eMazzanti Earns Four Microsoft Solutions Partner Designations and SAP on Azure Prep

  • Thread Author
eMazzanti Technologies announced that it has earned four Microsoft Solutions Partner designations under the Microsoft AI Cloud Partner Program — Infrastructure (Azure), Data & AI (Azure), Digital & App Innovation (Azure), and Modern Work — and that it has met prerequisite requirements for the SAP on Microsoft Azure specialization, marking a significant credentials milestone for the Hoboken, N.J. managed services provider.

A businessman in a suit holds a 'SAP on Microsoft Azure' sign beside an Azure dashboard.Background​

Microsoft’s partner ecosystem has been reorganized around the Microsoft AI Cloud Partner Program and the Solutions Partner designations, a structure that ties partner recognition to measurable outcomes in three pillars: Performance, Skilling, and Customer Success. Achieving a Solutions Partner designation requires partners to meet a partner capability score threshold and demonstrate activity across those three areas; Microsoft documents a minimum capability score of 70 points (out of 100) and points in each category as the baseline guardrail for award. These designations are no longer simple marketing badges. They are procedural achievements that unlock benefits including go‑to‑market resources, co‑sell eligibility, prioritized search discoverability in Partner Center, and access to specializations that require additional audit or skilling steps. The marketplace impact and sales motion advantages of solutions partner recognition have driven a wave of partner announcements in 2024–2025 as system integrators and MSPs align their GTM and technical investments to Microsoft’s cloud and AI priorities.

What eMazzanti announced — concise summary​

  • The company secured Solutions Partner designations in:
  • Infrastructure (Azure)
  • Data & AI (Azure)
  • Digital & App Innovation (Azure)
  • Modern Work.
  • Microsoft noted that eMazzanti has met prerequisite requirements for the SAP on Microsoft Azure Specialization, an additional validated specialization with its own audit and performance bars.
  • The announcement includes a quote from Carl Mazzanti, eMazzanti’s president and co‑founder, framing the designations as validation of the company’s investments in Microsoft‑aligned skilling and managed‑service capabilities.
This combination—multiple solutions partner designations plus movement toward a workload specialization—signals a deliberate effort to align product, people, and proof with Microsoft’s highest priority cloud and AI solution areas.

Why these specific designations matter​

Infrastructure (Azure)​

The Infrastructure Solutions Partner designation demonstrates a partner’s ability to migrate, run, and operate enterprise infrastructure on Azure: VMs, networking, storage, backup, site recovery, and hybrid scenarios. For customers with lift‑and‑shift, rehost, or platform migration needs, Infrastructure designation is a procurement shorthand that the partner can handle cloud operations at scale. Microsoft’s Solutions Partner framework ties this to measurable performance metrics and skilling credentials.

Data & AI (Azure)​

Data & AI signals capacity with Azure data platform services (Synapse, Fabric, Databricks integrations, AI platform services) and measured customer outcomes for analytics and AI. In practice this designation matters when organizations are moving from proofs‑of‑concept to production: customers expect governance, data lineage, and measured usage growth as part of customer success scoring. Achieving Data & AI is evidence of both technical skill and commercialized deployments.

Digital & App Innovation (Azure)​

Digital & App Innovation covers cloud‑native application modernization, developer productivity, Kubernetes and container platforms, DevOps toolchains, and low‑code/no‑code accelerators. For enterprises seeking to modernize legacy apps or build new cloud‑native services, a partner with this designation has demonstrated the combination of developer and cloud engineering skills Microsoft expects.

Modern Work​

The Modern Work designation ties to Microsoft 365, Windows management, Teams, Viva and the productivity stack. This signals capability in end‑user computing transformation, identity, device management, and collaboration—areas essential for hybrid work models and employee experience modernization. Historically, Modern Work was one of eMazzanti’s public strengths and is now reflected in the official Solutions Partner taxonomy.

What the SAP on Microsoft Azure specialization means — and why to be cautious​

eMazzanti’s statement that it has met prerequisite requirements for the SAP on Microsoft Azure Specialization is important because that specialization is a workload‑specific, audited recognition that requires:
  • An aligned Solutions Partner designation (Infrastructure).
  • Performance thresholds expressed through Azure Consumed Revenue (ACR) aggregated across customers. Microsoft’s publicly posted figures for SAP on Azure prerequisites vary by page and timing: one Microsoft page references an average monthly ACR of USD 10,000 aggregated over the prior three months and at least three customers, while other Microsoft guidance documents show a higher aggregate ACR figure (for some specializations the page says USD 30,000 aggregated over three months). This inconsistency is a product of changing program rules and geography‑ or timeframe‑based updates; it should be validated in Partner Center before relying on it as fact.
  • Skilling: certified individuals with SAP/Azure relevant certifications or completion of Microsoft’s “Run SAP on the Microsoft Cloud” learning path.
  • A successful third‑party audit or documented customer references as part of the specialization workflow.
Because public Microsoft pages and guidance documents are periodically updated, the precise numeric thresholds for ACR and the audit checklist are subject to change. The prudent procurement step is to ask the partner for an export or screenshot from Partner Center showing the specialization status and the audit outcome rather than relying solely on a press release statement.

Verification: what the public record shows​

  • The company press release announcing the four solutions partner designations and the SAP prerequisite comes from a PR distribution (PR Newswire) published on November 25, 2025 and quotes company leadership and the specific solution areas awarded. This is the primary public record of the announcement.
  • eMazzanti’s own site has historically published Modern Work recognition and partner credentials that align with the new Solutions Partner messaging; earlier Modern Work designation materials are available from eMazzanti’s site and show a sustained Microsoft alignment. Public company messaging supports the new announcement but is not an external audit.
  • Microsoft documentation explains the mechanics, scoring, and specialization pathway for SAP on Microsoft Azure and the Solutions Partner model — offering authoritative details about the program rules and the partner capability score mechanics. These pages are the independent, program‑level verification of what the badges mean and what evidence Microsoft collects.
  • Third‑party industry coverage of Microsoft partner milestones shows a broader pattern: multiple partners publishing Solutions Partner achievements and specializations across 2024–2025 as the program matured. This trend situates eMazzanti’s announcement inside normal partner‑ecosystem activity, but does not independently verify company claims beyond what Microsoft’s Partner Center and audit processes establish. Examples include public announcements from peers that have pursued all six Solutions Partner designations or specializations.
  • Independent directories and market intelligence (for example, industry review sites listing eMazzanti among leading regional consultants) corroborate eMazzanti’s market presence but do not replace Partner Center evidence or audit artifacts. These sources are useful for context on capability and reputation, not for program validation.

Practical implications for customers, procurement teams, and channel partners​

Achieving four Solutions Partner designations plus movement toward a workload specialization is strategically valuable — but it is neither a guarantee of project success nor a substitute for vendor due diligence.
Key customer takeaways:
  • Benefits
  • Faster vendor shortlisting: Solutions Partner badges provide procurement teams with a searchable, program‑verified filter in Partner Center.
  • Access to Microsoft resources: designation opens co‑sell pathways, deployment funding eligibility and partner‑level technical resources that can accelerate proof‑of‑value work.
  • Signal of organized skilling: badges indicate a partner has invested in role‑based certifications and internal training programs to meet Microsoft’s skilling thresholds.
  • Risks and caveats
  • Maintenance risk: Partner designations depend on ongoing performance, skilling and customer success metrics. A badge today does not guarantee the same badge next quarter; partners must maintain or renew metrics and pass audits where applicable.
  • Marketing vs. operational reality: A press release is promotional. It is legitimate to request direct evidence the partner’s program claims match Partner Center records and, where a specialization is involved, to ask for the audit summary or Microsoft verification letter.
  • Specialization thresholds vary and change: numeric thresholds (ACR, certified personnel counts) can vary across program updates and regions; they must be checked in Partner Center. Multiple Microsoft pages sometimes show different numbers across updates—so confirm the current requirement rather than relying on a published press statement.
Recommended procurement checklist (practical, sequential):
  • Request an authenticated screenshot or exported view from Partner Center showing the partner capability score and the active Solutions Partner designations.
  • For workload specializations (e.g., SAP on Azure), request the Microsoft specialization certification letter or Partner Center proof and ask for the third‑party audit executive summary (redacted if required).
  • Ask for named references for recent, similar‑scope projects with contactable customer references and measurable outcomes (uptime, ACR, cost savings, timeline adherence).
  • Obtain attestation of security posture: SOC 2 / ISO 27001 reports, vulnerability management evidence, and incident response playbooks if the partner operates production workloads.
  • Confirm contractual protections: SLA definitions, escalation paths, migration warranties and rollback plans when the partner manages critical infrastructure or SAP workloads.

Critical analysis — strengths, commercial upside, and realistic risks​

Strengths​

  • Strategic alignment with Microsoft’s cloud‑and‑AI priorities. The four designations map directly to the technical pillars most enterprise buyers now prioritize: infrastructure reliability, data & AI, cloud app modernization, and modern workplace transformation. This alignment improves relevance in Microsoft‑centric RFPs.
  • Stronger GTM and co‑sell potential. Solutions Partner designation often increases discoverability and eligibility for Microsoft co‑sell motions, which can shorten procurement cycles for partner‑led pilots and proofs of concept.
  • Indication of organized skilling and measurable customer outcomes. Success in these designations requires role‑based certifications and customer success evidence — an operational bar that many smaller providers do not meet. When genuine, that bar translates to more predictable delivery.

Risks and limitations​

  • Press release inflation is common. Many partners publish press releases when they hit program milestones. That publicity can blur the difference between achieved and maintained status, and messaging sometimes omits the nuance about whether a partner has fully completed audit steps required for a specialization. Buyers should always request Partner Center evidence and, for specializations, the audit letter.
  • Program complexity and shifting thresholds. Microsoft’s partner program rules (ACR thresholds, skilling requirements, audit checklists) have changed during the AI Cloud Partner Program rollout. At times different Microsoft pages show different numeric thresholds for specializations; these inconsistencies create confusion for buyers and partners alike. This is especially relevant for SAP on Azure requirements, where public guidance includes differing ACR numbers on separate pages. Always verify in Partner Center.
  • Operational scale vs. marketing signal. A Solutions Partner designation says the partner met certain program thresholds — but it doesn’t replace direct evidence of team capacity, documented runbooks, or sector experience for regulated industries. For large, mission‑critical projects, customers should demand named, production references and technical artifacts.

How partners convert badges into real customer value (practical advice for MSPs)​

Partners that turn badges into sustained customer advantage follow a repeatable operating model:
  • Map badges to packaged offerings — e.g., Infrastructure: lift‑and‑shift migration package with defined timeframes, Data & AI: an analytics factory starter kit with governance checkpoints, Modern Work: device and identity lifecycle playbook.
  • Publish measurable outcomes (ACR growth, time‑to‑value, customer satisfaction) and maintain a public dashboard or case library showing proof points.
  • Operationalize Microsoft audit artifacts: archive audit summaries and make sanitized versions available for customers to review under NDA when necessary.
  • Invest in internal enablement so the skilling threshold is sustained instead of a one‑time quota accomplishment.
These pragmatic steps move a partner from being a “badged vendor” to a predictable delivery organization.

Broader market context​

A number of international systems integrators and managed service providers have used the Solutions Partner framework as a strategic milestone in 2024–2025. Examples include companies announcing full sets or multiple designations to signal capability across the Microsoft stack; this reflects a broader channel race to be visible for enterprise AI and cloud transformation work. The wave of announcements is consistent with partners pursuing increased co‑sell visibility and Microsoft alignment. At the same time, independent analysis and reporting about partner rebrands and capability signaling underscores a practical truth: badges are valuable, but they are an invitation to probe rather than proof of fit. Industry analysts regularly recommend that customers convert partner badges into vendor artifacts — Partner Center screenshots, audit reports, named references — before awarding critical contracts.

Actionable checklist for Windows‑focused IT buyers (quick reference)​

  • Ask for Partner Center evidence of the four Solutions Partner designations and of any specialization audit completion.
  • Request at least three named customer references for similar‑scale Azure/SAP/Data & AI/Modern Work projects and confirm contactability.
  • Obtain redacted audit executive summaries for specializations or a copy of the Microsoft specialization letter.
  • Validate security posture with SOC 2 / ISO 27001 evidence and review the partner’s incident response playbook.
  • Insist on SLAs, migration warranties, and a staged cutover and rollback plan for infrastructure and SAP projects.

Conclusion​

eMazzanti Technologies’ announcement that it has secured four Microsoft Solutions Partner designations and met prerequisites for the SAP on Microsoft Azure specialization is a credible market signal that the company is deepening its alignment with Microsoft’s cloud and AI strategy. The practical benefits for customers include faster shortlisting and potential access to Microsoft co‑sell resources, while the operational demands of these designations mean that the headline is only the start of procurement due diligence.
Microsoft’s partner program documentation explains the guardrails that make these designations meaningful — the partner capability score, documented skilling and customer success metrics, and workload specialization audits — but the program’s complexity and periodic rule changes require buyers to ask for Partner Center evidence and audit artifacts before assuming capability. For IT teams evaluating eMazzanti or any partner with recent Solutions Partner announcements, the most responsible path is straightforward: treat the badge as a positive filter, then convert that signal into operational proof. Ask for Partner Center screenshots, audit summaries for specializations, named references and SOC/ISO attestations, and require contractual protections that reflect the risk and criticality of the intended workload. When those elements line up, the combination of Solutions Partner designations and specialization evidence can materially reduce procurement friction and increase the chances of a successful Azure‑based transformation.

Source: WV News eMazzanti Technologies Achieves Four Microsoft Solutions Partner Designations in AI Cloud Partner Program
 

eMazzanti Technologies announced it has earned four Microsoft Solutions Partner designations under the Microsoft AI Cloud Partner Program — Infrastructure (Azure), Data & AI (Azure), Digital & App Innovation (Azure) and Modern Work — and the company says it has met prerequisite requirements for the SAP on Microsoft Azure specialization, a move the firm frames as validation of deep Microsoft-aligned skilling and production delivery capability.

A diverse team analyzes SAP Azure cloud data with holographic dashboards in a server room.Background / Overview​

Microsoft restructured its partner ecosystem around the Microsoft AI Cloud Partner Program (MAICPP), replacing legacy competency labels with six Solutions Partner designations that are awarded based on a composite partner capability score across three pillars: Performance, Skilling, and Customer Success. Partners must reach a capability score threshold (commonly 70 out of 100) and register measurable activity in each category to qualify for a designation. This programmatic framework ties partner recognition to quantifiable metrics and makes the designations more than marketing badges. eMazzanti’s announcement, released via PR Newswire and widely syndicated, lists the four solution-area designations and states the company has met prequalification steps for the SAP on Microsoft Azure specialization — a workload-specific, audited recognition for partners that reach higher technical and operational thresholds for SAP workloads on Azure. The news was republished by multiple industry sites and wire services.

Why the designations matter​

What each Solutions Partner designation signals​

  • Infrastructure (Azure) — Demonstrates capability to migrate, run and operate enterprise infrastructure (VMs, networking, storage, backup, site recovery, hybrid scenarios) at scale on Azure. For buyers, this is a commonly used procurement shorthand for partners who can operate production infrastructure workloads reliably.
  • Data & AI (Azure) — Signals proficiency across Azure data platform services, analytics, and AI platform work. This designation matters when organisations seek partners who can move pilots into governed, production-grade data and AI systems.
  • Digital & App Innovation (Azure) — Covers cloud-native application modernization, developer productivity, AKS/containers, serverless/DevOps pipelines and platform engineering. It’s the badge buyers check for cloud-native modernization projects.
  • Modern Work — Maps to Microsoft 365, Teams, Windows management, Viva and identity/device management. This reflects end-user computing transformation and hybrid workplace delivery capabilities.
Each Solutions Partner designation unlocks program benefits — improved Partner Center visibility, eligibility for co-sell programs, prioritized search ranking in partner directories, and access to benefits that support go-to-market and technical delivery. But a designation is an operational signal, not an absolute guarantee of delivery quality; it must be validated with operational artefacts.

Business and go-to-market impact​

For eMazzanti, holding multiple designations broadens the firm’s positioning across the most sought-after Microsoft stacks — infrastructure, data/AI, application modernization and modern workplace. This multi-pillar alignment improves the firm’s attractiveness in Microsoft co-sell motions and in enterprise shortlists where procurement teams use partner badges as first-order filters. The designations can shorten procurement cycles if backed by demonstrable customer outcomes and named references.

The SAP on Microsoft Azure specialization: what “met prerequisites” likely means — and why to be cautious​

eMazzanti’s press materials state it “has met prerequisite requirements for the SAP on Microsoft Azure Specialization.” There are two distinct steps to understand here:
  • Solutions Partner alignment: the partner must hold an active Infrastructure (Azure) Solutions Partner designation to be eligible.
  • Specialization prerequisites: Microsoft requires specific performance, skilling, and an audit or evidence component before a partner can attain the specialization in Partner Center. The performance bar is expressed as Azure Consumed Revenue (ACR) aggregated over customers and timeframe, plus required certified individuals and an audit.
Important caveat: Microsoft’s public guidance has shown differing numeric thresholds across pages and over time. One Microsoft partner page lists an average monthly ACR of USD 10,000 aggregated over the previous three months from at least three customers for SAP prequalification, while the Partner Center specialization guidance lists USD 30,000 ACR aggregated over the last three months in some places; other advanced-specialization documentation cites much higher ACR figures for higher‑level specializations (e.g., hundreds of thousands of dollars of SAP-specific ACR for advanced designations). This inconsistency is real and has been observed in public Microsoft pages; it means the exact numeric requirement that eMazzanti met must be verified inside Partner Center or via the specialization certification letter. Because eMazzanti’s release uses the language “met prerequisite requirements,” buyers should treat that as an accurate company claim about having cleared initial gates — but not as conclusive proof that the full audit and final specialization award is completed. Procurement teams should request the Microsoft-issued specialization certification letter or Partner Center export to confirm the status.

Verifying the public record (what the press releases and Microsoft pages show)​

  • eMazzanti’s formal announcement was published on PR Newswire on November 25, 2025 and recirculated across industry news sites, repeating the four Solutions Partner designations and the SAP prerequisite claim. The release quotes Carl Mazzanti and frames the recognitions as validation of investments in Microsoft skilling and managed services.
  • Independent industry syndication (AiThority, regional news aggregators) republished the PR distribution; these are useful for signal verification but are not independent audits of Microsoft Partner Center status.
  • Microsoft’s documentation on the Partner Capability Score and Solutions Partner designations explains the scoring model and the 70‑point threshold used to qualify for a designation. These program rules are authoritative for understanding what the badges mean and how partners qualify.
  • Microsoft’s specialization pages and Partner Center guidance detail the prerequisites and the audit step for SAP on Azure, including ACR, certified personnel and third‑party audit requirements, but the numeric ACR figures cited across pages are not uniformly consistent in public documentation. This is a documented source of confusion in the channel and should be validated in Partner Center.

Critical analysis — commercial strengths and credible risks​

Strengths of eMazzanti’s announcement​

  • Strategic alignment with Microsoft’s highest-priority stacks. The four designations directly map to enterprise demand: infrastructure reliability, data & AI, app modernization and modern workplace transformation. That alignment helps eMazzanti show breadth to enterprise buyers.
  • Improved GTM and co-sell potential. Multiple designations typically increase a partner’s eligibility for Microsoft co-sell programs and marketplace discoverability, which can accelerate pilot funding and shorten proof‑of‑value cycles. For an MSP with field sales motion, these benefits are meaningful.
  • Evidence of structured skilling. Meeting several Solutions Partner thresholds requires role‑based certifications and demonstrable customer outcomes. If sustained, those investments reduce delivery variability and support repeatable offerings.

Risks and limitations buyers should weigh​

  • Badge volatility and maintenance. Solutions Partner status and specializations depend on ongoing metrics — ACR, certifications and customer metrics — which can fluctuate. A badge today does not guarantee the same badge in six months. Contracts should require current Partner Center evidence at signing.
  • Marketing compression of audit steps. Press releases often condense complex qualification and audit workflows into headline statements. The difference between meeting prerequisites and completing the formal audited specialization is material for mission‑critical workloads like SAP. Buyers must ask for audit documents or the Microsoft certification letter.
  • Inconsistent public thresholds for SAP prequalification. Microsoft’s public pages have displayed different ACR numbers for SAP prequalification at different times; this inconsistency is real and amplifies the need for Partner Center verification rather than relying on press copy.

Practical due‑diligence checklist for IT buyers and procurement teams​

To convert eMazzanti’s badge claims into verifiable procurement signals, request the following before awarding high‑risk or mission‑critical contracts:
  • An authenticated Partner Center export or screenshot showing the active Solutions Partner designations and current partner capability scores.
  • The Microsoft specialization certification letter for SAP on Microsoft Azure, or an exported Partner Center specialization status showing “Active.” If the partner claims only to have met prerequisites, request the audit timeline and the third‑party audit executive summary.
  • At least three named, contactable production references for similar-scale SAP/Azure/Data & AI/Modern Work projects, including measurable outcomes (uptime, cutover timelines, cost/usage metrics).
  • Security and compliance artefacts (SOC 2 / ISO 27001 reports, penetration test cadence, vulnerability scanning and incident response runbooks) if the partner will manage production systems or sensitive data.
  • Contractual SLAs and rollback/migration warranties for SAP and other mission‑critical workloads; require acceptance milestones tied to concrete operational artefacts (runbooks, DR tests, backup verification).

How partners convert badges into repeatable customer value (advice for MSPs)​

To avoid the “badge as marketing” trap and to turn Microsoft recognition into revenue and predictable delivery, partners should:
  • Map each Solutions Partner designation to a packaged offering with defined scope, outcomes and pricing (for example: Infrastructure — lift‑and‑shift migration package with defined timeframe and rollback windows; Data & AI — analytics factory starter kit with governance checkpoints; Modern Work — device and identity lifecycle playbook).
  • Publish sanitized audit summaries and redacted case studies (available under NDA) that prove the partnership has passed Microsoft’s audit steps and delivered measurable business outcomes.
  • Maintain an internal enablement cadence so skilling thresholds are not a one‑time checkbox but a sustained competency (certification expirations, training pipelines, role‑based improvement plans).
  • Use Partner Center exports as a matter of course for opportunity qualification and to help customers validate the partner’s current program standing.
These steps help a partner move from being a “badged vendor” to a predictable delivery organization that procurement teams are willing to trust on enterprise workloads.

Context in the channel: a broader market pattern​

A wave of partner announcements during 2024–2025 shows many MSPs and systems integrators racing to earn Solutions Partner designations and specializations as Microsoft’s AI-and-cloud agenda matured. The program design encourages partners to pursue multiple designations because program benefits and co-sell privileges often stack. The result is both positive (more partners investing in skilling) and challenging (buyers must probe badges to ensure delivery readiness). eMazzanti’s announcement sits squarely in that channel trend: many partners are signaling Microsoft alignment to capture co-sell and field visibility gains.

Technical verification and cross‑referencing (what was checked)​

  • The headline claim that eMazzanti earned four Solutions Partner designations is consistent with the PR Newswire release and syndicated outlets. The PR Newswire posting is the primary public record of eMazzanti’s announcement.
  • The program mechanics — capability score framework, solution area list, and the 70‑point threshold — are documented in Microsoft Learn and partner-facing pages. These pages were used to verify what the designations represent and what metrics are measured.
  • The SAP on Microsoft Azure specialization prerequisites (active Infrastructure Solutions Partner designation, ACR performance, certified personnel, third‑party audit) are described on Microsoft’s specialization pages; however, the specific ACR thresholds vary across Microsoft pages (10k vs 30k examples) and between specialization and advanced-specialization documentation. This inconsistency was explicitly flagged and verified by comparing multiple Microsoft pages. Procurement should therefore validate in Partner Center for the definitive figure.
  • Independent corroboration of the PR release was observed in industry syndication (AiThority and other outlets), which confirms distribution but does not replace Partner Center evidence as the authoritative verification.

What this means for Windows-focused IT teams and enterprise buyers​

  • If your organisation is evaluating eMazzanti for Azure infrastructure, SAP, Data & AI, app modernization, or Modern Work services, the designations are a meaningful procurement signal that the partner has invested in Microsoft‑aligned skills and met program performance metrics.
  • Treat the press release as a starting point: require Partner Center evidence, specialization certification letters, and named references before entrusting the partner with mission‑critical workloads, particularly SAP.
  • For long-term relationships, require operational artefacts in contracts (runbooks, DR tests, backup verification, security attestations) and milestone-based acceptance criteria to convert the badge into measurable delivery guarantee.

Final assessment and closing perspective​

eMazzanti Technologies’ announcement that it has secured four Solutions Partner designations and met prerequisites for the SAP on Microsoft Azure specialization is consistent with the company’s long-standing Microsoft alignment and is credible as a company statement distributed via PR channels. The recognitions map to the set of capabilities enterprise customers now prize: scaled infrastructure operations, production-ready data & AI, cloud application modernization, and modern workplace transformation. At the same time, the practical value of the badges depends entirely on whether the partner can prove operational readiness with Partner Center exports, audited specialization letters, named references and contractual protections. Microsoft’s own public documentation confirms the program mechanics, but also demonstrates that some numeric thresholds (especially for SAP specializations) have been presented inconsistently across public pages — a reality that increases the urgency for buyers to validate claims in Partner Center rather than relying solely on press copy. In short: the announcement is a positive market signal and a useful cue for IT buyers to explore eMazzanti as a candidate for Azure-centric projects — provided buyers follow a disciplined verification and procurement process that translates badges into verified delivery commitments.


Source: The Malaysian Reserve https://themalaysianreserve.com/202...ner-designations-in-ai-cloud-partner-program/
 

Back
Top