GRUB2 CVE-2025-61663 Use After Free: Patch and Mitigate Now

  • Thread Author
Neon GRUB2 warning on a dark circuit-board, with orange warning triangles and shattered fragments.
A newly disclosed use‑after‑free bug in the GRUB2 bootloader — tracked as CVE‑2025‑61663 — arises from a missing unregister call in the normal command module and can cause a local attacker who can invoke GRUB commands to crash the bootloader or the host, prompting immediate patching from multiple vendors.

Background / Overview​

GRUB2 is the most widespread bootloader on Linux systems and runs before the operating system kernel, which makes its security posture critical for platform integrity and availability. The bootloader is modular: features such as command parsers and filesystem handlers are implemented as modules that register commands, hooks, or callbacks when loaded and are supposed to unregister those callbacks when they are unloaded. When that cleanup step is missed, the code can leave dangling pointers (references to memory that has already been freed), creating a use‑after‑free (UAF) condition that can be triggered later. The vulnerability in question is explicitly a missing unregister call for the normal command that leads to such a UAF. Vendors that have tracked and published advisories for this issue treat it as a moderate severity defect with a CVSS v3.1 base score of 4.9 (vector CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L), reflecting a local attack vector and high attack complexity. The public metadata and vendor advisories indicate the report was coordinated and published in mid‑November 2025, and multiple distributions have already issued updates.

What exactly is CVE‑2025‑61663?​

The technical root cause​

At a high level the bug is simple and classic: a command object (the normal command) is registered when its module is initialized, but when the module is unloaded the code path that should remove or unregister that command does not always execute. Later, if the command is invoked after the module has been removed, GRUB2 may call into memory that has already been freed — a textbook use‑after‑free. The immediate, reproducible effect is instability or a crash of the bootloader (availability impact). This class of bug is not novel; kernel and low‑level projects repeatedly show the same pattern (register on success, always unregister on any failure or unload path). Upstream fixes typically add the missing unregister call or restructure teardown logic to guarantee cleanup even on error. The Linux kernel’s MTD subsystem experienced an analogous missing‑unregister problem in the past, which illustrates how small cleanup omissions can lead to persistent failures and “cannot create duplicate” sysfs errors — a useful precedent for administrators assessing risk and remediation.

Affected components and platforms​

Vendor tracking (Red Hat, SUSE, and downstream mirrors) lists the GRUB2 package and the normal module as affected. Red Hat has mapped the issue to RHEL 7/8/9/10 and to Red Hat OpenShift (RHCOS/RHOS variants) where GRUB is packaged as part of the platform image. SUSE and other distributions have published advisories and fixed package builds for their platforms. This is an upstream GRUB2 bug that has been incorporated into distribution errata rather than being a vendor‑specific product flaw.

Impact and exploitability: realistic assessment​

Primary impact: availability (Denial of Service)​

  • Immediate effect: invoking the orphaned command after the module unload causes a use‑after‑free that commonly leads to a crash or halt of GRUB2, which in turn prevents the system from booting or causes instability during the boot phase.
  • Scope: local only — the attacker must be able to run GRUB commands (local console or serial/managed console access, or an ability to influence boot parameters). The vulnerability is not a remote network service exploit in normal configurations.
Multiple trackers and vendor CNAs classify the primary impact as availability rather than confidentiality or integrity, although they do not entirely discard the possibility that a more elaborate exploitation chain could yield further impact. Published scoring (CVSS 4.9) reflects low confidentiality/integrity impact and low availability impact in the CVSS vector — though real‑world availability impact can be high for systems that cannot be rebooted or recovered easily (appliances, embedded devices, or cloud images).

Exploitability and prerequisites​

  • Attack vector: local (GRUB command execution).
  • Privileges required: none (the advisories indicate no special privileges are required beyond the ability to invoke the command), but practical exploitation usually requires some control over the boot-time environment or console access.
  • Attack complexity: high — a successful chain depends on timing and environment (the module must be unloaded and the command invoked afterwards). The published assessments emphasize that a reliable exploit cannot be executed “at will” in most environments.

Public evidence of exploitation​

As of the coordinated disclosure and vendor advisories there is no authoritative public proof‑of‑concept that elevates this UAF to a remote code execution or secure‑boot bypass in the wild. The public trackers mark NVD entries as awaiting enrichment, and the EPSS/SSVC exposure values are very low, indicating no known active exploitation at publication. Claims that use‑after‑free in a bootloader could lead to code execution are conceptually correct in some contexts, but there is no published exploit code linking CVE‑2025‑61663 to RCE as of the advisory dates — treat such claims as unverified until a reproducible PoC appears.

Patching, mitigation, and vendor responses​

Vendor patches and timelines​

  • SUSE has published GRUB2 update packages and security announcements that explicitly remediate CVE‑2025‑61663 alongside closely related UAF fixes for other commands; SUSE’s advisory includes exact package thresholds (for example, grub2 >= 2.12-150600.8.44.2 on affected SUSE lines). Administrators using SUSE or openSUSE should apply the provided patchset via zypper or YaST.
  • Red Hat has mapped the issue into its CVE tracking and errata system and lists the GRUB2 packages in RHEL 7/8/9/10 and OpenShift as affected; Red Hat’s security metadata and bugzilla IDs identify the bug and link to errata packages — operators should install the vendor RHSA/errata updates for their release and verify package changelogs.
  • Distribution mirrors and scanners (Tenable, AlmaLinux/CloudLinux errata pages, and third‑party vulnerability databases) also reference vendor errata; these are useful to confirm whether a host’s installed package version is in the fixed range. Use vendor advisories as the authoritative source for the exact package names and release numbers.

Recommended remediation steps (operational checklist)​

  1. Inventory: identify systems that ship or use GRUB2 (boot hosts, appliances, OpenShift nodes, cloud images). Query package databases to find installed grub2 versions:
    • On RPM-based systems: rpm -q grub2 grub2-common grub2-efi*
    • On DEB-based systems: dpkg -l | grep grub2
  2. Check vendor advisories and errata: confirm whether your exact OS/build is listed as affected and which package version contains the fix. Look for the upstream commit IDs or the shipped package version in the changelog.
  3. Patch: install the vendor-supplied updates for grub2 (for example, on SUSE: zypper in -t patch SUSE-2025-4152=1) or use your vendor’s recommended update mechanisms (yum/dnf update grub2*; apt update && apt upgrade grub2 packages). Reboot is generally required because GRUB is part of early boot.
  4. Validate: after reboot, confirm the running kernel and package versions and inspect grub package changelogs to ensure the errata with the bugfix is present.
  5. For cloud / image users: verify whether vendor images (RHCOS, cloud marketplace images) have been rebuilt with updated GRUB2 packages; if not, plan image refreshes. For OpenShift and managed platforms, consult platform vendor guidance for node updates.

Short‑term mitigations if you cannot patch immediately​

  • Restrict console/boot access: limit who can access the system console, virtual serial ports, or management console (iDRAC/iLO/IMM) that can invoke GRUB commands. Because this is a local vector, reducing console access reduces exposure.
  • Enable GRUB password protection: lock down GRUB’s command line and menu editing with a superuser password (use PBKDF2 hashes and the recommended distro tools such as grub2‑mkpasswd or grub2‑setpassword). This prevents unauthorized users from entering commands at the boot prompt. Implementing GRUB passwords can be operationally risky if misconfigured — test in a lab first.
  • Harden physical and guest access: for virtualized environments, avoid exposing virtual machine consoles to untrusted tenants and require appropriate access controls for VM lifecycle operations.
Note: these are mitigations, not replacements for vendor patches. A bootloader with password protection is defensively helpful but does not fix the underlying UAF.

Detection and hunting guidance​

  • Because GRUB runs before the OS, traditional SIEM/EDR telemetry will not capture GRUB memory faults. Prioritize:
    • Monitoring for unexpected boot failures or systems that fail to respond at boot time after routine operations.
    • Tracking patch status and package changelogs as the primary detection: a host with an unpatched grub2 package is vulnerable.
    • For managed/cloud platforms: monitor image rebuild and errata application pipelines (image manifests, cloud provider bulletin boards).
  • For forensic triage, if a machine fails to boot or halts in the GRUB menu, capture serial console logs, IPMI/KVM recordings, or platform console output and cross‑reference bootloader versions. Vendor bugzilla entries and upstream commits sometimes include sample oops traces or reproduction notes that can guide debugging.

How serious is this for enterprise Windows admins and mixed environments?​

Enterprises that run mixed Windows/Linux infrastructure should treat this class of problem as operationally important even if it’s not a direct Windows code path. Many datacenter appliances and vendor images bundle GRUB2 (for example in Linux‑based cloud images, appliance OSes, and OpenShift nodes). If those systems are used in critical paths (boot servers, control plane nodes, storage appliances), an unpatched GRUB2 can cause availability incidents independent of Windows servers. Track vendor‑provided images carefully and coordinate image updates with infrastructure teams.

Why missing unregisters keep coming up — engineering perspective​

This vulnerability is another instance of a recurring engineering antipattern: registering a callback or command on success but failing to guarantee unregistration on every teardown path. Proper error handling in modular, low‑level code must be symmetrical: every successful registration should have an unconditional cleanup path that runs whether the module unloads cleanly or earlier initializations fail.
Past fixes in kernel and bootloader code typically take one of two forms:
  • Insert the missing unregister or cancellation call in the error/unload path.
  • Rework ownership so that the object owning the registration is responsible for unregistering on destruction (defensive cleanup).
Either approach is small in code size but can be large in operational effect because it restores consistent lifecycles and prevents dangling pointers. This pattern is well documented in other advisories where a single missed cleanup created a persistent failure mode for module reloads and driver stacks.

What to watch for over the coming weeks​

  • Updated vendor advisories and errata that enumerate which GRUB2 package releases contain the fixes for CVE‑2025‑61662/61663/61664 (several related UAF issues were disclosed concurrently). Confirm the exact release numbers in your distro’s security tracker before declaring systems patched.
  • Any proof‑of‑concept exploit or active exploit campaign that elevates the impact from DoS to code execution. As of the coordinated disclosure there is no public PoC linking CVE‑2025‑61663 to a Secure Boot bypass or arbitrary code execution; if that changes, vendor advisories and NVD will be updated and operators must react quickly. Flag any public claims of RCE as unverified until reproduced by multiple independent sources.
  • Backport status for vendor kernels and images, particularly in embedded appliances and long‑tail systems that do not frequently receive updates. Those devices frequently lag and are the most exposed in practice.

Practical checklist — immediate actions​

  1. Query inventories for grub2 packages and record versions.
  2. Consult vendor advisories (Red Hat, SUSE, your distro vendor) for fixed package versions and errata IDs.
  3. Schedule and apply package updates; plan reboots for servers and appliances.
  4. Where immediate patching is impossible, restrict console and boot access and enable GRUB password protection in a tested configuration.
  5. Validate post‑patch that the package changelog or errata references the CVE or upstream commit.
  6. Monitor vendor channels for any escalation in exploitability or published PoCs.

Conclusion​

CVE‑2025‑61663 is a clear reminder that even small omissions — a single missing unregister call — can have outsized operational consequences when they occur in early‑boot code like GRUB2. The vulnerability is local in nature and primarily affects availability (use‑after‑free leading to crashes), but because GRUB runs before the OS and underpins boot security, it deserves rapid attention. Administrators should treat vendor advisories as authoritative, apply the supplied GRUB2 updates promptly, and apply short‑term access controls (console restriction, GRUB password protection) where necessary until all images and hosts are patched. Vendors and distro trackers have already published fixes and package updates; confirm your environment’s coverage and reboot affected systems into the patched images as soon as practical.
Source: MSRC Security Update Guide - Microsoft Security Response Center
 

Back
Top