CVE-2023-3978: Azure Linux Attestation and Go x net html Patch Guide

Microsoft’s brief advisory language should be read carefully: Azure Linux is the product Microsoft has publicly attested as including the vulnerable golang.org/x/net/html component for CVE‑2023‑3978, but that attestation is a scoped inventory statement — not a mathematical proof that no other Microsoft product could include the same vulnerable code. (msrc.microsoft.com)

Background / Overview​

CVE‑2023‑3978 is an XSS‑oriented vulnerability in the Go package golang.org/x/net (specifically the html subpackage) where text nodes not in the HTML namespace are rendered literally instead of being properly escaped. That behavior can allow unescaped content to reach a browser and become a vector for cross‑site scripting. The issue was disclosed in August 2023 and has been cataloged across Go’s vulnerability trackers. A patch was released in the golang.org/x/net module — fixed in version v0.13.0 and later.
This vulnerability is primarily a library‑level problem: the vulnerable code lives in an open‑source Go module that many projects and distributions consume. Where the vulnerable code actually matters in production is when an application, service, distro package, or cloud image either ships the module as a runtime dependency or includes binaries compiled with a vulnerable module version. That makes the scope of affected software dependent on which artifacts include the module and how they were built. The Go project’s vulnerability pages and the OSV database make this clear: the affected range is golang.org/x/net versions before v0.13.0 and the fix is to upgrade that package and/or rebuild binaries that include it.

---

What Microsoft has said (and what the wording means)​

Microsoft’s public advisory text for this and similar issues has followed a pattern: the MSRC entry and associated machine‑readable VEX/CSAF metadata name Azure Linux (CBL‑Mariner / Azure Linux images and related artifacts) as a product that includes the open‑source library and is therefore potentially affected. Microsoft also explicitly notes that it began publishing CSAF/VEX attestations in October 2025 and that it will update the CVE/VEX records if additional Microsoft products are identified as carriers of the implicated upstream component. Read together, those two sentences serve different functions: one is an inventory result for a named product family; the other is a process commitment to expand attestation coverage. (msrc.microsoft.com)
Practical translation:

• When MSRC says “Azure Linux includes this open‑source library,” treat that as a confirmed, authoritative finding for the Azure Linux product family. Customers using Azure Linux images should assume the library was present and take the published remediation steps without delay.
• When MSRC adds “we will update the CVE if additional products are identified,” treat that as an admission that Microsoft’s inventory work was initially scoped and that other Microsoft artifacts may or may not have been inspected yet. In short: lack of a VEX/CSAF attestation for another Microsoft product is absence of attestation, not proof of absence.

---

Is Azure Linux the only Microsoft product that includes the library?​

Short answer: No — Azure Linux is not necessarily the only Microsoft product that could include the vulnerable library. It is, however, the only Microsoft product Microsoft has publicly attested to include the component for this CVE at the time of the advisory. That attestation is authoritative for Azure Linux, but it does not preclude other Microsoft images or artifacts from containing the same module, especially when those artifacts are built independently. (msrc.microsoft.com)
Why that nuance matters technically:

• Microsoft ships many different Linux‑adjacent artifacts — Azure Marketplace images, AKS node images, the linux‑azure kernel, WSL2 kernels shipped with Windows, and more. Each artifact is built from specific upstream commits and with particular configure/build flags. Whether a given artifact includes the vulnerable code is an artifact‑level question.
• The golang.org/x/net/html vulnerability is in a Go module. If Microsoft ships a binary that embeds the vulnerable module (either via a packaged runtime, a statically linked Go binary, or a distribution package), that artifact can be affected even if another Microsoft product does not ship the module. The presence or absence depends on the exact module versions used at build time.

Evidence that Microsoft actually acted on the problem:

• Azure-related release notes and image updates reference upgrades to Go‑based components and to images because of golang.org/x/net CVEs, including CVE‑2023‑3978. For example, AKS and Azure image release notes show image updates and upgraded container images that addressed golang.org/x/net CVEs. That confirms that Microsoft’s operational response included updating Azure Linux artifacts and related images.

---

Who should be worried — a practical risk model​

• Azure Linux / CBL‑Mariner customers: treat Microsoft’s attestation as a confirmed hit. If you run Azure Linux images, you should apply the vendor updates to your images and containers as soon as possible. Microsoft’s VEX/CSAF listing is the authoritative signal here.
• Azure image and AKS operators: if you deploy Microsoft‑published VM images, node images, or container images that MSRC or Azure release notes say were updated, prioritize those updates. Azure release notes explicitly point to image updates that remedied golang.org/x/net CVEs.
• Administrators of other Microsoft artifacts (WSL, linux‑azure kernels, Marketplace appliances, partner images): do not assume you’re unaffected just because MSRC did not name your product. Inventory and verify — treat non‑attested products as “unverified” until you or Microsoft confirm otherwise.
• Developers and operators who ship Go binaries: if your service imports golang.org/x/net/html (directly or via a dependency) and you built a binary with a vulnerable module version, you must update the dependency and rebuild. The vulnerability is a runtime/rendering issue; simply patching the OS package manager on a host won’t fix an embedded, statically compiled binary.

---

Technical details and fixed versions​

• Vulnerable component: golang.org/x/net/html (Render, render1 symbols implicated).
• Affected range: versions before v0.13.0.
• Fixed version: v0.13.0 (upgrade golang.org/x/net to v0.13.0 or newer).
• CVSS and classification: public trackers list the issue as medium severity with CVSS v3.1 ~6.1 (impact limited to confidentiality/integrity in certain rendering contexts). The immediate technical risk is XSS in contexts where untrusted content winds up rendered by the library in a browser or browser‑like environment.

Operational takeaway: for systems that consume the module via distribution packages (apt/rpm) you should look for distro advisories mapping the CVE to package names and versions, and apply the vendor’s package updates. For applications built from source, update the Go module in your go.mod to the fixed version and rebuild. If you vendor dependencies, update the vendor tree and rebuild.

---

Detection — how to find whether your environment is affected​

• Inventory images and packages
• Check your fleet for Azure Linux / CBL‑Mariner images and ensure they are on the updated image versions Microsoft published. Azure AKS and image release notes provide evidence of when images were updated to address the golang.org/x/net CVEs — use those release notes to prioritize remediation.
• On RPM/DEB systems, search the package manager for golang‑x‑net, golang packages that import golang.org/x/net, or for application packages that carry vendored Go modules.
• Scan container images and binaries
• Use SBoM and SBOM tools (CycloneDX, SPDX) or container scanners to find golang.org/x/net in image layers.
• For Go binaries, there is no universal “contains module X” metadata, but you can:
• Reproduce the build and check go.mod/go.sum.
• Scan for strings or symbol references that indicate linking to Go runtime or to the module (less reliable).
• Preferably, consult build artifacts and CI pipelines (the definitive source of which module versions were used).
• Application source check
• In repositories, run:
• go list -m all
• or examine go.mod/go.sum for golang.org/x/net and its version.
• If you find an entry older than v0.13.0, update it.
• Use vendor and distro advisories
• Many Linux distributions have already mapped CVE‑2023‑3978 to specific distro packages and published fixed package versions; consult your distribution vendor security advisories and Microsoft’s VEX/CSAF attestation for Azure Linux where relevant.

---

Remediation and mitigation steps​

• Azure Linux (and affected Azure images)
• Apply the vendor updates Microsoft published for Azure Linux images or follow the Azure image/AKS guidance for node image updates. Azure release notes and Tenable/Nessus plugin metadata show Microsoft updated images and container images to address the golang.org/x/net CVEs. If you run Azure Linux images, update them now.
• For Go applications and services
• Upgrade module:
• Replace or require golang.org/x/net v0.13.0 or later in go.mod.
• Run go get golang.org/x/net@v0.13.0 (or edit go.mod and run go mod tidy).
• Rebuild every binary that links the module (including containers).
• Redeploy the rebuilt images/binaries to production. The vulnerability is in rendering behavior; static compilation retains the vulnerable code until the binary is rebuilt with the patched module.
• For distribution packages and third‑party components
• Apply vendor packaging updates (apt/yum/zypper) where distributors have shipped patched packages.
• If a third‑party product you consume ships an embedded Go binary, request an SBOM or a VEX/CSAF attestation from the vendor and verify they applied the v0.13.0 fix; if not, insist on patched builds or rebuilds.
• Temporary mitigations when immediate updates are impossible
• For web‑facing services that cannot be rebuilt immediately, apply application‑level escape/sanitization of untrusted inputs at the highest level practical to reduce the window for XSS.
• Add strict Content Security Policy (CSP) headers to limit the consequences of XSS in the short term.
• Implement additional input validation and output encoding layers where the vulnerable rendering library is used. These are stopgaps; the long‑term fix is updating and rebuilding.

---

Why this kind of CVE highlights the limits of product‑level attestations​

Microsoft’s approach of publishing machine‑readable CSAF/VEX attestations for product families is an important step for transparency and automation, but the model is inherently phased and product scoped. That means:

• An attestation that says “Azure Linux includes this library” is extremely useful for Azure Linux customers because it lets them automate triage and prioritize patching.
• The same attestation cannot be used to prove that every other Microsoft artifact is clean. Microsoft has said it will update CVE entries if more products are found to include the component; until then, other artifacts remain unverified and need per‑artifact checks. Security practitioners must therefore keep two parallel practices: consume vendor VEX/CSAF output to automate triage where available, and maintain robust internal artifact inventory and SBOM‑driven checks for the rest of their estate.

This dual approach — automated vendor attestations plus internal artifact verification — is the only practical way to manage supply‑chain risk at scale. Relying on a single vendor attestation for all downstream artifacts invites blind spots, particularly in organizations that run many curated or custom images built from similar upstream sources.

---

Recommended checklist for security teams​

• If you run Azure Linux images, apply Microsoft’s published updates immediately and confirm patch status via your cloud image inventories.
• Build and CI:
• Update go.mod to require golang.org/x/net@v0.13.0+ where used.
• Rebuild all Go binaries that include or transitively import golang.org/x/net.
• Containers and images:
• Scan container images for vulnerable module versions using SBOM or layer analysis.
• Rebuild and redeploy images that include outdated golang modules.
• Third‑party verification:
• Request SBOMs or VEX attestations from vendors supplying Go binaries or Azure Marketplace images.
• Prioritize vendors with automated attestations and clear remediation timelines.
• Temporary mitigations:
• Add CSP and tighter output encoding at web tiers while you push binaries/images through the rebuild pipeline.
• Monitoring:
• Watch MSRC VEX/CSAF for updates that name additional Microsoft products.
• Watch Go project security advisories and distro advisories for late‑breaking mapping to other artifacts. (msrc.microsoft.com)

---

Notable strengths and potential risks in Microsoft’s public guidance​

Strengths

• Machine‑readable VEX/CSAF attestations: Microsoft’s move to publish machine‑readable attestations for product artifacts (starting with Azure Linux) is a major operational improvement. It enables automated triage and clearer remediation prioritization for customers using those products. (msrc.microsoft.com)
• Explicit process commitment: Microsoft’s statement that it will update CVE/VEX records as more products are identified demonstrates a willingness to expand coverage and reduce uncertainty over time.
• Operational action on Azure images: The Azure and AKS release notes indicate Microsoft has actively updated images to remove or upgrade vulnerable Go components, which is the practical remediation Azure customers need.

Risks and limitations

• Phased coverage leaves short‑term unknowns: For customers who run Microsoft artifacts not yet attested by MSRC, there is a short‑to‑medium‑term inventory gap that requires manual or internal tooling to close. Absence of an attestation is not evidence of absence of vulnerable code.
• Embedded binaries require rebuilds: The nature of the vulnerability — a library behavior in a Go module — means that many fixes require rebuilding and redeploying binaries. That is operationally heavier than installing a package update on a host. Teams that do not track build provenance or do not maintain CI pipelines for all binaries will face a longer remediation window.
• Multiple distributions and images: The same upstream Go module can appear in many distributor packages, containers, and cloud images; coordination across distribution vendors and cloud providers is necessary to ensure consistent coverage.

---

Conclusion​

CVE‑2023‑3978 is a real, fixable vulnerability in golang.org/x/net/html that has measurable remediation steps (upgrade to v0.13.0+ and rebuild affected binaries). Microsoft’s public attestation that Azure Linux includes the vulnerable component is authoritative for Azure Linux and is accompanied by concrete image updates and AKS changes. However, that attestation is product‑scoped, not global: it does not prove other Microsoft artifacts are free of the vulnerable module. Security teams should therefore treat Microsoft’s VEX/CSAF attestation for Azure Linux as a confirmed hit for that product while simultaneously performing artifact‑level inventories, SBOM checks, and CI rebuilds across their environments to detect and remediate any other occurrences of the vulnerable golang module. Timely upgrades, rebuilds, and image replacements are the only full remediation paths; temporary hardening measures (CSP, sanitization) can narrow the window of exposure while you complete rebuilds and redeployments.

---

Source: MSRC Security Update Guide - Microsoft Security Response Center