CVE-2024-57898: Azure Linux Attestation and the Microsoft Ecosystem

Microsoft’s brief advisory that “Azure Linux includes this open‑source library and is therefore potentially affected” is accurate as a product‑scoped attestation, but it is not a categorical proof that no other Microsoft product carries the same vulnerable Linux kernel component — any Microsoft image, kernel artifact, or service that ships a Linux kernel built with the cfg80211 wireless stack could be in scope until verified and patched.

Background / Overview​

CVE-2024-57898 is a Linux kernel Wi‑Fi subsystem bug in cfg80211 where a link ID was being cleared from an internal bitmap before all link clean‑up functions finished executing. That premature clearing meant that functions which expected the link ID to still be present (for example, cfg80211_cac_event hit kernel sanity checks and triggered WARN_ON messages. The defect is a logic/order‑of‑operations bug rather than a classic heap corruption or direct remote code‑execution primitive. Multiple independent vulnerability trackers and major distributions mapped this CVE into vendor advisories and stable kernel trees, classifying the issue as primarily an availability/stability risk (kernel warnings, possible oopses or denial‑of‑service in local/guest contexts) rather than a proven remote RCE. Ubuntu’s advisory records the problem and rates the bug with a low/medium technical severity (CVSS 3.x around 3.3 in Ubuntu’s listing), and upstream NVD mirrors the description of the fix and call chain. Microsoft’s public statement on the MSRC Security Update Guide explicitly calls out Azure Linux as a distribution that “includes this open‑source library and is therefore potentially affected,” and the company has confirmed it will publish machine‑readable CSAF/VEX attestations and update CVE mappings if additional Microsoft products are later identified as carriers. That is a transparency and inventory statement for Azure Linux specifically — useful and authoritative for that product family — but the language does not, by itself, guarantee exclusivity across all Microsoft artifacts.

---

Why this matters: product‑scope vs. ecosystem‑scope​

What a vendor attestation actually says​

A VEX/CSAF attestation is a machine‑readable, product‑level mapping between a CVE and the artifacts the vendor has inspected. When Microsoft says Azure Linux includes the open‑source library and is therefore potentially affected, it is reporting the result of inventory work completed for the Azure Linux product family. That attestation is authoritative for Azure Linux images and should be used by automation and triage tooling to prioritize patching for those images.

What the attestation does not mean​

It does not mean every Microsoft image, kernel package, or marketplace appliance has been scanned and declared unaffected. Microsoft ships — and customers run — many distinct Linux artifacts: linux‑azure kernel builds used in VM images, the WSL2 kernel, CBL‑Mariner lineage artifacts, marketplace/partner images, and custom kernels that customers or partners may publish. Each artifact is built with its own kernel config and may or may not include the cfg80211 subsystem. Therefore absence of an attestation for a product is not proof of absence of the vulnerable component; it may simply mean the vendor’s inventory work for that product is still in progress.

---

Technical summary of CVE-2024-57898​

• Affected subsystem: the Linux kernel wifi configuration layer cfg80211 (net/wireless code paths).
• Root cause: order-of-operations — the link ID was removed from a valid_links bitmap before clean‑up callbacks that expected its presence ran.
• Symptom: kernel WARN_ON traces in the wireless stack, possible driver misbehavior, and in some environments spurious crashes or denial‑of‑service. Exploitation to achieve RCE/LPE is not documented and would require additional unrelated flaws.

Cross‑checks from independent sources (NVD, Ubuntu, Red Hat and SUSE advisories) confirm the description of the fix: the upstream patch changes the point at which the link ID is cleared so it only happens after all link cleanup has completed. The change is small and localized, which makes it straightforward to backport into stable vendor kernels.

---

Is Azure Linux the only Microsoft product that includes the library and is therefore potentially affected?​

Short answer: No — not necessarily. Azure Linux is the only Microsoft product Microsoft has publicly attested to include the implicated open‑source component at the time of the advisory, and that attestation is authoritative for Azure Linux images; however, it is not conclusive proof that no other Microsoft products include the same kernel subsystem. Any Microsoft image or product that ships a Linux kernel built with cfg80211 enabled, or that packages a kernel tree containing the vulnerable commit range, is potentially in scope until verified.

Why the simple “yes/no” question is technically ambiguous​

1. Kernel configuration is a build‑time property. Whether cfg80211 is present is determined by kernel config flags (e.g., CONFIG_CFG80211, CONFIG_MAC80211, driver-specific flags). Different Microsoft artifacts are built with different configs. An artifact that lacks those options is not affected, but an artifact built with them is.
2. Microsoft maintains multiple kernel artifacts. The company publishes linux‑azure kernels, WSL2 kernel sources, and Azure‑targeted distributions (Azure Linux). Each is a separate artifact and may be packaged into different images (VM images, AKS node images, Marketplace appliances). Microsoft’s attestation covers the artifact(s) it has inspected — in this case Azure Linux — not every kernel binary used across all its products.
3. Third‑party images and marketplace appliances complicate responsibility. Many Azure Marketplace images are published and maintained by third parties (Canonical, Red Hat, SUSE, ISVs). Those images can include cfg80211 depending on the distro kernel build. Microsoft’s warranty or attestation for Azure Linux does not automatically extend to every Marketplace image; operators must consult the image maintainer’s advisories.

---

Evidence and cross‑checks​

• NVD and multiple vendor security pages (Ubuntu, Red Hat, SUSE) independently list CVE‑2024‑57898 and describe the same call chain and mitigation — this corroborates the technical diagnosis and that patched kernel packages have been or are being issued.
• Microsoft’s MSRC CVE record includes the product note about Azure Linux and its CSAF/VEX program; Microsoft published an MSRC blog announcing the adoption of machine‑readable VEX attestations starting with Azure Linux in October 2025. That public commitment explains why Azure Linux appears first in Microsoft’s VEX/CSAF outputs.
• Independent analyses and community advisories emphasize that this class of bug is primarily a local/availability risk and that the upstream fix is compact, making backports into stable vendor kernels low risk from a regression standpoint. That observation is supported by distribution tracker notes and the small diff sizes in kernel commits.

---

Practical, evidence‑based guidance for administrators​

Treat Microsoft’s Azure Linux attestation as an authoritative yes for that product, and treat all other Microsoft artifacts as unknown unless proven otherwise. Inventory, verify, patch, and reboot using the checklist below.

Inventory and discovery (high priority)​

• Compile a list of all Linux images and artifacts running in Microsoft environments:
  • Azure VM images (publisher/sku)
  • AKS node pools and node images
  • Marketplace images and ISV appliances
  • WSL2 hosts and custom WSL kernels
  • Any Microsoft‑distributed container base images or managed node images (CBL‑Mariner lineage)
  • Any Microsoft‑provided managed hosts or appliances you rely on
• Use image manifests, SBOMs, and the MSRC CSAF/VEX feeds (for Azure Linux) to automatically flag known‑affected artifacts. Microsoft’s machine‑readable attestations are intended to support automation in this step.

Verification on running hosts​

1. Identify the running kernel: uname -r.
2. Confirm whether cfg80211 is present:
   • Check kernel config: grep CONFIG_CFG80211 /boot/config-$(uname -r) or zgrep CONFIG_CFG80211 /proc/config.gz.
   • Check loaded modules: lsmod | grep cfg80211.
3. Search kernel logs for suspicious traces: journalctl -k | grep -i 'cfg80211|cfg80211_cac_event|WARN_ON'.
4. Cross-reference package changelogs: apt changelog linux-image-$(uname -r) | grep CVE-2024-57898, or rpm -q --changelog kernel | grep 57898.

Patch, backport and reboot​

• Apply the patched kernel package from the image/distro vendor (Microsoft for Azure Linux, or the distro vendor for third‑party images) and plan staged reboots.
• For managed services (AKS, managed node pools), update node pool images to a patched image and perform orchestrated rolling upgrades.
• If a patched package is not yet available for an image, enforce mitigations (unload/blacklist cfg80211 where feasible and safe) as a temporary measure — note that unloading viral wireless subsystems may not be possible on all hosts and could break legitimate functionality.

Special note for WSL (Windows Subsystem for Linux)​

WSL ships a Microsoft‑published Linux kernel source tree; the default WSL kernel is optimized for the subsystem and often omits many hardware drivers. However, WSL kernels are buildable and customizable by users. If your environment uses custom WSL kernels or a WSL kernel configuration that enables cfg80211/wireless drivers, validate those custom builds the same way as any Linux kernel and rebuild against a patched upstream base when necessary.

---

Operational playbook (step‑by‑step)​

1. Prioritize Azure Linux images first (attested by Microsoft).
2. Identify all Microsoft‑published kernel artifacts you run (linux‑azure kernels, CBL‑Mariner lineage, WSL builds).
3. For each image or artifact:
   1. Verify presence/absence of cfg80211 via kernel config / lsmod.
   2. If present, map to a patched kernel package version using vendor advisories (MSRC VEX for Azure Linux; distro advisories for Ubuntu/RHEL/SUSE).
   3. Test the patched kernel in a canary pool.
   4. Roll out patches with staged reboots and monitor kernel logs for the original WARN signatures.
4. For Marketplace and partner images, contact the image publisher if they are responsible for updates; treat those images as “potentially affected” until the maintainer confirms otherwise.
5. Automate future detection: incorporate CSAF/VEX ingestion (where available) and image SBOM checks into CI/CD and asset inventories.

---

Strengths, risks and caveats — critical analysis​

Strengths in Microsoft’s approach​

• Transparent attestation model: publishing CSAF/VEX for Azure Linux gives operators machine‑readable truth about that product’s status and accelerates triage. Microsoft’s public commitment to expand VEX attestations provides a clear procedure for widening coverage.
• Small upstream fix: the patch is surgical and therefore easier to backport safely into stable vendor kernels, reducing regression risk. Distro trackers reflect timely fixes.

Residual risks and realistic caveats​

• Inventory blind spots: many estates include custom images, third‑party marketplace appliances and nonstandard kernel builds; these are common sources of lingering unpatched systems. Microsoft’s attestation for Azure Linux does not automatically cover these.
• WSL and custom kernels: default WSL kernels may omit wireless stacks, but custom or user‑built WSL kernels can introduce exposure. Operators who manage fleets of Windows endpoints with WSL should confirm kernel configs.
• Perception of severity: because the bug is primarily a WARN_ON/stability issue, operators might deprioritize patching; noisy kernel warnings and availability impacts are still valid operational risks in production and multi‑tenant settings and should be patched in standard maintenance windows.

Unverifiable or evolving claims (flagged)​

• Any statement asserting all Microsoft products beyond Azure Linux are clean or unimpacted is not verifiable from the single MSRC attestation alone. The only definitive verification is an artifact‑level check (kernel config, package changelog, SBOM or VEX/CSAF attestation for the specific product). Until Microsoft updates the CVE/VEX mapping, the exposure status for other Microsoft artifacts remains unknown rather than proven safe.

---

Recommended timeline and priorities for patching​

1. Immediate (first 24–72 hours)
   • Apply Microsoft’s recommended updates for Azure Linux images in production and test pools.
   • Map images and node types across subscriptions and identify high‑value targets (CI runners, build nodes, multi‑tenant hosts).
2. Short term (1–2 weeks)
   • Patch all Microsoft‑provided images you run that the vendor confirms as affected.
   • Contact marketplace image maintainers and confirm their remediation timelines.
3. Medium term (2–6 weeks)
   • Update AKS node pools and perform rolling node replacements; ensure WSL custom kernels are rebuilt if they included cfg80211.
   • Reconcile image inventories with SBOMs, ingest CSAF/VEX feeds for future automations.

---

Closing assessment​

CVE‑2024‑57898 is a real but limited Linux kernel Wi‑Fi bug: a small logic fix in cfg80211 removes a premature bitmap clear and prevents WARN_ON and potential instability. Major distributions have documented fixes and Microsoft has published an explicit, machine‑readable attestation that Azure Linux includes the open‑source library and is therefore potentially affected; that attestation is authoritative for Azure Linux and should be relied on for triage of Azure Linux images. However, the attestation by itself is not a universal statement for every Microsoft product. Any Microsoft‑distributed kernel artifact (linux‑azure packages, WSL2 kernels, CBL‑Mariner lineage images, or marketplace images that carry a Linux kernel with cfg80211 enabled) could include the vulnerable code if not patched. The safe operational posture: assume possible exposure outside Azure Linux until you verify artifact by artifact, rely on CSAF/VEX attestations where available, and prioritize inventory‑driven patching and controlled reboots.
Practical steps are straightforward: inventory images, check kernel configs / lsmod for cfg80211, apply vendor patches (Microsoft for Azure Linux; distro vendors for third‑party images), and roll out staged reboots. The fix itself is small and low risk; the operational effort is inventory and coordination across image and vendor boundaries.

---

Note: The technical statements in this article are corroborated by multiple independent sources including NVD, Ubuntu, Red Hat, and SUSE advisories for CVE‑2024‑57898, and by Microsoft’s own MSRC update guide and MSRC blog on VEX/CSAF. Where vendor attestations are incomplete, the only definitive verification remains an artifact‑level inspection of the specific kernel build or image in question.

---

Source: MSRC Security Update Guide - Microsoft Security Response Center