Fabric IQ: Semantic Layer for Enterprise AI Agents and Automated Ops

  • Thread Author
Microsoft’s Ignite keynote and product pages have confirmed a deliberate step toward making enterprise data “meaningful” to both people and machines: Fabric IQ, introduced as a preview capability inside Microsoft Fabric, layers semantic intelligence over analytics, time‑series, geospatial and operational systems so agents and applications can reason about business concepts (customers, orders, inventory) instead of raw tables and streams. This new IQ family — which also includes Work IQ for Microsoft 365 context and Foundry IQ for managed knowledge grounding — is positioned as the data backbone for identity‑bound, auditable AI agents and operational automation across Azure, Microsoft 365 and Fabric.

A blue data-network connecting Customers and Orders with AI agents and Microsoft tools (Power BI, OneLake).Background / Overview​

Microsoft framed Ignite 2025 around the idea of the “agentic” enterprise: fleets of specialized AI agents that plan, act and are governed as first‑class services. Fabric IQ sits at the center of this vision for data: it promises a single semantic layer that maps analytical artifacts and operational records into a shared ontology of business entities and relationships. That ontology becomes the lingua franca agents use to reason, make decisions and trigger actions in operational systems. Three strategic pieces make the announcement significant:
  • A semantic layer aimed at closing the gap between analytics and operational automation.
  • A managed knowledge and grounding service (Foundry IQ) to reduce RAG complexity for agent builders.
  • A governance/control plane (Agent 365) and tooling (Copilot Studio, Microsoft Agent Factory) that treat agents like tenant principals with identity, telemetry and policy attachments.

What Fabric IQ is designed to do​

Fabric IQ is presented as a preview workload inside Microsoft Fabric that converts existing data artifacts into a business‑centric semantic model. The stated design goals are practical and ambitious:
  • Provide a no‑code and IT‑governed way to build a live ontology of business entities, rules and objectives so domain experts and business users can express meaning without changing raw schemas.
  • Extend BI definitions into a semantic model that is consumable by AI agents and operations pipelines, not just reports.
  • Offer a native graph engine to enable multi‑hop reasoning across entities and relationships, improving an agent’s ability to draw conclusions that require chained lookups.
  • Deliver data agents (virtual analysts) that answer business questions using the semantic model rather than ad‑hoc SQL joins.
  • Power autonomous operations agents that can reason over live telemetry, evaluate tradeoffs and, under governance, take actions in real time.
Microsoft’s Book of News and Ignite blog posts make the preview status clear while emphasizing integration with Power BI modeling, OneLake storage and Fabric’s mirroring/connectors as accelerators for adoption. Enterprises using Power BI can reuse modeling work to accelerate Fabric IQ’s ontology creation.

How the semantic model differs from classic data modeling​

Traditional data modeling focuses on schemas optimized for storage and queries. Fabric IQ’s premise is different: the ontology is a live, business‑centric abstraction that sits above raw schemas and ties tables, time‑series streams and operational records to business semantics (for example, mapping shipment telemetry, ERP records and service tickets to a single shipment entity). That lets agents and downstream automation work against business concepts rather than brittle schema joins. The upshot is fewer one‑off mappings and more consistent decision logic if the ontology is well governed.

Architecture and technical plumbing​

Fabric IQ is built to leverage core Fabric building blocks and Microsoft’s broader agent stack. Key architectural points announced or documented:
  • OneLake as the underlying storage and sharing fabric, enabling shortcuts and mirrored datasets to be surfaced into the semantic model without unnecessary copies.
  • Connectors and mirroring support (Dataverse, SAP, SharePoint shortcuts, etc. to bring transactional and operational systems into Fabric with minimal ETL. These are critical to keep the semantic model up to date.
  • A native graph engine for relationship traversal and multi‑hop reasoning, enabling agents to answer questions that require chaining across entities (e.g., “Which customers saw a delivery delay that triggered a service incident and were on a priority contract?”).
  • Integration points for Foundry IQ (managed knowledge retrieval) and Work IQ (people/work context) so that agents can combine business entity reasoning, curated knowledge, and human/context signals.
Microsoft has highlighted that Fabric IQ runs as a Fabric workload and uses Fabric capacity meters; billing specifics for certain ontology items were flagged as coming later, and Fabric IQ is explicitly in preview. Vendor performance claims (for related database and infrastructure items) should be treated as starting points for validation.

The broader “IQ” ecosystem: how Fabric IQ fits with Work IQ and Foundry IQ​

Fabric IQ is one of three complementary intelligence layers Microsoft presented:
  • Work IQ — a people‑centric intelligence layer built from Microsoft 365 signals (mail, files, chats, meetings, relationships and inferred memory) that supplies agents with work context and continuity.
  • Foundry IQ — a managed knowledge grounding service that aggregates and routes queries across Microsoft 365, Fabric IQ, custom apps and web sources to provide provenance‑aware, permissioned retrieval for agents.
  • Fabric IQ — the business‑entity semantic layer for analytics and operational systems.
Microsoft’s pitch is that these three layers form a shared intelligence layer so agents can make safer, higher‑value decisions with traceable provenance and correct access controls. Independent reporting and Microsoft’s own materials both emphasize the governance, identity and telemetry aspects that make agentic automation auditable.

Real‑world use cases (practical scenarios)​

Fabric IQ’s value is clearest in use cases that require combining analytics, telemetry and operational state with business logic:
  • Supply chain triage and routing — combine inventory, shipment telemetry and order records to autonomously reroute a delayed shipment or trigger corrective logistics actions under policy approval.
  • Customer resolution automation — join CRM records, support tickets and delivery telemetry to enable a data agent to present a consolidated remediation plan and—when authorized—create a follow‑up ticket automatically.
  • Sales enablement and seller copilot — surface role‑specific insights by blending conversation transcripts, CRM notes and sales performance models so a data agent supplies precise answers backed by SQL counts plus supporting documents via Foundry IQ. (A commercial customer example showed voice‑first copilot flows using Fabric embeddings and SQL.
  • Cloud operations orchestration — combine observability telemetry, configuration records and runbooks; operations agents can propose or enact remediation steps governed by Agent 365 policies and approval gates.
These examples illustrate why Microsoft stresses that Fabric IQ is a “force multiplier” for data teams rather than a replacement: good entity design, lineage and governance are prerequisites for safe, effective automation.

Strengths and notable engineering choices​

  • Semantic grounding reduces brittle mappings. When done well, a shared ontology avoids repeated ad‑hoc joins and inconsistent interpretations of the same concept across teams. That promotes operational consistency and reduces downstream maintenance.
  • Integration with existing modeling work. Organizations with mature Power BI or Dataverse models can reuse those assets to accelerate ontology creation. This lowers the ramp for Microsoft‑centric customers.
  • Governance‑first design. Treating agents as directory principals (Entra Agent IDs), offering Agent 365 for catalog/telemetry, and integrating Defender and Purview are pragmatic steps toward enterprise readiness. Those choices make it easier to apply existing identity and compliance controls to agents.
  • Hybrid grounding and retrieval. Foundry IQ and Fabric IQ together give a cleaner path for RAG‑style grounding that preserves provenance and access controls — a real win for explainability and auditability.

Risks, limitations and unverifiable claims​

No product launches in the agent era are risk‑free. Several clear caveats stood out in the announcements and early reporting:
  • Preview status and evolving APIs. Fabric IQ and Foundry IQ are in preview. Enterprises should treat initial behaviors as subject to change and validate the API surface and policies during pilots.
  • Data quality and modeling work required. Ontologies do not create themselves — successful adoption requires investment in entity design, lineage, metadata and Purview tagging. That migration effort can be substantial and often falls to central data teams.
  • Vendor lock‑in risk. Several analysts cautioned that heavy investment in a Fabric IQ ontology can increase migration costs if an organization later wants to move away from Microsoft’s stack. Treat this as an architectural trade‑off rather than a technical defect.
  • Operational blast radius from autonomous agents. Agents that can act (create tickets, change infra, order stock) expand the potential for automation‑driven faults. Agent 365 and approval gates reduce risk, but humans, runbooks and staged rollouts remain essential.
  • Unverified performance claims. Related Azure data services (HorizonDB, DiskANN indexing, etc. include vendor benchmarks; independent validation remains essential before committing to large‑scale production. Treat vendor numbers as directional until proven in your workload.

Governance, security and compliance checklist​

To pilot Fabric IQ safely, organizations should treat agentization as an operational program, not a feature toggle. A recommended starter checklist:
  • Define a bounded pilot with clear KPIs (time saved, MTTR reduction, error rate) and a rollback plan.
  • Model critical entities first (one or two): define ownership, sensitivity, retention and access rules.
  • Integrate Purview classification and test that Fabric IQ’s ontology honors existing data labels and DLP rules.
  • Publish agents in Agent 365 registry only after security review; enforce Entra Agent IDs, conditional access and least‑privilege scopes.
  • Start agents in monitor‑only or suggest‑only modes; require human approval for any write or destructive actions.
  • Instrument agent telemetry into SIEM/SOAR, create alerts and update runbooks to include agent‑specific incidents.
These steps mirror Microsoft’s own recommended cautious path from preview to production and reflect independent analyst guidance.

Practical adoption roadmap — a staged approach​

  • Discovery and scoping. Inventory candidate workflows where Fabric IQ can reduce mapping complexity (order routing, ticket triage, inventory reconciliation).
  • Entity pilot. Build a minimal ontology for a single domain (e.g., Order → Shipment → Incident), mirror source data into OneLake, and validate joins and lineage.
  • Agent prototype. Create a data agent that answers a narrow class of business questions; log decisions and expose provenance via Foundry IQ.
  • Governed shadowing. Run operations agents in monitor‑only mode inside Agent 365 with SIEM integration; compare proposed actions to human decisions.
  • Graduated autonomy. Move to suggest‑and‑execute modes with approval gates, then to limited automated actions once performance and auditability are proven.
  • Scale and refine. Expand the ontology, add graph relationships, and roll out approved agents to additional domains with quotas and cost controls.
This staged path reduces blast radius, provides measurable learning, and enables finance and security teams to model costs and controls up front.

What to watch next (verification points)​

  • Billing and SKU details for Fabric IQ ontology items and Agent 365 licensing; Microsoft has indicated pricing details will be published after preview. Validate with your Microsoft account team before broad rollouts.
  • Performance and scale characteristics of the native graph engine and mirroring pipelines under realistic enterprise event rates. Vendor claims should be benchmarked against your workload.
  • Foundry IQ SLAs, data residency and routing controls — because Foundry IQ becomes a dependency for agent grounding in many scenarios. Confirm SLAs and access controls for high‑assurance use cases.
  • Interoperability tests if you intend to use non‑Microsoft agents or multi‑cloud model routing (MCP and Agent‑to‑Agent patterns lower friction but require proof‑of‑concepts).

Final assessment​

Fabric IQ is an important and logical extension of Microsoft’s Fabric and Copilot roadmap: by codifying business meaning in an ontology and coupling that layer to managed retrieval and a governance control plane, Microsoft addresses several real blockers for enterprise agent adoption — chiefly, context, provenance and control. For Microsoft‑centric enterprises with mature data modeling and governance practices, Fabric IQ will likely accelerate useful agent deployments and reduce some operational friction that made agents brittle in earlier pilots. That said, the promise comes with tradeoffs. Ontology creation and upkeep are nontrivial, vendor lock‑in and migration costs can be real, and autonomous agents increase operational complexity. Organizations should approach Fabric IQ as a strategic program: invest in metadata, pilot deliberately, instrument telemetry and keep humans in the loop for high‑impact actions. The winners will be teams that combine disciplined data engineering, security controls and focused business pilots to turn semantic intelligence into repeatable automation.

Fabric IQ marks a pragmatic next step in the enterprise AI journey: it shifts the conversation from “can models answer questions?” to “can models and agents act with shared business meaning, traceability and governed authority?” The answer will depend on how well enterprises invest in the plumbing — the ontology, lineage and controls — required to make that shared meaning trustworthy and operational at scale.
Source: InfoWorld Microsoft Fabric IQ adds ‘semantic intelligence’ layer to Fabric
 

Microsoft’s Ignite keynote delivered more than incremental updates — it introduced a new intelligence layer that promises to change how enterprises turn data into automated action: Fabric IQ, a preview workload inside Microsoft Fabric that maps business entities, relationships and rules to live data in OneLake so AI agents and human teams can reason and act on the same semantic model.

Neon blueprint of OneLake data lakehouse architecture highlighting order, governance, and live ontology.Background / Overview​

Microsoft has framed the post-Ignite product story around an “agentic” enterprise: fleets of specialized AI agents that plan, act and are governed as first-class services. Fabric IQ sits at the center of that vision as the semantic intelligence layer for operational and analytical data, complementing Work IQ (context from Microsoft 365) and Foundry IQ (managed knowledge grounding) to form a unified IQ ecosystem. Together these layers are intended to give agents consistent business context across documents, applications and live operational telemetry. Microsoft positions Fabric IQ as a workload that converts existing Fabric artifacts — lakehouse tables, eventhouses, Power BI semantic models and streaming signals — into a live ontology of business entities (customers, orders, assets) with properties, relationships, rules and event bindings. That ontology then powers conversational data queries, graph reasoning and autonomous operations agents that can evaluate trade-offs and take actions under governance. The functionality is shipped as preview items in Fabric, including an Ontology item, a Data Agent and an Operations Agent.

What exactly is Fabric IQ?​

The core idea: semantics over schemas​

Traditional analytics focuses on schemas and tables; Fabric IQ flips that by modeling the business world as an operational ontology. Rather than asking “which table contains orders?”, agents and users query concepts like Order X or Priority Customer Y. The ontology binds those concepts to underlying data sources, time-series telemetry, geospatial feeds and Power BI semantics so answers and actions reflect the enterprise’s own definitions, not ad‑hoc joins. This matters because semantic fragmentation is a persistent blocker in practice: finance, sales and support often maintain conflicting definitions of the same metric. Fabric IQ aims to make a single, governed source of truth accessible to both people and agents. Microsoft’s official documentation describes IQ as a preview workload that unifies OneLake artifacts and exposes them to analytics, agents and applications with consistent semantic meaning.

Key components (high level)​

  • Ontology project (preview / private preview): Model entities, relationships, attributes, rules and actions; visually design ontologies without code and bind them to OneLake sources, streaming signals and semantic models. Business experts can iterate on meaning using no-code tools.
  • Data Agent: A natural‑language interface that generates queries (SQL, DAX, KQL) against the semantic layer; supports multi‑hop, graph-driven associative reasoning for cross-system analysis.
  • Operations Agent (preview): Autonomous decision-making agents that monitor ontology entities and events in real time, evaluate policies and trade-offs, and take governed actions (with configurable human supervision). Microsoft demonstrates supply‑chain rerouting as a canonical example.

Technical architecture and integration​

OneLake as the single fabric​

Fabric IQ is built on OneLake, Microsoft Fabric’s tenant-wide logical lake. The ontology binds to data stored or mirrored into OneLake — lakehouses, warehouses, streaming eventhouses and Power BI semantic models — so semantics are applied across the same repository teams already use for analytics. Microsoft documentation explicitly positions IQ as a workload that organizes data in OneLake according to the language of the business.

Native graph and multi-hop reasoning​

A central technical choice is a native graph engine (Microsoft Fabric Graph) to support dependency analysis and multi-hop traversals. That enables queries like “find customers with shipments delayed by more than 24 hours whose orders are on a priority contract and have an open SLA incident,” where the path requires traversing orders → shipments → telematics → incidents. Fabric IQ uses graph traversal to enable this kind of associative reasoning for both Data and Operations agents.

Streaming, geospatial and time‑series support​

Fabric IQ explicitly integrates streaming signals, geospatial data and time-series telemetry into its ontology bindings so operational events — vehicle telemetry, sensor time series, and location data — can be reasoned about in context. That capability is the foundation for real‑time monitoring and decision-making by Operations Agents.

Connectors and mirroring​

To reduce heavy ETL, Fabric provides mirroring and shortcut mechanisms to bring data into OneLake non-destructively: database mirroring (GA) for SQL engines, Dataverse mirroring, SharePoint/OneDrive shortcuts, and a preview of zero-copy SAP integration. These connectors are critical because the ontology must stay in sync with operational systems for autonomous actions to be safe and timely.

Model Context Protocol (MCP) and agent interoperability​

Fabric IQ participates in a broader agent interoperability story. Microsoft’s Model Context Protocol and APIs provide the plumbing for agents to call into the ontology and for MCP-compliant tools to act as agent “tools”, enabling tighter runtime integration between agents, apps and Fabric metadata.

What Fabric IQ promises — practical capabilities​

  • Semantic reuse of Power BI work: Power BI’s 20+ million semantic models can be used as ontology starting points, accelerating adoption for organizations with existing BI investments.
  • Natural‑language business queries: Data Agent translates plain-language business questions into SQL, DAX or KQL and uses the ontology and graph to surface precise answers and explanations.
  • Real‑time, governed automation: Operations Agents continuously monitor entities and events and can execute operational playbooks while honoring enterprise policies, approval gates and audit trails.
  • Cross‑system reasoning without heavy ETL: By linking disparate datasets to the ontology, Fabric IQ enables agent-driven cross-system analysis for scenarios like supply chain orchestration, grid management and field operations.

Pricing, licensing and commercial mechanics — what we know and what to verify​

Public materials indicate Fabric IQ is being delivered as a Fabric workload in preview; Microsoft has introduced an Agent Factory program with a metered plan to consume Foundry and Copilot Studio services for agent development, described as requiring no upfront licensing for eligible customers. However, claims that “Fabric IQ requires no additional licensing and is included with existing Fabric subscriptions” appear in some reporting and early coverage; enterprises should treat that as provisional until confirmed in Microsoft’s official licensing guidance and tenant admin consoles. Pricing for agent execution, Foundry runtime, and additional managed services may be metered separately. Confirm contractual terms with Microsoft or your reseller before committing to production scale automation.

Why Fabric IQ matters — strategic impact​

For data and analytics teams​

Fabric IQ promises to shorten the path from question to insight by eliminating repeated semantic mapping work. Data teams can centralize semantics, reduce duplicate transformation logic and make BI definitions executable for agents and applications. This reduces the friction of building production-grade automated processes that must align with business rules and reporting definitions.

For operations and frontline teams​

Operations agents informed by Fabric IQ can detect conditions, weigh constraints and take corrective actions in near real time — for example rerouting deliveries during congestion, or triggering grid reconfiguration when telemetry indicates risk. The ontology’s representation of priorities, constraints and business rules is what allows the system to trade off cost, service and compliance.

For AI and agent builders​

Grounding generative and reasoning systems in a structured business ontology addresses one of the central operational problems for production AI: explainability and reliability. Models that reason against entities and rules (rather than raw text or unlabeled tables) are easier to trace, test and govern. Fabric IQ reduces the RAG (retrieval augmented generation) complexity and supplies a single, permissioned endpoint for enterprise context when paired with Foundry IQ.

Industry validation and early adopters​

Public examples shared in briefings and coverage include energy and systems integrator use cases: ENMAX Power is referenced as using ontology modeling in Fabric IQ to unify grid telemetry and operational records, letting agents reason about transmission and distribution data that previously lived in siloed relational systems. Kyndryl is mentioned as using ontologies to ground decision-making agents and accelerate tuning cycles for agent deployments. These early validations illustrate how ontology modeling helps consolidate operational state for complex, distributed systems.
Microsoft’s broader messaging about Fabric’s growth — more than 28,000 paid Fabric customers and adoption among a majority of large enterprises — provides commercial context for vendor momentum but does not replace customer-specific pilots and performance validation. The 28,000‑customer figure and related growth claims appear in Microsoft financial and product blogs and were repeated during the company’s public earnings commentary.

Strengths: what Fabric IQ gets right​

  • Governed semantic layer: Centralizing definitions reduces semantic drift and produces a single source of truth for both reporting and automated decision-making.
  • No-code ontology tooling for domain experts: Letting business users iterate on meaning decreases handoffs and speeds domain modeling compared with engineering-only workflows.
  • Native graph and real‑time binding to telemetry: Built-in graph traversal plus streaming/time-series bindings enables complex, multi-hop reasoning and real-time situational awareness.
  • Integrated agent ecosystem and governance: Agent 365, Entra Agent IDs and Defender/ Purview integrations provide a governance story that treats agents like governed principals rather than opaque processes.

Risks and limitations — what to watch for​

1) Data quality, metadata and Purview dependencies​

An ontology is only as useful as the data it links to. Organizations with inconsistent metadata, incomplete Purview classification, or fragmented source systems will find the semantic mappings brittle. A governance-first approach is required: invest in lineage, classification and data health checks before relying on autonomous agent actions.

2) Hidden integration and modeling costs​

No-code tools reduce initial friction, but high-fidelity ontologies for complex operations still require careful entity design, business rule codification and cross-team coordination. Expect professional services, modeling cycles and iterative validation to be necessary for production-grade automations.

3) Security, compliance and audit complexity​

Autonomous agents acting on operational systems increase the attack surface. Although Microsoft surfaces Entra Agent IDs, Defender integration and audit traces, organizations must define approval gates, least‑privilege scopes, and test rollback and quarantine workflows. Legal and compliance teams need clear retention and provenance policies for agent actions and memory artifacts.

4) Vendor lock‑in and data gravity​

Fabric IQ’s tight coupling to OneLake, Power BI semantic models and Microsoft’s agent runtime stack (Foundry, Agent 365) accelerates development for Microsoft‑centric estates but increases dependency on Microsoft’s control plane. Multi‑cloud or poly‑vendor organizations should evaluate portability strategies and export/synchronization guarantees for ontologies and policies.

5) Pricing ambiguity for scale​

Public materials point to preview availability and an Agent Factory metered plan, yet commercial terms for large-scale agent runtime, Foundry execution and high‑frequency Operations Agent actions are still being clarified. Validate pricing assumptions and meter mechanics during pilot negotiations.

Practical recommendations for IT leaders — a disciplined path to adoption​

  • Start with a bounded pilot: pick 1–2 entity models (e.g., orders + shipments or assets + sensors) where the value of automation is measurable and the data sources are well‑known.
  • Reuse existing semantic work: import Power BI models and Dataverse definitions as ontology accelerators to reduce modeling overhead.
  • Invest in data governance first: prioritize Purview classification, lineage and data health for the sources bound to the ontology.
  • Adopt monitor‑only and human‑in‑the‑loop phases: run Operations Agents in observation mode before enabling autonomous execution; use approval gates for the first months of production.
  • Define emergency rollback and quarantine playbooks: ensure Agent 365/Defender integration can pause or quarantine agents that exceed behavioral thresholds.
  • Validate economics early: request detailed metering examples for Agent Factory, Foundry runtime, and any managed services to model expected monthly consumption.

Example pilot scenarios and expected ROI​

  • Supply chain triage: Combine order records, shipment telemetry and carrier capacity to reroute priority deliveries. ROI comes from reduced SLA penalties and improved customer satisfaction.
  • Grid operations: Link SCADA telemetry, maintenance logs and asset definitions to identify failing transformers and prioritize dispatch, reducing outage minutes and manual triage overhead. ENMAX’s pilot-style usage is an instructive example.
  • Field service automation: Allow an Operations Agent to triage alerts, schedule technicians and pre-stage parts based on ontology-defined priorities and parts availability — producing fewer truck rolls and faster repairs.
Each scenario requires clear KPIs (mean time to resolution, SLA adherence, cost per incident) and control experiments that compare human‑only workflows to agent‑assisted outcomes.

What to verify during technical evaluation​

  • Latency and throughput: Measure graph traversal and trigger-to-action latency under realistic telemetry volumes.
  • Consistency: Confirm that ontology bindings remain consistent after source schema changes or incremental mirroring updates.
  • Explainability: Ensure Data Agent responses include traceable provenance (which tables, which events, which rules) so humans can audit decisions.
  • Policy enforcement: Test dynamic policy changes (e.g., temporary embargoes or priority shifts) and confirm agents adopt them immediately.
  • Resilience: Validate failover modes for agent runtimes and test agent quarantine procedures.

The long view — Fabric IQ and the future of the intelligence layer​

Fabric IQ reflects a broader architectural bet: effective, trustworthy AI in the enterprise depends not only on larger models or more data, but on structured semantic understanding of business operations. By elevating business concepts into a managed ontology with live bindings to telemetry and systems of record, Microsoft is trying to make agents auditable, explainable and operationally useful rather than experimental curiosities. That ambition aligns with Microsoft’s simultaneous investments in Agent 365, Foundry IQ and Copilot Studio — a full stack for building, governing and operating agents at scale.
However, the technical and organizational rigour required to model entities, govern data and secure autonomous actions will be the decisive factor determining whether Fabric IQ becomes a mainstream operational platform or a promising but niche capability. Enterprises that pair careful governance and pilot discipline with Fabric’s emerging tooling will have a head start in turning semantics into safe automation.

Conclusion​

Fabric IQ introduces a pragmatic and necessary layer for agentic automation: a live, governed semantic model that bridges analytics, telemetry and operational systems so AI agents can reason in business terms. The preview capabilities — Ontology modeling, the Data Agent for natural language queries and the Operations Agent for closed‑loop decisioning — combine with Microsoft’s broader agent governance story to offer a coherent path from experiments to production automation.
At the same time, practical adoption hinges on three non‑technical factors: disciplined data governance, rigorous pilot design and commercial clarity on metering and license terms. Organizations should pilot Fabric IQ on well-scoped problems, validate provenance and safety controls, and insist on transparent pricing and SLAs before scaling agents into mission-critical operations. The payoff — faster, more consistent decisions and auditable automation grounded in the enterprise’s own language — could be transformative, but only with deliberate engineering and governance upstream.


Source: How2shout Microsoft Fabric IQ Launches at Ignite 2025: Transforming Enterprise Data Into Intelligent Action
 

Back
Top