Ditch Third-Party Antivirus: Built-In Defender and Platform Protections Are Usually Enough

If you still pay for Norton, McAfee, or any other consumer antivirus subscription out of habit, you’re not alone — but you may be spending for nostalgia more than protection. Built‑in platform defenses like Microsoft Defender (Windows Security), Apple XProtect, and Google Play Protect now block the vast majority of commodity threats, industry labs regularly rate Defender among the top consumer products, and most high‑value cyberattacks target organizations and third‑party services rather than the average home PC.

Background: what changed since the era of “install antivirus immediately”​

For decades the default security story for Windows users was simple: install a third‑party antivirus the moment you set up a PC. That made sense when vendor engines were the primary line of defense against wormy email attachments, drive‑by downloads, and self‑propagating malware. Over the last ten years, however, platform vendors and app ecosystems invested heavily in layered defenses: integrated antivirus engines, app vetting, sandboxing, code notarization, runtime exploit mitigations, and cloud telemetry. Those changes are not theoretical — independent lab results now routinely place built‑in protections at or near the top of consumer antivirus rankings.
At the same time, cybercriminal economics changed. Today’s most damaging incidents — supply‑chain compromises, mass data exfiltration, and enterprise ransomware campaigns — focus on high‑value targets or on exploiting vulnerabilities in third‑party software used by many organizations. Examples include the SolarWinds Orion supply‑chain compromise (disclosed publicly in December 2020) and the MOVEit file‑transfer vulnerability exploited by Cl0p in 2023; these incidents hit large institutions and their suppliers, not random home desktops. Those attacks illustrate that buying consumer antivirus doesn’t protect you from the real systemic risks that cause the biggest breaches.

---

Overview: What built‑in security gives you today​

Windows: Microsoft Defender (Windows Security)​

• Real‑time protection for files, downloads, and running processes is enabled by default.
• Cloud‑delivered telemetry and behavioral analysis let Defender react quickly to new commodity threats.
• Additional protections like SmartScreen, Controlled Folder Access, and exploit mitigations harden the platform against typical consumer threats.

Independent test labs have given Microsoft Defender top marks in many recent cycles. AV‑TEST awarded Defender full scores in consumer protection/performance/usability in multiple 2024–2025 cycles, and AV‑Comparatives’ real‑world tests put Defender near the top of the pack for blocking commodity threats. That performance parity is the central technical fact driving the “do you need third‑party AV?” conversation.

macOS: XProtect, Gatekeeper, and notarization​

Apple’s multi‑layer model focuses heavily on reducing distribution of malicious apps: App Store vetting, Gatekeeper checks for unsigned or altered packages, notarization for apps distributed outside the store, and XProtect’s signature and behavior‑based detections that run at launch and update daily. In short, macOS ships with several defensive layers that stop many common vectors before a third‑party scanner ever runs.

Android and iOS: store vetting and Play Protect / App Store policies​

Mobile ecosystems rely on vetting at distribution more than on endpoint scanners. Google Play Protect and Play Store review processes blocked millions of policy‑violating apps in recent years, and Apple’s App Store review and notarization workflows serve a similar protective role for iOS and macOS ecosystems. For most users who install apps only from official stores and keep OS updates current, these protections remove a large portion of mobile‑app risk.

---

The core arguments for ditching third‑party consumer antivirus​

1) The free, built‑in engine is good enough for most people​

AV‑TEST’s consumer product reviews and AV‑Comparatives’ Real‑World Protection tests show that Microsoft Defender consistently blocks the bulk of commodity malware in realistic scenarios. In short, the “engine” you get with Windows today is closer to the paid alternatives than it used to be. If your threat model is “common malware and scams encountered during normal browsing, email, and downloads,” Defender alone is a defensible baseline.

2) Many attack vectors are already blocked before antivirus matters​

Modern clients and ecosystems block or constrain many traditional entry points:

• Email clients and webmail block suspicious executable attachments or strip dangerous content.
• Browsers and SmartScreen/URL‑reputation services block known phishing domains and malicious downloads.
• App stores and notarization processes prevent most malicious apps from reaching average users.

That means commodity threats are often stopped before the antivirus engine is the deciding factor. For users who avoid sideloading and keep their OS and apps updated, the incremental protection third‑party AV adds is small.

3) Attackers focus on enterprises and third‑party software​

The biggest and costliest breaches are usually caused by supply‑chain flaws, misconfigured enterprise tools, or vulnerabilities in widely used enterprise products — not the absence of a third‑party AV on a home PC. The SolarWinds and MOVEit incidents are vivid examples where attackers gained scale by exploiting vendor software or managed services that serve many organizations. Consumer antivirus subscriptions do not prevent those fault lines.

4) Extra features can be redundant or raise privacy concerns​

Modern AV suites often bundle VPNs, identity monitoring, password managers, and telemetry collectors. Those extras may be useful for some households, but they also increase the software footprint, can add system overhead, and in several high‑profile cases have raised privacy concerns about data‑collection practices. Choosing to pay for conveniences — not core protection — is a legitimate consumer trade‑off, but it’s different from paying for objectively better antivirus detection.

---

Where paid antivirus still makes sense (and where it doesn’t)​

Good reasons to consider a paid third‑party suite​

• You need cross‑platform, multi‑device coverage for Windows, macOS, Android, and iOS under one subscription.
• You want easy family management and centralized dashboards for non‑technical household members.
• You require additional services (reliable VPN with audited no‑logs policy, identity‑theft insurance, secure cloud backup) included in one bundle.
• You support legacy systems or specialized software where Defender’s integration may be less convenient or tested.

Weak reasons, or poor ROI, for paying​

• Paying just to avoid “popup alerts” or because you feel safer with a brand name. For many home users, that peace of mind is paid redundancy rather than materially better protection.
• Installing multiple endpoint agents “just in case.” Extra agents can conflict, increase boot time, and expand the local attack surface.
• Relying on third‑party AV to stop supply‑chain or enterprise‑scale breaches. These threats require organizational controls, patching, and monitoring — not consumer AV.

---

Practical guidance: How to secure a modern PC without paying for AV​

If you decide to rely on built‑in protections, follow these practical, prioritized steps:

• Enable and keep Microsoft Defender (Windows Security) real‑time protection and cloud‑delivered protection enabled. Microsoft updates Defender’s security intelligence several times per day.
• Keep the operating system and all installed apps updated; activate automatic updates wherever possible. Patch management closes the majority of exploit avenues.
• Use browser protections: keep phishing protections and SmartScreen enabled, and prefer browsers that integrate URL reputation features.
• Avoid sideloading apps or installing software from untrusted sources. On macOS, rely on notarization and Gatekeeper; on Android, use the Play Store and Play Protect when possible.
• Practice basic hygiene: strong, unique passwords (with a password manager), enable multi‑factor authentication for important accounts, and maintain regular backups (ideally offline or immutable backups for ransomware resilience).
• If you need extra features (VPN, identity monitoring), evaluate vendors carefully and compare the long‑term cost versus value; consider stand‑alone services rather than bundled AV if that’s cheaper.

---

The risks and caveats you must accept if you stop paying​

No defensive posture is perfect. Here are the meaningful downsides if you choose Defender‑only:

• Targeted attacks and novel, highly targeted exploits can bypass any consumer engine; those scenarios are rare for the average user but still possible. If you are a journalist, executive, or high‑value individual, your risk profile may be higher.
• Built‑in protections sometimes favor tight integration over broad feature parity. For example, some web‑security features in Windows are optimized for Microsoft Edge and may not protect other browsers equally. If you use niche workflows or older enterprise software, test carefully.
• False negatives are still possible. While labs report high detection rates in controlled tests, labs cannot replicate every social‑engineering trick or targeted zero‑day exploit. Treat lab numbers as informative guidance, not absolute guarantees.

When a claim can’t be independently verified — for example, the exact dollar value of identity‑theft insurance payouts some bundles advertise — treat that as a marketing promise rather than a technical fact and read vendor contracts and privacy policies before buying. Flag these claims as unverifiable without vendor documentation.

---

What independent testing actually shows (quick read)​

• AV‑TEST (consumer product reports) has given Microsoft Defender full 6/6 scores for protection, performance, and usability in multiple 2024–2025 test cycles. That demonstrates parity on the metrics the lab measures.
• AV‑Comparatives’ Real‑World Protection tests place Defender among the high‑performers with protection rates in the upper‑90s (e.g., 99.1% in a recent cycle), which aligns it with many commercial products on the primary metric that matters to everyday users. These numbers underline that Defender blocks most commodity threats.
• Consumer adoption and subscription patterns show a generational split: older adults are significantly more likely to subscribe to paid antivirus than younger users, often driven by habit, perceived risk, or desire for bundled extras. Surveys from reputable consumer research organizations corroborate that pattern.

These lab results and consumer trends are the technical backbone of the argument that third‑party consumer antivirus has shifted from essential security to optional service and convenience.

---

Counterarguments and where the discourse is still unsettled​

• Some security professionals still recommend third‑party endpoint detection for customers who need centralized management, advanced telemetry, sandboxed execution, or integration with enterprise SIEM and EDR tools. The question is one of risk profile, not binary right/wrong. Community discussions and forum analyses reflect a spectrum of use cases where paid suites still add value.
• There are documented cases where poorly implemented third‑party agents increased attack surface or caused performance regressions. Conversely, some third‑party solutions offer specialized capabilities that Defender lacks. The correct decision requires matching capabilities to needs, not following marketing.
• Finally, vendor reputations and privacy practices matter. Some AV vendors have been criticized for telemetry or data handling practices; reading privacy policies and third‑party audits is prudent before purchasing. That’s a privacy decision layered on top of the security decision.

---

A pragmatic decision framework (quick checklist)​

• If you’re an average home user who uses one Windows PC, avoids pirated software, installs apps from official stores, enables updates, and practices basic hygiene: Microsoft Defender + built‑in OS protections are sufficient.
• If you have multiple types of devices or non‑technical family members, and you value bundled convenience (VPN, identity monitoring, centralized management): consider a paid suite but audit features and pricing.
• If you work with sensitive corporate data, are a public figure, or must meet compliance requirements: use enterprise‑grade EDR/managed detection and consult your IT/security team — consumer AV is not designed for those use cases.
• If you keep a third‑party AV for peace of mind, ensure it’s from a reputable vendor, disable overlapping real‑time scanning that causes conflicts, and regularly review renewals and pricing.

---

Conclusion​

The short version: for most consumers, paying for traditional third‑party antivirus is optional, not mandatory. Built‑in defenses — Microsoft Defender on Windows, XProtect and Gatekeeper on macOS, and Play Protect on Android — now stop the majority of everyday threats, and independent tests show these built‑in engines perform at levels once reserved for paid products. That doesn’t mean third‑party suites are useless: they still provide convenience, cross‑platform bundles, and extra services that some households find valuable. But if your goal is strictly to stop commodity malware on a single home Windows PC, you can safely rely on the free, built‑in protections as long as you keep your system updated, avoid risky downloads, and follow basic security hygiene.
If you’re unsure what’s right for your situation, start by auditing your device inventory and threat model: list what you must protect (banking, work files, family accounts), consider whether convenience or centralized management matters, and choose the minimal set of tools that delivers those outcomes without unnecessary cost or complexity. Community conversations and technical reviews echo the same pragmatic advice: spend thoughtfully, not out of habit.

---

Source: How-To Geek You don't need to pay for third-party antivirus software to protect your PC anymore