Gigabyte R113-C10 1U Server Review: AMD EPYC Power Meets Compact, Manageable Design

Gigabyte’s R113-C10 1U server, powered by AMD’s EPYC 4004 series, arrives at an inflection point in the world of compact, cost-effective server infrastructure. With evolving expectations for PCIe connectivity, out-of-band management, and raw per-core efficiency, this system’s value proposition stands in sharp relief against both familiar Intel Xeon E-series models and competing “entry-level” server solutions. After extensive evaluation and review—including thorough benchmarking and real-world deployment scenarios—this article provides a deep dive into the system’s design, management, performance, and deployment viability for Windows Server 2025, VMware ESXi 8.0, and beyond.

Introduction: An Evolving Landscape for 1U Servers​

Enterprises and hosting providers have long sought compact servers that balance density and flexibility without running up the cost. The traditional 1U form factor has seen a resurgence in innovation, largely driven by AMD’s aggressive push into markets previously dominated by Intel's Xeon E and even Xeon Gold series. Gigabyte’s R113-C10-AA02, built around AMD’s EPYC 4000 series (notably the 4464P reviewed here), embodies this shift by offering enhanced PCIe connectivity, a robust BMC-driven management interface, and robust support for modern DDR5 ECC memory. Such capabilities make it an appealing alternative to previous-generation systems like Lenovo’s ST45 V3 or even larger rackmount solutions from the likes of Dell.
But how well does it deliver in real-world testing? Does the spec sheet translate into meaningful operational advantages for Windows-centric shops, virtualization hosts, or those seeking high-density storage and network options? Let’s break down the key architectural, performance, and operational findings—highlighting strengths, limitations, and best-fit use cases.

Topology and PCIe Connectivity: A Notable Step Forward​

One prominent criticism of Lenovo’s ST45 V3 platform focused on its constrained PCIe options, which limited expansion opportunities for storage and networking. Gigabyte’s R113-C10 addresses this head-on, offering a clearly optimized path for PCIe expansion despite its compact dimensions:

• The board’s topology closely reflects its published block diagram, ensuring transparency between marketing claims and user experience.
• The server’s PCIe lane allocation, while naturally more modest than high-end, multi-CPU servers like Dell’s PowerEdge R770, is generous for its class and price. Most deployments in the “affordable 1U” niche require two or three high-speed PCIe devices—a need the R113-C10 comfortably satisfies.
• For organizations eyeing edge workloads or dense virtualization, this setup unlocks ample flexibility for fast NVMe storage, secondary network adapters/NICs, or hardware accelerators.

What's particularly impressive is not simply the presence of sufficient PCIe lanes, but the simplicity and clarity in how they're routed and managed. This ensures fewer bottlenecks and a lower learning curve for system integrators. Real-world testing corroborates these claims: populating the server with both enterprise SSDs and high-performance network cards yielded consistently high throughput, without the intermittent slowdowns sometimes found in lower-cost platforms.

Out-of-Band Management: Enterprise-Grade, Out of the Box​

A clear dividing line between professional servers and high-end workstations lies in their remote management capabilities. Many entry-level platforms—including the aforementioned Lenovo ST45 V3—skimp on full BMC/IPMI implementations, leaving IT staff reliant on local management or jury-rigged solutions.
Gigabyte sidesteps this misstep with the inclusion of the ASPEED AST2600 BMC, running MegaRAC SP-X firmware. This decision delivers several critical advantages:

• Users gain access to comprehensive out-of-band management, including full-featured iKVM, remote media mounting, sensor readouts, and fan control. This brings the R113-C10 into parity with mainstream Supermicro and ASRock Rack systems in terms of day-to-day administration.
• The management interface is intuitive, with a navigation style that will feel immediately familiar to seasoned datacenter managers.
• In testing, the iKVM function enabled seamless operating system installations and hardware troubleshooting—freeing admins from the constraints of front-panel and physical access.

For Windows Server 2025 environments in particular, where remote deployment and automation via PowerShell are routine, this level of management integration represents a meaningful productivity boost. Security is also improved: remote credential management and event logging capabilities allow for more robust compliance in regulated industries.

Test Configuration and Methodology: Reflecting Real-World Use​

To gauge the R113-C10’s performance envelope, multiple configurations and workloads were deployed:

Component	Model / Configuration
Chassis	Gigabyte R113-C0-AA02
Motherboard	Gigabyte MC13-LE0
CPU	AMD EPYC 4464P (12-core, 24-thread, 65W TDP)
Memory	2x V-Color 48GB DDR5-5600 ECC UDIMMs (96GB)
OS SSD	Samsung MZ-VL21T0B 1TB NVMe
Data SSD	4x 3.84TB Micron 5300 PRO SATA
Hypervisors	Windows Server 2025, VMware ESXi 8.0

This blend of high-capacity ECC DDR5, current-generation NVMe and SATA SSDs, and a 12-core/24-thread EPYC CPU targets typical scenarios for SMB datacenters, edge deployments, and virtualized hosting. Operating system and hypervisor testing spanned both traditional Windows workloads and contemporary virtualization environments, emphasizing practical relevance instead of artificial benchmarks alone.

Performance Analysis: Where AMD’s 4464P Shines​

In raw throughput and efficiency, AMD's EPYC 4004 series—particularly the 4464P SKU—leaves a distinct impression in the “affordable server” space.

SPEC CPU2017 and Real-World Performance​

When tested with the industry-standard SPEC CPU2017 suite, the R113-C10’s 4464P lands nearly neck-and-neck with the Intel Xeon E-2488 in terms of per-core performance. But it diverges dramatically in core count: with 12 physical cores against the Xeon E-2488’s 8, it delivers 50% more available compute per socket. Mainstream competitors like the dual-socket Xeon Gold 6252 are left further behind on per-core efficiency, reflecting AMD’s ongoing microarchitectural edge.

• The performance measured is within +/-2% of prior tests with the EPYC 4464P in other form factors, supporting the conclusion that the R113-C10's design does not bottleneck the CPU in typical use.
• Multi-threaded scores scale linearly, maximizing the benefit of AMD’s “more cores per dollar” proposition.

Memory Speed: 1DPC vs. 2DPC Impact​

A nuanced but important consideration when spec’ing RAM for the EPYC 4004 platform is channel population:

• With both DIMM channels populated (2DPC), supported memory speeds drop from DDR5-5200 to DDR5-3600. This is notably reflected in benchmark deltas between configurations with two DIMMs vs. four DIMMs.
• Geekbench 5 and Geekbench 6 highlight a 2-10% performance differential for less memory-bandwidth-bound workloads; however, memory-intensive applications may see greater variances.
• In practical deployment terms, this suggests a preference for fewer, higher-capacity DIMMs (for example, 2x 32GB or 2x 48GB) to preserve theoretical peak memory bandwidth—unless capacity requirements dictate otherwise.

Storage and I/O Throughput​

Paired with Samsung and Micron enterprise SSDs, the R113-C10 consistently maintained high sequential and random I/O rates across both the primary NVMe boot SSD and secondary SATA storage pool. The PCIe-connected NVMe lanes, in particular, performed without evidence of shared bandwidth bottlenecks, corroborating the topology’s strengths.
Host applications—including SQL Server, file servers, and software-defined storage platforms—benefitted most clearly from this robust I/O design. This is particularly relevant for Windows Server 2025 workloads, where mixed-usage VMs or containers may stress both CPU and storage concurrently.

Virtualization, Windows Server, and Use Case Validation​

Server hardware in late 2024 must prove itself across a spectrum of deployment models—not just single-OS installs or purpose-built appliances. The R113-C10’s tested compatibility with both Windows Server 2025 and VMware ESXi 8.0 positions it uniquely for hybrid shops seeking agility.

• Windows Server 2025 installed without complication and had no issues with driver or firmware support for the included storage and management hardware.
• VMware ESXi 8.0 saw all PCIe and storage devices correctly enumerated, with nested virtualization and pass-through configurations running smoothly.
• Real-world virtual machine density, constrained primarily by DRAM capacity in test configs, was competitive with other systems tested on the same hypervisor stack.

This breadth of compatibility suggests the R113-C10 is ready for edge deployments, traditional SMB datacenters, and even service provider scenarios where management automation, reliability, and cross-OS flexibility are necessary.

Notable Strengths​

Several standout strengths distinguish the Gigabyte R113-C10 relative to its immediate competitors and broader market peers:

1. Cost-Effective Compute Density​

• AMD’s EPYC 4004 series delivers substantially more cores at a given TDP than Intel’s current Xeon E platform. The 65W, 12-core 4464P is a clear value outlier.
• This allows for deployment of denser virtualization or multi-tenant hosting solutions in a minimal rack footprint, sidestepping the need for more expensive dual-socket or higher-power server options.

2. Management Features on Par with Larger Platforms​

• The inclusion of ASPEED’s AST2600 and MegaRAC SP-X puts this 1U system in the company of far more expensive rackmount servers, improving both manageability and physical security.
• Features like full iKVM with remote media mounting—sometimes omitted by rival “budget” servers—translate directly into time saved for remote troubleshooting and deployment.

3. Flexible PCIe and Storage Options​

• Ample, uncongested PCIe support for NVMe, RAID, and add-on cards render the R113-C10 suitable for varied storage architectures—from pure SSD to hybrid HDD+SSD or even NVMe over Fabrics front-ends.
• The platform does not artificially constrain expansion in the way some lower-cost OEM systems do, giving buyers confidence to invest for the long term.

4. Power Efficiency and “Right-Sizing”​

• Systems like the R113-C10, paired with 65W TDP processors, consume substantially less power than older entry-level servers and even some workstation-class hardware. This translates to lower operational costs and, where relevant, reduced thermal load—an advantage for both green initiatives and tight rack or closet spaces.

Potential Risks and Limitations​

No system is without drawbacks or limitations, and discerning buyers should weigh these factors:

1. Memory Bandwidth Trade-Offs​

• The reduction in memory speed from 1DPC to 2DPC (DDR5-5200 to DDR5-3600) can impact performance for bandwidth-hungry database and analytics workloads. While not unique to Gigabyte’s implementation, this is an architectural reality of the AMD EPYC 4004 platform.
• For organizations requiring both large RAM footprints and maximum bandwidth, careful DIMM selection is essential.

2. Limited Room for Redundant Power and Cooling​

• The 1U form factor, by necessity, limits the space available for redundant hot-swap power supplies and extra-large heatsinks or airflow channels.
• In high-availability or high-utilization scenarios, this could translate to shorter mean time between failures (MTBF) than larger 2U or 4U systems, unless external redundancies (e.g., rack UPS, facility-level cooling) are in place.

3. Single-Socket (Non-Scalable) Upgrade Path​

• While the EPYC 4004 platform excels in value and power efficiency, it is single-socket only. Organizations anticipating rapid, in-place CPU upgrades or scaling beyond 12-16 cores per server should consider their long-term needs accordingly.

4. Vendor Ecosystem and Firmware Support​

• While Gigabyte is a well-established player, some competing vendors (notably Dell, HPE, Supermicro) offer a broader ecosystem for automated firmware management, on-site support contracts, and third-party integrations.
• Though firmware and driver updates were straightforward during testing, enterprise buyers with established vendor preferences may want to review Gigabyte’s update cadence and support channels.

Critical Analysis: Market Position and Fit​

The R113-C10, powered by AMD’s EPYC 4004 series, lands at a compelling intersection of affordability and capability. It is unambiguously more capable than previous Xeon E-based rack servers—delivering higher per-socket core density, better management integration, and no obvious expansion bottlenecks. For mid-sized Windows Server deployments, ESXi clusters in boutique hosting, or edge-compute environments where density and remote management are paramount, it sets a new bar for 1U competitors.
However, prospective buyers should be attuned to its architectural compromises: memory speed scaling, limited upgradability beyond single-socket, and the constraints inherent in 1U chassis remain nontrivial factors. Organizations with heavier needs—for example, in-memory databases, multi-PB scale-out storage, or tightly regulated mission-critical apps—may still benefit from higher-end 2U/4U solutions.
Overall, the clear documentation, stable firmware, and cross-compatibility with Windows Server 2025 and VMware ESXi 8.0 make this a rare “set it and forget it” proposition for many workloads. For system integrators, managed service providers, and advanced users alike, it offers a combination of simplicity and muscle that feels purpose-built for modern IT realities.

Conclusion: An Impressive, Modern 1U Server for Broad Deployments​

The Gigabyte R113-C10 validates the promise of AMD’s EPYC 4000 series in the server space: more cores, better price/performance, and enterprise-grade manageability in a package that is neither intimidating nor artificially constrained. Compared with direct rivals like the Lenovo ST45 V3 or older Xeon E servers, it delivers on the “no compromises” sales pitch in a manner both measurable—through benchmarks—and practical, as reflected in real-world deployments across Windows Server 2025 and virtualization platforms.
While it may not be the right solution for every use case, especially where extreme memory bandwidth or hardware redundancy is vital, its strengths—compute density, robust management, flexible I/O—prove decisive for most SMB, edge, and hosted environments. Provided buyers are mindful of the memory and scalability nuances, the R113-C10 stands as one of the best-balanced 1U AMD EPYC servers on the market.
For Windows-centric IT professionals keen to modernize their infrastructure without breaking the bank, the R113-C10 merits serious consideration. As AMD continues to advance its server portfolio, platforms like the R113-C10 are poised to become standard-bearers for the next wave of efficient, manageable, and highly deployable server infrastructure.

---

Source: ServeTheHome Gigabyte R113-C10 Review a 1U AMD EPYC 4000 Series Server