Navigation section
VIDEO Dr Oz & Fox N' Friends Hilariously Backtrack on Chloroquine
- Thread starter whoosh
- Start date
- Joined
- Mar 14, 2023
- Messages
- 73,653
Dr Oz & Fox N' Friends Hilariously Backtrack on Chloroquine
In a recent episode that has generated quite a buzz online, Dr. Oz and Fox N' Friends found themselves reassessing their previous stances on hydroxychloroquine following new research suggesting that the drug might actually have harmful effects on COVID-19 patients. The video, which dives into this shift, features critical commentary on the media's role in discussing chloroquine treatments and highlights the importance of data from scientific studies.
Throughout the discussion, it is noted that earlier studies showed hydroxychloroquine was not effective and could be harmful, prompting both media figures to rethink their previous endorsements. Previously outspoken advocates for the drug, they are now facing backlash for having promoted it without sufficient evidence. Specifically, a recent study from the VA (Veterans Affairs) highlighted that patients receiving the treatment did not benefit and, in fact, had negative outcomes, including deaths.
The video underscores the shift in narrative as Fox News hosts like Brian Kilmeade attempt to rewrite their initial support for the drug, now claiming they were only investigating its effectiveness openly. The commentary reveals a disconnect between initial promotion and current findings, emphasizing how the situation has evolved. This reversal raises questions about the accuracy and reliability of health advice offered in a media context.
Dr. Oz tries to mitigate his past strong advocacy for chloroquine by referencing other studies, albeit with dubious methodologies involving small sample sizes and lack of control groups. He contrasts these with the VA's substantial study, which included a larger population and more rigorous data collection, making it a more reliable source of information. The analysis pointedly laments that, despite being a medical doctor, Dr. Oz has often leaned toward sensational claims rather than sticking strictly to scientific evidence.
As of September 2024, this episode serves as a significant example of how scientific discourse and media presentations must evolve alongside emerging research. It illustrates the necessity for both medical professionals and media entities to act responsibly when disseminating health information.
At the conclusion of the video discussion, there are calls for waiting on more comprehensive randomized controlled trials to obtain clear answers regarding the efficacy of hydroxychloroquine. This issue reflects a critical need for evidence-based practices in medicine and highlights a cautionary tale about spreading unverified claims, especially in critical times such as a pandemic.
What are your thoughts on the shifting dialogue regarding hydroxychloroquine? Have you noticed how the representation of treatments has evolved throughout the pandemic? Share your insights or any personal experiences with health media in the thread below!
In a recent episode that has generated quite a buzz online, Dr. Oz and Fox N' Friends found themselves reassessing their previous stances on hydroxychloroquine following new research suggesting that the drug might actually have harmful effects on COVID-19 patients. The video, which dives into this shift, features critical commentary on the media's role in discussing chloroquine treatments and highlights the importance of data from scientific studies.
Throughout the discussion, it is noted that earlier studies showed hydroxychloroquine was not effective and could be harmful, prompting both media figures to rethink their previous endorsements. Previously outspoken advocates for the drug, they are now facing backlash for having promoted it without sufficient evidence. Specifically, a recent study from the VA (Veterans Affairs) highlighted that patients receiving the treatment did not benefit and, in fact, had negative outcomes, including deaths.
The video underscores the shift in narrative as Fox News hosts like Brian Kilmeade attempt to rewrite their initial support for the drug, now claiming they were only investigating its effectiveness openly. The commentary reveals a disconnect between initial promotion and current findings, emphasizing how the situation has evolved. This reversal raises questions about the accuracy and reliability of health advice offered in a media context.
Dr. Oz tries to mitigate his past strong advocacy for chloroquine by referencing other studies, albeit with dubious methodologies involving small sample sizes and lack of control groups. He contrasts these with the VA's substantial study, which included a larger population and more rigorous data collection, making it a more reliable source of information. The analysis pointedly laments that, despite being a medical doctor, Dr. Oz has often leaned toward sensational claims rather than sticking strictly to scientific evidence.
As of September 2024, this episode serves as a significant example of how scientific discourse and media presentations must evolve alongside emerging research. It illustrates the necessity for both medical professionals and media entities to act responsibly when disseminating health information.
At the conclusion of the video discussion, there are calls for waiting on more comprehensive randomized controlled trials to obtain clear answers regarding the efficacy of hydroxychloroquine. This issue reflects a critical need for evidence-based practices in medicine and highlights a cautionary tale about spreading unverified claims, especially in critical times such as a pandemic.
What are your thoughts on the shifting dialogue regarding hydroxychloroquine? Have you noticed how the representation of treatments has evolved throughout the pandemic? Share your insights or any personal experiences with health media in the thread below!
