CVE-2024-44971: Fixing a kernel memory leak in bcm_sf2 DSA driver

  • Thread Author
A small, surgical change in the Linux kernel’s Distributed Switch Architecture (DSA) driver tree — a single added call to free a PHY device reference — has been cataloged as CVE-2024-44971 and carries an outsized operational meaning for network hosts that use the Broadcom Starfighter‑2 (bcm_sf2) switch driver: the bug allowed a reference-count imbalance that can slowly leak kernel memory and, in persistent workloads, degrade system availability.

Close-up of a Broadcom BCM SF2 chip on a PCB, as a hand places a tag reading phy_device_free().Background / Overview​

The vulnerability lives in the bcm_sf2 driver's MDIO registration path, inside the function bcm_sf2_mdio_register(). During device initialization the routine attempts to discover and remove pre-existing PHY devices by calling of_phy_find_device() and phy_device_remove() in a loop. Under certain error paths the code failed to balance the reference count increment performed by the kernel's device lookup helpers, leaving an outstanding reference on a struct device and preventing the associated memory from being reclaimed. The upstream fix adds a phy_device_free() call — which in turn calls put_device() — to return the extra reference and ensure deterministic cleanup.
This is a classical resource-management bug — a missing reference decrement — but it matters because kernel memory leaks are cumulative and visible to high‑availability infrastructure. Over time and with repeated device registration/removal cycles (for example during frequent hotplug tests, dynamic configuration changes, or repeated driver reloads), the leak can cause memory pressure, OOM conditions, or kernel instability and therefore a denial of service. Multiple distributors and trackers flagged the issue with a Medium CVSS score and described the availability impact as the primary concern.

Technical anatomy: what exactly went wrong​

The players: of_phy_find_device(), bus_find_device(), and reference counts​

When the DSA driver looks up PHY devices created from device-tree nodes, it calls a chain of helpers that ultimately call into the device model's find routines. One of those helpers increments the device reference count using get_device() to promise that the returned pointer will remain valid to the caller. Proper kernel API usage requires the caller to balance that increment with the corresponding put_device() (or a domain-specific wrapper such as phy_device_free()) once it is done with the object.
In the flawed code path inside bcm_sf2_mdio_register(), that balancing put was omitted across some error and exit paths. The result: the kernel retained an extra reference on the device structure and the memory backing the device was never released. Over repeated cycles this produces a cumulative memory leak. The kernel patch adds a call to phy_device_free() at the appropriate locations to ensure the reference count is decremented.

Why a missing put_device() matters in kernel drivers​

Missing reference decrements may seem minor in a single invocation, but kernel memory is a finite and shared resource. A leaking driver can:
  • Hold onto memory that the kernel cannot reclaim.
  • Prevent device teardown code paths from fully releasing resources, leaving device state inconsistent across reconfiguration.
  • Under load, accelerate overall memory pressure and trigger out‑of‑memory behavior or forced restarts.
This pattern recurs across kernel subsystems; kernel hardening tools and fuzzers frequently flag reference-count imbalances and devres misuse as high‑value correctness issues. A recent analysis of similar DSA and PHY subsystem fixes shows this is not an isolated code smell — it is a class of maintenance mistakes that consistently produce availability regressions when exercised in long‑running systems.

Scope: who and what is affected​

The vulnerability is in the Linux kernel source tree’s DSA bcm_sf2 driver, so the exposure depends on whether a system runs a kernel that:
  • Includes the bcm_sf2 driver, and
  • Has a runtime or configuration profile that triggers the problematic code path (device-tree based PHY discovery / repeated register/unregister flows).
Multiple public trackers and vendors mapped the fix into the stable kernel trees and distribution kernels. The National Vulnerability Database (NVD) and other trackers list the issue against the Linux kernel and calculate a CVSS v3.1 base score of 5.5 (Medium) with the Availability metric rated High. Distribution advisories from mainstream vendors included the patched commits into the stable kernels packaged for their releases.
Practically speaking, the bug is most relevant for:
  • Embedded systems, routers, and network appliances that use Broadcom Starfighter‑2 silicon and the bcm_sf2 driver.
  • Development and test environments that frequently register/unregister PHY devices.
  • Any kernel build that includes the driver and is used in long‑uptime or high‑reconfiguration scenarios.
If your host does not include the bcm_sf2 DSA driver, or if your platform never reaches the code path (for example, because it uses static PHY configuration), the vulnerability is not a direct operational risk.

Evidence and verification​

Kernel maintainers accepted and merged a corrective patch into the stable kernel trees; the change is visible in multiple kernel‑stable commits and was discussed on the networking kernel mailing list as a necessary cleanup to avoid double get_device() without matching put_device() semantics. The commit messages make the intent explicit: add the missing phy_device_free() (or equivalent put) calls and unwind error paths to avoid retained references. Distributors published security updates that reference the same commit set when shipping patched kernels.
Independent vulnerability databases and vendor advisories corroborate the root cause, the fix, and the operational rationale for assigning availability impact as the primary effect. These independent confirmations cross‑validate the technical claim and make the factual picture verifiable: the bug is a memory leak that has been fixed by balancing a missing reference decrement.

Exploitability and real‑world risk​

Can an attacker remotely exploit this?​

No credible remote code‑execution or privilege escalation vector is associated with this specific defect. The vulnerability is a local resource-management bug: it requires the attacker to be able to trigger the driver’s PHY registration/removal behavior on the target host. For many servers and appliances that are not multi‑tenant or do not expose local device management to unprivileged users, that requirement raises the bar.
That said, the practical exploit scenario is straightforward in environments where attackers already have local access or where a malicious user controls a workload that can repeatedly exercise the MDIO registration code: they can repeatedly create conditions that cause the driver to call the offending path and gradually consume kernel memory until service degradation or an OOM kills key processes. Several vulnerability trackers therefore classify the attack vector as local with low complexity but a meaningful availability impact.

How fast does the leak matter?​

That depends on the workload and hardware. If the code path runs rarely, a single missing put_device() may never be noticed. In contrast, continuous or repeated runs (for instance looped device probing during development, test harnesses, crash-reload loops, or malicious automation) can make the leak materialize within minutes to hours depending on system memory and the per‑leak allocation size.
Operators running network infrastructure or test labs should assume the leak is persistent — repeated triggers accumulate — and therefore treat it as an availability problem that merits prompt remediation.

Patch status and distribution guidance​

Multiple stable kernel commits address the issue and maintainers backported fixes to relevant stable releases. Major distributions tracked the fix and issued security updates in their kernel packages. If you manage Linux systems, do the following:
  • Inventory your fleet for kernels that include the bcm_sf2 driver and for platforms built on Broadcom Starfighter‑2 silicon.
  • Identify distribution kernel updates that include the upstream fix and prioritize them for deployment, especially on hosts that run network appliances, routers, or test platforms where the driver is used. Several vendors already shipped patched kernel packages in their regular security channels.
Typical vendor actions observed in the wild:
  • Stable kernel trees received the patch and the commit was cherry‑picked to several stable branches.
  • Distributors (Ubuntu, SUSE, Red Hat variants and others) included the patch in their kernel update advisories and released updated kernel packages for affected releases.
  • Vendor advisories emphasize that the fix is a code correctness patch without changes to public interfaces; in most environments it is safe to apply the kernel update during standard maintenance windows.
If you rely on long‑term support kernels, check your vendor’s specific advisory and test the new kernel in a staging environment before broad rollout.

Mitigations, workarounds, and detection​

Immediate mitigations​

If you cannot immediately install a patched kernel, consider these short‑term mitigations — but beware there are trade‑offs:
  • If the bcm_sf2 driver is not required for your workload, remove or blacklist the driver so it is not loaded. This is a blunt but effective defensive step for hosts where the driver is unused. Note that blacklisting a driver may disable associated hardware functionality.
  • Limit unprivileged code execution and local access to hosts that expose device‑management paths. Since the vulnerability requires local triggers, tightening local access (sandboxing, unprivileged container restrictions, and strict user permissions) reduces the practical exploit surface.
  • Avoid running workloads or test harnesses that repeatedly register/unregister PHY devices on production hosts.
These are operational mitigations; they do not “fix” the kernel bug, they only reduce the likelihood of it being triggered until you can apply the vendor patch.

Detection and monitoring​

Detecting a memory leak in the kernel requires a combination of proactive telemetry and signs-of-stress detection:
  • Monitor kernel memory pressure metrics and track trends rather than single samples. A slow, steady increase in slab or driver-related allocations correlated with DSA/MDIO activity is suggestive.
  • Watch for repeated device registration logs, MDIO/PHY probe and remove messages in dmesg, and any kernel oops or warnings near device removal paths.
  • Use kernel memory leak detection tools (kmemleak where available) in test and staging environments to identify leak patterns during heavy exercise. Several kernel fixes were prompted by kmemleak reports and syzbot KASAN findings in other subsystems; the same approach helps here.

Long‑term remedy​

The only durable solution is to apply the upstream‑backported fix in your kernel. The patch is small and non‑functional: it restores correct lifetime semantics and does not alter external behavior. That makes it a low‑risk update from a functionality standpoint but high‑priority from an availability perspective.

Why this class of bugs keeps appearing — and how to avoid it​

Reference-count imbalances and devres misuse are a persistent maintenance hazard in kernel code because device lifetime management requires discipline across many execution paths (success, error, and unwind). The pattern that produced CVE‑2024‑44971 is common in drivers that:
  • Use helper functions which themselves acquire references on behalf of callers.
  • Perform multiple operations in sequence where an early allocation succeeds but a later registration fails, requiring careful unwinding.
  • Mix devres-managed allocations with manual allocation/free flows, increasing the chance of mismatched lifecycle handling.
Kernel maintainers and reviewers have applied several recurring mitigations to reduce recurrence:
  • Prefer domain-specific free wrappers (e.g., phy_device_free()) that clearly express ownership semantics.
  • Avoid hidden reference increments in helper calls where possible, or make their reference semantics explicit in API documentation and naming.
  • Write clear error-unwind paths and add unit or regression tests for typical failure scenarios.
  • Use static analyzers, kmemleak, and fuzzers to exercise failure paths and catch leaks early.
This issue’s upstream patch and the associated review discussion illustrate that careful API use and explicit unwind logic are the correct long‑term defenses.

Practical checklist for administrators (what to do now)​

  • Inventory: Determine which hosts run kernels that include the bcm_sf2 driver or which platforms use Broadcom Starfighter‑2 silicon.
  • Assess exposure: Identify hosts where PHY registration/removal is active (test rigs, dev platforms, appliances performing hotplug).
  • Patch: Prioritize kernel updates from your distributor that include the upstream fix. Test in staging, then roll out during maintenance windows.
  • Mitigate: If patching is delayed, consider blacklisting the driver on non‑production systems or applying access restrictions to prevent repeated local triggers.
  • Monitor: Add kernel memory and MDIO/PHY activity telemetry to your monitoring dashboards and set alert thresholds for unexpected increases.
  • Learn: If you maintain custom kernels, incorporate the patch or equivalent fix into your build stream and add regression tests to prevent regressions.

Strengths and limitations of the patch and the disclosure​

Notable strengths​

  • The fix is minimal, targeted, and straightforward: adding a single, well‑scoped call to free the extra reference and improving error unwinding. That makes it low‑risk for regressions.
  • The vulnerability description and patch are publicly traceable in upstream commits and distributor advisories, enabling reproducible verification across kernel trees and vendor packages.

Potential limitations and remaining risks​

  • The root category — lifecycle mismanagement — can occur elsewhere in the driver tree; fixing one spot does not guarantee all similar paths are corrected. Operators should not assume the generic class of leaks is gone.
  • Detection in production is non‑trivial; subtle leaks may take time to produce measurable system effects. Without proactive testing and monitoring, operators may miss gradual availability degradation.
  • Workarounds such as blacklisting drivers may not be possible in many production appliances that require the hardware, making patching the only realistic fix.
Where claims about the presence of exploits or active exploitation are made, they should be treated cautiously: no credible public reports indicate active exploitation of this specific CVE in the wild at publication time, and the attack vector remains local. That still matters because local attack capability can be achieved by container escapes, compromised admin credentials, or malicious software running on multi‑tenant hosts. Administrators should assume the risk model accordingly.

Conclusion​

CVE‑2024‑44971 is a reminder that tiny errors in kernel resource management can produce outsized operational consequences. The defect itself is straightforward — a missing reference decrement that results in a memory leak — and the upstream fix is equally surgical. Because the attack vector is local and the impact is availability, the immediate operational priority is simple and practical: identify affected systems and apply the patched kernel packages from your vendor as soon as feasible.
For infrastructure teams that run network appliances, telecommunication gear, or development/test platforms with frequent PHY reconfiguration, this CVE warrants rapid attention. Apply patches, tighten local access controls where possible, and add telemetry so the next subtle resource leak is caught before it becomes an outage. The kernel community’s proactive review and the cross‑vendor advisories make remediation straightforward — the remaining challenge is operational discipline in pushing the kernel updates to the systems that need them most.

Source: MSRC Security Update Guide - Microsoft Security Response Center
 

Back
Top