CVE-2025-47954: SQL Injection Privilege Escalation in SQL Server — Urgent Patch

Microsoft’s advisory for CVE-2025-47954 describes an SQL Injection–style weakness in Microsoft SQL Server that can allow an authenticated actor to escalate privileges across the network — a high‑impact finding that requires immediate attention from DBAs and security teams.

Background / Overview​

Microsoft SQL Server is a core element of many enterprise environments, hosting business applications, identity stores, and critical data. An elevation-of-privilege (EoP) flaw that hinges on SQL injection is especially dangerous because it turns any authenticated foothold — even a low‑privilege application or service account — into a potential path to full database compromise and onward to host or network takeover. Microsoft’s Update Guide entry for CVE-2025-47954 frames the issue as improper neutralization of special elements used in an SQL command (a classic SQL injection / CWE‑89 pattern) exploitable over the network.
This advisory appears alongside a cluster of serious SQL Server fixes issued by Microsoft in mid‑2025. Those bundled updates included heap‑overflow and information‑disclosure fixes that illustrate how input‑validation bugs can quickly escalate from data exposure to remote code execution and privilege elevation when chained together. Administrators should treat SQL Server updates in this cycle as high priority. (app.opencve.io, cvedetails.com)

---

What Microsoft says (summary of the advisory)​

• The flaw is classified as an SQL injection / improper neutralization of special elements in an SQL command. The vulnerable code path constructs or executes SQL in a way that untrusted input can alter semantics.
• The attacker must be authenticated — they need to be able to reach the SQL Server service with some valid credentials or an account that the server accepts. This lowers the bar compared with unauthenticated remote‑code vulnerabilities, but still represents a serious risk because many service and application accounts are widely used and often over‑privileged.
• The impact is elevation of privilege on the SQL Server instance (and, depending on configuration and chaining, potential escape to OS‑level actions). Microsoft’s Update Guide is the authoritative source for the official list of affected builds and the KB/patch identifiers that remediate CVE‑2025‑47954.

Caution: Microsoft’s MSRC pages are delivered with client‑side rendering; administrators should view the Update Guide from a modern browser or use vendor patch metadata in patch‑management tooling to obtain the exact KB numbers and fixed build releases.

---

Technical analysis — how an SQL injection can become privilege escalation​

At a high level, SQL injection lets an attacker inject SQL tokens or clauses into a query so that the server executes commands the developer never intended. In the context of SQL Server privilege escalation, commonly abused techniques include:

• Stacked queries or sp_executesql payloads that run additional administrative commands (CREATE LOGIN, ALTER SERVER ROLE, EXECUTE AS).
• Abuse of stored procedures or modules that run with higher privileges (module signing, ownership chaining, or EXECUTE AS contexts).
• Use of extended stored procedures or legacy features (xp_cmdshell, OLE Automation procedures) to trigger OS‑level actions when the server process has elevated rights.
• Manipulating query logic to impersonate or escalate to sysadmin roles, or to create a new principal bound to a high‑privilege role.

Because SQL Server often runs under service accounts or is reachable from application tiers, a single injection that grants CREATE LOGIN or sysadmin membership can turn a low‑privilege breach into a complete data compromise. Historic Patch Tuesday data from mid‑2025 shows multiple SQL Server fixes where input handling or memory‑corruption flaws were combined to enable RCE or EoP, underscoring how tightly linked these failure modes are. (app.opencve.io, cvedetails.com)

---

Who is at risk​

• Publicly reachable SQL Server instances or servers in weakly segmented networks.
• Environments where application service accounts have more privileges than strictly needed (common in legacy apps).
• Systems with poor auditing and slow patch cycles.
• Instances using older ODBC/OLE DB drivers or client libraries that may be listed as companion affected components in Microsoft’s advisory.

---

Immediate actions — 0–24 hours (emergency playbook)​

• Verify Microsoft’s advisory for CVE‑2025‑47954 and identify the matching KBs and fixed builds for your SQL Server versions from the Update Guide. Apply vendor guidance as the primary remediation path.
• If any affected instances are reachable from untrusted networks, isolate them now: block TCP 1433/UDP 1434 and any named instance ports at the perimeter, move them to management networks, or disable public bindings temporarily.
• Increase logging and enable SQL Server Audit (or Extended Events) to capture privileged‑action telemetry: CREATE LOGIN, ALTER SERVER ROLE, sp_addsrvrolemember, EXECUTE AS, changes to xp_cmdshell or agent jobs. Preserve logs for forensics.
• Rotate credentials for high‑privilege accounts if there is any suspicion of compromise; lock down unused or stale logins and remove excessive rights from application/service accounts.
• Schedule an urgent patch window and test the Microsoft update in staging, then roll to production per risk posture. If you cannot immediately patch, apply compensating controls (network restrictions, least‑privilege enforcement, PAM).

---

How to confirm whether you’re affected​

• Inventory all SQL Server instances (physical, VM, container, cloud) and collect exact build numbers (SELECT @@VERSION or use SQL Server error logs). Compare builds to the list in Microsoft’s Update Guide.
• Search for companion updates to OLE DB/ODBC drivers listed in vendor guidance — many SQL Server advisories include client/driver fixes that matter for mitigations and compatibility testing.
• If an automated scanner reports CVE‑2025‑47954 but Microsoft’s Update Guide does not list that CVE string for your builds, treat the finding as potentially misattributed and cross‑reference the scanner evidence with Microsoft’s KB numbers (export the scanner proof and map it to the KB). Mislabeling is common during rapid patch cycles.

---

Detection and hunting guidance (practical queries and telemetry)​

Collect the following telemetry and run these checks as part of an incident‑hunt:

• SQL Server Audit / Extended Events: Monitor for CREATE LOGIN, ALTER SERVER ROLE, sp_addsrvrolemember, and unexpected EXECUTE AS events. Forward to SIEM for alerting.
• Quick DBA query to find server principals with sysadmin membership:
• SELECT p.name, p.type_desc FROM sys.server_principals p JOIN sys.server_role_members m ON p.principal_id = m.member_principal_id JOIN sys.server_principals r ON m.role_principal_id = r.principal_id WHERE r.name = 'sysadmin';
• Run this regularly to detect newly elevated principals.
• Look for sudden increases in DDL (schema changes), agent jobs created to run external commands, or unexpected use of xp_cmdshell and other elevated procedures. Collect Windows Event logs for new service installs or scheduled tasks that coincide with suspicious SQL events.
• Network telemetry: Inspect database queries from unexpected client IP ranges for patterns of stacked queries, sequences including EXEC sp_executesql with large payloads, or query strings containing SQL metacharacters typical of injection attacks (UNION SELECT, --, / /).

---

If you find evidence of exploitation — immediate response​

• Isolate the affected host from the network while preserving volatile evidence (memory, running processes).
• Take full backups of databases and system state; preserve copies of SQL logs and any relevant agent job outputs before remediation steps.
• Rotate credentials that may have been exposed (service accounts, application secrets, DB admin passwords).
• Perform a privilege review: remove any suspicious logins created recently, revoke unexpected role grants, and harden remaining credentials.
• Run full forensic analysis or engage a response partner; check for persistence mechanisms (scheduled tasks, services, web shells, new admin accounts).

---

Patch testing and deployment guidance​

• Test updates in a staging environment that mirrors production builds and connected applications. Validate drivers (ODBC/OLE DB), ORMs, and application compatibility with the patched SQL Server binaries.
• Use a staged rollout: patch a subset of instances, validate application behaviour and query performance, then accelerate wider deployment. For large estates, prioritize internet‑facing and high‑risk systems first.
• Track KB and CU metadata in your patch‑management system (WSUS, SCCM/ConfigMgr, Intune, or your third‑party patch orchestration tool). Microsoft’s Security Update Guide is authoritative for exact KB numbers and remediation mappings.

---

Long‑term hardening and resilience​

• Enforce least privilege for application and service accounts; prefer managed identities and constrained principals where possible.
• Eliminate direct public exposure of SQL endpoints; use private endpoints, VPNs, or application proxies and strictly limit inbound flows to necessary application tiers.
• Require parameterized queries and prepared statements in application code; centralize data‑access layers to reduce injection risk at the source. Adopt static and dynamic application security testing (SAST/DAST) to find SQLi patterns before deployment.
• Maintain continuous vulnerability scanning and inventory of SQL Server builds and third‑party drivers. Automate patch detection and apply vendor guidance promptly.

---

Risk tradeoffs, strengths, and limits of the advisory​

• Strength: Microsoft’s Update Guide provides authoritative KB mappings and fixed build numbers that let administrators target exact remediations for each SQL Server branch. Use that official metadata for patch orchestration.
• Strength: The advisory’s classification (SQL injection / improper neutralization) gives defenders a clear remediation vector — focus on parameterization, auditing, and least privilege — which are actionable across both application and infrastructure tiers.
• Risk: The vulnerability requires an authenticated attacker; that reduces attack complexity compared with unauthenticated RCEs but raises the realistic threat level because compromised application accounts and lateral‑movement techniques are common. Many environments expose convenient accounts to multiple services, which widens the attack surface.
• Risk: Publicly available scanners and third‑party feeds sometimes misattribute CVE identifiers or lag Microsoft’s Update Guide. Do not rely solely on third‑party CVE strings returned by a scanner; always map scanner findings to the vendor KB to confirm the correct patch.

---

What’s not confirmed (and why you should verify)​

• If you require exact affected build numbers, CVSS base score, or Microsoft’s exploitability assessment for CVE‑2025‑47954, consult the Update Guide entry in a browser and capture the KB/patch identifiers for your specific product branch. The MSRC UI is the authoritative source; other public trackers may lag in indexing or show different CVE IDs for related fixes.
• As of the advisory snapshot used to prepare this report, Microsoft did not publish exploit code in the advisory. If proof‑of‑concept (PoC) code or exploit modules appear in public repositories after disclosure, urgency and priority for detection must increase immediately. Monitor vendor and community channels for PoC publication.

---

Practical checklist — a concise action plan for DBAs (prioritized)​

• Immediate: Open the Microsoft Update Guide entry for CVE‑2025‑47954 and identify the KBs for your SQL Server builds. Plan patch windows.
• Emergency containment: Block public database ports and isolate vulnerable instances.
• Audit & hunt: Enable SQL auditing; run the sysadmin membership query and look for recent CREATE LOGIN/ALTER ROLE activity. Preserve logs.
• Rotate high‑risk credentials and harden service accounts.
• Patch & verify: Apply vendor patches in staging, test app compatibility (drivers/ODBC/OLE DB), then deploy.
• Post‑patch: Run integrity checks, search for persistence, and continue elevated monitoring for 30–90 days.

---

Final verdict — treat CVE-2025-47954 as high priority​

CVE‑2025‑47954 describes a network‑accessible SQL injection that enables privilege escalation for an authenticated attacker. Given SQL Server’s central role in enterprise infrastructure and the frequency with which attackers chain initial access with EoP bugs, this advisory should be treated as high priority for patching and hardening. Follow Microsoft’s Update Guide for the exact KBs, apply patches promptly after staging, and implement compensating controls (network isolation, auditing, least privilege) where immediate patching is infeasible.
Acting now — isolating exposed instances, increasing telemetry, and accelerating tested patch rollouts — will markedly reduce the risk that a compromised application or low‑privilege account is turned into a full database compromise.

---

(If more granular KB numbers, CVSS ratings, or Microsoft exploitability text are required for your environment, retrieve the CVE‑specific page in the Microsoft Update Guide from an administrative browser and map those artifacts into your patch orchestration system before deploying updates.)

---

Source: MSRC Security Update Guide - Microsoft Security Response Center