Microsoft Store Waives Individual Developer Fee to Boost Indie Windows Apps

Microsoft's decision to remove the registration fee for individual developers publishing to the Microsoft Store is more than a pricing change — it's a clear signal that the company intends to make the Store a lower-friction, broader distribution channel for independent Windows software creators. The new onboarding flow waives the longstanding one‑time fee for individual accounts, replaces credit‑card gating with an identity‑verification step (government ID + selfie), and routes new publishers through a guided storefront sign‑up that feeds directly into Partner Center. (learn.microsoft.com)

Background​

Why this matters now​

For years the Microsoft Store carried two reputational problems: limited app types and a nontrivial onboarding cost that could deter hobbyists and small creators. Since the Windows 11 Store redesign and the broader opening of the platform to Win32, PWAs, Electron and other frameworks, Microsoft has worked to rebuild trust and attract more publishers. The latest change removes a direct financial barrier that disproportionately affected independent and emerging developers.

What Microsoft officially changed​

• Zero registration fee for individuals (flighted/rollout markets). Microsoft has implemented a new onboarding flow that waives the prior $19 one‑time charge for individual developer accounts in markets where the flow is available. Company/organization registrations still follow the legacy fee structure. (learn.microsoft.com)
• Simplified sign‑up path. New entrants must begin at the Store's marketing sign‑up page and follow a guided flow into Partner Center; this path omits the credit card requirement and replaces it with an ID‑based verification step. (learn.microsoft.com)
• Identity verification to reduce abuse. The new flow uses a government ID plus a selfie to verify identity for individual publishers — a friction point intended to protect end users and publisher reputation. (learn.microsoft.com)

---

Overview: Who benefits and what stays the same​

Beneficiaries​

• Hobbyists and solo developers who were previously discouraged by the small upfront cost or lack of accepted payment methods.
• Creators in emerging markets where credit card access is limited; removing the card requirement reduces a key adoption barrier. (techcrunch.com)
• Publishers who want Store distribution without Microsoft commerce. Non‑gaming apps can still choose to bring their own payment flow and retain the full revenue from sales processed outside Microsoft’s payment stack. (support.microsoft.com)

What remains unchanged​

• Company accounts still pay a registration fee. Organizations publishing under a business identity continue to use the legacy Partner Center onboarding (fee varies by market). (learn.microsoft.com)
• Identity checks and anti‑fraud measures are enforced. The new free flow trades monetary verification for ID verification as a mitigator against account abuse. (learn.microsoft.com)

---

Technical and platform details​

Supported app formats​

Microsoft's Store already supports a wide set of Windows application formats. The waiver and onboarding changes apply to developers publishing the following:

• Win32 (traditional desktop)
• UWP (Universal Windows Platform)
• .NET and .NET MAUI apps
• Progressive Web Apps (PWA)
• Electron apps
• MSIX‑packaged apps (recommended for Windows distribution)
  This inclusive approach is a continuation of the Store's multi‑packaging strategy that began in earnest with the Windows 11 Store redesign. (theverge.com)

MSIX, code signing and hosting​

For developers packaging apps as MSIX, Microsoft provides a simplified distribution story when publishing through the Store:

• Server‑side signing and publisher mapping. If you submit an unsigned or differently‑signed MSIX package to the Store, Microsoft's submission pipeline will sign the package with a Store‑trusted certificate and ensure the publisher metadata matches Partner Center records, avoiding common signature mismatches that break installs. (learn.microsoft.com)
• Store hosting and updates. When distributed through the Store, Microsoft hosts packages and delivers updates through the platform’s auto‑update mechanisms, removing the need for developers to run their own CDN and update checks. This reduces operational overhead for many small teams. (learn.microsoft.com)

Note: the specifics of code‑signing workflows (Azure SignTool, Azure Key Vault, or traditional certificates) remain relevant for CI/CD and sideloading scenarios; the Store’s signing step simplifies the consumer install flow but does not eliminate the need to manage signing in enterprise or pipeline contexts. (techcommunity.microsoft.com)

---

Commerce and monetization: more developer choice​

Bring‑your‑own billing​

One of the most consequential policy changes in recent years for the Microsoft Store has been the option for developers to use external billing systems for non‑gaming apps. Under this approach:

• Developers can integrate their own payment processors and manage purchases and refunds outside Microsoft's commerce platform.
• Microsoft will not take a cut on transactions processed entirely through developer‑controlled billing for those categories of apps that the policy permits. (support.microsoft.com)

Microsoft Commerce remains optional and attractive​

Developers who choose Microsoft’s commerce tooling still gain:

• Global payment coverage, easier tax handling, and integrated receipts/payouts.
• Lower platform fees in many cases compared with mobile storefronts, and streamlined distribution and discoverability benefits. (windowscentral.com)

Enterprise distribution and Intune integration​

The Store also supports enterprise scenarios:

• Integration with Intune and Microsoft Endpoint Manager allows IT teams to push Store entries (including line‑of‑business apps) to managed fleets, leveraging the same packaging and update pipeline. This hybrid route is valuable for devs aiming at commercial customers.

---

Reach and discoverability​

Microsoft’s claimed audience​

Microsoft reports that the Store reaches over 250 million monthly active users, which is significant reach for desktop software distribution. That scale matters for discoverability and user acquisition strategies. (blogs.windows.com)

Discoverability implications​

Listing in the Store is not a guarantee of downloads, but the Store’s current feature set (editorial curation, personalized home pages, and AI‑driven recommendations) improves organic discovery versus raw web distribution — especially for utility and productivity software that benefits from centralized trust signals. (blogs.windows.com)

---

Practical onboarding: step‑by‑step for new individual publishers​

• Start at the Microsoft Store developer marketing page (the new guided sign‑up route) and choose the Individual account type. The free onboarding flow is currently being flighted in many markets; if your region isn’t yet included you may still see the legacy flow. (learn.microsoft.com)
• Sign in with your personal Microsoft account (MSA). No corporate tax documentation is required for individual enrollment. (developer.microsoft.com)
• Complete the ID verification step — upload a government‑issued ID and a selfie as prompted. This step replaces the previous credit card requirement for identity confirmation. (learn.microsoft.com)
• Reserve your app name in Partner Center, prepare your package (MSIX recommended), and submit. If you’re publishing via MSIX and submit an unsigned package, the Store signing process will apply a trusted signature for distribution. (learn.microsoft.com)
• Choose whether to use Microsoft Commerce or to implement your own in‑app payments for non‑gaming products; configure enterprise distribution if you plan to target organizations via Intune. (support.microsoft.com)

---

Benefits — what developers (and Microsoft) gain​

• Lowered friction = more creators. Removing the fee and the credit card gate reduces a measurable barrier for hobbyists, students, and creators in markets with limited payment infrastructure. That likely increases the breadth of available apps on the Store. (techcrunch.com)
• Operational simplicity. Packaging with MSIX and using Store hosting/signing removes headaches around certificate management, CDN hosting, and update orchestration for small teams. (learn.microsoft.com)
• Flexible monetization. Choice between Microsoft’s commerce tools and developer‑managed billing lets teams design business models that match their needs while preserving Store discoverability. (support.microsoft.com)
• Stronger platform credibility. ID verification and Store curation aim to reduce fraud and counterfeit apps, improving customer trust and potentially reducing support burdens on indie publishers. (learn.microsoft.com)

---

Risks, caveats and unanswered questions​

1) Identity verification raises privacy and inclusivity concerns​

Replacing a credit card requirement with government ID + selfie shifts the friction point to identity privacy. For creators in countries with thin or inconsistent ID systems, or for privacy‑conscious developers, the requirement may still be a barrier. Microsoft’s guidance indicates ID data is used for verification and handled per privacy standards, but independent privacy assessments or third‑party audits are not publicly detailed in the onboarding documentation. Developers with privacy concerns should treat this as a trade‑off and examine the verification experience closely. (learn.microsoft.com)

2) Flighting and uneven rollout​

The free onboarding flow is being flighted: some markets and entry points use the new flow while others still show the legacy paid registration in Partner Center. That inconsistency will create confusion for publishers trying to sign up right away. Microsoft’s support channels and Partner Center notes reflect ongoing updates about availability. If you see a fee still displayed, the recommendation is to use the Store marketing sign‑up entry as instructed or wait for regional rollout. (learn.microsoft.com)

3) Discoverability is still competitive​

A free listing does not guarantee user attention. The Store now hosts many more apps than it did a few years ago, so standing out will still require metadata optimization, marketing, editorial relationships, or paid promotion. The economic benefit of free onboarding may be limited for developers who lack the resources to promote their app after listing.

4) Policy and enforcement details​

The long‑term specifics around which app categories can use external payments, and precisely how Microsoft enforces buyer protections and refunds for third‑party billing flows, remain subject to policy clarifications. Developers implementing external payments must ensure they follow Microsoft’s in‑app policy rules to avoid takedowns or delisting. Existing help pages outline the principles, but edge cases deserve caution. (support.microsoft.com)

---

Competitive comparison: how Microsoft’s move stacks up​

• Google Play: charges a one‑time $25 developer registration fee (historically), though Google has offered various waivers for certain regions/programs. Microsoft’s zero‑fee move for individuals undercuts that barrier. (techcrunch.com)
• Apple App Store: charges an annual $99 fee for the Apple Developer Program for both individuals and organizations; Microsoft’s free individual option is a clear differentiator. (techcrunch.com)

Net result: Microsoft has created one of the lowest cost entry points among major app platforms for independent PC developers, trading monetary verification for identity verification and continuing to emphasize developer choice.

---

Practical recommendations for Windows developers​

• Prepare an MSIX pipeline. MSIX simplifies Store submission and ensures Microsoft can apply its Store signature. Use Azure Key Vault or Azure SignTool in CI/CD if you need signed artifacts for testing or enterprise distribution. (learn.microsoft.com)
• Decide your commerce path early. If you want to keep 100% of revenue and you’re building a SaaS or license model, confirm the Store policy for your product category and test refund/customer support handling with your payment provider. (support.microsoft.com)
• Treat the Store listing as a marketing asset. Invest in screenshots, short explainer videos, concise descriptions, and consider promotional codes or launch discounts to accelerate discoverability. The Store’s editorial and curated features can amplify well‑presented apps.
• Document privacy choices and be ready for verification. Make sure your publisher display name, TOS, and privacy policies are consistent and ready to show if Partner Center requests additional documentation during verification. (learn.microsoft.com)

---

Conclusion​

Removing the registration fee for individual Microsoft Store publishers is a practical, developer‑friendly change that aligns with Microsoft’s broader efforts to open the Windows app ecosystem and reduce friction for independent creators. The combination of flexible commerce options, improved MSIX support (including Store signing and hosting), and the Store’s expanding reach creates a compelling proposition for small teams and hobbyists who want broad Windows distribution without heavy operational costs.
That said, the move is not a panacea. Identity verification replaces one form of friction with another, rollout is phased and inconsistent, and discoverability remains a competitive challenge. For developers who value distribution scale and trust signals — and who can navigate ID verification and listing strategy — the Store now represents a lower‑cost, lower‑maintenance path to reach Windows users at scale. (learn.microsoft.com)

---

Important verification note: the free onboarding flow is a flighted change, and its availability can vary by market and sign‑up entry path; if you encounter legacy pricing in Partner Center, use the Store marketing entrypoint or consult Microsoft support until your market is included in the new flow. (learn.microsoft.com)

---

Source: Digital Information World Microsoft Drops Store Fees for Independent Windows Developers

 

[ChatGPT]

Microsoft's decision to remove the Microsoft Store registration fee for individual developers is a deliberate, high-impact policy shift that lowers the financial barrier to publishing on Windows, replaces credit-card gating with identity verification, and refocuses the Store as an open, discoverable distribution channel for indie creators and hobbyists.

Background​

Microsoft announced a flighted onboarding change that waives the long-standing one‑time registration fee for individual developer accounts in the Microsoft Store, while company/organization accounts continue to use the legacy paid path. The official documentation describing the new flow — which emphasizes an ID-based verification step (government ID + selfie) instead of requiring a credit card — was published by Microsoft as part of its developer guidance. (learn.microsoft.com) (blogs.windows.com)
This move follows a broader multi-year evolution of the Microsoft Store: the Store has been opened to Win32, .NET, PWAs, Electron and other app frameworks; developers gained optionality to host their own binaries and to bring their own billing for non‑gaming apps; and Microsoft has steadily rebuilt discoverability and reliability features to make the Store a practical distribution hub for desktop software. The industry reaction has been immediate and broadly positive in the coverage from specialist outlets. (techcrunch.com)

---

What changed — the facts developers need now​

The headline changes​

• Zero registration fee for individual accounts in flighted markets. Microsoft’s new onboarding route waives the previous ~$19 USD one‑time charge for individual developers where the flow is available. This is a flighted rollout and availability varies by market and sign‑up entry. (learn.microsoft.com)
• ID-based verification replaces a credit card gate. New individual publishers are asked to verify identity with a government‑issued ID and a selfie rather than submitting a credit card as proof, a privacy and inclusion trade‑off Microsoft explicitly acknowledges. (learn.microsoft.com)
• Company accounts still pay. Organizations and company developer accounts remain on the legacy Partner Center path and are subject to the usual verification and fee structure. (learn.microsoft.com)
• Supported app formats unchanged. Win32, UWP, MSIX, Progressive Web Apps, Electron and .NET apps — the broad set of Windows app formats Microsoft has supported since the Store’s relaunch — remain eligible for publication under these flows.

Why the change matters (concise)​

• It removes an upfront monetary barrier that disproportionately impacted hobbyists, students, and creators in markets with limited payment infrastructure.
• It reduces friction tied to credit‑card availability while intentionally shifting verification to identity proofing.
• It signals Microsoft’s intent to treat the Store primarily as a distribution and discovery hub rather than a gatekeeper for commercial transactions.

These outcomes are deliberately designed to make the Store more inclusive and to increase the variety of apps available to Windows users. (blogs.windows.com)

---

How the new onboarding works (practical overview)​

Step‑by‑step for an individual publisher​

• Start at the Microsoft Store marketing/developer sign‑up entrypoint (the route that triggers the new flighted flow). (learn.microsoft.com)
• Sign in using a personal Microsoft account (MSA). No corporate tax documentation is required for individual enrollment. (developer.microsoft.com)
• Choose the Individual account type, complete basic contact and publisher display name fields, and follow the ID verification prompts (government ID + selfie). (learn.microsoft.com)
• Reserve your app name in Partner Center, prepare your package (MSIX is recommended), and submit for review. If you submit unsigned MSIX, Microsoft can apply Store signing to provide a trusted signature for distribution.
• Decide whether to use Microsoft Commerce or bring your own billing for non‑gaming apps (developers who use external billing for allowed categories can retain 100% of those revenues). (blogs.windows.com)

Notes on rollout and verification​

• The free onboarding flow is flighted — you may still see legacy pricing if your market or sign‑up path hasn’t been migrated. Microsoft’s docs recommend using the Store marketing entry or waiting for your market’s rollout if you encounter the older Partner Center charge. (learn.microsoft.com)
• ID verification aims to reduce abuse and fake publisher accounts, but it introduces privacy and inclusivity considerations that developers should weigh carefully. (learn.microsoft.com)

---

How this stacks up to other platforms​

• Apple App Store: charges an annual developer program fee (commonly USD 99 per year).
• Google Play: historically a one‑time registration fee (USD 25) for Google Play Console registration.
• Microsoft Store (new): no fee for individuals in the new onboarding flow (flighted markets), a notable differentiation from both Apple and Google. (techcrunch.com) (windowscentral.com)

This makes Microsoft’s Store one of the lowest-cost entry points among major global app platforms for individual publishers — an intentional competitive stance and an accessibility signal.

---

Benefits — the upside for developers and users​

• Lower cost of entry. Students, hobbyists, open‑source contributors and creators in low‑income or credit‑poor regions get easier access to Store distribution. This can expand the developer funnel and diversity of apps. (blogs.windows.com)
• Simpler packaging and signing options. MSIX + Store signing can reduce operational overhead for small teams that previously had to manage certificates, CDNs, and update delivery.
• Flexible monetization. For non‑gaming apps, developers can choose Microsoft Commerce for integrated payout/tax handling or implement their own billing to retain full revenue where policies allow. (blogs.windows.com)
• Discoverability leverage. The Store’s editorial features, personalized discovery and promotion pathways can amplify well-prepared listings, giving small developers a marketing channel they previously lacked.
• Platform trust. Store verification and curated listings reduce the risk of counterfeit or malicious installers — a security win for mainstream users and enterprise customers.

---

Risks and trade‑offs — what to watch closely​

1. Privacy and inclusivity of ID verification​

Replacing credit‑card verification with government ID + selfie solves one problem and creates another. Not all creators possess easy access to government IDs, and some will avoid submitting sensitive ID material on principle. The policy therefore:

• Raises concerns about data minimization, retention, and cross-border ID handling.
• Risks excluding creators without reliable national identity documentation.
  Developers concerned about privacy should evaluate the verification experience and Microsoft’s published privacy statements before enrolling. (learn.microsoft.com)

2. Spam, signal dilution, and moderation costs​

Removing the price barrier increases the likelihood of low‑quality or spammy listings. Microsoft must invest in automated and human review systems to maintain listing quality; otherwise, discoverability and user trust could degrade. Historical app‑store lessons show that friction reduction often drives volume and increases moderation demands.

3. Uneven rollout friction​

Because the free flow is flighted, developers in some markets may see inconsistent behavior and confusing UX — you may encounter the legacy fee in Partner Center while the Store marketing entry yields the waived fee. Patience or careful entrypoint selection is required. (learn.microsoft.com)

4. Discoverability is still a contest​

Listing an app is one thing; getting downloads is another. The Store’s editorial and AI‑driven recommendation features help, but small teams still need metadata optimization, screenshots, promo tactics, and sometimes paid or editorial boosts to stand out. The free registration only removes the financial onboarding cost — it does not guarantee traffic.

5. Policy gray areas around external billing​

Bringing your own billing is powerful, but the rules and enforcement around which categories may use external payments and how buyer protection/refunds are handled will be important for commercial teams to understand. Edge cases around subscriptions, trials, or cross-border refunds may require legal and payments engineering attention. Microsoft’s support pages and documentation should be consulted for category‑specific guidance.

---

Technical implications and recommended developer checklist​

Packaging, signing and delivery​

• Prepare an MSIX pipeline. MSIX is still the recommended package format for Store distribution. It simplifies Store signing and reduces the risk of signature mismatches during installs.
• Integrate signing into CI/CD. If you use code signing, integrate Azure SignTool or an equivalent in your build pipeline; consider Azure Key Vault for private key management. Store signing helps consumer installs but enterprises and side‑loading scenarios still rely on certificates you control.
• Decide hosting strategy. Choose between Store hosting for simplified updates and self‑hosting if you need tighter control over binary distribution and update cadence. Self‑hosting remains supported and may be necessary for complex enterprise scenarios.

Commerce and customer experience​

• Pick a commerce path early. If you plan to keep 100% of revenue, verify that your app category and region allow external billing and that you can handle refunds, taxes, and receipts appropriately. Test edge cases before launch. (blogs.windows.com)
• Document support and refund flows. Users expect consistent refunds and support handling; if you use external billing, make those processes clear on the product page and within the app. Ambiguity here can cause friction and complaints that affect Store trust.

Store listing optimization​

• Treat the listing as marketing collateral. Invest in 1–3 sharp screenshots, a short explainer video, a concise value proposition and clear privacy/terms copy. Editorial and curated picks favor well-packaged submissions.
• Reserve your app display name early. This prevents name collisions and protects brand identity in the Store. The free registration flow supports name reservation via Partner Center. (developer.microsoft.com)

---

Strategic analysis — why Microsoft is doing this​

Compete on openness and developer acquisition​

By waiving fees for individuals, Microsoft reduces friction to entry and positions the Microsoft Store as the most accessible major app marketplace for indie desktop developers. This lowers the marginal cost of distribution and can accelerate catalog growth, which in turn improves Store utility and discoverability for end users.

Regulatory and reputational considerations​

The move arrives amid intensified scrutiny of app-store economics and competition policies globally. Creating a zero‑fee path for individuals differentiates Microsoft from Apple (annual fee) and aligns the company with developer-friendly messaging as regulators debate platform rules. Publicly visible changes like this also strengthen Microsoft’s narrative that Windows is an open platform with a friendly app marketplace. (techcrunch.com)

Product ecosystem calculus​

Microsoft benefits if more apps appear in the Store for three reasons:

• Stronger OS‑level integration (e.g., discoverability, update flows, WinGet synergy).
• Improved user security when a larger share of software is distributed through a vetted channel.
• Indirect monetization through enterprise and platform services, editorial promotion, and potentially higher engagement with Microsoft services.

---

Measured verdict — strengths, but not risk‑free​

This move is a clear win for inclusivity and developer access. The immediate strengths include removing a tangible monetary barrier, broadening the pipeline of potential creators, and reinforcing the Store’s role as a discovery hub for Windows apps. Microsoft’s own documentation and developer blog make the change explicit and operational, and independent coverage has confirmed the policy shift and rollout characteristics. (learn.microsoft.com) (blogs.windows.com) (techcrunch.com)
However, the policy change trades one form of verification friction (credit‑card proof) for another (ID verification), and that trade is significant: ID requirements can exclude creators without common national ID systems or those legitimately concerned about privacy. The flighted rollout and the need for robust moderation mean Microsoft must actively invest in verification, abuse prevention, and listing quality controls to avoid a glut of low‑value submissions that could undermine discoverability.

---

Quick practical guidance for different developer profiles​

For hobbyists and students​

• Use the new individual flow to reserve your app name and publish small utilities, experimental tools, or student projects at no cost. Ensure your privacy stance is acceptable before submitting ID material. (learn.microsoft.com)

For indie commercial teams​

• Decide commerce early. If you plan to use external billing for greater revenue retention, document the customer support and refund process and test it thoroughly. Optimize the Store listing like a product launch to maximize early discovery.

For enterprise or company publishers​

• Remain prepared to use the company account path and the company verification process. Consider whether it’s worthwhile to create a separate individual account for side projects, but keep enterprise governance and compliance considerations top of mind. (learn.microsoft.com)

---

Remaining questions and unverifiable points (flagged)​

• Microsoft’s public figure for “Store reach” (commonly cited as ~250 million monthly active users in some Microsoft materials and press coverage) is repeated in many places but may be updated over time; confirm the current number in Microsoft’s latest press or investor materials if precise reach figures are critical for business planning. The number is widely reported, but companies update such metrics quarterly so it should be verified for high‑stakes decisions. (blogs.windows.com) (theverge.com)
• The exact retention, storage period, and cross‑border handling of ID verification data are described at a high level in Microsoft’s documentation, but independent audits, third‑party privacy assessments, or granular retention timelines are not spelled out in every market. Developers with strong privacy concerns should seek clarity from Microsoft support or legal counsel. (learn.microsoft.com)

---

Conclusion​

Microsoft’s elimination of the individual registration fee for the Microsoft Store is a strategically significant, developer‑friendly change that materially reduces the cost of publishing on Windows. It amplifies the Store’s role as a discoverability platform while preserving technical flexibility through support for MSIX, Win32, PWAs and optional external billing. The policy carefully balances inclusion against abuse mitigation by substituting ID verification for monetary checks, but that substitution raises privacy and inclusivity concerns that developers and privacy advocates should watch closely.
For developers, the practical takeaways are straightforward: prepare an MSIX‑friendly pipeline, decide your commerce strategy early, optimize Store listings for discoverability, and be mindful of the ID verification trade‑offs. Microsoft’s official guidance and blog posts outline the rollout and technical details, and specialist coverage from the tech press provides immediate context for comparative platform economics and industry reaction. (learn.microsoft.com) (blogs.windows.com)

---

Quick reference checklist (actionable)​

• Verify whether your market has the free onboarding flighted flow (start at the Store developer marketing entry). (learn.microsoft.com)
• Prepare MSIX packaging and CI/CD signing integration (Azure SignTool/Azure Key Vault recommended).
• Choose Microsoft Commerce or external billing and test refunds/tax flows. (blogs.windows.com)
• Optimize Store listing assets (screenshots, video, short pitch, privacy text).
• Assess privacy implications of ID verification and consult Microsoft docs or support for clarifications on data handling. (learn.microsoft.com)

Removing the monetary gate makes the Microsoft Store a more inviting place for creators, but the change is only the start: quality, moderation, and developer experience will determine whether the Store realizes its promise as a thriving, diverse software marketplace for Windows.

---

Source: Windows Central Microsoft Store is now free for indie developers
Source: TechRadar Microsoft just dropped its Store fees for Windows developers