Lyon Transitions to Open-Source Software, Pioneering Europe's Digital Sovereignty Shift

In a striking illustration of shifting digital sovereignty priorities across Europe, Lyon, France’s third-largest city, has announced its decisive transition away from Microsoft software, embracing a suite of open-source alternatives in a move set to reverberate throughout the continent’s public sector. The city’s plan, formally outlined in a public memo, is more than a mere technology upgrade: it marks a conscious pivot toward reducing foreign software dependencies, extending hardware lifespans, and fostering European innovation as geopolitical tensions with the United States increasingly shape government technology choices.

The Lyon Departure: Motivation, Scope, and Execution​

Lyon’s decision aligns with a broader European trend of public institutions questioning the long-term viability of proprietary software ecosystems. For Lyon, the rationale is multifaceted:

• Digital Sovereignty: By transferring operations to open-source platforms such as OnlyOffice (developed by Latvian engineers), Linux, and PostgreSQL, Lyon’s municipality aims to regain control over its data and software infrastructure. This effort diminishes reliance on American tech giants whose software has dominated the public sector but whose legal frameworks can sometimes conflict with EU privacy and localization laws.
• Hardware Longevity: Unlike Microsoft’s commercial products, which impose set end-of-life (EOL) dates and deprecation cycles—Windows 10, for instance, will cease official support in October 2025—open-source systems enable municipalities to prolong hardware usability, reducing e-waste and the economic burden of frequent upgrades.
• Environmental Responsibility: By deferring forced hardware refreshes, Lyon aligns its IT strategy with broader urban sustainability targets, lowering environmental impact through reduced procurement and disposal activities.

The scale of the undertaking is remarkable: Lyon’s city government employs approximately 10,000 staff, each of whom will be guided through extensive retraining and upskilling programs to make the leap from Microsoft Office and Windows to open-source replacements.

What Does the Transition Look Like in Practice?​

Lyon’s technology roadmap is ambitious yet pragmatic. The city is migrating to OnlyOffice for productivity needs, Linux as the core operating system, and PostgreSQL for enterprise-grade database management. For video conferencing and office workflow automation, Territoire Numérique Ouvert—a European open-source suite—will replace Microsoft Teams and related cloud offerings. This systematic approach not only addresses core office functions but also attempts to provide a European, open alternative for virtually every key productivity category.
The city’s administrators have acknowledged the considerable organizational challenge the transition entails. Large-scale retraining is required to ensure productivity does not collapse during the migration. Technology transitions at this scale, especially to open-source tools, often bring compatibility headaches and user resistance, as demonstrated by Munich’s much-publicized but ultimately reversed attempt in the previous decade.

The European Context: Lyon Is Not Alone​

Lyon’s seismic software shift is part of an accelerating continental movement. In Germany, the state of Schleswig-Holstein announced it will end all contracts for Microsoft software—including Teams—progressively replacing them with open-source solutions. Neighboring Danish cities, notably Copenhagen and Aarhus, are reportedly exploring similar moves. These parallel stories frame Lyon’s action not as an isolated rebellion, but as a leading indicator of a broad EU realignment around digital autonomy.
The momentum reflects several converging trends:

• Rising Geopolitical Tensions: Transatlantic disagreements over data privacy, antitrust, and digital taxation have made EU officials wary of overreliance on U.S. platforms.
• National Legislation: Countries like France and Germany are embedding open-source preference clauses and data localization requirements into public procurement law.
• EU-Driven Projects: The European Commission continues to invest in open-source stacks for government, aiming to create viable “European clouds” and productivity platforms.

Advantages: What Does Lyon Stand to Gain?​

Lyon’s open-source pivot—if executed well—offers a range of strategic and tactical benefits:

1. Enhanced Digital Sovereignty​

Open-source tools offer governments source code access, autonomy in deployment, and control over updates and security. This independence is increasingly vital as cross-border data transfer laws become more stringent and as the threat of extra-territorial measures looms larger.

2. Cost Predictability and Potential Savings​

Proprietary licenses and subscriptions from Microsoft and similar vendors represent major line-items in municipal budgets. By adopting open-source alternatives, Lyon anticipates reducing long-term software licensing costs, although these savings must be balanced against spending on training, migration, and occasional compatibility workarounds.

3. Environmental Stewardship​

EOL-driven hardware obsolescence drives unnecessary e-waste. By freeing itself from Microsoft’s upgrade treadmill, Lyon expects to extend the usable life of existing hardware, in turn reducing carbon footprint associated with continuous equipment refreshes.

4. Customizability and Innovation​

Open-source platforms allow cities to tailor features to local needs, foster local tech ecosystems, and drive public sector innovation. With European developers at the helm of projects such as OnlyOffice and Territoire Numérique Ouvert, the benefits extend beyond IT and into local economic development.

Risks and Challenges: Proceeding with Eyes Wide Open​

While Lyon’s move has been widely lauded by open-source advocates, the historical record urges caution. Municipal open-source migrations have met with mixed results:

1. Compatibility and Interoperability​

Real-world public sector organizations must interact with national agencies, citizens, and external partners, many of whom standardize on Microsoft formats. Perfect fidelity in document rendering and complex macros is rarely achievable in alternative suites, risking workflow disruption.

2. User Experience and Training Overhead​

Familiarity breeds efficiency. Employees who have spent years in Microsoft Office face a steep learning curve in transitioning to new interfaces and paradigms. If retraining programs are underfunded or staff engagement is low, frustrating dips in productivity can ensue.

3. Legacy Systems Integration​

Much of public sector IT remains tied to proprietary Windows applications, custom-built over decades for everything from accounting to government records. Migrating, replacing, or emulating these systems is expensive and occasionally impossible.

4. Reversal Risk​

Munich’s “LiMux” saga is the cautionary counterweight to migration optimism. After a decade building a Linux-based municipal IT environment, the city council eventually reversed course, reverting to Microsoft platforms due to persistent compatibility difficulties and end-user frustration. While Lyon’s leadership is aware of this precedent, the risk of a similar reversal remains should technical, operational, or political challenges prove overwhelming.

How Are Open-Source Solutions Maturing?​

Advocates argue—justifiably—that the open-source ecosystem of 2025 is far more robust than it was when Munich began its journey. Major productivity platforms now offer cloud collaboration and mobile integration, and the ability to follow familiar Microsoft formats has improved.

• OnlyOffice: Built for interoperability with Microsoft formats (.docx, .xlsx, .pptx), OnlyOffice strives for high-fidelity document rendering and supports web-based and desktop environments. Its growing user base across European government attests to its viability, though real-world edge cases persist.
• Linux: No longer the exclusive domain of technologists, desktop Linux distributions now offer user-friendly experiences and streamlined update management. Major vendors provide long-term support necessary for stable government operations.
• Territoire Numérique Ouvert: Designed for European public administration, this suite addresses GDPR requirements, local language support, and accessibility standards out of the box.

Vendor Response and Broader Industry Impact​

Despite Lyon’s visibility as a high-profile customer, Microsoft is unlikely to experience direct revenue pain from a single municipality’s departure. The symbolic value, however, is real. Should similarly sized (or larger) public bodies across Europe follow suit, the cumulative effect may force U.S. tech giants to reconsider pricing, licensing flexibility, and regional data localization strategies.
Thus far, Microsoft has publicly emphasized both the strengths of its public sector offerings and its commitment to EU-specific trust and compliance initiatives. However, real concessions—such as source code audits, deeper European cloud partnerships, and more granular data localization—are emerging only slowly.

The Road Ahead: Will the Open-Source Migration Succeed?​

The ultimate success or failure of Lyon’s open-source journey will hinge on several key factors:

1. Executive Commitment​

Strong pronouncements must translate into sustained investment in change management, support services, and responsive IT helpdesks. If transition fatigue sets in or political winds shift, the project could lose momentum.

2. End-User Involvement​

Inclusive transition strategies—engaging staff throughout the process, gathering feedback, and rapidly addressing problems—can smooth resistance and uncover issues before they become systemic hurdles.

3. Measured, Gradual Rollouts​

Successful migrations often unfold in phases: pilot groups, gradual expansion, and careful prioritization of legacy application porting. Rushed, “big-bang” rollouts magnify the risk of major disruption.

4. Community and Vendor Support​

The open-source world thrives on collaboration. By engaging actively with upstream projects, sharing improvements, and investing in local developer communities, Lyon can help ensure its chosen platforms remain robust and responsive over time.

The Ripple Effect: What It Means for Other Cities​

For other urban policymakers, Lyon’s transition is instructive. The city’s willingness to openly recount its successes and setbacks will provide a crucial playbook for peers considering similar steps. Cities large and small increasingly recognize their IT decisions as questions of political, economic, and environmental strategy.
Forward-looking local governments are wise to evaluate the following when charting their software futures:

• Vendor Lock-In Risk: Understanding the long-term implications of a single-supplier IT stack, especially when future costs or policy shifts may constrain flexibility.
• Sovereignty and Regulatory Compliance: Ensuring contractual terms support local legal mandates, especially where personal data is involved.
• Sustainability: Incorporating environmental footprint analysis into technology refresh cycles and procurement decisions.

Conclusion: A Defining Moment for Digital Sovereignty​

Lyon’s strategic retreat from Microsoft in favor of European and open-source software is both a technological and a political act. As digital autonomy ascends the European agenda, the city stands as a test case for the balance between control and convenience, sustainability and compatibility, cost and capability.
While risks abound—most notably around user experience, legacy interoperability, and potential reversals—the direction of travel is clear. European cities, ever more mindful of data sovereignty, digital independence, and environmental responsibility, are charting a new course for public sector IT. Lyon’s experience will not only shape its own digital destiny, but its successes and setbacks will serve as a blueprint for governments across the continent seeking to reclaim agency over their technological infrastructure.
If early signs hold, Lyon just might prove that the future of municipal IT in Europe can indeed be open, sustainable, and sovereign. The world—Microsoft included—will be watching closely.

---

Source: TechRadar One of France's largest cities has now also ditched Microsoft for open source software