• Thread Author
A long-awaited shift is taking shape within Microsoft's Windows ecosystem. The tech giant has committed to eventually making WinUI—a modern user interface framework central to Windows development—“truly open source.” While Microsoft’s intentions are now public, the path to full transparency for WinUI is convoluted, riddled with technical hurdles and drawing mixed reactions from a developer community eager for clarity, stability, and renewed focus from Redmond.

Background: The Evolution of WinUI​

Since its inception as part of Project Reunion in 2020, WinUI has carried Microsoft’s ambitious aim: unifying the diverse worlds of Windows application development. Windows developers had long been split across the Universal Windows Platform (UWP), the ancient-but-still-vital Win32 API, and .NET-based systems like Windows Forms and Windows Presentation Foundation (WPF). Project Reunion—now known as the Windows App SDK (WASDK)—sought to erase these silos, providing a single toolkit for building cutting-edge, visually coherent applications leveraging Microsoft’s Fluent Design system.

From Fragmentation to Unification​

Microsoft’s Windows development landscape has suffered from fragmentation since the introduction of Windows Runtime (WinRT) and UWP with Windows 8. These initiatives introduced modern APIs and security models but also created barriers and confusion. WinUI 3, envisioned as the bridge between these paradigms, aimed for a future where all developers, regardless of their platform lineage, could participate in API improvements and share in a unified workflow.

The Promise: True Open Source for WinUI​

Microsoft lead software engineer Beth Pan recently offered a glimpse of transparency: the company is set on a journey to make WinUI’s source code entirely open, moving beyond the existing, periodically mirrored GitHub repository where the true development still takes place behind closed Microsoft doors.

The Phases of Open Sourcing​

According to Pan, progress towards open source will unfold in four distinct stages:
  • Frequent Mirroring: More consistent updates to the public GitHub mirror, providing developers with closer-to-real-time access.
  • Third-Party Builds: Enabling external developers to reliably build WinUI themselves—critical for experimentation and deeper architectural understanding.
  • Community Contributions: Allowing non-Microsoft contributors to submit pull requests, fix bugs, and locally run tests.
  • GitHub as Primary Repository: Transitioning code development so that GitHub becomes WinUI’s main repo, ensuring full transparency and community collaboration from end to end.
Each step depends on untangling WinUI’s codebase from proprietary underpinnings within Windows—no easy feat thanks to deep system integrations and legacy dependencies.

Developer Frustration: Stagnation and Slow Progress​

Far from uniformly celebratory, the response among Windows developers is tinged with skepticism and weariness. Many have witnessed a long parade of grand promises about UWP, WinRT, and WinUI, only to be met with glacial progress and persistent bugs.

The Loudest Grievances​

  • Lengthy Waits for Bug Fixes: Unresolved defects—such as in modal dialogs and input validation—have bred frustration and diminished trust.
  • Lack of Modern Tools: Notably, developers point to the absence of a visual designer for Visual Studio, making UI development more cumbersome compared to other platforms.
  • Resource Concerns: Some developers openly question Microsoft’s commitment. “How many people in total are assigned to the WinUI/WinAppSDK teams?” one asked, echoing a widespread sense that Microsoft treats these tools as maintenance rather than areas for sustained innovation.

The Roots of Disillusionment​

Much of this fatigue is rooted in the repeated fracturing of the Windows dev ecosystem. Each new API or toolkit—WinRT, UWP, WASDK—promised coherence but often delivered further division or left critical scenarios unaddressed. As one developer remarked, “the entire WinRT (and its follow-on WinUI) idea was a mistake,” mourning the loss of simplicity and stability that once characterized Win32 and .NET Windows Forms/WPF development.

Technical Hurdles: Untangling Proprietary Code​

The slow pace of WinUI’s open sourcing is driven by daunting technical realities. Decades of Windows development have tied critical UI infrastructure to proprietary layers within the OS, much of which cannot simply be published or re-licensed. This complexity makes opening the entire WinUI repo a careful and incremental process rather than an immediate transformation.

Why the Code Can’t Be Opened Overnight​

  • Deep System Hooks: Core parts of WinUI interact directly with the Windows kernel, graphics pipelines, and other closed-source components.
  • Legal and Security Entanglements: Certain modules encase patented or licensed technology, and others relate to protected system operations that raise security concerns if broadly disclosed.
  • Dependency Management: Cleanly separating what can be shared and what must remain proprietary is an enormous logistical—as well as engineering—challenge.

The Benefits of True Open Source for WinUI​

Despite hurdles, unlocking WinUI as a real open source project would be transformative for Windows developers and the entire Microsoft ecosystem.

Key Advantages​

  • Community-Driven Innovation: Allowing direct code contributions empowers the broader community to address issues, experiment with features, and drive the framework forward independently of Microsoft’s internal cycles.
  • Faster Bug Fixes: With more eyes on the code, critical bugs can be spotted and resolved faster, improving reliability and developer satisfaction.
  • Increased Transparency: Developers gain a clear, unfiltered view into WinUI’s architecture and decision-making, enabling deeper trust and adoption.
  • Enhanced Learning and Experimentation: Open source fosters a culture of learning—by reading, modifying, and proposing enhancements, developers expand their mastery of Windows internals.
  • Long-Term Stability: The risk of “abandonware” diminishes, since even if Microsoft’s focus shifts, the code survives, maintained by the community.

The Risks and Lingering Questions​

Opening WinUI’s codebase, while pivotal, cannot repair all wounds. The move surfaces a spectrum of questions and risks that Microsoft must address to restore confidence.

Not Just a Checkbox​

  • Resource Allocation: The perception that WinUI has been underfunded risks becoming reality if opensourcing is used as an excuse to reduce Microsoft’s direct investment. The health of the framework will hinge on continued engineering leadership—both from Redmond and the community.
  • Governance Model: True open source projects thrive with transparent governance, clear contribution guidelines, and a welcoming culture. Microsoft must detail how the community will participate in setting direction and prioritizing features.
  • Competing Priorities: There’s a sense that Microsoft’s focus has pivoted towards web and cross-platform technologies. Many developers fear WinUI, even open sourced, may receive only minimal, maintenance-mode attention unless consumer interest and business needs align.
  • Fragmentation vs. Unity: The ecosystem’s long history of split developer bases is hard to ignore. WinUI must demonstrate it can bring consistency rather than perpetuate the cycles of disruption seen with past initiatives.

WinUI and the Future of Windows Development​

The commitment to open source, however gradual, marks a watershed for Microsoft’s flagship UI layer. In a world where developers expect transparency and agency, proprietary toolkits appear increasingly anachronistic. If executed well, the shift could re-invigorate third-party developer engagement and signal a bold new era of openness within the Windows platform.

Competitive Pressures​

Microsoft faces mounting competition from open ecosystem juggernauts—Electron, Flutter, React Native, and others—that let developers target Windows, macOS, and Linux from a single codebase. Opening WinUI levels the playing field, making Windows-native experiences more attractive and maintainable, and broadening the appeal of Windows as a first-class application platform.

Enterprise and Independent Voices​

For enterprises that bet on modern Windows development, open sourcing WinUI would provide insurance against product stagnation and abrupt change. For indie developers and hobbyists, it opens pathways to experiment, tinker, and contribute that have long been restricted to privileged insiders.

Moving from Words to Action​

Promises, however well-meaning, mean little without sustained follow-through. Real transformation will require Microsoft’s engineering leadership to not only untangle code, but also to re-engage with developers in a spirit of humility and partnership.

Reconstructing Trust​

Every phase in the open sourcing roadmap should be accompanied by:
  • Clear timelines and progress reports
  • Regular community updates and AMAs
  • Transparent bug tracking and triage
  • Investment in critical tooling—including long-missing Visual Studio designers
  • Robust documentation and onboarding guides
These steps are essential if WinUI’s open source journey is to reverse the erosion of trust documented by the dev community. With consistent delivery, Microsoft may yet repair bridges badly burned in prior cycles and provide a platform that’s both modern and reliable for the next decade.

Conclusion: A Fork in the Road for Windows Development​

The pledge to make WinUI truly open source is fraught with complexity, but also heavy with promise. The coming months and years will reveal whether Microsoft can thread the needle—balancing business imperatives, technical realities, and a renewed focus on the needs of its global developer base.
Success would revitalize Windows as an app platform at a time when developer mindshare is more mobile, cloud, and web-obsessed than ever. Failure, or a half-hearted execution, would leave lingering doubts about the future of native Windows development and perhaps cede the innovation mantle to cross-platform competitors. The trajectory of WinUI stands as the bellwether for Microsoft’s larger priorities: will Windows development be an open, thriving community, or a relic of a walled-garden past? The world, and millions of developers, are watching for the answer.

Source: theregister.com Microsoft promises to make WinUI 'truly open source'