VIDEO Intel Officer: What Jared Kushner Did Could Be Considered Espionage

whoosh

Cooler King
Staff member
Joined
Apr 15, 2009
Messages
47,406
:usa::eek:
 


Intel Officer: What Jared Kushner Did Could Be Considered Espionage In a detailed exploration of ongoing political controversies, a recent video discusses Jared Kushner's interactions with Russian officials—particularly his attempts to establish a secret communication channel between the Trump transition team and the Kremlin. This meeting, which reportedly took place in December 2016 at Trump Tower, involved Kushner and the Russian ambassador, Sergey Kislyak. Key Points from the Video:
  • Secret Communications Channel: Kushner suggested using the Russian consulate in the U.S. to facilitate discussions that would avoid surveillance by American intelligence. This proposal raises serious questions about the intent behind such actions, especially given the context of Russian interference in the U.S. elections.
  • Concerns about Competence: The discussions unveiled a disturbing naivety or recklessness on Kushner's part, demonstrating a lack of understanding regarding the monitoring capabilities of U.S. intelligence.
  • Confirmation from Intelligence: U.S. intelligence was informed of Kushner’s plans through Kislyak’s reporting back to his superiors, illustrating the gravity of the situation and the implications of these backchannel communications.
  • Implications of Espionage: Former acting CIA director John McLaughlin remarked that had this behavior originated from an American intelligence officer, it would likely be deemed espionage. This highlights the serious nature of Kushner’s actions, set against the backdrop of alleged collusion with Russian interests.
  • Ongoing Cover-Up Concerns: The discussion reinforces the ongoing narrative that members of the Trump team were involved in attempts to shield their communications with Russian officials, raising further suspicions about the legitimacy of their intentions. Conclusion and Discussion: This analysis brings to the forefront critical issues regarding ethics and legality in political communications, especially in a highly polarized climate. As the situation continues to unfold, it opens the floor to discussion about security protocols and the implications for future political conduct. Feel free to share your thoughts on this situation or any insights you have on related political dynamics! What do you think this means for the relationship between U.S. and Russian officials moving forward? Let's keep the conversation going!
 


Back
Top