Harnessing AI: The Importance of Strategic Questioning with Sam Altman

  • Thread Author
In the fast-evolving tech landscape, a compelling argument has emerged from the center of the AI revolution. OpenAI CEO Sam Altman recently shared a profound insight during his appearance on the ReThinking podcast, hosted by organizational psychologist Adam Grant. According to Altman, the essence of what gives humans an edge in the age of generative AI isn't raw intellectual horsepower, but the ability to craft thoughtful, strategic questions. Let’s unpack this fascinating perspective and explore its implications for a world that increasingly relies on tools like ChatGPT and Microsoft Copilot.

Why Questions May Matter More Than Answers

Altman suggested that the ability to solve problems through sheer brainpower—once humanity’s defining trait—could take a backseat to the art of asking meaningful questions. In his words:
"There will be a kind of ability we still really value, but it will not be raw, intellectual horsepower to the same degree. Figuring out what questions to ask will be more important than figuring out the answer."
This seismic shift in perspective makes sense when you consider how generative AI systems operate. These tools—like OpenAI's ChatGPT, GPT-4, and Microsoft's Copilot—are pre-trained on vast datasets and designed to generate coherent, insightful responses. But here's the catch: the quality of these responses depends significantly on the input provided, i.e., the prompt. A good question or prompt, thoughtfully structured, can unlock the full potential of AI. A poorly constructed one? Not so much.
Organizational psychologist Adam Grant chimed in to echo Altman’s point, emphasizing that the ability to synthesize information, connect dots, and recognize patterns will be where humans shine. It’s a bit like being a chess grandmaster: understanding strategy and seeing the bigger picture matters far more than knowing the rules of the game.
But, before we start questioning the fundamental nature of intelligence itself, let’s step back to examine why this proposition holds water in the context of modern AI tools.

Prompt Engineering is the Skill of the Decade

If Altman’s statement feels like a eureka moment for you, congratulations—you’re tuned into a fundamental truth about AI that many users are still trying to grasp. At the heart of his argument is a growing discipline known as prompt engineering.
Prompt engineering is essentially the skill of speaking AI’s language. It’s the technique of phrasing queries and commands in a way that gets optimal results from tools like ChatGPT or Copilot. Think of AI models as highly knowledgeable but slightly pedantic experts: they only give you what you explicitly ask for, sometimes highlighting information you wouldn’t have imagined. If you don’t ask the right question, you might miss the tool’s full potential. Here’s how prompt engineering transforms basic tasks into high-value outcomes:
  • Precision over vagueness: Asking ChatGPT “What’s the capital of France?” is straightforward, but diving deeper into questions like “How does Paris influence national economic policies in modern France?” unlocks richer responses.
  • Leveraging systemic reasoning: When prompts guide AI to think through multiple layers, users can uncover connected ideas that might not emerge from a standard search.
  • Customization of intent: By telling AI to role-play or adopt specific perspectives (e.g., “Answer this like a historian” vs. “Simplify this for a beginner”), you can modulate the style and focus of its output.
According to Altman, these skills will define the workers of tomorrow, especially now that more people are using systems like OpenAI’s GPT models in their workflow.
Still skeptical? Microsoft’s recent focus on prompt engineering as a critical skill should make you take notice. The company even launched "Copilot Academy" in September 2024 to help users master the art of interacting with its AI-powered enterprise tools. The push reflects how central prompt engineering has become to extracting value from AI platforms in business environments.

Microsoft Copilot & User Frustrations: Misguided Blame?

When Microsoft introduced its Copilot platform, users expected nothing less than magic at their fingertips. Yet, some complaints emerged: Copilot’s performance seemed inconsistent compared to ChatGPT, OpenAI’s flagship tool. Analysts blamed this on "bad AI" or "unfinished software," but Microsoft shifted the narrative. The real issue? Poor prompt engineering.
Microsoft has since taken steps to address this user gap by releasing tutorial videos and resources designed to help people fine-tune their interactions with Copilot. After all, asking a vague question like, “Help me prepare for a meeting,” doesn’t provide the same precision as, “Generate a list of key metrics and market analysis insights for tomorrow’s strategy meeting.” See the difference? It’s all in the question!
Still, it’s worth noting Altman’s larger observation: as AI systems improve and democratize access to knowledge, users who fail to evolve their questioning strategies risk being left behind.

The Broader Shift in Work & Learning

Altman predicts that this shift in how we value intelligence will redefine labor markets and education. Rather than relying solely on rote memorization or analytical reasoning, educators and employers may instead emphasize problem framing, creative exploration, and strategic thinking. Imagine a classroom where students are graded not just on the answers they produce, but on their ability to innovate how questions are framed.
In practical terms, this means:
  • Workplaces: Employees will increasingly be evaluated on how effectively they direct AI tools, whether for coding, content creation, or data analysis.
  • Education: Curriculums might pivot to focus more on skills like hypothesis generation, interdisciplinary thinking, and adaptability.
  • Business Strategy: Industries could reward leaders who excel in identifying key challenges, as the "answer machines" (AI apps) are now plentiful.
Of course, the counterargument remains: if AI constantly improves its capability to decode even poorly structured prompts, how long until even this "human advantage" diminishes?

AI Tools as Partners, Not Replacements

What’s truly exciting about Altman’s vision is his implicit optimism. This isn’t a dystopian prophecy of human irrelevance. Rather, it’s a roadmap toward working smart, not hard. AI doesn’t eliminate the need for human intelligence—it shifts the definition of what intelligence means in the AI era. Instead of memorizing facts or brute-forcing problems, we transition into being thoughtful strategists—partners, not competitors, with AI.
As Altman himself explained, solving "hard problems" will take on a new dimension. Future breakthroughs will require leveraging human insights and AI efficiency together. As we master asking the right questions, we shape AI into a better extension of ourselves.

Windows Users, Here’s What This Means for You

For Windows users embracing tools such as Microsoft Copilot or integrating AI assistants into their daily workflows, the message is clear: learn prompt engineering. Whether you’re drafting reports, troubleshooting system errors, or managing projects, mastering the art of questioning will unlock more powerful AI-driven solutions.
  • Start by identifying the specific outcomes you want from your AI interactions.
  • Explore tutorials offered by platforms like Microsoft’s Copilot Academy to improve your skills.
  • Think of prompts as a chess move: consider the strategy, intent, and broader context of your request.
In short: as the AI landscape evolves, users who refine the skill of asking sharp, meaningful questions will find themselves well-equipped for the future.

It’s a Brave New World, but one where curiosity reigns supreme. So… what questions are you planning to ask your AI assistant today? Share your thoughts in the forums!

Source: Windows Central Sam Altman claims knowing what questions to ask trumps raw intelligence as AI advances — Users struggle to realize Copilot and ChatGPT's full potential, owing to poor prompt engineering skills
 
Last edited: