Microsoft Tightens Driver Attestation and WHCP Rules: Impact on Drivers and IT

Microsoft's move to tighten driver attestation and WHCP rules marks a decisive pivot: the company is raising the bar on what drivers must look like to be accepted, signed, and distributed to Windows users, and the change will affect driver authors, OEMs, enterprises, and anyone who still relies on older peripherals.

Background​

The Windows Hardware Compatibility Program (WHCP) and Microsoft’s attestation signing pipeline have long been the backbone of driver distribution on Windows. WHCP (formerly known as the Windows Hardware Lab Kit ecosystem and associated certification processes) governs how drivers are tested, validated, and published for retail audiences, while attestation signing has historically offered a quicker — but less rigorous — route for vendors to receive Microsoft signatures for drivers intended for testing or limited distribution.
Over the past two years Microsoft has signaled a strategy shift: reduce the presence of outdated or insecure drivers in the Windows Update catalog, tighten INF and package validation, and make HLK/WDK tooling stricter so that only higher-quality, better-isolated drivers reach users. This is part of a broader push that includes driver catalog cleanup, updated validation tooling, and certificate lifecycle changes for preproduction signing.

---

What Microsoft is changing — the short list​

• INF validation will enforce new checks via InfVerif /h: Driver INF files will be validated against a stricter rule set and submissions that fail these checks risk rejection. Partners are expected to run InfVerif /h locally before submission.
• Windows Update will be cleaned of legacy drivers: Microsoft will periodically “expire” drivers that are no longer associated with an audience, starting with drivers that have newer replacements on Windows Update. Partners have a six-month window to respond before permanent removal.
• Pre-production signing CA rotation: Microsoft is rotating the certificate authorities used for pre-production signed binaries; new issuing CAs take effect in mid-2025 and partners must adapt to avoid signing or expiration issues in test environments.
• Attestation and WHCP publishing expectations tightened: Microsoft continues to steer packages intended for retail audiences toward full WHCP submissions rather than attestation signing, and will increase validation requirements for attested packages.

These changes are not hypothetical: they are rolling into the Hardware Dev Center and the Partner Center workflows now and through the rest of the year, and they have practical implications for driver quality, distribution, and ecosystem maintenance.

---

Why this matters: security, reliability, and reputation​

Microsoft’s rationale is straightforward. Kernel-mode drivers and poorly validated device firmware remain a top attack surface in Windows ecosystems because they run with high privilege and can bypass software mitigations. By enforcing stricter INF validation, removing outdated drivers from the Windows Update catalog, and nudging partners toward full WHCP certification where HLK testing provides stronger assurances, Microsoft aims to:

• Reduce the number of vulnerable or unstable drivers reaching users.
• Improve the overall reliability of Windows Update and its reputation for delivering safe driver updates.
• Encourage driver authors to follow stronger isolation and compatibility practices during development and testing.

The security benefits are tangible: fewer legacy drivers in circulation means fewer long-unpatched vulnerabilities tied to obsolete vendor code. The reliability benefits are measurable for Windows Update itself, which has long suffered blame when poor drivers result in system instability after automatic updates.

---

Technical deep dive: InfVerif /h, HLK, and WHCP enforcement​

InfVerif /h — what changed and what to do​

Microsoft updated the InfVerif tool behavior by introducing the InfVerif /h mode. This mode includes checks that align with WHCP requirements and will be used by the Hardware Dev Center for attestation submissions. Starting in April 2025 (per platform guidance), driver submissions made to Partner Center must pass InfVerif /h, and the updated tool is distributed with the latest Windows Driver Kit (WDK). Vendors who continue to rely on older InfVerif behaviors will see submissions rejected until their INF packages meet the new checks.
Action items for driver teams:

• Install the latest WDK and run InfVerif /h locally on driver packages before each submission.
• Review the new INF validation errors and warnings documentation and treat InfVerif /h failures as release-blocking until resolved.
• Add InfVerif /h to CI pipelines to catch regressions early.

These steps are practical and necessary: Microsoft’s enforcement means local preflight validation is no longer optional if you want a smooth publishing process.

HLK refreshes and runtime compatibility playlists​

Microsoft released refreshed HLK playlists for Windows 11 24H2 and Windows Server 2025 (refreshed HLK available starting May 6, 2025). These refreshed HLK releases include test errata fixes, additions and removals of tests, and can affect what passes during certification. The HLK used for a system-level submission must match the Windows release guidance; vendors should avoid submitting against mismatched HLK playlists to limit unexpected failures.

Attestation vs. WHCP — the publishable difference​

Attestation signing still exists, but Microsoft is increasingly stressing that retail audience quality drivers should go through WHCP with HLK testing. Attestation signing can remain a tool for testing and restricted audiences, but attested drivers are not functionally identical in terms of publication rights and distribution: attested drivers historically cannot be published broadly to retail via Windows Update unless specific restricted publishing mechanisms are used. Microsoft has tightened the expectations here and clarified that attestation-signed content must meet the higher INF validation standards going forward.

---

The driver removal program: what “cleanup” means and who it affects​

Microsoft’s driver cleanup initiative will target drivers that are clearly superseded by newer versions and not tied to an active audience. The mechanics are simple: Microsoft will expire drivers by removing audience assignments in the Hardware Dev Center, which prevents Windows Update from offering those drivers to devices. A public announcement will follow each cleanup round and partners will have six months to contest or republish drivers with an appropriate business justification.
Who will feel the change?

• OEMs and IHVs that have long tail driver releases: they must review their catalog and proactively remove or consolidate legacy packages.
• Enterprise IT that rely on older drivers for validated configurations: they must capture affected drivers and ensure in-house distribution or republishing when necessary.
• Hobbyists and legacy-device owners who depend on old driver packages hosted in Microsoft’s catalog may lose convenient access to archived installers on Windows Update, increasing difficulty of maintaining very old hardware.

Microsoft’s stated compromise is partner republishing rights with potential business-justification requirements; still, organizations that depend on pre-existing driver artifacts should plan for alternative distribution or local package archives.

---

Certificate and signing lifecycle: the pre-production CA rotation​

Microsoft announced a certificate authority transition for pre-production driver signing. The CA used to sign pre-production binaries is expiring in mid-2025 and Microsoft will begin using a new CA for preproduction content starting June 9, 2025. Partners must be cognizant of signing, expiry, and validation behavior in their test environments to avoid unexpected failures or expired-package issues. Microsoft notes that going forward the signed content expiry won’t be tied directly to the issuing CA expiration, but partners should still validate their signing workflows.
Operational impacts:

• Confirm CI/CD signing tools are updated to reference the new issuing CA certificates.
• Re-sign or reissue preproduction binaries where necessary to maintain usable test artifacts.
• Verify automated test rigs and deployment systems accept the new CA chain.

This is one of those administrative changes that often gets missed until it breaks automation; proactively updating signing pipelines will avoid last-minute firefighting.

---

Cross-checks and what's verifiable today​

Several of the major policy shifts are directly documented in Microsoft’s Hardware Dev Center blog posts and in the Windows drivers documentation, and independent technology outlets and trade press have reported on the Windows Update driver cleanup and InfVerif changes. The core technical facts — that InfVerif /h will be enforced for attestation submissions, that Microsoft will expire legacy drivers from Windows Update, and that pre-production signing CAs are changing in mid‑2025 — are documented in Microsoft’s own posts and corroborated by independent coverage and analysis.
Some items still carry nuance and require partner attention:

• The precise timing and rollout windows for each enforcement step can vary by device class and submission type. Partners should treat published blog post dates and Partner Center notices as the authoritative timeline.
• The WHCP Software Bill of Materials (SBOM) requirement for CRA compliance is deferred to H2 2026 in the WHCP guidance for Windows 11, version 25H2, but Microsoft recommends early adoption. This deferral is explicit in Microsoft guidance, but dates and enforcement windows can change — monitor Partner Center announcements.

Where details could not be independently corroborated (for example, third‑party interpretations about how often Microsoft will run cleanup cycles), the correct approach is to treat the explicit Microsoft guidance as definitive and to flag broader extrapolations as speculative.

---

Practical guidance: how developers and IT teams should respond​

This is a transitional period for Windows driver ecosystems. Effective, low-friction preparation will reduce friction during submission and publication. Below are practical steps every driver team should take immediately.

• Update toolchain and add preflight checks
• Install the latest Windows Driver Kit (WDK) and HLK versions.
• Run InfVerif /h locally and integrate it into CI pipelines.
• Ensure HLK playlists used for certification match the Windows release you target.
• Audit and consolidate driver packages
• Inventory all published driver packages in the Hardware Dev Center.
• Remove or consolidate legacy versions proactively to avoid Microsoft-triggered cleanup surprises.
• Plan republishing if your business needs require older packages to remain available.
• Harden the driver development lifecycle
• Adopt driver isolation best practices, minimize kernel-mode footprint where possible, and use standard Windows mitigations like VBS/HVCI where applicable.
• Use HLK tests to validate compatibility and reduce post-publish regressions.
• Verify signing and CA chains
• Update signing automation to handle the new preproduction CAs and validate cert chain behavior in test harnesses.
• Re-sign or regenerate preproduction artifacts where required.
• Plan for fallback channels and enterprise distribution
• Enterprises should maintain internal driver repositories for validated, business-critical drivers rather than relying solely on Windows Update.
• Hobbyists and archival projects should consider mirroring essential legacy drivers to prevent loss of access if Microsoft expires older packages.
• Prepare for SBOM and supply-chain scrutiny (even if deferred)
• Although WHCP's SBOM enforcement is deferred to H2 2026, start compiling SBOMs for new driver submissions to reduce future friction.

---

Benefits and strengths of Microsoft’s approach​

• Improved ecosystem security: Fewer obsolete drivers means a smaller attack surface for kernel exploits and supply-chain compromises. This aligns with broader industry best practices and government cyber directives encouraging stronger supply-chain hygiene.
• Higher driver quality through enforced validation: InfVerif /h and refreshed HLK playlists make it harder for low-quality packages to slip through, improving stability for end users.
• Cleaner Windows Update catalog: By removing legacy drivers, Windows Update is less likely to present problematic or outdated drivers to users, improving the update experience and reducing rollback incidents.

These are all positive outcomes that address longstanding pain points for Windows users and admins. The shift is consistent with the industry trend of treating platform-level drivers as critical security assets rather than low‑effort distribution artifacts.

---

Risks and potential downsides​

• Legacy hardware breakage and e‑waste risk: Removing older driver versions from Windows Update could strand older devices where vendors have stopped publishing drivers elsewhere, increasing e‑waste and frustrating preservationists. Microsoft’s republishing option helps but may not be sufficient in every case.
• Operational burden on small ISVs: Stricter validations and required tooling upgrades could increase time-to-release for small independent hardware vendors without robust engineering teams, potentially reducing support for niche hardware.
• Transition friction in enterprise contexts: Enterprises that have standardized on validated driver versions may see additional overhead if Microsoft expires those packages; IT shops must maintain internal distribution and validation workflows to avoid service disruption.
• Tooling and certificate complexity: The CA rotation for preproduction signing can cause unexpected test breaks in CI/CD if certificate chains or signing tooling are not updated proactively.

None of these risks are insurmountable, but each requires explicit operational planning and investment from partners and IT organizations to avoid friction.

---

Timeline and key dates to track now​

• April 2025: InfVerif /h enforcement begins in HDC validation workflows — run InfVerif /h locally ahead of submissions.
• June 9, 2025: New CA used to sign preproduction content (CA rotation window begins). Begin validating signing workflows in June.
• June 19, 2025: Microsoft published its Hardware Dev Center blog outlining the Windows Update cleanup initiative; expect periodic cleanup rounds and a 6-month partner response window after each cleanup announcement.
• H2 2026: WHCP SBOM enforcement deferred to this window — prepare SBOMs now rather than late.

These are the dates that matter most for operational planning; partners should monitor the Hardware Dev Center and Partner Center dashboards for any additional region- or device-specific variations.

---

Final analysis: balancing security gains with operational reality​

Microsoft’s renewed focus on stricter WHCP policies, InfVerif /h enforcement, driver catalog cleanup, and CA lifecycle management is a sensible move toward reducing risk from kernel-mode drivers and improving Windows Update reliability. The security rationale is strong: kernel drivers are inherently privileged and poor-quality drivers have historically been vectors for both accidental and deliberate harm.
However, the transition imposes real operational costs. Small vendors, enterprises with large fleets, and users of legacy hardware will need to adapt. The most constructive path forward is proactive engagement: run InfVerif /h now, update HLK/WDK toolchains, audit and consolidate published driver packages, and prepare SBOMs ahead of enforcement windows. Microsoft has built in partner recourse — republishing and justification pathways — but those are reactive rather than preventive.
In sum, Windows driver security and reproducibility will improve if the ecosystem treats these changes as a modernization opportunity rather than an administrative nuisance. Teams that invest in tooling, automation, and cleaner release discipline will see fewer certification surprises and a more reliable Windows Update experience for their users.

---

Checklist: immediate actions for teams (quick reference)​

• Install latest WDK and HLK; add InfVerif /h into CI pipelines.
• Audit Hardware Dev Center driver inventory and consolidate legacy packages.
• Update signing automation to accept the new preproduction CA and re-sign where needed.
• Create or update SBOMs for critical drivers, even if enforcement is deferred.
• Maintain an internal driver repository for critical enterprise hardware and legacy devices.

Adopting this checklist will reduce risk and smooth the path through Microsoft’s enforcement waves.

---

Microsoft’s enforcement of stricter WHCP and attestation policies is not merely bureaucratic tightening; it is a structural shift intended to make kernel-level code safer and Windows Update more reliable. The trade-offs are real, but the direction aligns with broader industry moves to prioritize secure supply chains, rigorous validation, and minimized attack surfaces in platform ecosystems. The next 12–18 months will be the test: partners who prepare will benefit from stronger assurances and fewer emergency rollbacks; those who wait will face last‑minute pressure and potentially disrupted distribution.

---

Source: Neowin Microsoft commits to making Windows drivers better through strict WHCP policies