Logically Launches NextGen Service Platform with UpSkill, MyShop, and Managed AI

Logically’s LogicON 2025 keynote revealed a deliberate three‑pronged push to reposition the company from a traditional MSP into what it calls a NextGen Service Provider—announcing an UpSkill Academy training partnership, a 24/7 eCommerce procurement portal named MyShop, and a new Managed AI Solution intended to bring governance, security and operational controls to enterprise AI adoption.

Background / Overview​

LogicON is Logically’s annual customer and partner conference where product roadmaps, channel initiatives and customer enablement programs are showcased. This year’s announcements focus on three business vectors: workforce enablement, procurement simplification, and operationalized AI. Those vectors map directly to the most pressing enterprise challenges in 2025—skills gaps for Copilot and other productivity AI tools, procurement friction for distributed IT estates, and the skyrocketing need for governed, auditable AI use in regulated environments.
Logically describes the cumulative aim as shifting IT from reactive caretaking into a strategic, cyber‑first enabler of business outcomes. The company frames these releases as proof points of evolution toward a full stack of managed services that combine people, commerce and secure AI delivery. The vendor’s own marketing and event materials emphasize workforce readiness, faster procurement cycles, and a secure wrapper for AI that prevents “shadow AI” use.

---

What Logically Announced at LogicON 2025​

1) UpSkill Academy Partnership — People as the strategic layer​

• Logically announced a partnership with UpSkill Academy (also appearing in concurrent partner releases) to deliver role‑based training focused on Microsoft Copilot, AI enablement, cybersecurity and other cloud skills. The program includes executive bootcamps and scaled learning tracks aimed at moving employees from access to effective, secure usage.
• The partnership is positioned to deliver:
• Role‑specific Copilot adoption programs for business users and IT.
• Executive education (AI for Business Leaders) to align C‑suite decision‑making.
• Preferential pricing and certification bundles for Logically customers.

2) MyShop — frictionless procurement and asset control​

• MyShop is Logically’s new always‑on eCommerce portal intended to simplify procurement, provide real‑time pricing and availability, and give customers tighter oversight of device and software purchases through a single managed interface. The portal is designed to cut procurement lead times and reduce administrative friction traditionally associated with MSP‑led sourcing.
• Key claimed benefits:
• Faster procurement cycles and visibility into orders.
• Standardized SKUs and pre‑approved catalog items to enforce policy.
• Billing and lifecycle tie‑ins to managed services to close the IT asset loop.

3) Managed AI Solution — governance, control and secure automation​

• The most strategically consequential announcement is the Managed AI Solution: a Logically‑managed, cyber‑first service to centralize AI access, enforce governance, and operationalize automation while keeping organizational data sovereignty and IP safeguards intact. The vendor positions this as an enterprise substitute for uncontrolled consumer AI tools.
• Capabilities Logically highlights:
• A single secure interface to access leading AI models and orchestrate workflows across thousands of systems.
• Governance and audit trails to make AI adoption defensible for compliance and cyber‑risk assessments.
• Managed services to eliminate shadow AI and to capture productivity benefits while controlling risk. Logically suggests the solution can enable up to 20% productivity gains through secure automation and enablement.

---

Why these announcements matter: Strategic implications​

Workforce readiness is the first mile of AI adoption​

Training programs that are well‑aligned to actual roles materially accelerate safe adoption. Logically’s UpSkill partnership—if executed with measurable learning outcomes and a path to behavior change—addresses one of the most common failure modes of enterprise AI projects: users have access but lack the knowledge to use AI securely and effectively. Role‑based training, coupled with Copilot adoption plans, reduces the risk of data leakage and poor prompt design while increasing ROI for AI pilots.

Procurement is a hidden operational lever​

Fragmented procurement creates shadow spend, stale inventories, and gaps between owned devices and managed controls. A 24/7 eCommerce portal integrated with the MSP’s lifecycle services reduces procurement friction, enables policy enforcement and shortens time‑to‑value for new devices and licenses. For enterprises with distributed branches, this is a pragmatic operational win—if the portal integrates cleanly with existing asset management and entitlement systems.

Managed AI reframes risk as a managed outcome​

Unmanaged AI usage by employees—“shadow AI”—remains an existential compliance and IP risk. Logically’s Managed AI Solution is explicitly designed to convert shadow AI into an auditable, governed platform that centralizes data handling, access controls, and automation workflows. That approach aligns with industry trends toward managed AI offerings from MSPs and CSPs that package governance, SSO, and telemetry into a single service wrapper.

---

Cross‑checking the claims: verification and context​

• The three product pillars and the UpSkill partnership were published in Logically’s LogicON news materials and in PR distributions summarizing the event. The core facts—UpSkill Academy partnership, MyShop launch, and the Managed AI Solution—are consistently described across vendor press releases.
• Logically’s broader platform history and operational claims (for example, its OpLogic intelligent MSP platform and industry accolades) are documented in the company’s public blog and award notices; those establish operational context for the Managed AI product and the company’s MSP pedigree. However, independent customer case studies quantifying the 20% productivity gain claim were not published alongside the announcement; that productivity number should be treated as an aspirational vendor figure until independent, third‑party validations or customer pilots are published. Treat that specific numeric claim with caution.

---

Strengths: What Logically brings to market​

• Integrated people + product approach. Combining training, procurement and managed AI reduces friction along three critical adoption axes: skills, supply chain, and operational governance. That end‑to‑end approach speaks to enterprises that need turnkey programs, not point solutions.
• Cyber‑first positioning. By foregrounding security and governance in the Managed AI offering, Logically aligns its product with regulatory trends and cyber insurance expectations that prioritize data provenance, audit trails, and controlled access. This reduces organizational risk compared with ad‑hoc Copilot or free AI tool usage.
• Channel and customer enablement. MyShop promises to speed acquisition while enforcing compliance policies; UpSkill addresses the human change management that often stalls AI programs. When combined with Logically’s existing OpLogic automation, these elements can create measurable operational uplift if integrated properly.

---

Risks and open questions — where scrutiny is required​

• Unverified productivity claims. The “up to 20% productivity gains” statement is a vendor projection and lacks public, verifiable customer data at announcement time. Organizations should require pilot metrics and baseline measurements before accepting this as an ROI guarantee. Proceed only after reviewing pilot results and independent benchmarks.
• Data residency and model hosting specifics. The announcement emphasizes “data sovereignty” and governance, but it does not specify where models are hosted, whether inference happens on‑prem, in a sovereign cloud, or in third‑party model providers’ clouds. Those technical deployment choices materially affect compliance posture and risk. Enterprises must demand deployment topology details and contractual commitments for data handling.
• Vendor lock‑in and platform dependency. Centralizing AI through a managed provider reduces shadow risk but can create dependency: model selection, workflow orchestration, and prompt logs may become platform‑specific artifacts. Procurement teams must insist on exportable logs, clear exit terms, and interoperability for future portability.
• Supply chain and procurement security. MyShop simplifies buying, but centralizing procurement also centralizes attack surface: payment systems, vendor catalogs, and automated provisioning connectors must be secured and independently audited. A breech at the procurement layer could cascade into device compromise.
• Operational scaling and support SLAs. Managed AI services add new operational dimensions—model updates, cost controls for inference, prompt auditing, and incident response for AI‑driven automation. Contracted SLAs, cost transparency for model usage, and 24/7 support commitments must be explicit.

---

Technical considerations for IT leaders evaluating Logically’s Managed AI​

Governance and compliance checklist​

• Data Flow Map: Require a full diagram showing data ingress, transient data retention during inference, and long‑term storage locations. Confirm whether logs include prompts, model outputs, and whether those are encrypted at rest.
• Identity and Access: Ensure SSO integration (Entra ID/Azure AD, Okta, etc.), RBAC, and just‑in‑time access controls are supported. Ask for proof of principle for conditional access policies.
• Auditability: Confirm immutable, tamper‑evident logging for prompts, responses, and actions taken by AI. Ensure logs are exportable for audits and eDiscovery.
• Model Management: Identify whether models are third‑party hosted or vendor‑operated, and who controls model updates. Clarify any fine‑tuning workflows and data used for retraining.
• Encryption and Key Management: Validate use of customer‑managed keys (CMK) where available, and options for BYOK for model data.
• SLA and Cost Controls: Require explicit SLAs for uptime, incident response, and clear pricing for inference and fine‑tuning to avoid billing surprises.

Integration and orchestration​

• Confirm connectors for common enterprise systems (HRIS, CRM, ServiceNow, Microsoft 365) and how the Managed AI handles connector credentials, secrets storage, and token rotation.
• Examine workflow orchestration: does the Managed AI offer secure, auditable triggers for automated actions (e.g., creating tickets, changing policies)? If so, ensure two‑step approvals are available for high‑risk actions.

Security testing and independent validation​

• Require third‑party penetration tests and privacy impact assessments. Ask for SOC 2, ISO 27001, or equivalent attestation covering the managed AI service components.
• Demand documentation for red‑team testing of AI workflows, including failure modes, hallucination controls, and poisoning resistance if model fine‑tuning is offered.

---

Procurement and pilot recommendations​

• Run a time‑boxed pilot (6–12 weeks) that includes baseline productivity metrics, security scenarios, and compliance tests. Measure concrete KPIs such as task completion time, error rates, and number of manual escalations avoided.
• Define success criteria up front: measurable productivity improvements, acceptable false‑positive/false‑negative rates in automation, and required compliance logs.
• Insist on data portability: export formats for prompt logs, workflows and any custom models or embeddings generated during the pilot.
• Test failover modes: ensure critical workflows have human in the loop and can be decoupled from AI if the service becomes unavailable.
• Negotiate exit and transition clauses including data return timelines, escrow of customizations, and assistance with migration to alternate providers.

These steps limit operational risk while giving procurement teams clear evidence to judge the program’s viability.

---

Competitive and market context​

Managed AI is rapidly becoming a core competency for MSPs that want to monetize AI adoption safely. Logically’s approach mirrors broader industry movement where service providers combine governance, SSO, telemetry and training to deliver enterprise‑grade AI. The difference for channel buyers will be the quality of integration, the clarity of SLAs, and the vendor’s ability to bring measurable outcomes rather than aspirational promises. Logically’s existing investments in automation (OpLogic) and MSP workflows give it an advantage in operational maturity, but buyers should evaluate prospective vendors on independent metrics and third‑party audits.

---

Practical checklist for IT and security teams (quick reference)​

• Confirm model hosting topology and data residency guarantees.
• Require SSO/RBAC, CMK support, and exportable immutable logs.
• Demand pilot KPIs and independent security attestations.
• Verify procurement portal security controls and API access governance.
• Insist on contractual cost transparency for model inference and fine‑tuning.
• Secure exit and portability clauses in the MSA.

---

Conclusion — pragmatic optimism, measured adoption​

Logically’s LogicON 2025 announcements are a coherent and market‑savvy response to three hard enterprise problems: lack of AI skills, procurement friction, and unmanaged AI risk. The combined proposition—training, a procurement platform, and a managed AI stack—addresses adoption from people to process to platform. If Logically can deliver robust technical transparency around model hosting, provide independent security attestations, and demonstrate measurable pilot outcomes, the offering will be compelling to mid‑market and enterprise customers seeking a low‑friction route to secure AI adoption.
At the same time, buyers must insist on proof—quantified pilot results, clear deployment topologies, and auditable logs—before signing long‑term commitments. Vendor promises of productivity gains and governance are useful starting points, but only hard metrics, transparent contracts, and tested operational controls will turn those promises into sustainable business value. Proceed with structured pilots, insist on third‑party validation, and keep exit paths open.

---

Quick action plan for IT leaders evaluating Logically’s announcements​

• Request a technical whitepaper detailing Managed AI deployment options and data flows.
• Ask for SOC 2 or ISO attestation covering the MyShop and Managed AI components.
• Schedule a 6–12 week pilot with defined KPIs and data export requirements.
• Verify UpSkill Academy course outlines and certification paths for Copilot adoption.
• Negotiate pricing transparency and exit terms prior to procurement portal activation.

These pragmatic steps will convert the LogicON announcements from marketing claims into verifiable outcomes for organizations seeking secure, productive, and governable AI adoption.

---

Source: The Malaysian Reserve https://themalaysianreserve.com/202...-the-future-of-secure-and-intelligent-it/amp/

 

[ChatGPT]

Logically’s LogicON 2025 keynote has delivered a tightly coordinated push to turn managed IT services into a single, auditable pathway for secure AI adoption, workforce enablement, and streamlined procurement — announcing three linked innovations that together reposition the company from a traditional MSP toward what it calls a “NextGen Service Provider.” The announcements — a strategic training partnership with UpSkill Academy, a 24/7 eCommerce procurement portal named MyShop, and a new Managed AI Solution — were introduced as complementary moves to solve three persistent enterprise problems: skills gaps for productivity AI, procurement friction across distributed estates, and the operational and compliance risks of unmanaged AI use.

Background / Overview​

LogicON is Logically’s annual customer and partner conference where product roadmaps, channel initiatives and customer enablement programs are showcased. The 2025 agenda emphasized pragmatic, outcome-driven adoption of AI across mid-market and enterprise customers: train people to use AI safely, make buying and lifecycle control frictionless, and wrap AI with governance and auditability so it can be deployed at scale without becoming a compliance liability. That three‑pronged strategy — People, Procurement, Platform — is the organizing logic behind the UpSkill, MyShop and Managed AI announcements.
Logically frames these changes as a move beyond break‑fix support into managed outcomes: the company’s pitch is to shift IT from reactive caretaking to strategic, cyber‑first enablement of business goals by combining training, commerce and governed AI services into a single operating model. That market positioning places Logically squarely in the fast‑growing class of MSPs packaging AI governance and enablement as managed services.

---

What Logically Announced​

UpSkill Academy Partnership — People as the strategic layer​

Logically announced a partnership with UpSkill Academy that brings role‑based, enterprise training focused on Microsoft Copilot, AI enablement, cybersecurity and cloud skills to its customer base. The program will include executive bootcamps (AI for Business Leaders), Copilot adoption tracks, and scaled learning for business users and IT administrators, plus preferred partner pricing for Logically customers. The UpSkill release positions this as the “first mile” of safe AI adoption: giving users the knowledge to use Copilot‑style tools effectively and securely.
Why this matters: uncontrolled access to AI is only half the problem; lack of competent usage — poor prompts, unsafe data handling, and workflow design that leaks IP — is the other. A structured training path that maps to specific roles can materially reduce misuse and accelerate measurable ROI if the program is implemented with behavior‑change metrics rather than only completion certificates.

MyShop — frictionless procurement and lifecycle control​

MyShop is Logically’s always‑on eCommerce portal that aims to collapse procurement lead times, standardize SKUs, and tie purchases directly to managed service lifecycles and policy enforcement. For distributed organizations and franchise‑style estates, MyShop promises centralized oversight with the speed of retail checkout, real‑time pricing and availability, and integration points back into asset management and billing. The portal is presented as a way to remove procurement as an adoption bottleneck while enforcing security and procurement policies.
Practical value proposition: faster time‑to‑value for new devices and licenses, policy enforcement at the point of purchase, and tighter integration between acquisition, provisioning and lifecycle support — all of which reduce shadow spend and stale inventories that undermine IT control. Integration quality (APIs, entitlement sync, asset catalog matching) will determine whether MyShop is a genuine operational win or an additional silo.

Managed AI Solution — governance, control and secure automation​

The centerpiece announcement is a Managed AI Solution: a Logically‑managed, cyber‑first service that centralizes AI access, enforces governance, and operationalizes automation while protecting data sovereignty and intellectual property. Key vendor claims include a single secure interface to leading AI models, orchestration for automation workflows across potentially thousands of systems, governance and audit trails for compliance, and managed services designed to eliminate “shadow AI.” Logically also suggested the solution could enable up to 20% productivity gains through secure automation and enablement.
Critical note: the 20% productivity figure appears as a vendor projection in the announcement materials and was not accompanied by independent customer case studies at the time of the release. Treat that specific numeric claim as aspirational until third‑party pilot results or independent benchmarks are published.

---

Technical and Operational Analysis​

What the Managed AI Solution must deliver to be credible​

Enterprises buying a managed AI service are buying more than model access; they’re buying contractual guarantees about data handling, auditability, and controllability. The announcement signals the right priorities, but technical verification matters. At a minimum, procurement teams should demand clear answers on:

• Hosting topology: Are models hosted on‑prem, in a sovereign cloud region, or via third‑party model provider clouds? Data egress, residency and inference locality are fundamental compliance variables.
• Identity and access: Support for SSO/RBAC and integration with Microsoft Entra ID (or equivalent). Two‑step approvals for high‑risk actions should be available.
• Key management: Customer‑managed keys (CMK) for encryption at rest and in transit where regulatory posture demands custody.
• Transparent telemetry: Immutable, exportable logs of prompts, responses, embeddings and workflow runs — in formats that allow forensic analysis and portability.
• Audit and attestations: SOC 2/ISO 27001 or equivalent attestation covering the managed service and regular third‑party red‑team testing.
• Fail‑safe design: Human‑in‑the‑loop controls on critical tasks, and graceful failover to pre‑AI workflows if services degrade.

These items are not optional for regulated sectors; they are preconditions. The LogicON material acknowledges these concerns in high level, but buyers must require technical whitepapers and contractual language that specify the above before committing.

Integration and portability concerns​

Centralizing AI through a vendor-managed platform reduces shadow use but increases vendor dependency. Practical risks include platform‑specific artifacts (prompt logs, workflow DSLs, or proprietary orchestrators) that make migration costly. Procurement teams must insist on:

• Export formats and migration assistance for prompts, embeddings and any custom models.
• Exit and transition clauses with timelines for data return and configuration escrow.
• Transparent cost models for inference, fine‑tuning and storage to avoid surprise bills.

If those protections are missing or vague, the convenience of an integrated Managed AI service could become long‑term lock‑in.

Security posture and independent validation​

The announcement repeatedly invokes “data sovereignty” and governance, but lacked detailed technical topology in the public materials. Independent validation is non‑negotiable:

• Require a current SOC 2 Type II (or equivalent) report that explicitly covers AI‑handling processes.
• Ask for results of red‑team and adversarial testing of model chaining, prompt injection mitigations, and embedding poisoning resistance.
• Demand a privacy impact assessment for how the service processes personal data and whether pseudonymization or differential privacy techniques are used for embeddings.

Vendors that are serious about enterprise AI will have independent attestations and test reports ready for procurement review; those that don’t should be subject to a time‑boxed pilot, not long‑term commitments.

---

Market Context and Competitive Landscape​

Managed AI is rapidly becoming a core competency for MSPs that want to monetize AI adoption safely. Logically’s approach — combining governance, SSO, telemetry, and training — mirrors industry trends where channel providers package an enterprise‑grade wrapper around model access. What differentiates success in this segment will be:

• Operational maturity: Can the MSP deliver predictable SLAs and consistent telemetry?
• Integration depth: Does the managed AI platform integrate cleanly with existing ITSM, identity, and asset management stacks?
• Proof of outcomes: Are there measurable pilot metrics showing productivity or operational efficiency gains?

Logically’s existing automation investments (its OpLogic platform and managed services pedigree) provide operational credibility, but market differentiation will depend on third‑party validation and clear case studies.

---

Strengths — Where Logically’s Play Makes Sense​

• Coherent go‑to‑market: Packaging training (UpSkill), procurement (MyShop) and governance (Managed AI) addresses three real friction points along an adoption journey rather than delivering disjoint point solutions. This end‑to‑end framing is attractive to mid‑market buyers who lack deep internal AI program management.
• Cyber‑first posture: By foregrounding governance and audit trails in the Managed AI solution, Logically aligns the product with regulatory and cyber‑insurance expectations that emphasize data provenance and defensible controls. That’s a practical pitch for regulated industries.
• Channel enablement potential: MyShop and UpSkill can lower the commercial and change‑management barriers that often slow rollouts, giving Logically a path to faster adoption cycles and clearer license capture.

---

Risks, Gaps and What Buyers Should Probe​

• Unverified productivity claims. The “up to 20% productivity gains” language is a vendor projection in the announcement and lacks third‑party validation at publication time. Buyers should require time‑boxed pilots with pre‑ and post‑KPIs.
• Model hosting and data residency ambiguity. The releases emphasize “data sovereignty” but do not detail hosting topologies. This is a critical open question for customers in regulated sectors. Demand explicit deployment options in writing.
• Potential vendor lock‑in. Centralized management of prompts, workflows and models can create migration barriers. Insist on exportable artifacts and well‑defined exit mechanics before signing multi‑year agreements.
• Procurement security assumptions. MyShop’s value depends on strong API integration with asset and entitlement systems and on secure procurement controls; if integration is shallow, MyShop risks becoming another admin silo. Validate integration capabilities and security posture during evaluation.

---

Practical Recommendations for IT and Security Teams​

Below is a pragmatic, prioritized checklist for organizations evaluating Logically’s LogicON 2025 offerings (or any vendor making similar managed AI claims).

Immediate (RFP / Procurement stage)​

• Request a technical whitepaper explaining model hosting topologies (on‑prem, sovereign cloud, vendor cloud) and data flows.
• Require SOC 2/ISO 27001 attestations covering the Managed AI and MyShop components; request recent penetration test summaries.
• Insist on contract language for exportable, immutable logs, CMK support, and defined SLAs for data return on termination.

Pilot design (6–12 weeks recommended)​

• Define measurable KPIs up front: task completion time, error rates, escalation counts, and user satisfaction. Establish baseline metrics before pilot start.
• Include both productivity and security scenarios: sample prompts that include regulated data, mock incident response tasks, and compliance audits.
• Test portability: export prompt logs and embeddings mid‑pilot and validate format and completeness.

Operational controls (if moving to production)​

• Implement least‑privilege RBAC and two‑step approvals for high‑impact workflows. Monitor for unusual chaining and conduct periodic red‑team testing.
• Maintain human‑in‑the‑loop gates for decision workflows affecting PII, financial transactions, or safety‑critical outcomes.
• Negotiate a clear exit playbook and data escrow for custom automations or fine‑tuned models.

---

Implications for Windows‑Centric Environments​

Logically’s emphasis on Copilot adoption and role‑based training aligns with a broad ecosystem push — Microsoft itself continues to build Copilot Studio education and agent training tracks, and MS’s enterprise Copilot rollouts have made role‑tailored learning an expected part of vendor offerings. Integrations with Microsoft Entra ID and Defender stacks are likely prerequisites for deep enterprise adoption; procurement teams should check how Logically’s managed stack integrates with Microsoft identity and audit telemetry.
For Windows server and endpoint managers, the managed AI proposition is attractive only if it supports existing identity, logging and SIEM workflows; otherwise, it adds another telemetry silo rather than simplifying operations. Ask for pre‑built connectors to your SIEM, M365 audit logs, and any ticketing/ITSM systems used for lifecycle automation.

---

Verdict — Pragmatic Optimism, Demanding Proof​

Logically’s LogicON 2025 announcements are a coherent, market‑savvy response to three hard enterprise problems: lack of AI skills, procurement friction, and unmanaged AI risk. The combined proposition — training + procurement + a managed AI wrapper — is sensible and addresses adoption across people, process, and platform. That said, the offering’s real value will depend on operational depth, technical transparency, and empirical outcomes.

• If Logically supplies detailed deployment topologies, strong independent security attestations, exportable artifacts and measurable pilot results, the Managed AI Solution could become a pragmatic path to secure AI for mid‑market enterprises.
• If the vendor’s materials remain high level and the productivity metrics are unverifiable marketing claims, buyers should insist on short pilots and protect themselves contractually against lock‑in.

At present, the announcements are a credible blueprint — but they remain vendor promises until proven in the field. Procurement and security teams should treat the LogicON news as an invitation to test, measure and validate, not as a turnkey replacement for governance and risk management disciplines that are already required.

---

Quick Action Plan for IT Leaders Evaluating Logically​

• Ask Logically for a technical whitepaper that specifies model hosting options, data residency guarantees, and the exact telemetry exported for audits.
• Negotiate pilot KPIs and a 6–12 week proof‑of‑value engagement with contractual right to exit if KPIs aren’t met.
• Request SOC 2/ISO evidence, recent pen‑test reports, and a privacy impact assessment for the Managed AI workflows.
• Validate MyShop’s API integrations with your asset and entitlement systems in a sandbox before routing real procurement through the portal.
• Prioritize role‑based UpSkill tracks that map to your highest‑value Copilot automation targets and require measurable behavioral outcomes (not just completion certificates).

---

Logically’s LogicON 2025 is directing attention to the right problems and proposing a sensible stack to solve them. The combination of training, frictionless procurement, and governed AI could materially reduce both operational friction and compliance risk — provided that the vendor’s technical and contractual deliverables stand up to scrutiny. The next step for buyers is structured pilots, hard KPIs, and insistence on third‑party attestations; that discipline will separate hopeful marketing from operationally reliable managed AI.

---

Source: StreetInsider Logically Unveils Three New Innovations at LogicON 2025, Advancing the Future of Secure and Intelligent IT