores the all-hands-on-deck panic sweeping through tech’s biggest boardrooms: miss the next wave of AI-powered programming, and risk being left in the dust by a new, nimbler generation of tools and teams.
AI Coding: Not Just a Sidekick
It’s tempting to write off the recent flurry of AI coding assistants as glorified autocompletes. That’s understandable—after all, “autocomplete” has been around longer than most of today’s YC founders. But Cursor and its ilk represent something new: real-time collaborators, able to reason about sprawling codebases, explain arcane error logs, and adapt to a developer’s style faster than even the keenest human mentor.Cursor, in particular, has leaned into this transformation. Where Copilot and its cousins have sometimes been pilloried as distracting or too generic, Cursor delights in being a tool that developers shape to their needs—not the other way around. Its success lies in meeting coders where they live: at the intersection of creativity, frustration, and caffeine.
What’s more, the skyrocketing daily user numbers suggest this isn’t a niche movement. As more code is written with the help of Cursor and friends, the very nature of software development is shifting. No, AI coding tools won’t replace programmers, any more than spreadsheets wiped out accountants. But as they get smarter and more context-aware, the definition of “programmer” is broadening. Sure, you still need to know your classes from your closures. But suddenly, knowing how to wrangle AI suggestions, spot hallucinations, and redirect LLM-powered copilots is just as core a skill.
Behind the Hype: Cursor’s Business Is Booming
If you’re wondering whether all this developer wooing actually translates into business success, wonder no more. Cursor’s reported $100 million-plus in annual recurring revenue (ARR) puts it on par with, or even ahead of, many better-known SaaS giants. That kind of revenue validates not only Cursor’s product vision but also the very market for AI-enhanced code development. For VCs—especially those lucky enough to have their chips on Anysphere’s number—these figures aren’t just impressive, they’re intoxicating.It’s no surprise, then, that when Cursor’s leadership went shopping for new investment at a valuation approaching $10 billion, they drew an eager crowd. In a market where most startups would kill (metaphorically, we hope) for a tenth of those numbers, Anysphere looks set for a long run at the center of the technology maelstrom.
What’s Next: The Model Arms Race
Cursor’s model-agnostic approach has put it at the heart of a new, fast-moving storm: the AI model arms race. As OpenAI, Anthropic, Google, and others roll out ever-better, ever-larger language models, Cursor can make the best of each new breakthrough available to its users within days, or even hours. This nimbleness distinguishes Cursor from slower-moving giants, who must move through layers upon layers of corporate choreography before rolling out new tech.That agility might prove to be the difference maker. As the LLM field becomes crowded and feature sets begin to converge, the winners won’t just be those who make the best models—they’ll be the companies who deliver those models into developers’ hands, and who shape the workflows in ways that feel intuitive rather than disruptive.
Already, with products like OpenAI’s newly announced Codex CLI aiming to lower the technical barriers for deploying powerful models in real-world pipelines, there’s an uneasy sense that the ground is shifting. The AI wars, once the preserve of brainy researchers and startup cowboys, are now boardroom affairs—to be won not just on technical merit but also through ecosystem lock-in, business partnerships, and sheer, unfiltered user love.
Cursor’s Place in the AI Coding Canon
Let’s be blunt: Cursor isn’t the only player in town. But at this point in the script, it’s the one drawing the most applause—and the most acquisition offers.Cursor’s secret sauce isn’t just technical; it’s cultural. The company’s refusal to tie its destiny to any single LLM vendor, its embrace of developer autonomy, its relentless focus on user feedback rather than corporate bean-counting—all combine to make Cursor a darling of the community. The open questions—How will Cursor respond to even fiercer competition? Will it someday succumb to acquisition—but on its own terms?—are the sorts of things to keep AI aficionados glued to their news feeds.
Meanwhile, founders at small and large AI coding tools alike would be wise to study Cursor’s path: model flexibility, deep engagement with developer communities, and a refusal to be boxed in by any single ecosystem. Cursor’s trajectory is a potent reminder that the future of coding—and perhaps the fate of the next digital superpowers—lies as much in attitude as in algorithms.
Conclusion: The Future Is Elastic
The last twelve months have seen the world of AI coding assistants convulse with excitement, rivalry, and the quiet hum of billions in new investment. Cursor, an upstart that refused to choose between the best minds at Anthropic and OpenAI, engineered its way to the front of the pack—earning not just developer loyalty but also open courtship from the kingmakers of generative AI.OpenAI’s gaze, intense but (so far) unrequited, hasn’t slowed Cursor’s pace. If anything, it’s thrown gasoline on the innovation fire. As the world’s largest technology companies fight it out in the cloud, the winners—at least today—are the millions of programmers who now have access to tools that were sci-fi fantasy only a few years ago.
Cursor’s journey is proof that speed, flexibility, and community engagement are the new table stakes in a world remade by AI. Whether Cursor remains an independent powerhouse or succumbs to the gravity of a trillion-dollar titan, one thing is certain: “vibe coding” is here, and software development may never look the same.
So, open your IDE, fire up your favorite LLM, and get coding—the future of programming just got a whole lot more interesting. And Cursor, for now, is setting the pace.
Source: Dataconomy Cursor was on OpenAI’s radar before Windsurf
Last edited:
