CVE-2025-39705: AMD DC Driver Fix and Azure Linux Attestation Scope

A critical null-pointer dereference in the AMD Linux display driver (tracked as CVE-2025-39705) has been fixed upstream, and Microsoft’s public attestation names Azure Linux as a known, potentially affected Microsoft product — but that attestation covers only the inventory Microsoft has completed so far and does not, by itself, guarantee that no other Microsoft product includes the vulnerable component.

Background / Overview​

CVE-2025-39705 is a kernel-level vulnerability in the AMD display driver's DC module where the cleanup function dc_destruct could dereference dc->ctx->perf_trace when dc->ctx remained NULL after a failed context construction. The practical result is a kernel null-pointer dereference that can produce an oops, driver crash, or host instability — an availability (Denial‑of‑Service) impact rather than a direct confidentiality or privilege‑escalation vector. Upstream maintainers implemented a small defensive change to ensure a NULL check is performed before dereferencing the context pointer. Microsoft’s MSRC entry for CVE-2025-39705 explicitly states that Azure Linux includes the open-source component that contains this bug and is therefore potentially affected, and that Microsoft began publishing machine‑readable CSAF/VEX attestations in October 2025, committing to update CVE attestations if additional Microsoft products are later found to include the component. That is a procedural, product‑scoped declaration — authoritative for Azure Linux but not an exhaustive inventory of every Microsoft image, kernel build, or statically linked binary across the company.

---

What Microsoft actually said — how to read the wording​

Microsoft’s attestation model and scope​

Microsoft has adopted a phased approach to publishing machine‑readable attestations (CSAF for advisories and VEX for exploitability/affected-status). The initial rollout started with the Azure Linux distribution (formerly CBL‑Mariner), where Microsoft automated mapping of third‑party CVEs into product-level VEX statements. For a given CVE, a VEX document indicates whether a specific Microsoft product is Known Affected, Not Affected, Fixed, or Under Investigation. Microsoft’s CVE page for CVE-2025-39705 follows this model: it states that Azure Linux includes the open‑source library implicated and that Microsoft will update the CVE if it discovers additional product impact.

Why “Azure Linux only” is not the same as “only Microsoft product that could be affected”​

• The VEX/CSAF statement is an inventory attestation for the product(s) Microsoft has completed. It is not a guarantee that other Microsoft products do not contain the component.
• Microsoft ships many distinct artifacts — kernels, VM images, container images, WSL kernels, agents, marketplace appliances, and statically linked binaries — and inclusion of an upstream component is determined on a per‑artifact basis (build flags, packaging choices, static linking). That means a vulnerable upstream file can be present in some Microsoft images but not others.
• Microsoft’s public commitment to “update the CVE if additional products are identified” is a reassurance about process (they will expand the attestations as inventory work completes), not a proof that there are no other carriers. Treat the Azure Linux VEX as authoritative for Azure Linux; treat the rest of the Microsoft portfolio as possible until artifact-level scans and attestations say otherwise.

---

Technical summary of the vulnerability​

The bug in plain terms​

• Component: Linux kernel AMD display driver (DC module).
• Fault: dc->ctx may remain NULL if display-control context construction fails (for example, due to memory allocation failure). Later, dc_destruct dereferences dc->ctx->perf_trace without checking dc->ctx for NULL.
• Consequence: Kernel NULL pointer dereference → oops/panic or driver crash → availability impact for the host or guest.

What the upstream fix does​

Upstream maintainers applied a small, surgical change to ensure a NULL check or safe fallback is used before accessing the perf_trace member. The fix is intentionally narrow — it preserves normal driver behavior and converts a crash‑prone path into a safe error or no‑op path. The kernel stable trees have the cherry‑picked commits referenced in public trackers.

---

Who is affected — practical exposure model​

Broad categories of potentially affected systems​

• Any Linux system running a kernel build that includes the affected AMD display/DC driver code and that has not yet received the stable commit containing the fix.
• Shared or multi‑tenant hosts that expose DRM device nodes (e.g., /dev/dri/*) to untrusted users or containers — these are higher risk because local, less‑trusted actors may be able to trigger the driver paths that lead to the null dereference.
• Embedded or vendor‑supplied kernels and appliances with long update cycles — historically the highest long‑tail risk since vendors may not backport fixes promptly.

Why Microsoft’s attestation does not fully answer “which Microsoft products are affected?”​

• Microsoft’s VEX output for this CVE lists Azure Linux artifacts that ship the vulnerable kernel components and provides the machine‑readable attestation for those products. That provides deterministic guidance for Azure Linux customers.
• However, a Windows product, WSL kernel, Azure Marketplace image, or a Microsoft-curated container image could independently include a kernel or compiled binary that contains the vulnerable driver — Microsoft’s public attestation will be updated as those artifacts are inventoried. Until Microsoft declares them Not Affected or Fixed in VEX, you should assume they may be carriers until verified.

---

How to verify exposure in your environment (practical, step‑by‑step)​

• Inventory first (high‑value sources):
• List all VMs, containers, and images running on Azure and elsewhere that were provisioned from Microsoft‑published images (Azure Linux, Marketplace images, curated images).
• Identify hosts that load AMD GPU drivers: run lsmod | grep amdgpu, check dmesg/journalctl for amdgpu messages, and inspect /dev/dri presence and permissions.
• Check product attestations:
• Pull Microsoft’s CSAF/VEX files for the CVE (MSRC publishes these for Azure Linux and will add more products as inventory completes). Use the VEX file as the authoritative, machine‑readable signal for Azure Linux.
• Kernel/package verification:
• Ask your distro’s security tracker or check package changelogs for kernel package versions that include the stable commit IDs referenced by CVE records (Ubuntu, Red Hat, SUSE, Debian track these). If a packaged update is available, install it and reboot.
• Artifact inspection for non‑OS images:
• For container images and appliances, inspect runtime images for kernel modules or statically embedded drivers. Static binary inspection may be required: examine /lib/modules, kernel module lists, and binaries that may include drivers.
• For WSL or other distributed kernels, check the specific kernel artifact Microsoft shipped for that product.
• Compensating controls if you cannot patch immediately:
• Restrict access to DRM device nodes: tighten udev rules, remove user groups that grant direct access, and avoid mounting /dev/dri into untrusted containers.
• Isolate hosts that present GPUs to untrusted workloads (CI runners, multi‑tenant VMs).
• Monitor kernel logs aggressively for oops traces that reference the AMD display driver or dc_destruct.

---

Detection and response — what to hunt for​

• Kernel oops/panic traces with messages like “NULL pointer dereference” and stack frames referencing AMDGPU/DC functions (for example, frames showing dc_destruct or perf_trace access). Capture dmesg, serial console logs, and journal entries immediately if you see these.
• Repro steps that might indicate vulnerability: repeated GPU page-table updates, explicit IOCTLs to DRM devices, or workloads that stress GPU memory mapping — if those trigger kernel oopses on unpatched kernels, you are likely vulnerable.
• SIEM rules to add:
• Match kernel logs for “amdgpu” AND “NULL pointer” or “dc_destruct”.
• Alerts on repeated DRM device resets, compositor crashes, or unexplained reboots correlated with GPU workloads.

---

Cross‑checking the public record (verifiability)​

Multiple independent vulnerability trackers corroborate the technical description and remediation path:

• The NVD entry summarizes the dc_destruct NULL dereference and the check-for-NULL remediation.
• Ubuntu’s security tracker published the CVE details and assigned a Medium priority while documenting the remediation status in its kernels.
• OSV and other mirrors list upstream kernel stable commit references and recommend kernel updates.

Where direct kernel commit verification is needed, upstream stable git / kernel.org commits are the primary source for the exact code changes and commit IDs referenced by CVE records; distribution advisories reference those commits in their patch notes. If you need the authoritative patch text for backporting, consult the kernel stable repository commit referenced in the CVE metadata.

---

Critical analysis — strengths, limits, and residual risks​

Strengths of the upstream and vendor responses​

• The upstream patch is surgical and minimal, which lowers regression risk and makes vendor backports straightforward. That improves the likelihood distributions and vendors will push fixes quickly.
• Microsoft’s adoption of CSAF/VEX and initial publication for Azure Linux provides machine‑readable, trustworthy attestations that help automation and reduce alert noise for customers running that distribution. The VEX model is a positive transparency improvement that helps customers make deterministic remediation decisions.

Residual and systemic risks​

• Vendor lag: Embedded devices, appliances, or OEM kernels often lag upstream and may never receive timely backports. These fleets represent the largest long‑tail exposure.
• Artifact diversity: Microsoft (and many vendors) ship many artifacts across cloud, edge, and appliance lines. A single VEX statement for Azure Linux does not automatically cover Marketplace images, WSL kernels, or statically linked binaries; each artifact needs inventory verification.
• Detection blind spots: Kernel-level availability issues produce local artifacts (oops traces) that may not be visible to perimeter-only monitoring. Effective detection requires kernel log collection and correlation across hosts.

Unverifiable claims and cautionary flags​

• If any public claim asserts that no other Microsoft products include the component solely because Microsoft has not yet attested them, that should be treated as unverifiable until Microsoft’s inventory for those specific products is published. Absence of attestations is not equivalent to absence of vulnerable code.

---

Recommended action plan for administrators and MSSPs​

• Inventory (immediate)
• Enumerate hosts with AMD GPU drivers: lsmod | grep amdgpu, find /lib/modules -name amdgpu[I], and check /dev/dri/[/I] permissions.
• Inventory Azure Linux images and other Microsoft‑published artifacts you run; fetch Microsoft’s VEX/CSAF files and map them to your images.
• Patch (high priority)
• Check distro security trackers (Ubuntu, Red Hat, SUSE, Debian) for kernel packages that include the stable commit referenced by CVE records.
• Apply vendor-provided kernel security updates that contain the fix and reboot in a controlled window.
• For vendor kernels or appliances without updates, engage vendor support and request backport timelines.
• Mitigate (if immediate patching is infeasible)
• Restrict access to /dev/dri and GPU device nodes; tighten udev rules and container runtime device mounts.
• Isolate hosts that expose GPU access to untrusted code or multi‑tenant workloads.
• Validate (post‑patch)
• Reproduce the previously observed GPU workload or issue in a test environment; confirm no oops/panic traces occur in the updated kernel.
• Continue to monitor kernel oops telemetry for any recurring traces.
• Communicate
• Treat Microsoft’s Azure Linux VEX statement as authoritative for Azure Linux images you consume, but continue to validate other Microsoft artifacts until they are likewise attested.

---

Final assessment — answering the question directly​

Is Azure Linux the only Microsoft product that includes the open‑source library and is therefore potentially affected by CVE‑2025‑39705?

• Short, accurate answer: No — Azure Linux is not necessarily the only Microsoft product that could include the vulnerable code. It is the only Microsoft product Microsoft has publicly attested as including the affected component for this CVE at the time of the advisory. That attestation is authoritative for Azure Linux but does not prove the absence of the vulnerable component in other Microsoft artifacts.
• Operational nuance (the important part): Microsoft’s statement reflects completed inventory work for Azure Linux and a commitment to expand VEX attestations as it inventories additional products. Customers running Azure Linux should treat Microsoft’s VEX as the canonical signal for that distribution and patch accordingly. Customers running other Microsoft images, WSL kernels, Marketplace appliances, or Microsoft‑distributed binaries should perform artifact-level verification (or wait for Microsoft’s attestation expansion) rather than rely on absence of a VEX entry as proof of safety.

---

A proactive, artifact‑level approach will give the correct answer for any given environment: treat Microsoft’s Azure Linux VEX attestation as authoritative for Azure Linux, but assume other Microsoft-produced images and kernels are potential carriers until you verify them by inventory, VEX attestations, or direct inspection. Apply patched kernels where available, restrict access to DRM devices in the interim, and engage vendors for backports on appliances and embedded devices to remove the long tail of exposure.

---

Source: MSRC Security Update Guide - Microsoft Security Response Center