Debunking 2025 Windows Security Myths: Defender, Paid AV, and Windows 10 EOL

Three persistent beliefs about Windows security still shape user behavior in 2025 — that you must pay for antivirus, that Microsoft Defender is a catch‑all shield, and that staying on Windows 10 is safe for years to come — and each of these myths is now misleading in ways that materially affect risk, cost, and remediation strategies.

Background​

Windows security has evolved from a weak, add‑on problem set into an integrated, platform‑level ecosystem. Microsoft ships several defensive technologies with Windows — Microsoft Defender Antivirus, SmartScreen, Controlled Folder Access, Windows Sandbox, BitLocker, and hardware‑backed protections such as Virtualization‑Based Security (VBS) — that raise the baseline protection available to typical consumers and many small businesses. Independent labs now rank Microsoft Defender among the top performers on core malware protection tests, while Defender’s tight integration with the OS gives it operational advantages third‑party suites can’t fully replicate. (av-test.org)
At the same time, adversaries have shifted toward people‑centric attacks (phishing, BEC, SIM swaps) and highly targeted exploit chains that can sidestep endpoint controls. The FBI’s Internet Crime Complaint Center recorded nearly 860,000 complaints in 2024 and attributed the largest complaint volume to phishing and spoofing — a clear reminder that most successful compromises now rely on persuasion as much as on code. (fbi.gov)
This article verifies the three myths circulating in popular tech coverage, cross‑checks them with independent labs and official notices, and then provides pragmatic, actionable guidance for Windows users and administrators who want to move from myth to measured practice.

---

Myth 1 — “You must buy a paid antivirus subscription to be safe”​

Why the myth persists​

For two decades, the dominant narrative was: pay for a branded security suite or accept weaker protection. Commercial AV vendors reinforced that story with advertising and bundled extras — and historically there were differences in detection quality and feature breadth. That memory persists even though the underlying platform has changed dramatically.

What the evidence actually shows​

• Microsoft Defender is built into Windows and enabled by default on consumer Windows 10 and Windows 11 installations. It provides real‑time protection, cloud‑assisted telemetry, and integration with Windows Update and SmartScreen. When no third‑party AV is present, Defender runs in active mode out of the box. (learn.microsoft.com)
• Independent lab results (2024–2025) show Defender scoring at or near the top on real‑world protection and laboratory detection metrics. AV‑TEST consistently awarded Defender full protection points in recent consumer and enterprise evaluations in early 2025. AV‑Comparatives’ enterprise real‑world testing for March–June 2025 ranked Defender with a protection rate near the very top of the measured set (98.9% in that sample), while other vendors marginally outperformed in specific scenarios. These results confirm that Defender now represents a robust baseline for most users. (av-test.org, av-comparatives.org)
• Many reputable vendors still offer free tiers or light editions (for example, Avast/AVG, Bitdefender Free, Avira free offerings), giving consumers capable scanners without immediate subscription costs. Reviews and buyer guides in 2025 continue to point to free AVs as viable alternatives for budget‑constrained users. (techradar.com)

Critical nuance — what paid products still bring​

Paid security suites continue to add value in specific areas:

• Cross‑platform coverage (macOS, Android, iOS) under a single management console.
• Identity and credit monitoring, insurance or remediation services for identity theft.
• Advanced privacy or secure‑browser features, larger VPN allocations, or bundled backup.
• Enterprise management, reporting, and integration with EDR/MDR offerings.

Only purchase a paid subscription if those features match your real threat model. For many home users who run Windows and practice basic hygiene, Defender + good operational practices delivers the highest security bang for the buck.

Practical checklist (when to skip a paid AV)​

• Your devices are Windows‑only and you use Microsoft Defender with all recommended protections enabled.
• You enforce unique passwords, MFA, and use a reputable password manager.
• You keep Windows Update active and install patches promptly.
• You do not need cross‑platform licensing, identity remediation, or heavy parental‑control suites.

If any of these is false — especially cross‑platform needs or enterprise management — evaluate paid suites against lab data and feature requirements before buying.

---

Myth 2 — “Microsoft Defender will stop everything — it’s total protection”​

Why the myth is dangerous​

A belief that Defender is omnipotent creates complacency. Security is not a single product; it's a layered system. Defender is excellent at detecting and blocking known and emergent malware patterns in the wild, but there are important attack classes it cannot eliminate by itself.

Verified strengths of Microsoft Defender​

• High detection and low false positives in AV‑TEST and AV‑Comparatives recent rounds; Defender frequently earns top scores for protection, performance, and usability. Those lab results demonstrate that Defender is a high‑quality, no‑cost engine for blocking conventional malware and many zero‑day waves when cloud telemetry is available. (av-test.org, av-comparatives.org)
• Platform integration gives Defender system‑level telemetry that third‑party tools cannot match without deep hooks; this enables features like controlled folder access, ransomware protection, tamper protection, and sandboxing.

Real limitations you must accept​

• Social engineering and credential theft: If a user clicks a convincing phishing link, enters credentials on a fake site, or is tricked into approving a login or bypassing protections, Defender cannot un‑type those credentials or forcibly stop every deception. The bulk of today’s losses stem from social engineering, not pure malware. (fbi.gov)
• Reputation‑based gaps (SmartScreen & URL filtering): SmartScreen relies on reputation signals. Newly created phishing pages and obfuscated delivery chains may bypass reputational blocks until telemetry accumulates; SmartScreen is effective but not infallible.
• Highly targeted, multi‑stage exploit chains: Advanced attackers that develop zero‑day kernel or firmware exploits can evade endpoint AV until a patch or mitigation is available. Defender reduces blast radius and often detects post‑exploit behavior, but it cannot guarantee zero risk against nation‑level or well‑resourced adversaries. (av-test.org)
• Privilege and supply‑chain attacks: Compromised installers, malicious drivers, or supply‑chain poisoning can operate below or alongside conventional AV detection models. Defender mitigations help but cannot single‑handedly eliminate these threat vectors.

Recommended augmentations (when Defender alone is insufficient)​

• Enable tamper protection, Controlled Folder Access, and SmartScreen; keep Defender’s cloud‑delivered protection active.
• Enforce multi‑factor authentication (MFA) everywhere possible and use a password manager.
• For high‑value users or businesses, invest in EDR/MDR (Endpoint Detection and Response / Managed Detection & Response) to provide telemetry, hunting, and human analysis.
• Train users with phishing simulations and enforce least privilege on accounts and admin rights.

---

Myth 3 — “Windows 10 offers the best long‑term security because it’s familiar and stable”​

The calendar is literal: Windows 10 support ends October 14, 2025​

Microsoft’s lifecycle policy is definitive: as of October 14, 2025, Windows 10 will no longer receive security updates, feature updates, or technical support for mainstream Home and Pro editions. That makes running Windows 10 beyond that date an increasing security liability unless the device is enrolled in an Extended Security Updates (ESU) program or replaced/upgraded. Microsoft explicitly recommends upgrading eligible devices to Windows 11 or enrolling in the consumer ESU for temporary continued coverage. (support.microsoft.com, microsoft.com)
Microsoft also published a consumer ESU pathway that extends security updates for a limited period (through October 13, 2026) by enrollment, including multiple enrollment options. Treat ESU as a bridge — not a permanent strategy. (microsoft.com)

Why EOL matters in technical terms​

• No new security patches: Newly discovered vulnerabilities affecting system libraries, drivers, and privileged services won’t be fixed on unsupported Windows 10 builds. This increases the risk surface proportionally to the number and severity of future disclosures.
• App vendor support declines: Over time, major third‑party vendors will shift testing and feature work to current OS versions; compatibility and security updates for popular apps may degrade on Windows 10.
• Attack economics: Unsupported platforms with large installed bases become attractive to attackers because a single exploit can reach many unpatched devices.

Practical migration planning — a prioritized sequence​

• Inventory: Document devices, OS versions, age, and upgrade eligibility.
• Compatibility check: Use the PC Health Check app and consult OEM firmware/driver support for TPM, firmware updates, and boot configuration needed for Windows 11.
• Risk triage: If a device cannot upgrade, isolate it on segmented VLANs, reduce administrative rights, and apply compensating controls (strict firewall rules, limited browsing).
• Backup and test: Back up user data and test upgrade paths in a staging environment where possible.
• ESU as a stopgap: Enroll eligible devices in ESU only when migration within timelines is not feasible; plan to retire ESU‑covered devices within the ESU window. (microsoft.com)

---

Cross‑cutting technical verifications​

Defender behavior with third‑party AV​

When a supported, registered non‑Microsoft AV solution is installed on Windows 10/11, Microsoft Defender typically disables itself automatically to avoid conflicts and resource contention. In managed enterprise contexts, Defender can be configured to run in passive or EDR‑only modes so that Defender’s EDR telemetry remains available even if a third‑party scanner handles active file blocking. Administrators should confirm AMRunningMode or the Windows Security app to verify the active state. (learn.microsoft.com)

Lab cross‑validation​

• AV‑TEST consumer and enterprise product evaluations in early 2025 show Defender achieving maximum protection scores in their standard battery of real‑world and reference tests. (av-test.org)
• AV‑Comparatives’ March–June 2025 enterprise real‑world test placed Microsoft near the top of its measured set with a 98.9% protection rate in that sample; other vendors occasionally lead on select datasets. These differences are real but typically marginal for general consumer risk models. (av-comparatives.org)

---

Practical, prioritized hardening checklist for Windows users (quick actions with high ROI)​

• Enable Windows Update and install cumulative updates weekly; don’t postpone critical patches. (Patching closes the largest class of exploit opportunities.)
• Confirm Windows Security / Microsoft Defender is active unless you have a deliberate third‑party solution in place. If you install third‑party AV, verify Defender’s passive/disabled status and confirm EDR telemetry if you rely on Defender for Endpoint. (learn.microsoft.com)
• Turn on Tamper Protection, Controlled Folder Access, and SmartScreen. Test Controlled Folder Access in audit mode before enforcing to reduce false positives.
• Use MFA everywhere; prioritize MFA on email, financial, and cloud accounts.
• Adopt a password manager and unique passwords per service.
• Encrypt laptops with BitLocker and back up recovery keys securely.
• Train staff and household members on phishing red flags; use simulated phishing exercises for businesses.
• For unknown files, use Windows Sandbox (Pro/Enterprise) or a disposable VM rather than running them on your primary profile.
• Plan and schedule Windows 10 migrations now; treat ESU as a temporary bridge only. (microsoft.com)

---

Risks, trade‑offs, and market caveats​

• False sense of security: High lab scores and shiny vendor dashboards can lull users into risky behavioral patterns. The single largest attack vector is still human decision‑making, not raw malware detection.
• Pricing and feature churn: Third‑party vendors update pricing, free/paid feature split, and cross‑platform coverage frequently. Don’t commit to annual subscriptions based solely on last year’s review; verify current offers in your region at the time of purchase. (This is a time‑sensitive area; vendor pricing can change.)
• Platform complexity: Enabling aggressive protections (sandboxing, strict UAC, controlled folder policies) can break workflows; organizations should test policies on representative users before enforce‑rolling them.
• ESU dependence: Extended Security Updates delay but do not remove the long‑term cost and technical debt of running an unsupported OS. ESU buys time for migration planning — not a permanent fix. (microsoft.com)

---

What editors and product pages said (summary of the original claim)​

A summary piece circulated this year that distilled three common Windows security myths — paid antivirus required, Defender is omnipotent, and Windows 10 is safe to use long term — and urged readers to update their assumptions. That article correctly identifies the direction of change: built‑in defenses and free offerings have closed much of the historical gap in baseline protection, and Microsoft’s support calendar is definitive for migration planning. But the piece is a prompt rather than a full roadmap: applying the facts to real risk requires checking lab results, verifying OS lifecycle dates, and planning compensating controls for social engineering and high‑value targets.

---

Executive summary — what Windows users must internalize for 2025​

• Stop treating paid AV as the automatic best default. For many home users, Microsoft Defender + good practices is sufficient and cost‑effective. Buy paid suites only for specific needs (cross‑platform coverage, identity remediation, enterprise management). (av-test.org, techradar.com)
• Treat Microsoft Defender as a high quality baseline, not a magical silver bullet. Defender defends strongly against malware but cannot eradicate human‑centered attacks (phishing, social engineering) or guarantee immunity from targeted exploit chains. Reinforce Defender with MFA, password hygiene, EDR/MDR where appropriate. (av-test.org, ic3.gov)
• Windows 10 EOL is real and imminent: October 14, 2025 is the end of standard support. Plan upgrades or ESU enrollment now; do not rely on antivirus alone to compensate for an unsupported OS. (support.microsoft.com, microsoft.com)

---

Final verdict and call to action​

The simplest, most defensible posture for most Windows users in 2025 is a layered one: keep Windows updated, use Microsoft Defender with advanced protections enabled, adopt strong account hygiene (MFA and a password manager), and treat unexpected email or links with skepticism. Organizations and users with higher risk profiles should add EDR/MDR and consider paid suites only when they provide demonstrable, necessary capabilities that Defender or other free tools cannot supply.
The three myths still float around because they are easy to explain and emotionally persuasive — but they no longer match the technical reality. Replace those myths with a concrete checklist and a migration calendar: update, enable protections, plan upgrades, and train people. That combination is the single most effective, evidence‑based strategy for reducing compromise in 2025. (av-test.org, av-comparatives.org, fbi.gov)

---

Source: VOI.ID Three Windows Security Myths To Avoid In 2025

 

[ChatGPT]

Three simple, persistent beliefs about Windows security — that you must buy a paid antivirus, that Microsoft Defender magically blocks everything, and that sticking with Windows 10 is the safest long-term choice — are shaping decisions in 2025 that expose millions of users to unnecessary costs and, in some cases, real risk. The claims behind those myths deserve a clear-eyed rebuttal: the technical baseline on Windows has changed, independent lab evidence shows Microsoft’s built-in defenses are far stronger than many expect, and the Microsoft support calendar for Windows 10 is an immovable timeline that must drive migration planning. (support.microsoft.com)

Background / Overview​

Windows security is no longer the same landscape it was a decade ago. Microsoft now ships an integrated defensive stack — Microsoft Defender Antivirus, SmartScreen, Controlled Folder Access, Windows Sandbox, BitLocker, and hardware‑assisted protections such as Virtualization‑Based Security (VBS) and Hypervisor‑Protected Code Integrity (HVCI) — that together raise the baseline for both consumers and many businesses. At the same time, attackers are shifting tactics: social engineering (phishing, business email compromise), supply‑chain abuse, and sophisticated exploit chains pose threats that no single product can eliminate. The three myths that follow matter because they guide where users spend money, how they train people, and whether they plan an OS migration. (fbi.gov)

---

Myth 1 — “You must pay for antivirus to be safe”​

The claim and the origin story​

For years the common advice was simple: buy a paid security suite, because free tools and built‑in protection weren’t enough. That era reflected reality when Windows lacked modern, cloud‑assisted detection and platform integration. Marketing reinforced the message: branded AV vendors promoted themselves as necessary. That history still colors buying behavior today.

The technical reality in 2025​

Microsoft Defender is built into Windows 10 and Windows 11 and runs automatically unless a third‑party product takes over; its real‑time protection, cloud lookups, behavior monitoring, and tamper protection are modern capabilities intended to serve as a capable baseline for mainstream users. Microsoft documents that Defender’s anomaly and behavior detection, cloud‑delivered protection, and always‑on heuristics are active components of the product’s defenses. (learn.microsoft.com)
Independent testing laboratories now routinely rank Microsoft Defender among the top performers in core malware protection tests. AV‑TEST’s consumer evaluations in late 2024 and early 2025 awarded Defender full protection points and top marks for performance and usability. AV‑Comparatives’ 2025 enterprise real‑world testing showed Defender near the top of the measured set (a 98.9% protection rate in one multi‑month sample). Those results are not flukes — they reflect a sustained improvement in Defender’s detection model and cloud telemetry. (av-test.org, av-comparatives.org)
At the same time, many reputable third‑party vendors continue to offer free tiers that provide solid baseline scanning; paid plans add extras such as cross‑platform coverage, identity remediation, VPNs, or premium support. Expert buyer guides in 2025 continue to list free options (Bitdefender Free, Avast/AVG free editions, Avira) as viable for users who don’t need bundled extras. (techradar.com)

What that means for most home users​

• For a typical Windows‑only home PC that receives updates, uses a password manager, and has Multi‑Factor Authentication (MFA) on important accounts, Microsoft Defender + good operational hygiene is cost‑effective and technically sufficient for baseline malware defense.
• Buying a paid suite makes sense when your threat model includes cross‑platform needs (Windows, macOS, Android, iOS), identity remediation and insurance services, parental controls, or centralized management for many devices.
• If you install a reputable third‑party AV, Defender will typically move to passive mode so the two don’t conflict — but verify that the third‑party product’s telemetry, real‑time protection, and support model actually match your needs. (learn.microsoft.com, techradar.com)

Actionable checklist — when to skip paid AV​

• You run Windows only and use Defender with real‑time protection and tamper protection enabled.
• You enforce MFA, use unique passwords via a password manager, and keep Windows Update active.
• You have a trusted backup plan (local + offsite) and BitLocker or whole‑disk encryption on laptops.
  If any of these items are false, evaluate paid products against independent lab data and your specific requirements. (av-test.org, techradar.com)

---

Myth 2 — “Microsoft Defender will stop everything — it’s total protection”​

Why the myth is dangerous​

Lab scores are persuasive, and Defender’s tight OS integration gives strong results for malware detection. But interpreting those scores as proof of omnipotence is a mistake — and a dangerous one. Believing a single product will protect against every threat reduces emphasis on human training, account hygiene, and layered controls that actually prevent the majority of today’s losses.

Strengths: what Defender reliably does well​

• Malware detection and removal: Repeated AV‑TEST and AV‑Comparatives results show Defender blocks the vast majority of conventional malware and many zero‑day waves in the wild. Defender scores high on protection, performance, and usability in independent lab tests. (av-test.org)
• Platform integration: Defender’s system‑level telemetry enables features such as Controlled Folder Access (ransomware mitigation), Windows Sandbox (ephemeral testing), SmartScreen (reputation and URL filtering), and BitLocker integration. These features make Defender operationally effective without adding third‑party drivers that can break at the kernel level. (learn.microsoft.com)

Real limitations and the classes of attacks Defender cannot eliminate on its own​

• Social engineering and phishing: If a user voluntarily types credentials into a convincing fake site, approves a malicious MFA prompt, or is tricked into installing malicious software, an endpoint AV cannot un‑enter credentials or fully reverse a human mistake. Phishing and spoofing were the top categories by volume in the FBI IC3 2024 report and remain primary drivers of financial loss. Educating users, using phishing‑resistant MFA, and enforcing safe recovery options are higher‑ROI defenses against these attacks than swapping antivirus engines. (fbi.gov, hipaajournal.com)
• Highly targeted exploit chains and supply‑chain attacks: Nation‑state or well‑resourced attackers that leverage zero‑day kernel/firmware exploits or trusted update mechanisms can bypass endpoint defenses until patches or mitigations are deployed. Defender helps detect post‑exploit behavior but can’t guarantee immediate prevention against sophisticated, bespoke exploitation.
• Reputation gaps: SmartScreen and other reputation services are powerful but reputation‑based; newly minted phishing pages or obfuscated redirect chains can bypass reputation filters until telemetry accumulates. SmartScreen enhancements (e.g., Enhanced Phishing Protection) improve coverage but are not foolproof. (learn.microsoft.com, en.wikipedia.org)

Recommended augmentations (where Defender alone is insufficient)​

• Enforce phishing‑resistant MFA (hardware keys or platform authenticators) for high‑value accounts.
• Adopt a password manager and eliminate password reuse.
• Add EDR/MDR (Endpoint Detection & Response / Managed Detection & Response) for organizations and high‑risk users; these services provide telemetry, hunting, and human analysis.
• Use Least Privilege for everyday accounts and isolate admin tasks to hardened or dedicated workstations.
• Run phishing simulations and formal user training in organizations. (learn.microsoft.com, fbi.gov)

---

Myth 3 — “Windows 10 offers the best long‑term security because it’s familiar and stable”​

The calendar is literal: Microsoft’s lifecycle and why it matters​

Microsoft’s lifecycle policy is not opinion — it’s a published schedule. Windows 10 support ends on October 14, 2025; after that date consumer Home and Pro editions will no longer receive regular security updates or technical support. Microsoft offers a Consumer Extended Security Updates (ESU) program as a temporary bridge for eligible devices, but ESU is explicitly a stopgap, not a permanent solution. Relying on an unsupported OS exposes systems to unpatched kernel and platform vulnerabilities, shifting the risk burden to compensating controls that are often costly and incomplete. (support.microsoft.com, learn.microsoft.com)

Why running an unsupported OS becomes riskier over time​

• Unpatched platform vulnerabilities accumulate, creating persistent and exploitable attack surfaces for threat actors.
• Third‑party apps and drivers will gradually drop compatibility or stop patching legacy platforms, increasing instability and reducing security testing.
• Compliance and insurance implications: organizations that run unsupported platforms may face higher cyber insurance premiums, audit failures, or non‑compliance with industry standards.
• Historical precedent (Windows XP, older IE versions) demonstrates how attackers quickly weaponize unpatched ecosystems once vendor support is removed. (learn.microsoft.com)

Options if you can’t upgrade immediately​

• Enroll in Microsoft’s Consumer ESU (if eligible) as a temporary measure — check the current enrollment mechanisms and pricing in your region; offerings changed during 2025 and may be time‑sensitive. Treat ESU as a one‑year bridge, not a migration plan. (techradar.com, support.microsoft.com)
• Apply compensating controls:
• Strict network segmentation and firewall rules.
• Robust EDR and centralized logging for monitoring and rapid response.
• Least privilege and privileged access workstations for administrative tasks.
• Isolate legacy systems behind application proxies or VMs.
• Plan and execute a phased migration to Windows 11 or to compliant hardware; prioritize mission‑critical and internet‑exposed systems first. Use tools like Windows PC Health Check and Microsoft’s upgrade guidance to validate compatibility. (learn.microsoft.com)

---

Practical, prioritized hardening checklist (high ROI actions)​

• Keep Windows Update enabled and install cumulative updates promptly. Patching closes the largest and most common attack window. (support.microsoft.com)
• Verify Microsoft Defender (Windows Security) is active when no third‑party AV is installed; enable Tamper Protection, Controlled Folder Access, and SmartScreen. (learn.microsoft.com)
• Enforce MFA on email, cloud services, and financial accounts; prefer phishing‑resistant MFA where available. (fbi.gov)
• Use a reputable password manager and unique passwords per site. (tomsguide.com)
• Enable BitLocker on laptops and store recovery keys securely. (learn.microsoft.com)
• For unknown files, use Windows Sandbox (Pro/Enterprise) or a disposable VM. (learn.microsoft.com)
• Plan migration from Windows 10 now; treat ESU as temporary. Maintain an inventory and test applications on Windows 11. (support.microsoft.com, learn.microsoft.com)

---

Strengths, risks, and trade‑offs — an honest assessment​

Notable strengths​

• Integrated protection: Defender’s built‑in nature reduces compatibility friction and gives Microsoft unique telemetry advantages.
• Independent validation: Multiple labs show Defender as a top performer in protection, performance, and usability in 2024–2025. That matters for baseline threat models. (av-test.org, av-comparatives.org)
• Cost efficiency: For many consumers, Defender + free vendor options deliver high value without subscription expense. (techradar.com)

Important risks and caveats​

• Human factor remains dominant: The FBI IC3 data shows phishing and spoofing dominate complaint volume and financial loss. Technical controls cannot fully substitute for user awareness and resilient account controls. (fbi.gov)
• Advanced adversaries and zero‑days: No endpoint AV can claim immunity from a targeted zero‑day exploiting firmware, kernel, or supply chain vectors.
• Policy and pricing volatility: Vendor pricing, feature sets, and enrollment programs (like ESU) change; pricing references and availability are time‑sensitive and region‑dependent. Verify current offers before planning purchases. (techradar.com)
• Operational friction: Aggressive protections (VBS/HVCI, strict Controlled Folder Access) may break workflows; test policies on representative users before broad enforcement. (learn.microsoft.com)

---

What to tell decision makers (IT managers and power users)​

• Treat Defender as the high‑quality baseline, not a silver bullet. If your organization lacks EDR/MDR, add it for enterprise visibility and rapid response.
• Do not postpone Windows 10 migrations; set concrete timelines tied to Microsoft’s October 14, 2025 end‑of‑support date and prioritize assets with internet exposure. ESU is a temporary bridge, not a substitute for planned upgrades. (support.microsoft.com)
• Spend security budget where it multiplies defensive value: phishing‑resistant MFA, endpoint detection and response, and user training deliver more risk reduction per dollar than redundant consumer AV subscriptions for most scenarios. (fbi.gov, av-comparatives.org)

---

Quick FAQs — evidence‑backed answers​

• Is Microsoft Defender “good enough”? For the majority of Windows‑only home users, yes — Defender provides a strong baseline corroborated by AV‑TEST and AV‑Comparatives results. For high‑risk profiles or cross‑platform households, evaluate paid suites for the extra features you need. (av-test.org, av-comparatives.org)
• Will paid AV always outperform Defender? Not necessarily. Lab data shows Defender near the top on protection and performance; some paid suites lead on select metrics or add features that matter to particular users. Compare features to your threat model. (av-test.org, av-comparatives.org)
• Can SmartScreen or Defender stop phishing? They help (URL checks, reputation signals, and enhanced phishing protections), but they cannot stop every social‑engineering attack. Use MFA, password managers, and training to address the human vector. (learn.microsoft.com, fbi.gov)
• Is it safe to stay on Windows 10 after October 14, 2025? No — without ESU your OS will no longer receive security fixes. Plan migrations, or apply strict compensating controls and treat ESU as a short extension if available. (support.microsoft.com)

---

Final verdict — practical guidance for 2025​

The central lessons are simple, actionable, and evidence‑based: stop treating paid antivirus as an automatic default, recognize Microsoft Defender as a very capable baseline but not a silver bullet, and do not treat Windows 10 support as optional after October 14, 2025. For most home users the lowest‑cost, highest‑effectiveness posture is Defender with strong account hygiene (MFA + password manager), prompt patching, and a tested backup strategy. For organizations and high‑value targets, add EDR/MDR, phishing‑resistant authentication, and a migration plan away from unsupported OSes.
Myth‑busting without follow‑through is useless. Replace those myths with a short checklist and a migration calendar: enable recommended Defender protections, enforce MFA, run targeted phishing simulations, inventory Windows 10 devices today, and schedule migrations or ESU enrollment where needed. That layered, practical approach is the most reliable way to reduce compromise in 2025 and beyond. (av-test.org, support.microsoft.com)

---

---

Source: VOI.ID Three Windows Security Myths To Avoid In 2025