Inforcer Helps MSPs Scale Microsoft 365 Security & Copilot with Intune Initiative

Inforcer’s recent elevation into Microsoft’s MSP-focused Intune initiative marks a tangible step toward making Microsoft 365 more manageable, secure, and AI-ready for Managed Service Providers — and it comes at a moment when MSPs desperately need standardized, scale-ready tooling to extract value from Microsoft’s sprawling cloud stack.

Background / Overview​

Microsoft 365 is now the operational backbone for millions of small and medium businesses, but the platform’s native consoles and product silos were not originally designed for high-volume, multi-tenant management. MSPs that support dozens or hundreds of tenants face tool fragmentation, inconsistent policy enforcement, and heavy operational overhead when trying to deploy Microsoft security baselines, rollout features such as Copilot, or manage device posture via Intune. inforcer positions itself as a purpose-built layer that standardizes Microsoft 365 policy, enforces security baselines at scale, and surfaces Copilot readiness across multiple tenants — capabilities Microsoft is explicitly trying to make easier for partners through a new Intune-for-MSPs initiative.
Inforcer’s public announcement and product pages emphasize three strategic outcomes for MSPs:

• Consolidated multi-tenant management across Microsoft 365 and Intune to reduce context switches and manual configuration drift.
• Enforced security baselines and compliance monitoring so MSPs can ship higher-value security services rather than one-off policy work.
• Copilot and AI readiness tooling that audits data governance, access controls, and sensitivity labeling — prerequisites for safe Copilot deployment.

These claims are reinforced in the company’s own materials and repeated in multiple trade outlets that covered the partnership announcement. The story is not purely marketing: inforcer’s public positioning and roadmap explicitly show features aimed at standardization, automated remediation, and tenant-level assessments.

---

Why this matters to MSPs​

The operational problem: tenant sprawl and tool fragmentation​

MSPs commonly manage a mix of Microsoft admin UIs (Partner Center, Entra, Intune, Defender, Purview), third-party RMM/PSA systems, and bespoke scripts. That fragmentation creates:

• Repetitive manual work for every tenant onboarding.
• Inconsistent policy implementations across customers.
• Difficulty proving continuous compliance to customers and auditors.
• Barriers to productizing Microsoft security and Copilot as repeatable services.

inforcer and similar platform vendors attempt to convert that ad-hoc operational burden into repeatable, productized services by centralizing policy templates, automating remediation, and creating multi-tenant dashboards. This shift can reduce technician time per tenant and make Microsoft 365 an easier platform to monetize.

Business opportunity: productized managed services and margin expansion​

MSPs that convert manual Microsoft 365 tasks into packaged offerings gain three advantages:

• Faster onboarding and lower per-tenant operational cost.
• Clearer, repeatable tiers (baseline security, advanced security, Copilot enablement).
• Upsell pathways tied to AI and security maturity instead of chaotic hourly work.

Inforcer’s messaging explicitly targets these outcomes, and independent reporting shows the company is building toward being the operational spine MSPs can use to build Microsoft-first services. That narrative is supported by recent funding and customer-growth coverage showing a rapidly expanding user base.

---

What Microsoft’s initiative does — and what inforcer adds​

Microsoft’s Intune-for-MSPs initiative (what Microsoft has signalled)​

Microsoft has increasingly acknowledged the need for partner-ready flows, migrations, and co-managed capabilities for Intune and Microsoft 365. Whether through migration programs, Copilot readiness events, or partner enablement tracks, Microsoft is providing more direct partner resources and product-level hooks to help MSPs scale. The Intune-for-MSPs initiative aims to consolidate tooling and provide partner-focused engagement, training, and influence on the roadmap.

Inforcer’s role and value-add​

According to the announcement, inforcer was selected as a Microsoft partner to participate in the initiative; the company claims it is one of two software development companies chosen in the initiative’s initial phase. As a partner, inforcer will offer:

• Integrated multi-tenant management across the Microsoft technology stack.
• Direct engagement and enablement resources from Microsoft product teams.
• Tools to standardize Microsoft 365 policy configurations and enforce security baselines.
• A Copilot readiness assessment MSPs can run across customers’ tenants.

Note: the claim that inforcer is “one of only two” software development companies in the initial phase is presented in the press coverage. Independent confirmation via Microsoft’s own public roster of partners for this specific initiative is limited at the time of reporting; MSPs should treat this particular phrasing as company-reported and verify any exclusivity claims directly with Microsoft channel contacts if that distinction matters for commercial discussions.

---

Key features and how they change operations​

Centralized policy and baseline enforcement​

• Standardized policy templates let MSPs apply the same CIS/industry baseline across tenants.
• Automated monitoring and remediation detect and correct configuration drift.
• Policy versioning and rollback reduce risk when Microsoft or customer requirements change.

These capabilities reduce human error and free up skilled engineers to work on higher-value tasks such as advisory projects or tailored security programs. inforcer’s own documentation and product pages emphasize policy automation and drift detection as core features.

Copilot readiness assessments​

• Audits of data organization, labeling, and access control.
• Checks for data governance, auditing, and sensitivity labeling — essential for preventing sensitive data exposure when Copilot queries tenant content.
• Pilot design guidance that helps MSPs shepherd customers through staged Copilot deployments.

Copilot’s power is directly related to how well tenant data is organized and governed. An MSP that can demonstrate a repeatable Copilot readiness assessment gains a compelling product to sell alongside licensing. Inforcer’s resources explicitly position such an assessment as part of their platform roadmap.

Multi-tenant visibility for security telemetry​

• Consolidated dashboards for Defender, Sentinel, and other Microsoft security outputs.
• Centralized alerting and remediation flows reduce the noise produced by multiple tenant consoles.
• Integration opportunities with MSP toolchains (RMM/PSA) to link security findings to tickets and SLAs.

This makes it easier to deliver managed detection and response-style offerings or to integrate security posture improvements into standard managed service packages. The Microsoft Intelligent Security Association (MISA) ecosystem also supports integration pathways for vendors; inforcer announced MISA membership, which bolsters its ability to integrate with Microsoft Security technologies.

---

Market signals: traction, funding, and credibility​

Multiple industry outlets reported that inforcer has expanded quickly since launch, with a customer base north of 800 MSPs cited in company materials and coverage of a recent Series B round that underscores investor confidence. The company’s rapid hiring and geographic expansion form part of that credibility story. These commercial signals matter to MSPs evaluating vendor longevity and roadmap stability.
Quotes in the announcement illustrate the channel-level endorsement:

• Jamie Daum, CEO & Co-founder of inforcer, framed the product as a tool to help MSPs scale Microsoft practices and prepare for AI-first workloads.
• Jason Roszak, VP of Product for Intune at Microsoft, is quoted welcoming partners like inforcer who build capabilities on top of Intune that help MSPs scale.
• Rob Young of Infinity Group described inforcer as filling a critical gap in multi-tenant management and security enforcement.

---

Strengths and practical benefits​

• Operational efficiency: Centralized management and automated remediation reduce technician time, enabling MSPs to manage more tenants with the same staff.
• Standardization at scale: Scripting best practices into repeatable policy templates makes service delivery predictable and auditable.
• Faster time-to-market for new services: Copilot readiness assessments and packaged security tiers enable MSPs to productize and price offerings rather than sell labor by the hour.
• Closer Microsoft alignment: Participation in Microsoft partner initiatives and MISA membership can accelerate integration opportunities and provide early access to partner enablement.
• Commercial credibility: Fundraising and a growing MSP user base point to market traction and likely continued product investment.

---

Risks, caveats, and areas requiring due diligence​

• Vendor lock-in and single-vendor dependency
• Leaning heavily on any single tooling layer for policy, backup, and remediation introduces dependency risks. MSPs must evaluate exit strategies, exportability of policies, and how inforcer integrates with existing RMM/PSA systems.
• Claims requiring independent verification
• The announcement’s claim that inforcer was “one of only two” initial software development companies in the Intune initiative is presented in press coverage; Microsoft’s public partner lists for the program are not exhaustive in public channels. MSPs should verify partner program details directly with Microsoft partner managers if exclusivity matters to procurement or co-selling.
• Security and compliance posture expectations
• Tools can automate enforcement, but automated remediation must be carefully tested. An over-eager remediation rule could break critical customer workflows if conditional access policies or app access rules are changed without adequate testing.
• Complexity of Copilot governance
• Copilot’s data surface requires careful governance. Even with readiness checks, the nuances of data residency, sensitivity labeling, and downstream audit trails mean an MSP’s legal and compliance teams must be involved before large-scale Copilot rollouts. inforcer’s Copilot-readiness guidance is a step in that direction but does not replace formal compliance reviews.
• Competitive landscape and consolidation
• Several vendors — including Hornetsecurity and a range of MSP-focused tooling providers — are introducing multi-tenant management tooling. MSPs should compare feature parity, pricing, and integration depth with Microsoft OEM tooling or competing ISVs.

---

Practical guidance for MSPs evaluating inforcer (checklist)​

• Technical evaluation
• Run a pilot with a subset of tenants to validate policy templates, remediation workflows, and integration with your RMM/PSA.
• Verify API-level integration: ensure the platform can export/import policies, and confirm SLAs for API rate limits and change events.
• Security & compliance review
• Confirm how backups of tenant configurations are stored and who can access them.
• Validate support for sensitivity labels, retention policies, and audit trails aligned to your customers’ compliance needs.
• Commercial considerations
• Clarify pricing (per-tenant vs. per-customer vs. per-feature), renewal terms, and any co-sell or go-to-market commitments Microsoft might offer.
• Ask for references from MSPs that match your size and verticals.
• Operational readiness
• Develop runbooks for automated remediation and fallbacks for safe rollbacks.
• Train service delivery engineers on the platform and update managed service agreements to reflect new responsibilities and SLAs.
• Roadmap and vendor stability
• Confirm product roadmap items (e.g., the announced October Copilot readiness feature) and request timelines, beta access, and release notes.
• Assess funding and customer traction to estimate the vendor’s ability to maintain and evolve the platform.

---

How MSPs can productize Microsoft 365 + Copilot offerings​

• Baseline Security Pack (month 0)
• Policy standardization, CIS-aligned Intune/Entra settings, conditional access setup.
• Automated compliance reporting and a quarterly security review.
• Managed Security Tier (month 1–ongoing)
• Defender monitoring, central alert triage, and incident playbooks integrated with RMM/PSA.
• Monthly posture reports and remediation SLA.
• Copilot Enablement Add-on (pilot → rollout)
• Copilot readiness assessment, pilot deployment for a pilot user group, governance and prompt design.
• Ongoing Copilot safety monitoring and prompt governance workshops.
• Advisory & AI Strategy
• Quarterly reviews to identify AI-readiness opportunities (automations, Copilot flows, knowledge management).
• Upsell to AI governance, data classification projects, and custom Copilot prompt tuning.

This staged productization approach reduces risk by starting with baseline security, then layering advanced services as customers demonstrate maturity and ROI. Inforcer’s platform capabilities are positioned to help MSPs automate and measure these exact steps.

---

The competitive landscape: where inforcer fits​

The market for multi-tenant Microsoft 365 management is active and rapidly evolving. Vendors such as Hornetsecurity, Nerdio, and other specialized ISVs are building overlapping capabilities — from centralized tenant dashboards to Intune migration tooling and security baselines. Each vendor’s strengths vary:

• Some focus on email, backup, or threat protection.
• Others emphasize device management and Intune automation.
• New entrants are racing to provide Copilot readiness and data governance features.

MSPs should map vendor functionality against their service goals (e.g., security-first, Copilot enablement, scale efficiency) and select partners that minimize integration lift while maximizing the specific outcomes they need. inforcer’s close alignment with Microsoft’s partner initiatives and MISA membership positions it as a candidate for MSPs wanting a Microsoft-centric stack, but it is not the only option.

---

What to watch next (six- to twelve-month horizon)​

• Adoption metrics and references: MSPs evaluating inforcer should ask for case studies that demonstrate time-to-value and measurable reductions in per-tenant administration hours.
• Product releases and roadmap adherence: the company announced an October release with a comprehensive Copilot readiness assessment; MSPs should validate delivery and test the feature in pilots.
• Microsoft program expansion: whether Microsoft broadens the Intune-for-MSPs program and publishes a formal, public roster of partners and capabilities will increase transparency and help MSPs align co-sell motions.
• Ecosystem integrations: look for deeper integrations with Sentinel, Defender, and third-party RMM/PSA platforms that reduce operational friction and ticketing overhead.

---

Final analysis — practical verdict for MSPs​

Inforcer’s selection as a partner in Microsoft’s Intune-for-MSPs initiative and its concurrent MISA membership are credible signals that the vendor sits squarely in Microsoft’s partner ecosystem and is being positioned to solve real channel pain points. The platform’s emphasis on policy standardization, remediation, and Copilot readiness addresses the operational and commercial barriers that stop many MSPs from productizing Microsoft 365 and AI services.
However, the pragmatic value will be proven in execution:

• Can inforcer reliably automate remediation without disrupting customers?
• Will the announced Copilot readiness tooling be both comprehensive and safe enough to assuage compliance-minded customers?
• How well does the platform integrate into the MSP’s existing RMM/PSA toolchain and commercial model?

MSPs should run careful pilots, verify platform exportability and fail-safe rollbacks, and insist on clear SLAs for remediation actions. Where those checks pass, inforcer can materially reduce operational overhead, enable higher-margin Microsoft-first services, and accelerate safe Copilot adoption. The combination of Microsoft partnership signals, MISA membership, and funding momentum point to a vendor worth shortlisting — provided MSPs follow standard procurement discipline and validate claims in their own environments.

---

In sum, inforcer’s Microsoft-aligned approach offers a pragmatic bridge between the complexity of Microsoft 365 management and the commercial opportunity of AI-enabled managed services. The announced partnership and product roadmap are promising, but real-world pilots and integration proofs will determine whether it becomes a core plank in an MSP’s Microsoft stack or one more tool that creates yet another vendor dependency.

---

Source: SourceSecurity.com https://www.sourcesecurity.com/news/inforcer-elevates-microsoft-365-management-msps-co-14053-ga-co-1758207701-ga.1758198724.html

 

[ChatGPT]

Inforcer’s elevation into Microsoft’s MSP-focused Intune initiative marks an important inflection point for managed service providers seeking to productize Microsoft 365, scale multi-tenant operations, and prepare customers for AI-driven services such as Microsoft Copilot.

Background / Overview​

Microsoft 365 has become the default productivity and collaboration layer for millions of small and medium businesses, but the platform’s native consoles were not built with high-volume, multi-tenant MSP operations as the primary use case. MSPs routinely juggle Intune, Partner Center, Microsoft Entra, Defender, Purview, Sentinel, and third‑party RMM/PSA toolchains — a level of fragmentation that leads to inconsistent enforcement, slow onboarding, and heavy administrative overhead.
inforcer’s public announcement positions the company as a purpose-built layer for multi-tenant Microsoft 365 management: standardizing policy templates, enforcing security baselines, centralizing telemetry, and surfacing Copilot readiness across customer tenants. Their message is that MSPs can use the platform to reduce operational friction and build repeatable, higher‑margin service tiers on top of Microsoft 365.
This change matters because Microsoft itself is accelerating the integration of AI into endpoint and tenant management tools — for example, Security Copilot’s integration with Intune and Entra, and Microsoft’s role-based Copilot release wave scheduled for the October 2025 window — making tenant readiness and standardized security baselines prerequisites for safe and productive AI rollout.

---

What Microsoft and inforcer are claiming​

• Microsoft has created a partner-focused initiative commonly referenced as #IntuneForMSPs to help MSPs consolidate tooling, reduce operational overhead, and accelerate delivery of Microsoft 365 and Copilot services. inforcer says it was selected as a partner in the initiative and will work with Microsoft product teams on enablement and tooling for MSPs.
• inforcer highlights capabilities that matter to MSPs:
• Integrated multi-tenant management across Microsoft 365 and Intune.
• Standardized policy configuration and enforcement across tenants to reduce drift.
• Copilot readiness assessments and pilot guidance to reduce data leakage and misconfiguration risk.
• Centralized visibility and remediation for Microsoft security telemetry (Defender, Sentinel, etc.).
• Commercial signals cited by the company: a reported customer base of 800+ MSPs, a recent $35M Series B that followed a $19M Series A, and rapid hiring and international expansion — all used to underscore traction and roadmap momentum.
• inforcer also announced membership in the Microsoft Intelligent Security Association (MISA), which positions the vendor inside Microsoft’s security partner ecosystem. The MISA program itself is described by Microsoft as an invitation-only ecosystem that requires integration with qualifying Microsoft Security products.
• Multiple trade outlets picked up the story and reported that inforcer was “one of only two software development companies selected for the initial phase” of Microsoft’s initiative. That specific exclusivity wording appears in press coverage but is not clearly confirmed on a public Microsoft roster at the time of reporting; treat the “one of two” phrasing as company/press-reported pending direct Microsoft confirmation.

---

Why this matters to MSPs and Windows-centric customers​

The operational gap: tenant sprawl and tool fragmentation​

MSPs managing dozens or hundreds of tenants face:

• Repetitive, manual onboarding and configuration work for every new customer.
• Inconsistent policy enforcement across tenants, which increases risk.
• Difficulty proving continuous compliance and delivering repeatable Copilot pilots.

A platform that centralizes templates, automates remediation, and provides tenant-level assessments reduces per-tenant effort, freeing engineers to sell and deliver advisory and advanced services rather than repetitive configuration tasks. inforcer’s positioning directly targets this gap.

The commercial opportunity​

By standardizing baseline security and offering Copilot readiness as a discrete, repeatable service, MSPs can:

• Launch tiered offerings (baseline, advanced security, Copilot enablement).
• Improve margins through repeatable automation rather than hourly break/fix.
• Shorten time-to-revenue for Microsoft 365 projects and AI pilots.

These are practical advantages in a crowded managed services market where differentiation increasingly rests on measurable outcomes, not just toolkits.

AI readiness is not just a marketing line​

Microsoft’s Copilot and Security Copilot work best when tenant data is well-labeled, governance is clear, and access controls are correctly scoped. Security Copilot’s integration with Intune and Entra underscores how AI features are being embedded into core admin workflows — which magnifies the consequences of misconfiguration. Preparing tenants for Copilot therefore requires more than licensing: it requires verified data governance, sensitivity labeling, and policy baseline enforcement. inforcer’s roadmap emphasizes Copilot readiness assessments to address this exact need.

---

Technical capabilities promised and their practical implications​

Standardize and enforce policy at scale​

• What inforcer says it does: apply consistent policy templates to multiple tenants, detect drift, and automate remediation and rollback.
• Why this matters: consistent baselines reduce attack surface and simplify audits; automated rollback limits blast radius when Microsoft or business requirements change.

Centralized telemetry and alerting​

• What inforcer says it does: aggregate security outputs from Defender, Sentinel, and other Microsoft products into a tenant-agnostic dashboard that MSPs can operate at scale.
• Why this matters: consolidated telemetry enables SOC-like services, ties alerts into ticketing/PSA workflows, and supports SLA-driven managed detection/response offerings.

Copilot readiness assessments and pilot tooling​

• What inforcer says it will add: a comprehensive Copilot readiness assessment in its October platform release that audits data labeling, knowledge boundaries, and pilot configurations.
• Why this matters: measured readiness reduces the risk of sensitive data exposure to generative models and gives MSPs a sellable, repeatable pre-flight service for Copilot adoption. Note that Microsoft’s broader Copilot release wave 2 plans set general availability and feature rollouts on an October 1, 2025 cadence, making October a logical window for partner tools designed to run tenant readiness checks.

---

Verification of key claims (what’s verified, what’s not)​

• inforcer’s platform capabilities (policy templates, multi-tenant views, Copilot guidance) are described and documented on the company website and blog — these product claims are verifiable in vendor materials and in their public roadmap posts.
• Commercial metrics — 800+ MSPs cited and the $35M Series B raise — are also published in the company’s press announcements and appear in industry coverage, which corroborates traction and investor backing. These figures are company-reported but traceable to their press materials.
• Microsoft’s security and Copilot direction — specifically the integration of Security Copilot into Intune/Entra and the October 2025 release wave for role-based Copilot offerings — is confirmed on Microsoft’s blog and release planning pages. Those dates and capabilities are Microsoft-published and therefore reliable for planning.
• The specific claim that inforcer is “one of only two software development companies selected for the initial phase” of Microsoft’s initiative appears in press coverage and vendor statements, but I found no public Microsoft list that explicitly brands the cohort as “two companies” at the time of reporting. Treat that exclusivity phrasing as press- or vendor-reported and seek direct Microsoft partner‑program confirmation if the number matters for procurement or commercial negotiations.

---

Strengths and credible upside​

• Microsoft alignment and timing: inforcer’s positioning dovetails with Microsoft’s push to embed Copilot and AI guidance into Intune and Entra workflows, which should make partner tooling valuable to both Microsoft and MSPs. Microsoft’s own Security Copilot integrations and October Copilot release cadence validate partner opportunities to deliver readiness tooling.
• Product-market fit for MSPs: the operational pain of tenant sprawl is well-documented; a platform that materially reduces per-tenant friction is a meaningful value proposition for MSPs seeking to scale without linear headcount growth. inforcer’s customer traction and Series B financing indicate investors see that potential as real.
• Go-to-market leverage: being part of a Microsoft partner initiative and MISA can accelerate engineering collaboration, co-sell opportunities, and technical enablement — all important for smaller vendors competing to be the MSP operational layer.

---

Risks, gaps, and what MSPs should carefully evaluate​

• Over-reliance on vendor claims: while product pages and press releases describe the value proposition, MSPs must validate real-world performance with pilot deployments. Key operational questions to test in a pilot:
• How accurate and actionable are automated remediation suggestions?
• What is the time-to-onboard per tenant (including consent, permissioning, and data access reviews)?
• How does the platform integrate with existing RMM/PSA and ticketing workflows?
• What are fail-safe rollback and change-management procedures?
• Data access and privacy boundaries: Copilot readiness tools — and any automation that reads tenant metadata or content — raise governance considerations. MSPs must map out exactly what data the platform ingests, where it’s stored, and what contractual protections are in place for customer data. This is especially important for regulated customers.
• Vendor lock-in and migration path: MSPs should evaluate exportability of policy templates, audit logs, and historical remediation data; ensure they can recover or migrate data if they change platforms. A tight integration is beneficial, but portability reduces long-term vendor risk.
• Operational complexity vs. single-pane promises: centralized tooling can hide complexity but can also create a single point of operational failure. Verify SLA commitments, incident response plans, and the vendor’s SOC/SEC posture (SOC2, penetration test history, etc.). inforcer’s site references SOC and certifications, but MSPs should still do due diligence on third-party attestations.
• Unverified exclusivity claims: the statement that inforcer was “one of only two software development companies” in the initial Microsoft cohort is reported by trade press and vendor materials, but a public Microsoft partner roster did not clearly enumerate the cohort in that way. MSPs should treat exclusivity claims cautiously and ask Microsoft or the vendor for formal confirmation if it affects procurement.

---

Practical guidance for MSPs evaluating inforcer (or similar platforms)​

• Pilot with a representative set of tenants:
• Include a mix of highly regulated, standard SMB, and edge-case tenants.
• Run the Copilot readiness assessment and validate findings against a manual assessment.
• Verify integration depth and telemetry fidelity:
• Confirm which Microsoft APIs the platform uses and whether the coverage includes Intune, Defender, Entra, Purview, and Sentinel.
• Check latency, alert fidelity, and the platform’s ability to correlate events across tenants.
• Test remediation automation carefully:
• Use a non-production tenant to validate automatic remediations and rollback behavior.
• Review operator workflows in the platform for false positives and human-in-the-loop approvals.
• Confirm compliance and data handling:
• Request SOC2 or equivalent audit reports, data residency guarantees, and deletion policies.
• Document what metadata and content the platform captures and how long it is retained.
• Negotiate practical commercial terms:
• Seek exportability of templates and logs.
• Agree on a practical onboarding SLA and rollback / off-ramp support in the contract.
• Use the partnership channel:
• If Microsoft co-sell or partner enablement is relevant, ask for direct channel engagement opportunities and references demonstrating joint customer success.

---

How this fits into the broader MSP ecosystem​

The rise of vendor platforms that specialize in Microsoft-first multi-tenant management is accelerating a shift from fragmented toolchains to purpose-built, cloud-native MSP stacks. Competitors and complementary vendors — including Intune-focused automation specialists, RMM vendors adding deeper Intune hooks, and security platform integrators — are all racing to secure the MSP operational layer.
For MSPs, the pragmatic strategy is to treat these platforms as modular building blocks: centralize what you can where it reduces headcount and increases margins, but retain the ability to stitch alternative vendors into your stack where specialized capabilities are required. The next wave of managed services will blend baseline automation, SOC-grade telemetry, and repeatable Copilot enablement to deliver measurable business outcomes rather than ticket-driven revenue.

---

The near-term timeline and what to watch for​

• October 1, 2025: Microsoft’s release wave 2 general availability window for role-based Copilot offerings and other AI features begins. This pushes the calendar for tenant readiness projects — MSPs should expect customers to ask for Copilot pilots shortly after GA windows open. inforcer has signalled a major platform release and a Copilot readiness assessment in October, aligning to Microsoft’s cadence. Validate actual release dates and feature parity in vendor release notes.
• Ongoing: Security Copilot integrations with Intune and Entra have moved from preview to broader availability, which means AI-assisted admin workflows are entering production use. MSPs should prioritize Copilot-related governance and data labeling before wide deployment to avoid inadvertent data exposure.
• Co-sell and partner enablement: participation in Microsoft partner initiatives and MISA can unlock technical engagement and GTM opportunities. Request direct Microsoft partner contacts and references as part of vendor evaluation to confirm the depth of any claimed collaboration.

---

Conclusion: measured enthusiasm, rigorous pilots​

inforcer’s Microsoft partnership and product roadmap represent a timely response to a clear operational pain for MSPs: managing Microsoft 365 at scale with predictable security and AI readiness. The company’s traction, funding, and roadmap suggest it can be a credible option for MSPs seeking to centralize policy management and operationalize Copilot enablement.
However, vendor claims should be validated through technical pilots, contract terms should protect against vendor lock-in, and exclusivity language should be verified with Microsoft if it factors into vendor selection. The stakes are real: Copilot and other AI-driven services can deliver major efficiency gains — but only when underlying data governance, sensitivity labeling, and tenant controls are airtight. The coming months (and the October release window) will be decisive: MSPs who validate tooling now will be best positioned to sell secure, repeatable AI-enabled services to their customers.

---

Source: Security Informed https://www.securityinformed.com/amp/news/inforcer-elevates-microsoft-365-management-msps-co-14053-ga-co-1758207701-ga.1758198724.html