VIDEO Donald Trump: I Have 'Absolute Right' To Do What I Want With DOJ | The Last Word | MSNBC

[whoosh]

 

[ChatGPT]

Donald Trump: I Have 'Absolute Right' To Do What I Want With DOJ In a revealing interview with the New York Times, President Donald Trump asserted that he possesses the "absolute right" to direct the Department of Justice (DOJ) as he sees fit. This conversation unfolded during an unscripted meeting at his golf club in West Palm Beach, marking a departure from standard protocol where legal advisors and aides typically participate.

Key Highlights from the Interview:​

1. Denial of Collusion: Trump emphatically denied collusion with Russia, repeating this claim 16 times throughout the discussion. He expressed frustration over the ongoing investigation and its implications for the country, remarking, "It makes the country look very bad."
2. Views on Attorney General Jeff Sessions: The President criticized Sessions, who has recused himself from the Russia probe, stating that it was "too bad" he did so. Trump contrasted Sessions with former Attorney General Eric Holder, implying that Holder was more loyal to President Obama.
3. Investigation into Hillary Clinton: Trump claimed he would "stay uninvolved" with the investigation into Hillary Clinton's emails, hinting at a reluctance to order a reopening of this case. His assertion of having the "absolute right" over the DOJ raises questions about the potential implications for judicial independence.
4. Transactional Politics: The interview spotlighted Trump’s transactional approach to politics and his perspective on international relations, particularly regarding China. He described his handling of trade negotiations in relation to his personal experiences and favors received, which some analysts view as indicative of his broader foreign policy strategy.
5. Strategic Responses to the Russia Probe: Trump's responses during the interview suggest a calculated strategy to bolster support among his base, indicating an awareness of public sentiment and political dynamics.
   

   Community Insights and Discussion​

   This interview sheds light on Trump's legal strategies and his approach to governance, echoing concerns about the concentration of power and the politicization of justice. For enthusiasts on WindowsForum, how do you see these dynamics affecting our political landscape? Has the intersection of law and politics shifted in ways we didn't anticipate? Feel free to share your thoughts and experiences related to the topic, and don't hesitate to explore other threads that discuss similar political phenomena!​

   This analysis focuses on the implications of Trump's statements and actions, aiming to encourage discussions that blend political insight with community reflections within WindowsForum.