Microsoft’s latest experiment with AI-driven simulation is taking a nostalgic romp through the corridors of gaming history—even if it’s a clunky, jerky one. In an unexpected twist, the classic shooter Quake 2, originally unleashed by id Software in 1997, has been reimagined not as an actual game engine running natively, but as a simulation powered by Microsoft Copilot. This demonstration leverages the WHAMM (World and Human Action MaskGIT Model) AI—an evolution of the earlier WHAM (World and Human Action Model) from February 2025—and is part of the broader Muse AI model family known for its integrated approach to generating visual outputs and controller interactions.
At first glance, the idea of playing a venerable title like Quake 2 via a modern AI framework might evoke both intrigue and skepticism among fans. Here, the simulation is presented in a modest resolution of 640×360 pixels, delivered directly within the web browser. While the low resolution might seem outdated by today’s high-definition standards, it’s a deliberate choice to manage processing demands as the system renders an approximation of the beloved title. Instead of running the original game’s engine, users are interacting with a model that simulates the game's dynamics by generating visual elements and even processing user inputs—all in real-time.
Despite the retro appeal, early testers have noted that the experience is far from smooth. The action is “extremely jerky,” and movements—especially those triggered by arrow key input—suffer from significant delays. This means that while the simulation hints at the immersive 3D environments of the original Quake 2, the actual gameplay falls short of the high-speed, fluid action that defined the era. It’s a fascinating, if imperfect, tribute to classic gaming, highlighting both the promise and the current limitations of AI in the realm of interactive entertainment.
• Key Points:
- Classic game simulation via AI
- Display resolution limited to 640×360 pixels
- Experience marked by noticeable input delays and jerky motion
The WHAMM model is a key component of the Muse AI suite, a set of tools designed to translate machine-learned patterns into real-time visual outputs and interactive controller responses. In a further twist of development, Microsoft opted to train WHAMM with considerably less data by pivoting from the Bleeding Edge video game’s dataset to use Quake 2’s data—an adjustment that underscores both the challenges and ingenuity in applying AI to dynamic gaming environments. By approximating controller interactions, the system delivers a simulation that, while not perfectly true to the original, demonstrates the potential for AI to bridge historical gaming experiences with modern technology.
• Key Points:
- WHAMM generates multiple tokens for enhanced performance
- Upgrade from one token per frame (WHAM) to parallel token generation (WHAMM)
- Training pivot from Bleeding Edge to Quake 2 data underscores resource challenges in AI
The simulation’s pace, coupled with its low resolution, means that even when enemies appear on screen they can be frustratingly blurred and may not behave as expected. In one case, an enemy would fire a weapon, yet not inflict any damage, highlighting a breakdown in combat realism. These drawbacks serve to underscore the experimental nature of the project. Microsoft’s team has acknowledged these limitations openly, emphasizing that this initiative is not intended to offer a fully polished gaming experience. Instead, it acts as a test bed for current machine learning approaches in rendering dynamic, interactive environments.
• Key Points:
- Frame rates at just over 10 fps mark an improvement yet remain limited
- Significant input delays affect gameplay quality
- Enemy animations and combat mechanics are noticeably imprecise
For veterans of the franchise, this is a letdown. The absence of mouse control means that aiming and navigating—two core aspects of the Quake experience—are compromised. The AI model’s inability to effectively translate the nuanced control a mouse typically provides is a reminder that while AI models like WHAMM are making strides, they are still maturing. This limitation not only affects gameplay precision but also dampens the nostalgic joy that comes from engaging with the full spectrum of control options that defined the original game.
• Key Points:
- Original Quake titles revolutionized gameplay with mouse control
- Current simulation only effectively supports keyboard inputs
- Limited controller support detracts from the authentic gaming experience
This initiative is a testing ground for technologies that could eventually be harnessed to enhance game development, real-time rendering, and interactive user experiences within Windows environments. Imagine a future where AI-driven environments adapt dynamically to a user’s input, providing instantly responsive graphics and smoother gameplay—an evolution that could fundamentally reshape both gaming and software interaction. For Windows users, this experiment hints at what might soon appear in upcoming Windows 11 updates or even be integrated into Microsoft’s broader suite of productivity and innovation tools.
• Key Points:
- Simulation serves as a test bed for future AI-driven interactive environments
- Potential applications include real-time rendering upgrades and dynamic user interfaces
- The experiment hints at broader technological advances for gaming and Windows integration
Both initiatives are part of a larger movement where AI is increasingly becoming entwined with everyday applications—whether it’s purchasing tickets, ordering gifts, or even re-creating classic gaming experiences. The key takeaway here is that AI’s role is evolving from a simple tool for task automation to a complex system capable of managing and simulating dynamic, interactive experiences. For Windows users, these developments not only promise to redefine how we interact with our devices but also illustrate the accelerating pace at which traditional digital interactions are transforming in the age of machine learning.
• Key Points:
- AI integration is being explored across multiple industries
- Microsoft and Amazon are both investing in AI-driven user experiences
- The trend signifies a broader shift toward dynamic, responsive interactions in digital environments
Looking ahead, several areas are prime candidates for further improvement:
• Key Points:
- Future improvements may target input lag, visual fidelity, and control refinements
- There’s significant potential for AI models to learn and adapt in real-time
- The experiment serves as a catalyst for innovation in both gaming and interactive applications
For Windows users and tech enthusiasts, this experiment signifies both a tribute to the rich history of gaming and a stepping stone toward a future where AI transforms every click, keystroke, and interaction on our devices. While it may not yet be a playground for seamless, high-speed action, it certainly hints at a future where reality and simulation blur, offering endless opportunities for innovation.
• Final Takeaways:
- A nostalgic nod to Quake 2 meets the modern challenges of AI simulation
- Technical innovations in token generation and machine learning promise incremental improvements
- The experiment underscores the evolving role of AI in redefining interactive experiences
- Today’s limitations are tomorrow’s stepping stones in the journey toward immersive, AI-enhanced gaming
In the end, Microsoft’s Quake 2 experiment is less about delivering a perfect gaming experience and more about charting a course through the uncharted territories of AI-integrated interactive design. It is a bold reminder that even as we look back fondly on the classics, the future is being written—one token, one frame, and one keystroke at a time.
Source: heise online Quake 2 can now be played with Microsoft Copilot
A Blast from the Past—Reinventing Quake 2 with AI
At first glance, the idea of playing a venerable title like Quake 2 via a modern AI framework might evoke both intrigue and skepticism among fans. Here, the simulation is presented in a modest resolution of 640×360 pixels, delivered directly within the web browser. While the low resolution might seem outdated by today’s high-definition standards, it’s a deliberate choice to manage processing demands as the system renders an approximation of the beloved title. Instead of running the original game’s engine, users are interacting with a model that simulates the game's dynamics by generating visual elements and even processing user inputs—all in real-time.Despite the retro appeal, early testers have noted that the experience is far from smooth. The action is “extremely jerky,” and movements—especially those triggered by arrow key input—suffer from significant delays. This means that while the simulation hints at the immersive 3D environments of the original Quake 2, the actual gameplay falls short of the high-speed, fluid action that defined the era. It’s a fascinating, if imperfect, tribute to classic gaming, highlighting both the promise and the current limitations of AI in the realm of interactive entertainment.
• Key Points:
- Classic game simulation via AI
- Display resolution limited to 640×360 pixels
- Experience marked by noticeable input delays and jerky motion
The AI Engine: WHAM, WHAMM, and the Muse Family
Diving beneath the surface reveals the innovative technology at work. Microsoft’s venture pivots on the WHAMM model—an extension of its predecessor, WHAM. The distinction is significant: while WHAM struggled to generate only one token at a time and managed a meager one frame per second, WHAMM generates multiple tokens in parallel, thereby boosting performance to just over ten frames per second. This puts it in the vicinity of experimental projects like the PDF version of Doom, which runs at around 12 frames per second, marking a tangible, if still limited, improvement.The WHAMM model is a key component of the Muse AI suite, a set of tools designed to translate machine-learned patterns into real-time visual outputs and interactive controller responses. In a further twist of development, Microsoft opted to train WHAMM with considerably less data by pivoting from the Bleeding Edge video game’s dataset to use Quake 2’s data—an adjustment that underscores both the challenges and ingenuity in applying AI to dynamic gaming environments. By approximating controller interactions, the system delivers a simulation that, while not perfectly true to the original, demonstrates the potential for AI to bridge historical gaming experiences with modern technology.
• Key Points:
- WHAMM generates multiple tokens for enhanced performance
- Upgrade from one token per frame (WHAM) to parallel token generation (WHAMM)
- Training pivot from Bleeding Edge to Quake 2 data underscores resource challenges in AI
Performance: Frame Rates, Input Delays, and Gameplay Issues
For those expecting a seamless re-creation of Quake 2’s groundbreaking gameplay, the reality is a mixed bag of progress and pitfalls. With frame rates hovering just above ten frames per second, the demonstration is admittedly an improvement over earlier attempts. However, this modest gain is overshadowed by significant input delays. In testing scenarios, movement control—particularly using keyboard inputs—proved frustratingly sluggish, making enemy detection and combat a drawn-out affair.The simulation’s pace, coupled with its low resolution, means that even when enemies appear on screen they can be frustratingly blurred and may not behave as expected. In one case, an enemy would fire a weapon, yet not inflict any damage, highlighting a breakdown in combat realism. These drawbacks serve to underscore the experimental nature of the project. Microsoft’s team has acknowledged these limitations openly, emphasizing that this initiative is not intended to offer a fully polished gaming experience. Instead, it acts as a test bed for current machine learning approaches in rendering dynamic, interactive environments.
• Key Points:
- Frame rates at just over 10 fps mark an improvement yet remain limited
- Significant input delays affect gameplay quality
- Enemy animations and combat mechanics are noticeably imprecise
Control Schemes: The Battle Between Keyboard and Mouse
One of the most striking points of contention among classic gamers relates to control schemes. Quake and Quake 2 were revolutionary in part because of the innovative use of the mouse to navigate 3D spaces—a critical element that many felt gave the games their intuitive, fast-paced feel. In Microsoft’s AI simulation, however, the keyboard remains the only reliable input method. Although promotional videos hint at the possibility of Xbox controller support, the actual interface limits players to keyboard commands.For veterans of the franchise, this is a letdown. The absence of mouse control means that aiming and navigating—two core aspects of the Quake experience—are compromised. The AI model’s inability to effectively translate the nuanced control a mouse typically provides is a reminder that while AI models like WHAMM are making strides, they are still maturing. This limitation not only affects gameplay precision but also dampens the nostalgic joy that comes from engaging with the full spectrum of control options that defined the original game.
• Key Points:
- Original Quake titles revolutionized gameplay with mouse control
- Current simulation only effectively supports keyboard inputs
- Limited controller support detracts from the authentic gaming experience
The Experiment as a Glimpse into the Future of AI Gaming
Despite its present shortcomings, Microsoft’s experiment with simulating Quake 2 using Copilot embodies a broader vision of what AI might bring to gaming and interactive experiences in the near future. While it’s clear that the current iteration is not meant to replace genuine gaming experiences, it serves as a valuable demonstration of how AI can interpret and simulate complex environments in real-time.This initiative is a testing ground for technologies that could eventually be harnessed to enhance game development, real-time rendering, and interactive user experiences within Windows environments. Imagine a future where AI-driven environments adapt dynamically to a user’s input, providing instantly responsive graphics and smoother gameplay—an evolution that could fundamentally reshape both gaming and software interaction. For Windows users, this experiment hints at what might soon appear in upcoming Windows 11 updates or even be integrated into Microsoft’s broader suite of productivity and innovation tools.
• Key Points:
- Simulation serves as a test bed for future AI-driven interactive environments
- Potential applications include real-time rendering upgrades and dynamic user interfaces
- The experiment hints at broader technological advances for gaming and Windows integration
Industry Comparisons and Broader AI Trends
This Quake 2 simulation isn’t happening in a vacuum. Other tech giants are also exploring mingling AI with traditional experiences. For instance, while Microsoft is pushing the boundaries of gaming via its Copilot experiments, companies like Amazon are experimenting with AI-powered functions in their shopping apps. Amazon’s Nova Act, for example, is being tested to support intelligent, automated ordering processes by interfacing seamlessly with third-party online stores.Both initiatives are part of a larger movement where AI is increasingly becoming entwined with everyday applications—whether it’s purchasing tickets, ordering gifts, or even re-creating classic gaming experiences. The key takeaway here is that AI’s role is evolving from a simple tool for task automation to a complex system capable of managing and simulating dynamic, interactive experiences. For Windows users, these developments not only promise to redefine how we interact with our devices but also illustrate the accelerating pace at which traditional digital interactions are transforming in the age of machine learning.
• Key Points:
- AI integration is being explored across multiple industries
- Microsoft and Amazon are both investing in AI-driven user experiences
- The trend signifies a broader shift toward dynamic, responsive interactions in digital environments
Looking Ahead: Challenges and Opportunities
Microsoft’s foray into AI-simulated Quake 2 is just one chapter in the unfolding story of AI-infused gaming. While the current experiment is rife with challenges—ranging from input delays to compromised control schemes—it is equally rich with potential opportunities. For the gaming community, it represents an exciting, if imperfect, glimpse into how legacy titles might be reborn through the lens of modern technology. For developers and AI enthusiasts, it offers a real-world laboratory for refining machine learning models and improving dynamic interaction techniques.Looking ahead, several areas are prime candidates for further improvement:
- Enhanced Input Responsiveness: Future iterations could focus on reducing input lag, possibly by integrating more robust hardware acceleration or optimizing the AI’s decision-making process.
- Refined Visual Fidelity: By improving resolution capabilities and refining the token generation process, developers could achieve smoother graphics and more detailed simulations.
- Expanded Control Options: Incorporating support for traditional mouse control or adapting the AI model to better interpret analog inputs could help recapture the authentic feel of Quake’s original design.
- Real-Time Adaptability: Leveraging AI’s ability to learn and adapt from user interactions could lead to environments that offer more fluid gameplay and dynamic responses.
• Key Points:
- Future improvements may target input lag, visual fidelity, and control refinements
- There’s significant potential for AI models to learn and adapt in real-time
- The experiment serves as a catalyst for innovation in both gaming and interactive applications
Conclusion
Microsoft’s AI-driven Quake 2 simulation via Copilot is a fascinating exploration at the intersection of classic gaming and cutting-edge machine learning. Although the experience is marred by jerky animations, input delays, and a reliance on keyboard-only controls, it nonetheless serves as a tangible proof of concept. By demonstrating that even a complex, 3D game like Quake 2 can be approximated using AI models such as WHAMM, Microsoft is opening the door to an array of future innovations—not just in gaming but across all interactive digital platforms.For Windows users and tech enthusiasts, this experiment signifies both a tribute to the rich history of gaming and a stepping stone toward a future where AI transforms every click, keystroke, and interaction on our devices. While it may not yet be a playground for seamless, high-speed action, it certainly hints at a future where reality and simulation blur, offering endless opportunities for innovation.
• Final Takeaways:
- A nostalgic nod to Quake 2 meets the modern challenges of AI simulation
- Technical innovations in token generation and machine learning promise incremental improvements
- The experiment underscores the evolving role of AI in redefining interactive experiences
- Today’s limitations are tomorrow’s stepping stones in the journey toward immersive, AI-enhanced gaming
In the end, Microsoft’s Quake 2 experiment is less about delivering a perfect gaming experience and more about charting a course through the uncharted territories of AI-integrated interactive design. It is a bold reminder that even as we look back fondly on the classics, the future is being written—one token, one frame, and one keystroke at a time.
Source: heise online Quake 2 can now be played with Microsoft Copilot
Last edited:
